Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking virtuals stable

2007-05-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
 On Wed, 23 May 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:

 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Ulrich Mueller kirjoitti:
 The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.:
 keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month
 before the package can go stable.

 The month is not set in stone. About who marks them, it's probably
 best to get the opinion of the arch teams. I don't think they will
 object to normal developers marking them. Arch teams: what do you
 think?

  Speaking for x86/amd64 and Emacs...I am ok with that. :)

So, only this reply.

May I conclude that nobody objects to the above?

Ulrich
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Maintainers desired for a few simple pkgs.

2007-05-30 Thread Ned Ludd
I'm looking to get rid of a few ebuilds I half ass maintain.

net-wireless/chillispot
(Open source captive portal or wireless LAN access point controller)

sys-devel/sparse
(C semantic parser)

Both are relativity low maintenance. 
Any takers? pretty please with party socks on top.

-- 
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: net-misc/upnp (June 13.)

2007-05-30 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
# Bjarke Istrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30 May 2007)
# masked for removal on 20070629
# Upstream is dead and there are several issues
# Please use net-libs/libupnp instead.
net-misc/upnp

Package has been dead for over a year (last release 20060305).
It has several knows issues, that has been fixed in net-libs/libupnp,
which is a fork of net-misc/upnp.

Unless anyone objects (and with a very good reason), I will remove
it from the tree on June 29.

GurliGebis
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

2007-05-30 Thread Marius Mauch
I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
up with a solution, but would look at and eventually include a
user-submitted patch for it. Currently those would either be left open
forever or closed as WONTFIX which isn't compeltely accurate. Therefore
I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
tons of open bugs that might never be closed (or get closed with a
somewhat incorrect resolution). It might also give people who want to
help a simpler target instead of browsing through all open bugs and
trying to find one where a user can work on.

Opinions?

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

2007-05-30 Thread Steve Long
Well speaking as a user who'd gladly help out with code-fixes for smaller
scale stuff, i think it's a great idea.

a few of the #friendly-coders would be glad to help out as well.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-30 Thread Bryan Østergaard

It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally
retiring from
Gentoo.

I've been a Gentoo developer for nearly 4 years now and I like to at least
pretend that I've made some important contributions to Gentoo during that
time. I've had a lot of fun but my frustrations have grown these past several
months and I've been entertaining the idea about retiring from Gentoo for
probably 6 months now. The past couple months the desire to leave Gentoo have
become much stronger and I think it's finally time for me and Gentoo to go our
separate ways.

I think I've put my fingerprint on Gentoo in quite a few important ways but
lately I've come to the realization that I probably can't do any more for
Gentoo. No matter how hard I try fighting for what I feel is right we seem to
end up with petty fights, flamewars or what I consider even worse - people
simply ignore what I'm working hard towards.

So I think it's high time that I leave the project and start looking for
another project where I can contribute something important and not just try to
keep afloat in a project that I seem to be at odds with to an ever
increasing degree.

I'll try to reach all the projects I'm leaving over the next few days and see
if I can pass on my work in a reasonable manner. I probably won't be around
much on irc but if you really need to contact me you can do so at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Good luck to all of you and may Gentoo development be as much fun for you as
it used to be for me.

Best regards,
Bryan Østergaard
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-30 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bryan Østergaard wrote:
 It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally
 retiring from
 Gentoo.
 
 I've been a Gentoo developer for nearly 4 years now and I like to at least
 pretend that I've made some important contributions to Gentoo during that
 time. I've had a lot of fun but my frustrations have grown these past
 several
 months and I've been entertaining the idea about retiring from Gentoo for
 probably 6 months now. The past couple months the desire to leave Gentoo
 have
 become much stronger and I think it's finally time for me and Gentoo to
 go our
 separate ways.
 
 I think I've put my fingerprint on Gentoo in quite a few important
 ways but
 lately I've come to the realization that I probably can't do any more for
 Gentoo. No matter how hard I try fighting for what I feel is right we
 seem to
 end up with petty fights, flamewars or what I consider even worse - people
 simply ignore what I'm working hard towards.
 
 So I think it's high time that I leave the project and start looking for
 another project where I can contribute something important and not just
 try to
 keep afloat in a project that I seem to be at odds with to an ever
 increasing degree.
 
 I'll try to reach all the projects I'm leaving over the next few days
 and see
 if I can pass on my work in a reasonable manner. I probably won't be around
 much on irc but if you really need to contact me you can do so at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Good luck to all of you and may Gentoo development be as much fun for
 you as
 it used to be for me.
 
 Best regards,
 Bryan Østergaard

Sad to see you go Bryan,

You were one of the first Gentoo developers i met, and you were really a
great help to get me started in this community; i bet many people owe
you the same 

Thanks and i wish you luck in your future projects,

P.S: Wouldn't you just like to take the Gentoo-one-month-off vacation to
relax a bit?

- --

Luis F. Araujo araujo at gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGXiiVaTNpke9pJcURAifyAJ9w7SqqRxk1a6WLOV0bKXwx7N74TQCfV7fV
vBb/0K7ygzOjWcPzejSdY8E=
=cdel
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-30 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 31 May 2007 03:35:20 +0200
Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So I think it's high time that I leave the project and start looking
 for another project where I can contribute something important and
 not just try to keep afloat in a project that I seem to be at odds
 with to an ever increasing degree.

Sad to see one of the few remaining sane people leave. But equally, I'm
really looking forward to seeing your next project.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-30 Thread Alin Năstac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bryan Østergaard wrote:
 It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm
 finally retiring from Gentoo.
I'm sorry to see another key developer leaving Gentoo. :(
I hope you'll come back someday... ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGXj4AozkEeOnWD00RApXkAKDVhdHijzlfGkI0Ul0W5445IOQ/VwCfYfjj
QpdDAZ67VXamxCJj/HI6erY=
=jqpG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

2007-05-30 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
On Thursday, May 31, 2007 02:32:22 AM Marius Mauch wrote:
 I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
 that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
 up with a solution, 

... or is lacking the necessary skills. 

 I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
 tons of open bugs that might never be closed

I fully agree. There are quite a few bugs I've seen that would be benefit 
from it.

Best regards, Wulf


pgpXWI0mkp49Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

2007-05-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:32:22AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
 I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
 that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
 up with a solution, but would look at and eventually include a
 user-submitted patch for it. Currently those would either be left open
 forever or closed as WONTFIX which isn't compeltely accurate. Therefore
 I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
 tons of open bugs that might never be closed (or get closed with a
 somewhat incorrect resolution). It might also give people who want to
 help a simpler target instead of browsing through all open bugs and
 trying to find one where a user can work on.
I think a keyword might be more useful, as at least with my bugs, I'd
like to keep them open myself - if the user doesn't provide a patch,
it's still something that I'd get around to doing eventually.

I specifically want my bugs to stay open, and be easily visible as to
why I've kept them open.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer  Council Member
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpeYCFfZ3Lza.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-30 Thread Peter Weller
On Thu, 31 May 2007 03:35:20 +0200
Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally
 retiring from
 Gentoo.
 
 I've been a Gentoo developer for nearly 4 years now and I like to at
 least pretend that I've made some important contributions to Gentoo
 during that time. I've had a lot of fun but my frustrations have
 grown these past several months and I've been entertaining the idea
 about retiring from Gentoo for probably 6 months now. The past couple
 months the desire to leave Gentoo have become much stronger and I
 think it's finally time for me and Gentoo to go our separate ways.
 
 I think I've put my fingerprint on Gentoo in quite a few important
 ways but lately I've come to the realization that I probably can't do
 any more for Gentoo. No matter how hard I try fighting for what I
 feel is right we seem to end up with petty fights, flamewars or what
 I consider even worse - people simply ignore what I'm working hard
 towards.
 
 So I think it's high time that I leave the project and start looking
 for another project where I can contribute something important and
 not just try to keep afloat in a project that I seem to be at odds
 with to an ever increasing degree.
 
 I'll try to reach all the projects I'm leaving over the next few days
 and see if I can pass on my work in a reasonable manner. I probably
 won't be around much on irc but if you really need to contact me you
 can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Good luck to all of you and may Gentoo development be as much fun for
 you as it used to be for me.
 
 Best regards,
 Bryan Østergaard

Sad to see you go... 'tis gonna be strange without you around... 
Best of luck with whatever you go to do next.

welp


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature