Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

[Luke Han]

+1

2015-05-29 11:34 GMT+08:00 Justin Erenkrantz :

> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Jake Farrell 
> wrote:
> > Based on the earlier discussion in thread [1], I would like to call a
> VOTE
> > to accept Mysos, an Apache Mesos framework for running MySQL instances,
> as
> > a new Apache Incubator project.
> >
> > The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached below
> >
> > The VOTE is open for at least the next 72 hours:
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator
> >   [ ] ±0
> >   [ ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because...
>
> +1.  -- justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: June report prep

[Luke Han]

What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project in
May's report but not on June
Would like to know that and get ready for coming report.

Thank you very much.
Luke


Best Regards!
-

Luke Han

2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey :

> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning 
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> >  wrote:
>
> >> The first action of the June report cycle is to send the "timeline"
> >> email to general@incubator.  This should be done by the last
> >> Wednesday of the month, so that people see it a full week before
> >> podling reports are due.  Here's a sample:
> >
> > Yay!
> >
> > With the correct version of python, this now works for me.  We won't
> > know what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much.
>
> Thanks, Ted -- looks good!
>
> And I'm glad that you sent it out, because it seems that "the other
> Marvin" flaked again and the per-podling reminder emails have not fired
> yet.  That's not something that the Report Manager is responsible for,
> though -- it's something the Incubator relies on individual volunteers
> to monitor.
>
> If the automatic reminders haven't fired by tomorrow, I'll send out
> manual reminders again.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: June report prep

[Ted Dunning]

Incubator projects start with monthly reporting and then switch to
quarterly after the first few reports.

I think that it is very helpful to do a bit of the report each month even
after switching to quarterly reporting because it is hard to remember
everything that has happened after 3 months.  Even just making a few notes
each week is a good thing.

This is also a good opportunity to build community if you spread around the
writing of those few lines.  Starting with super easy contributions like
that often leads to much more significant contributions later.




On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Luke Han  wrote:

> What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project in
> May's report but not on June
> Would like to know that and get ready for coming report.
>
> Thank you very much.
> Luke
>
>
> Best Regards!
> -
>
> Luke Han
>
> 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey :
>
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning 
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> > >  wrote:
> >
> > >> The first action of the June report cycle is to send the "timeline"
> > >> email to general@incubator.  This should be done by the last
> > >> Wednesday of the month, so that people see it a full week before
> > >> podling reports are due.  Here's a sample:
> > >
> > > Yay!
> > >
> > > With the correct version of python, this now works for me.  We won't
> > > know what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much.
> >
> > Thanks, Ted -- looks good!
> >
> > And I'm glad that you sent it out, because it seems that "the other
> > Marvin" flaked again and the per-podling reminder emails have not fired
> > yet.  That's not something that the Report Manager is responsible for,
> > though -- it's something the Incubator relies on individual volunteers
> > to monitor.
> >
> > If the automatic reminders haven't fired by tomorrow, I'll send out
> > manual reminders again.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

[VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating

[Luke Han]

Hi all,

The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Kylin 0.7.1 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin.

Since this is first release after join Apache Incubating project, we would
like to hear more feedback from incubator community and please help to
verify and vote our release candidate.

Proposal:
http://s.apache.org/kylin-0.7.1-vote

Vote result:
3 binding +1 votes
0 non-binding +1 votes
No -1 votes
http://s.apache.org/kylin-0.7.1-result

The commit to be voted upon:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kylin/commit/76b5d37561879140e73c9179d95a4e5e96751444

Its hash is 76b5d37561879140e73c9179d95a4e5e96751444.

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kylin/apache-kylin-0.7.1-incubating-rc2/

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
src.zip.md5 c8b0bb6744288f07ad625cc48521b088
src.zip.sha1 bafab62d5df6e77da0f236b9399a674abcc2b34a

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekylin-1004/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lukehan.asc

Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and with
the endorsement of our mentors we would now like to request
the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the release. The vote
is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes (3 +1)
is reached.

[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Luke Han, on behalf of Apache Kylin PPMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

[Bertrand Delacretaz]

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Jake Farrell  wrote:
>   [X ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because...

As mentioned before I think the name is too close to Mesos, especially
taking into account the ways those names are pronounced in various
languages.

This is not a veto of course as this is a majority vote, and I don't
object to the podling creation anyway, it's just the name that's
problematic IMO.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: June report prep

[Luke Han]

Thanks Ted, this is more clear now.

You are right, to have monthly summary is also very important to share such
information in project community,
and it's good start point for people learn more about that project when
they joined a new community

Thanks.


Best Regards!
-

Luke Han

2015-05-29 16:23 GMT+08:00 Ted Dunning :

> Incubator projects start with monthly reporting and then switch to
> quarterly after the first few reports.
>
> I think that it is very helpful to do a bit of the report each month even
> after switching to quarterly reporting because it is hard to remember
> everything that has happened after 3 months.  Even just making a few notes
> each week is a good thing.
>
> This is also a good opportunity to build community if you spread around the
> writing of those few lines.  Starting with super easy contributions like
> that often leads to much more significant contributions later.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Luke Han  wrote:
>
> > What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project
> in
> > May's report but not on June
> > Would like to know that and get ready for coming report.
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Luke
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > -
> >
> > Luke Han
> >
> > 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey :
> >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> > > >  wrote:
> > >
> > > >> The first action of the June report cycle is to send the "timeline"
> > > >> email to general@incubator.  This should be done by the last
> > > >> Wednesday of the month, so that people see it a full week before
> > > >> podling reports are due.  Here's a sample:
> > > >
> > > > Yay!
> > > >
> > > > With the correct version of python, this now works for me.  We won't
> > > > know what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Ted -- looks good!
> > >
> > > And I'm glad that you sent it out, because it seems that "the other
> > > Marvin" flaked again and the per-podling reminder emails have not fired
> > > yet.  That's not something that the Report Manager is responsible for,
> > > though -- it's something the Incubator relies on individual volunteers
> > > to monitor.
> > >
> > > If the automatic reminders haven't fired by tomorrow, I'll send out
> > > manual reminders again.
> > >
> > > Marvin Humphrey
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

[Joe Brockmeier]

On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> > Apache Sentry
> 
> This one looks like a problem.  A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the
> podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator.
> 
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sentry-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAE=hR03kUTGF3s5QCpuUj=_eyry_gsR=w6kd-pvd_-cdcru...@mail.gmail.com%3E
> 
> It would be perfectly understandable for an individual release manager to
> misunderstand the incubating release process, but it's troubling that not
> a single podling community member spoke up.  What's going on?

Apologies for just noticing this email, and for missing that. I'm
looking into this, I think there may have been a misunderstanding about
the need for IPMC votes vs. actually conducting a vote on general@.
(IIRC all three binding +1s are IPMC members.) 

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

[Jake Farrell]

Bringing back comments from a separate thread on board@

Sorry to see your vote of a -1 on the proposal due to the name. This was
raised during the discussion phase and as stated in the discussion we are
not against a name change, but saw it as something that was not a blocker
to entering incubation.

We did an initial name search on our own and there are no collisions on
Mysos externally and we have two Mesos PMC members on the project that did
not see any problems with the name, Dave and Vinod are both on the Mesos PMC.
A note has been sent to the Mesos PMC private@ list regarding the Mysos
proposal and the project name and asked that comments be brought back to
here.

-Jake


On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz  wrote:

> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Jake Farrell  wrote:
> >   [X ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because...
>
> As mentioned before I think the name is too close to Mesos, especially
> taking into account the ways those names are pronounced in various
> languages.
>
> This is not a veto of course as this is a majority vote, and I don't
> object to the podling creation anyway, it's just the name that's
> problematic IMO.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

[Joe Brockmeier]

On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 09:43 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> My understanding is that only TLPs can publish to blogs.a.o.

I guess that depends on whether you mean the top-level Apache blog there
or starting a new blog.

CloudStack started its blog on blogs.apache.org while we were a podling
with (IIRC) Sally's blessing. Example here:

https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/tags/4.0.1-incubating

Whether that was aggregated/carried on the main site, I don't recall.
 
Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

[David Nalley]

I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
blog at blogs.a.o

--David

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  wrote:
> Hi!
>
> can someone please remind me what's the policy
> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
> blogging platform?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier  wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> > Apache Sentry
>>
>> This one looks like a problem.  A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the
>> podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> 
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sentry-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAE=hR03kUTGF3s5QCpuUj=_eyry_gsR=w6kd-pvd_-cdcru...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> It would be perfectly understandable for an individual release manager to
>> misunderstand the incubating release process, but it's troubling that not
>> a single podling community member spoke up.  What's going on?
>
> Apologies for just noticing this email, and for missing that. I'm
> looking into this, I think there may have been a misunderstanding about
> the need for IPMC votes vs. actually conducting a vote on general@.
> (IIRC all three binding +1s are IPMC members.)

Thanks, Joe.

To clarify and elaborate:

The Apache Incubator is a "top-level project" at the Apache Software
Foundation -- like Apache Tomcat, like Apache Lucene, like Apache HTTPD. The
Incubator makes official Apache releases following a specific process, just
like those other top-level projects do.

Release candidates prepared by incubating podlings become official Apache
releases when the Incubator releases them. This requires a vote by the
Incubator PMC.

It is not valid for a subset of any Apache PMC to approve a release candidate
without giving the entire PMC sufficient opportunity for review.  This
prevents, for example, a handful of employees from ExampleCo making a release
of Apache Foo that other members of the Foo PMC find objectionable.

While the Sentry release glitch appears to have arisen from a
misunderstanding, there have been multiple occasions in the ASF's history
where failure to understand or uphold release protocols has resulted in
distorted project governance and disenfranchised PMC members.

>From time to time, you will hear people argue that the incubation process
should be reorganized and that the release votes on general@incubator should
be streamlined away.  Such arguments would be more persuasive, IMO, if it were
not routine to catch problems during the general@incubator vote phase.  In any
case, that is not the situation that exists today.

So we now have Sentry artifacts being distributed which have not been approved
by the full Incubator PMC.  A similar situation with another project was once
resolved by having the full PMC vote on the already-distributed artifacts.  In
my view, the Sentry podling should initiate such a vote, and a passing vote
would settle the issue.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

[Henry Saputra]

When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post
blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings
wait until graduation to post in it.

- Henry

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
> I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
> blog at blogs.a.o
>
> --David
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> can someone please remind me what's the policy
>> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
>> blogging platform?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

[Roman Shaposhnik]

This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive
at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ?

Thanks,
Roman.

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post
> blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings
> wait until graduation to post in it.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>> I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
>> blog at blogs.a.o
>>
>> --David
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> can someone please remind me what's the policy
>>> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
>>> blogging platform?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Sorry but it’s -1 binding form me:
- LICENSE is incorrect and missing 3rd party bundled software
- Incorrect Apache license headers added to files under other licenses
- Possible font licensing issues.

Unless that is other IPMC member this it ok to fix these issue in a future 
release and I’ll consider changing my vote.

I checked:
- incubating in file name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- hashes and signatures correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE issues (see below)
- All source file have Apache headers
- One unexpected binary file, but it used for testing

LICENSE is missing information on the bundled versions of font awesome, 
bootstrap, jQuery and normalize.css, See:
  ./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/docs/website/assets/css/font-awesome.min.css
  ./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/docs/website/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js
  ./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/docs/website/assets/js/jquery-1.9.1.min.js

I assuming these were not picked up because the mvn rat target is ignoring the 
docs directory?

See [1] on how to add these permissive licenses to LICENSE.

Looks like there may be some font licensing issues - for instance this file:
./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/docs/website/assets/fonts/helveticaneue-webfont.svg 

Which an Apache header has been incorrectly added to(?)

Contains this text:

Created by FontForge 20110222 at Thu Mar  6 12:16:42 2014
 By Orthosie Webhosting
Copyright (c) 1981, 1982, 1983, 1989 and 1993, Linotype Library GmbH or its 
affiliated Linotype-Hell companies. All rights reserved.

The digitally encoded machine readable software for producing the Typefaces 
licensed to you is now the property of Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG and its 
licensors, and may not be reproduced, used, displayed, modified, disclosed or 
transferred without the express written approval of Heidelberger Druckmaschinen 
AG.

Copyright (c) 1988, 1990, 1993 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.

Also this file:
./docs/website/assets/css/animate.css

Has had a Apache license added when it is MIT licensed. It’s information should 
also be added into the LICENSE file.

Some other minor issues:
-There are a few test and doc files without apache header that it could 
probably be added to.
-There is an archive which also look like it use for testing. Does this need to 
be distributed in the source repo?

./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/examples/test_case_data/minicluster/hbase-export.tar.gz
- Can I ask where this file came from and what license was it original under?
 ./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/dictionary/src/test/resources/dict/eng_com.dic

There are also there two binary font files - who licensing I’m unsure of:
./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/webapp/app/fonts/ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlPytCVloACqnDHJwh-em2k8.woff2
(may be Source San Pro which is covered by a SIL license so that would also 
need to go into the LICENSE file or be removed)
./kylin-0.7.1-incubating/webapp/app/fonts/toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGKUt5Ot5NIMarvNW-hkYWvT3rGVtsTkPsbDajuO5ueQw.woff2
(may be Source Sans Pro Bold?)

Can you also fix:
- LICENSE is missing the appendix from the standard license [2] can this be 
added.
- The NOTICE file should have the project name as “Apache Kylin"

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
2. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: Blog policy for poddlings

[Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)]

It's not ComDev is press@

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Roman Shaposhnik
Sent: ‎5/‎29/‎2015 7:11 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Blog policy for poddlings

This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive
at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ?

Thanks,
Roman.

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post
> blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings
> wait until graduation to post in it.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>> I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
>> blog at blogs.a.o
>>
>> --David
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> can someone please remind me what's the policy
>>> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
>>> blogging platform?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

[Greg Stein]

To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any
outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate
messaging. That is why we have press@ :-)

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:

> It's not ComDev is press@
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> 
> From: Roman Shaposhnik
> Sent: ‎5/‎29/‎2015 7:11 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Blog policy for poddlings
>
> This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive
> at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
> > When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post
> > blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings
> > wait until graduation to post in it.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
> >> I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
> >> blog at blogs.a.o
> >>
> >> --David
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik 
> wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> can someone please remind me what's the policy
> >>> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
> >>> blogging platform?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Roman.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

[Ted Dunning]

This is also why there need to be disclaimers on releases and such.



On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Greg Stein  wrote:

> To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any
> outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate
> messaging. That is why we have press@ :-)
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
> ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > It's not ComDev is press@
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > 
> > From: Roman Shaposhnik
> > Sent: ‎5/‎29/‎2015 7:11 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Blog policy for poddlings
> >
> > This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive
> > at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra  >
> > wrote:
> > > When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post
> > > blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings
> > > wait until graduation to post in it.
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
> > >> I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
> > >> blog at blogs.a.o
> > >>
> > >> --David
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>> Hi!
> > >>>
> > >>> can someone please remind me what's the policy
> > >>> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
> > >>> blogging platform?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Roman.
> > >>>
> > >>> -
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>