[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
Revision: 14511 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14511&view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2010-05-17 11:37:27 + (Mon, 17 May 2010) Log Message: --- 2010-05-17 13:37 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/include/hbapi.h * harbour/src/vm/dynsym.c + added to C functions: int hb_dynsymToNum( PHB_DYNS pDynSym ); PHB_DYNS hb_dynsymFromNum( int iSymNum ); which can be used to make conversion between dynamic symbols and numbers Modified Paths: -- trunk/harbour/ChangeLog trunk/harbour/include/hbapi.h trunk/harbour/src/vm/dynsym.c This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
Hi, On 2010.05.17 14:37, dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: + added to C functions: int hb_dynsymToNum( PHB_DYNS pDynSym ); PHB_DYNS hb_dynsymFromNum( int iSymNum ); which can be used to make conversion between dynamic symbols and numbers It is interesting, what new code is behind this modifications? :) Remote function/method execution or that? :) Regards, Mindaugas ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: Hi, > On 2010.05.17 14:37, dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > + added to C functions: > > int hb_dynsymToNum( PHB_DYNS pDynSym ); > > PHB_DYNS hb_dynsymFromNum( int iSymNum ); > > which can be used to make conversion between dynamic symbols and > > numbers > It is interesting, what new code is behind this modifications? :) > Remote function/method execution or that? :) Yes. I've wrote inproc OLE server for Harbour and it uses above functions to convert function/method/memvar symbols to DISPID in GetIDsOfNames() dispatch method and they are later converted back to symbols in Invoke() method. I've finished the code but I have no idea if it works or not. I've wrote everything using only documentation in the internet and haven't made any real life test so far so I do not want to make it public it yet. The idea is to create library which can be used by users to easy create own OLE servers. My current code should fully emulate the xHarbour.com ole server API: http://xharbour.com/index.asp?page=add_on_oleserver&show_sub=7&show_i=1 and this is one of the possible usage method. I also plan to add OLE wrappers to HBNETIO so users can use HBNETIO RPC from any other language which supports OLE, i.e. from Visual Basic or some .NET language. best regards, Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
Hi Przemek, >> On 2010.05.17 14:37, dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >>>+ added to C functions: >>> int hb_dynsymToNum( PHB_DYNS pDynSym ); >>> PHB_DYNS hb_dynsymFromNum( int iSymNum ); >>> which can be used to make conversion between dynamic symbols and >>> numbers >> It is interesting, what new code is behind this modifications? :) >> Remote function/method execution or that? :) > > Yes. I've wrote inproc OLE server for Harbour and it uses above > functions to convert function/method/memvar symbols to DISPID in > GetIDsOfNames() dispatch method and they are later converted back > to symbols in Invoke() method. > I've finished the code but I have no idea if it works or not. > I've wrote everything using only documentation in the internet > and haven't made any real life test so far so I do not want to > make it public it yet. > The idea is to create library which can be used by users to > easy create own OLE servers. My current code should fully > emulate the xHarbour.com ole server API: > http://xharbour.com/index.asp?page=add_on_oleserver&show_sub=7&show_i=1 > and this is one of the possible usage method. I also plan to add > OLE wrappers to HBNETIO so users can use HBNETIO RPC from any other > language which supports OLE, i.e. from Visual Basic or some .NET > language. Very nice, count me to those who are eagerly awaiting it. (even if in not yet fully cooked state) Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
Hi, It is interesting, what new code is behind this modifications? :) Remote function/method execution or that? :) Yes. I've wrote inproc OLE server for Harbour and it uses above functions to convert function/method/memvar symbols to DISPID in GetIDsOfNames() dispatch method and they are later converted back to symbols in Invoke() method. I've finished the code but I have no idea if it works or not. I've wrote everything using only documentation in the internet and haven't made any real life test so far so I do not want to make it public it yet. Perhaps one of the most amazing things is how can you write software without testing!!! :) Usualy I can not write more than 30 lines of code without trying to run it. The idea is to create library which can be used by users to easy create own OLE servers. My current code should fully emulate the xHarbour.com ole server API: http://xharbour.com/index.asp?page=add_on_oleserver&show_sub=7&show_i=1 Very old time ago, after I've seen it. It looked a little strange to me. Why the whole application is presented as a single object? This allows to call all public functions from external code. I thought it is more common to create some Harbour level object and share it via OLE server, thus making methods and properties of OLE object to be methods and properties of Harbour object (instead of public functions and memvars of Harbour application). Regards, Mindaugas ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: Hi, > >Yes. I've wrote inproc OLE server for Harbour and it uses above > >functions to convert function/method/memvar symbols to DISPID in > >GetIDsOfNames() dispatch method and they are later converted back > >to symbols in Invoke() method. > >I've finished the code but I have no idea if it works or not. > >I've wrote everything using only documentation in the internet > >and haven't made any real life test so far so I do not want to > >make it public it yet. > Perhaps one of the most amazing things is how can you write software > without testing!!! :) Usualy I can not write more than 30 lines of > code without trying to run it. Probably each of us likes to tests the code anyhow in the past I had to create some bigger peaces of code without any way to make real tests until I finished nearly whole project and believe me it's possible. In this particular case the code is relatively small ~500 lines. The most amazing is the fact that I've just compiled it and executed using WinXP machine in my office and it works correctly without any modifications. I can compile the .PRG client and server example from xHarbour.com OLE server page. I only have to link at least one of components (server or client) statically because both linked dynamically with the same harbour.dll shares the same HVM so server fails inside hb_vmInit(). I can add protection against multiple HVM initialization anyhow using the same HVM for client and server code introduces interactions between them which do not use OLE API, i.e. they will use the same static variables. I'm interesting if it's possible to link both client and sever dynamically with xhbdll.dll using xHarbour.com. If yes and users need it then I can also emulate it. > >The idea is to create library which can be used by users to > >easy create own OLE servers. My current code should fully > >emulate the xHarbour.com ole server API: > >http://xharbour.com/index.asp?page=add_on_oleserver&show_sub=7&show_i=1 > Very old time ago, after I've seen it. It looked a little strange to > me. Why the whole application is presented as a single object? This > allows to call all public functions from external code. I thought it > is more common to create some Harbour level object and share it via > OLE server, thus making methods and properties of OLE object to be > methods and properties of Harbour object (instead of public > functions and memvars of Harbour application). I also think that opening whole HVM is limited only to some rather small subset of possible applications and probably more restrictive servers which make public only some well defined set of methods using object or hash array will be more popular. But it's not my job to force how user will use it. The xHarbour.com compatible interface is only one of possible choices. best regards, Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > Very nice, count me to those who are eagerly awaiting it. > (even if in not yet fully cooked state) Thank you. There are some things which should be added/modified in hbmk2. First is support for .def files. This is .def file I used to link inproc OLE server DLL: EXPORTS DllCanUnloadNow PRIVATE DllGetClassObjectPRIVATE DllUnregisterServer DllRegisterServer DllMain HBMK2 does not support .DEF files and I had to pass it using -dflag parameter: -dflag=olesrv.def but I discovered that HBMK2 ignores parameters specified with *flags= if does not start with "-" so I have to hack above -dflag parameter to: -dflag="-W olesrv.def" Can you recognize .def files and pass them directly to linker? Why HBMK2 ignore -*flag= if params does not start with "-" character? Can you eliminate this restruction? The next thing is building DLL and passing some link time parameters which are used with standalone EXE files. It would be nice if we can have an option to enable support for -gt and similar switches when -hbdyn option is used, i.e. this option can be extended to -hbdyn[vm] and -hbdynvm will enable support for startup options specified in .c temporary file used for normal executable files and also harbour core libraries in inked library list. If only -hbdyn is used then Harbour libraries should nor be linked by default. Do you think it possible to add it? best regards, Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
Hi Przemek, >> Very nice, count me to those who are eagerly awaiting it. >> (even if in not yet fully cooked state) > > Thank you. > There are some things which should be added/modified in hbmk2. > First is support for .def files. > This is .def file I used to link inproc OLE server DLL: > > EXPORTS > DllCanUnloadNow PRIVATE > DllGetClassObjectPRIVATE > DllUnregisterServer > DllRegisterServer > DllMain > > HBMK2 does not support .DEF files and I had to pass it using -dflag > parameter: > -dflag=olesrv.def > but I discovered that HBMK2 ignores parameters specified with > *flags= if does not start with "-" so I have to > hack above -dflag parameter to: > -dflag="-W olesrv.def" > Can you recognize .def files and pass them directly to linker? > Why HBMK2 ignore -*flag= if params does not start with "-" > character? Can you eliminate this restruction? No problem to add support for .def files. I never had to use them so far, so maybe it will need a few iterations to get right. As for flag option, I'd prefer to make the filtering, otherwise it's very easy to deeply mess up some command lines, and can make hbmk2 fall out of control of things. The general concept is that hbmk2 deals with assembling the major components of the cmdline and user user is given a chance to supply additional flags only. Hence the name "-?flag=" and "?flags=" of these options. > The next thing is building DLL and passing some link time parameters > which are used with standalone EXE files. It would be nice if we can > have an option to enable support for -gt and similar switches when > -hbdyn option is used, i.e. this option can be extended to -hbdyn[vm] > and -hbdynvm will enable support for startup options specified in .c > temporary file used for normal executable files and also harbour > core libraries in inked library list. If only -hbdyn is used then > Harbour libraries should nor be linked by default. Do you think it > possible to add it? It seems fine to me. Same applies as above, I'm in the dark about OLE servers, so I'll either ask, or pls tell me what's specifically missing/needed. So far I understand -hbdynvm would disable -nohblib option. Can you help finding out, what's the best 1 description for -hbdynvm mode? -hbdyn is "create dynamic library". Maybe "create dynamic library with Harbour VM"? Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14511] trunk/harbour
Przemysław Czerpak wrote: > modifications. I can compile the .PRG client and server example from > xHarbour.com OLE server page. I only have to link at least one of > components (server or client) statically because both linked dynamically > with the same harbour.dll shares the same HVM so server fails inside > hb_vmInit(). I can add protection against multiple HVM initialization > anyhow using the same HVM for client and server code introduces > interactions between them which do not use OLE API, i.e. they will > use the same static variables. > In OS/2 this is a .dll definition at compile time, that is, INITINSTANCE clause inside .def file which tells the OS that the data segment has to be private for each process that attaches to that .dll. Hope this helps. Maurilio. PS. I'm sorry I haven't tested your serial routines under OS/2 yet, I simply don't have any spare time right now, but they build fine, at least. -- __ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|| farmaconsult s.r.l. ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour