Re: [Gluster-users] Ownership changed to root
Is it possible a gluster volume rebalance (or remove brick) was in progress in the background? If so you might have hit http://review.gluster.org/3861. If not, can you please file a bug with the client logs (of all the machines where 'disk' file was possibly getting modified? Thanks, Avati On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: > Hello, > > I'm seeing a weird issue with OpenStack and Gluster. > > I have /var/lib/nova/instances mounted as a glusterfs volume. The owner of > /var/lib/nova/instances is nova:nova. > > When I launch a vm and watch it launching, I see the following: > > root@c01:/var/lib/nova/instances/instance-0012# ls -l > total 8 > -rw-rw 1 nova nova0 Aug 24 14:22 console.log > -rw-rw-r-- 1 nova nova 1459 Aug 24 14:22 libvirt.xml > > This is correct. > > Then it changes ownership to libvirt-qemu: > > root@c01:/var/lib/nova/instances/instance-0012# ls -l > total 22556 > -rw-rw 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 0 Aug 24 14:22 console.log > -rw-r--r-- 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 27262976 Aug 24 14:22 disk > -rw-rw-r-- 1 nova nova 1459 Aug 24 14:22 libvirt.xm > > Again, this is correct. > > But then it changes to root: > > root@c01:/var/lib/nova/instances/instance-0012# ls -l > total 22556 > -rw-rw 1 root root0 Aug 24 14:22 console.log > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27262976 Aug 24 14:22 disk > -rw-rw-r-- 1 nova nova 1459 Aug 24 14:22 libvirt.xml > > OpenStack then errors out due to not being able to correctly access the > files. > > If I remove the /var/lib/nova/instances mount and just use the normal > filesystem, the root ownership part does not happen. > > I have successfully had Gluster working with OpenStack in this way on a > different installation, so I'm not sure why I'm seeing this issue now. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Joe > > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in > their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make > it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > - > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-**a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-**8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > - > > New changes would make it look like : > > --- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-**a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-**8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > --- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I > would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any > response, we will go ahead with the change. > > I suggest we retain the current output of 'gluster peer status' as-is and implement the above proposed format in the output of 'gluster --mode=script peer status' (perhaps make it even more script friendly?). Since --mode=script is already a support cli switch it would be ideal to include this change under that itself. Handling of --xml would be independent issue. If there are suggestions to the desired output format of 'gluster --mode=script peer status' from the users, it would be good to bring it up now. Avati ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Ok, maybe I didn't explain the true nature in detail: The number of fields and the formatting is all the same. nobody wants to read the output. Instead it is read by scripts most of the time. so the only valid question is the field delimiter, simply to make the output parseable as easy as possible for some scripts. There is no human in front of a terminal who really likes to read this output all day long. Does that make the point clear? On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:57:13 -0400 (EDT) Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > No. Output formats in that way generally start out nice but as you start > adding more fields, formatting them becomes difficult IMO. > > Pranith > - Original Message - > From: "Stephan von Krawczynski" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > Cc: "gluster-users" , "Gluster Devel" > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:01:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to > CLI output of 'peer status' > > Top posting and kidding is a bit exaggerated for one posting ... > > You are not seriously talking about 80 char terminals for an output that is > commonly used by scripts and stuff like nagios, are you? > > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:46:22 -0400 (EDT) > Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > hi Amar, > > This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this > > because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want > > to add more fields in future. > > > > Pranith. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Amar Tumballi" > > To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM > > Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of > > 'peerstatus' > > > > Hi, > > > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' > > in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to > > make it more script friendly. > > > > For example the current output would look something like: > > > > - > > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef > > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > > > - > > > > New changes would make it look like : > > > > --- > > UUID Hostname Status > > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > > > --- > > > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. > > I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without > > any response, we will go ahead with the change. > > > > Regards, > > Amar > > ___ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users@gluster.org > > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > ___ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > gluster-de...@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > -- > Regards, > Stephan > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- MfG, Stephan von Krawczynski -- ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH Lieferanschrift : Reiterstrasse 24, D-94447 Plattling Telefon : +49 9931 9188 0 Fax : +49 9931 9188 44 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Stephan von Krawczynski Registergericht : Deggendorf HRB 1625 -- ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Typical setup questions
I'f found pricing for Infiniband switches / cards to be cheaper than 10G cards/switches with the addition of being 4X fast. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Joe Topjian wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Matt Weil wrote: >> >> Since we are on the subject of hardware what would be the perfect fit for >> a gluster brick. We where looking at a PowerEdge C2100 Rack Server. > > > Just a note: the c2100 has been superseded by the Dell r720xd. Although the > r720 is not part of the c-series, it's their official replacement. > >> >> During testing I found it pretty easy to saturate 1 Gig network links. >> This was also the case when multiple links where bonded together. Are there >> any cheap 10 gig switch alternatives that anyone would suggest? > > > While not necessarily cheap, I've had great luck with Arista 7050 switches. > > We implement them in sets of two, linked together. We then use dual-port > 10gb NICs and connect each NIC to each switch. It gives multiple layers of > redundancy + a theoretical 20gb throughput per server. > > Thanks, > Joe > > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] QEMU-GlusterFS native integration demo video
I'd just like to also state this is fantastic. I hope the performance will match. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Fernando Frediani (Qube) wrote: > Thanks for sharing it with us Bharata. > > I saw you have two nodes. Have you done any performance tests and if so how > they compare with creating normal .qcow2 or .raw files on the filesystem, > specially for the writes ? > > Thanks > > Fernando > > -Original Message- > From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org > [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Bharata B Rao > Sent: 28 August 2012 05:14 > To: gluster-users@gluster.org; gluster-de...@nongnu.org > Subject: [Gluster-users] QEMU-GlusterFS native integration demo video > > Hi, > > If you are interested and/or curious to know how QEMU can be used to create > and boot VM's from GlusterFS volume, take a look at the demo video I have > created at: > > www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG3kF_djclg > > Regards, > Bharata. > -- > http://bharata.sulekha.com/blog/posts.htm, http://raobharata.wordpress.com/ > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 13:02 -0600, Joe Topjian wrote: > Hi James, > > FWIW: I tend to agree on this point. The other question that > comes to > mind is what "quick" bash scripts are you writing for managing > gluster? > > > "quick" might not have been the best word to use -- maybe "small" > would have been better. > > > For example, "peer status" + columns + grep + awk could be used for a > small Nagios check command. Gotcha... As an aside, If it's at all helpful to you, I've needed to parse some gluster --xml and I've made this: https://github.com/purpleidea/puppet-gluster/blob/master/files/xml.py which I call from within bash (puppet) basically. I'm hoping that it remains stable and I don't need to add versions checks everywhere. It might be a good idea for nagios stuff too. HTH, James > > > Thanks, > Joe signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Hi James, FWIW: I tend to agree on this point. The other question that comes to > mind is what "quick" bash scripts are you writing for managing gluster? > "quick" might not have been the best word to use -- maybe "small" would have been better. For example, "peer status" + columns + grep + awk could be used for a small Nagios check command. Thanks, Joe ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 12:51 -0600, Joe Topjian wrote: > Hi Pranith, > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: >Why not use --xml at the end of the command? That will > print the output in xml format. Would that make it easy to > parse?. > > > IMO, I can see --xml being useful for more "sophisticated" scripts > that utilize Perl, Python, or Ruby, however, for quick shell > scripting, I can see this being very difficult if not unusable. FWIW: I tend to agree on this point. The other question that comes to mind is what "quick" bash scripts are you writing for managing gluster? Get curious, James > > > Having the output print in set columns, though might wrap when printed > on <=80 char terminals, would make it very easy to parse with awk. > > > Thanks, > Joe > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Hi Pranith, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >Why not use --xml at the end of the command? That will print the output > in xml format. Would that make it easy to parse?. IMO, I can see --xml being useful for more "sophisticated" scripts that utilize Perl, Python, or Ruby, however, for quick shell scripting, I can see this being very difficult if not unusable. Having the output print in set columns, though might wrap when printed on <=80 char terminals, would make it very easy to parse with awk. Thanks, Joe ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Typical setup questions
Hi Matt, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Matt Weil wrote: > Since we are on the subject of hardware what would be the perfect fit for > a gluster brick. We where looking at a PowerEdge C2100 Rack Server. > Just a note: the c2100 has been superseded by the Dell r720xd. Although the r720 is not part of the c-series, it's their official replacement. > During testing I found it pretty easy to saturate 1 Gig network links. > This was also the case when multiple links where bonded together. Are > there any cheap 10 gig switch alternatives that anyone would suggest? While not necessarily cheap, I've had great luck with Arista 7050 switches. We implement them in sets of two, linked together. We then use dual-port 10gb NICs and connect each NIC to each switch. It gives multiple layers of redundancy + a theoretical 20gb throughput per server. Thanks, Joe ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Feodra 17 GlusterFS 3.3 and Firefox
I was able to cause client crashes with the 3.5 kernels in Fedora and have opened a bug report. Bugzilla is down right now or I would give you the bug link. Yannik Lieblinger wrote: >Hi Joe, > >I have do an update to the new kernel 3.5.2-3.fc17.x86_64. And have the same >problem. > >Does you test give some interesting results? > > >-- >Best regards > >Yannik Lieblinger > >___ >Gluster-users mailing list >Gluster-users@gluster.org >http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Typical setup questions
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:29:55AM -0500, Matt Weil wrote: > Since we are on the subject of hardware what would be the perfect > fit for a gluster brick. We where looking at a PowerEdge C2100 Rack > Server. Looks fine to me; UK website doesn't give the pricing so I imagine it's pretty expensive :-) > During testing I found it pretty easy to saturate 1 Gig network > links. This was also the case when multiple links where bonded > together. Are there any cheap 10 gig switch alternatives that > anyone would suggest? Netgear XSM7224S, Intel X520-DA2 adapters, and direct-attach cables (I've used Netgear ones for 3m and Intel for 5m) ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Typical setup questions
Brian thanks for this response. Since we are on the subject of hardware what would be the perfect fit for a gluster brick. We where looking at a PowerEdge C2100 Rack Server. During testing I found it pretty easy to saturate 1 Gig network links. This was also the case when multiple links where bonded together. Are there any cheap 10 gig switch alternatives that anyone would suggest? Matt On 8/24/12 4:28 PM, Brian Candler wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:51:24AM -0500, Matt Weil wrote: I am curious what is used typically for the file system replication and how do you make sure that it is consistent. So for example when using large 3TB+ sata/NL-sas drives. Is is typical to replicate three times to get similar protection to raid 6? Gluster sits on top of existing filesystems on the storage bricks, so it's fine to continue to use RAID10 (for performance) or RAID6 (for capacity) on those nodes. Gluster replicated volumes, and/or gluster geo-replication, then give you an additional layer of replication on top of that, and the ability to handle entire servers going out of service. If I were you, I would not want to have a non-resilient array like a RAID0 on my storage bricks. Whilst in principle you could have lots of separate 3TB filesystems and put them into a large distributed/replicated set, I think this is likely to be difficult to manage. In particular, the process of replacing a failed disk requires more skill than a simple RAID drive swap. One word of warning: when choosing 3TB SATA drives, ensure they support error recovery control (a.k.a. time-limited error recovery). Enterprise drives do, but many consumer ones don't. The Hitachi consumer ones do, for now anyway; Seagate ones do not. To attempt to enable it on a particular drive: # smartctl -l scterc,70,70 /dev/sda If the drive supports it, you'll see: SCT Error Recovery Control set to: Read: 70 (7.0 seconds) Write: 70 (7.0 seconds) There's plenty of discussion on the linux-raid mailing list if you want to go through the archives. Also what is typically done to ensure that all replicas are in place and consistent? A cron that stats of ls's the file system from a single client? I don't have a good answer to that. Stat'ing all files recursively used to be required for gluster <3.3 to force healing. As of gluster 3.3, there is a self-healing daemon which handles this automatically. So basically, you trust gluster to do its job. I guess there could be value in running a recursive md5sum on each replica locally and comparing the results (but you'd have to allow for files which were in the process of changing during the scan) Regards, Brian. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi Amar, > This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this > because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want > to add more fields in future. This actually seems like a fairly reasonable point to me However, the most important thing to me is that the --xml output stays stable. Thank you! James > > Pranith. > - Original Message - > From: "Amar Tumballi" > To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer > status' > > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' > in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to > make it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > - > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > - > > New changes would make it look like : > > --- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > --- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. > I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without > any response, we will go ahead with the change. > > Regards, > Amar > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Bryan, FYI XML output for 'peer status' isn't yet present in 3.3.0. It was just pushed into master. So if you want to test it, you'll have to build from master - Kaushal On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > No. Output formats in that way generally start out nice but as you start > adding more fields, formatting them becomes difficult IMO. > > Pranith > - Original Message - > From: "Stephan von Krawczynski" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > Cc: "gluster-users" , "Gluster Devel" > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:01:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to > CLI output of 'peer status' > > Top posting and kidding is a bit exaggerated for one posting ... > > You are not seriously talking about 80 char terminals for an output that is > commonly used by scripts and stuff like nagios, are you? > > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:46:22 -0400 (EDT) > Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> hi Amar, >> This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this >> because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want >> to add more fields in future. >> >> Pranith. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Amar Tumballi" >> To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" >> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM >> Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer >> status' >> >> Hi, >> >> Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' >> in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to >> make it more script friendly. >> >> For example the current output would look something like: >> >> - >> Hostname: 10.70.36.7 >> Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 >> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) >> >> Hostname: 10.70.36.6 >> Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef >> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) >> >> - >> >> New changes would make it look like : >> >> --- >> UUID Hostname Status >> c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected >> 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected >> >> --- >> >> If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. >> I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without >> any response, we will go ahead with the change. >> >> Regards, >> Amar >> ___ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> gluster-de...@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > -- > Regards, > Stephan > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
* Stephan von Krawczynski [2012 08 28, 15:31]: > You are not seriously talking about 80 char terminals for an output > that is commonly used by scripts and stuff like nagios, are you? > > > - > > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > - Given the '80 char terminals' and the plan to add more fields, I would suggest a kind of key-value output which should be as easy to parse: - cut here - c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7: Hostname: 10.70.36.7 c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7: State: Connected - cut here - This way you should be able to line-filter the output as if it was all in one line. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
No. Output formats in that way generally start out nice but as you start adding more fields, formatting them becomes difficult IMO. Pranith - Original Message - From: "Stephan von Krawczynski" To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" Cc: "gluster-users" , "Gluster Devel" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:01:57 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Top posting and kidding is a bit exaggerated for one posting ... You are not seriously talking about 80 char terminals for an output that is commonly used by scripts and stuff like nagios, are you? On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi Amar, > This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this > because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want > to add more fields in future. > > Pranith. > - Original Message - > From: "Amar Tumballi" > To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer > status' > > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' > in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to > make it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > - > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > - > > New changes would make it look like : > > --- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > --- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. > I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without > any response, we will go ahead with the change. > > Regards, > Amar > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Regards, Stephan ___ Gluster-devel mailing list gluster-de...@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Top posting and kidding is a bit exaggerated for one posting ... You are not seriously talking about 80 char terminals for an output that is commonly used by scripts and stuff like nagios, are you? On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi Amar, > This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this > because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want > to add more fields in future. > > Pranith. > - Original Message - > From: "Amar Tumballi" > To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer > status' > > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' > in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to > make it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > - > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > - > > New changes would make it look like : > > --- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > --- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. > I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without > any response, we will go ahead with the change. > > Regards, > Amar > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Regards, Stephan ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Pranith, I will look at it...Thanks. Bryan -Original Message- From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:51 AM To: Washer, Bryan Cc: Amar Tumballi; Gluster Devel; gluster-users Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Bryan, Why not use --xml at the end of the command? That will print the output in xml format. Would that make it easy to parse?. Pranith. - Original Message - From: "Bryan Washer" To: "Amar Tumballi" , "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 5:40:16 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peerstatus' I would love thisand would be more than happy to change my current parsing...this would make it A LOT easier to parseas well as easier to see all information on a disconnected peer as the information will be in a single line. Bryan Washer -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Amar Tumballi Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 6:06 AM To: Gluster Devel; gluster-users Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Hi, Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make it more script friendly. For example the current output would look something like: - Hostname: 10.70.36.7 Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.70.36.6 Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) - New changes would make it look like : --- UUID Hostname Status c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected --- If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any response, we will go ahead with the change. Regards, Amar ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose. Any improper use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or destroy all transmitted information. Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third party spam and filtering service. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose. Any improper use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or destroy all transmitted information. Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third party spam and filtering service ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
If this is the case...why not add a flag for the more verbose information ...and let the default provide just the basics with output very easy to parse like this... Bryan Washer -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Pranith Kumar Karampuri Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:46 AM To: Amar Tumballi Cc: gluster-users; Gluster Devel Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' hi Amar, This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want to add more fields in future. Pranith. - Original Message - From: "Amar Tumballi" To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Hi, Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make it more script friendly. For example the current output would look something like: - Hostname: 10.70.36.7 Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.70.36.6 Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) - New changes would make it look like : --- UUID Hostname Status c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected --- If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any response, we will go ahead with the change. Regards, Amar ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose. Any improper use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or destroy all transmitted information. Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third party spam and filtering service ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > hi Amar, > This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with > this because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we > want to add more fields in future. > It would be good to provide a switch for the new format while preserving the default... > > Pranith. > - Original Message - > From: "Amar Tumballi" > To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" < > gluster-users@gluster.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of > 'peerstatus' > > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' > in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to > make it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > - > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > - > > New changes would make it look like : > > --- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > --- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. > I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without > any response, we will go ahead with the change. > > Regards, > Amar > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Marcelo "¿No será acaso que esta vida moderna está teniendo más de moderna que de vida?" (Mafalda) ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Bryan, Why not use --xml at the end of the command? That will print the output in xml format. Would that make it easy to parse?. Pranith. - Original Message - From: "Bryan Washer" To: "Amar Tumballi" , "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 5:40:16 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peerstatus' I would love thisand would be more than happy to change my current parsing...this would make it A LOT easier to parseas well as easier to see all information on a disconnected peer as the information will be in a single line. Bryan Washer -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Amar Tumballi Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 6:06 AM To: Gluster Devel; gluster-users Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Hi, Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make it more script friendly. For example the current output would look something like: - Hostname: 10.70.36.7 Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.70.36.6 Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) - New changes would make it look like : --- UUID Hostname Status c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected --- If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any response, we will go ahead with the change. Regards, Amar ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose. Any improper use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or destroy all transmitted information. Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third party spam and filtering service. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
hi Amar, This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want to add more fields in future. Pranith. - Original Message - From: "Amar Tumballi" To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Hi, Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make it more script friendly. For example the current output would look something like: - Hostname: 10.70.36.7 Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.70.36.6 Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) - New changes would make it look like : --- UUID Hostname Status c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected --- If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any response, we will go ahead with the change. Regards, Amar ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
I would love thisand would be more than happy to change my current parsing...this would make it A LOT easier to parseas well as easier to see all information on a disconnected peer as the information will be in a single line. Bryan Washer -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Amar Tumballi Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 6:06 AM To: Gluster Devel; gluster-users Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Hi, Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make it more script friendly. For example the current output would look something like: - Hostname: 10.70.36.7 Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.70.36.6 Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) - New changes would make it look like : --- UUID Hostname Status c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected --- If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any response, we will go ahead with the change. Regards, Amar ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose. Any improper use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or destroy all transmitted information. Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third party spam and filtering service ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Failed to get names of volumes
Glusterd holds a cluster wide lock before performing any volume operation requested by cli (excluding 'volume info'). This lock is supposed to be released at the end of the given operation, whether the operation succeeded or not, but it appears that it hasn't in your case. But I don't think you've encountered the bug (843003) mentioned. Could you provide the glusterd logs of the server with the lock still held, so that we can make a diagnosis? - Kaushal On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:15 PM, s19n wrote: > > * s19n [2012 08 27, 17:56]: > > Additional update: seems that the command (and many others) is not > > working because of a 'local lock' being held. > > I think I am hitting the following, so I'll be looking forward the fix: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843003 > > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
[Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status'
Hi, Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make it more script friendly. For example the current output would look something like: - Hostname: 10.70.36.7 Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.70.36.6 Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) - New changes would make it look like : --- UUID Hostname Status c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected --- If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any response, we will go ahead with the change. Regards, Amar ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Failed to get names of volumes
* s19n [2012 08 27, 17:56]: > Additional update: seems that the command (and many others) is not > working because of a 'local lock' being held. I think I am hitting the following, so I'll be looking forward the fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843003 ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] QEMU-GlusterFS native integration demo video
Thanks for sharing it with us Bharata. I saw you have two nodes. Have you done any performance tests and if so how they compare with creating normal .qcow2 or .raw files on the filesystem, specially for the writes ? Thanks Fernando -Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Bharata B Rao Sent: 28 August 2012 05:14 To: gluster-users@gluster.org; gluster-de...@nongnu.org Subject: [Gluster-users] QEMU-GlusterFS native integration demo video Hi, If you are interested and/or curious to know how QEMU can be used to create and boot VM's from GlusterFS volume, take a look at the demo video I have created at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG3kF_djclg Regards, Bharata. -- http://bharata.sulekha.com/blog/posts.htm, http://raobharata.wordpress.com/ ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Ownership changed to root
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:21:57 +0100 Brian Candler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > Again, let me note two things: > > - the current code has a lot more (other) problems than the 2.X tree, that > > is > > why we won't use that. > > - if one has to look at the code to find out the basic problem he is not the > > target person of our question. > > To which I would suggest that if such a fundamental problem were known > about, it would have been fixed long ago. > > IMO your best bet is to raise a bug report in bugzilla. It is obvious I cannot do that because the only answer will be to update to a current version and re-file the report if the problem still persists. I am well aware though that the problem is quite fundamental for a fs... -- Regards, Stephan ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Ownership changed to root
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > Again, let me note two things: > - the current code has a lot more (other) problems than the 2.X tree, that is > why we won't use that. > - if one has to look at the code to find out the basic problem he is not the > target person of our question. To which I would suggest that if such a fundamental problem were known about, it would have been fixed long ago. IMO your best bet is to raise a bug report in bugzilla. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Ownership changed to root
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:43:27 +0100 Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > The gluster version is 2.X and cannot be changed. > > Ah, that's the important bit. If you have a way to replicate the problem > with current code it will be easier to get someone to look at it. Again, let me note two things: - the current code has a lot more (other) problems than the 2.X tree, that is why we won't use that. - if one has to look at the code to find out the basic problem he is not the target person of our question. -- Regards, Stephan ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
