[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=400237=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-400237 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 09/Mar/20 17:17 Start Date: 09/Mar/20 17:17 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on pull request #11079: [BEAM-9288] Update to use vendored gRPC without shaded conscrypt URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11079 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 400237) Time Spent: 6h 50m (was: 6h 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 6h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=400227=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-400227 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 09/Mar/20 16:51 Start Date: 09/Mar/20 16:51 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11079: [BEAM-9288] Update to use vendored gRPC without shaded conscrypt URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11079#issuecomment-596647895 LGTM This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 400227) Time Spent: 6h 40m (was: 6.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 6h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=400209=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-400209 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 09/Mar/20 16:21 Start Date: 09/Mar/20 16:21 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #11079: [BEAM-9288] Update to use vendored gRPC without shaded conscrypt URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11079#issuecomment-596629816 R: @amaliujia Note that the vendored gRPC may have not yet replicated to many maven repos and we may get spurious failures. Watching: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/beam/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0/ This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 400209) Time Spent: 6.5h (was: 6h 20m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 6.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=400208=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-400208 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 09/Mar/20 16:20 Start Date: 09/Mar/20 16:20 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #11079: [BEAM-9288] Update to use vendored gRPC without shaded conscrypt URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11079#issuecomment-596629816 R: @amaliujia Note that the vendored gRPC may have not yet replicated to many maven repos and we may get spurious failures. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 400208) Time Spent: 6h 20m (was: 6h 10m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 6h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=400207=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-400207 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 09/Mar/20 16:19 Start Date: 09/Mar/20 16:19 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on pull request #11079: [BEAM-9288] Update to use vendored gRPC without shaded conscrypt URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11079 Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] [**Choose reviewer(s)**](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-your-change) and mention them in a comment (`R: @username`). - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles`, where you replace `BEAM-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue. - [ ] Update `CHANGES.md` with noteworthy changes. - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf). See the [Contributor Guide](https://beam.apache.org/contribute) for more tips on [how to make review process smoother](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-reviewers-job-easier). Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch) Lang | SDK | Apex | Dataflow | Flink | Gearpump | Samza | Spark --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- Go | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/) Java | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow_Java11/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow_Java11/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=398594=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-398594 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 05/Mar/20 18:39 Start Date: 05/Mar/20 18:39 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on pull request #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 398594) Time Spent: 6h (was: 5h 50m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 6h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=398142=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-398142 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 05/Mar/20 05:19 Start Date: 05/Mar/20 05:19 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049#issuecomment-595034134 @lukecwik all green. Please feel free to merge this PR and start vendored gRPC release. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 398142) Time Spent: 5h 50m (was: 5h 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 5h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=398068=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-398068 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 05/Mar/20 02:02 Start Date: 05/Mar/20 02:02 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049#issuecomment-594988191 Run Python PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 398068) Time Spent: 5h 40m (was: 5.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 5h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=397994=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-397994 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 04/Mar/20 23:55 Start Date: 04/Mar/20 23:55 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049#issuecomment-594946667 Run CommunityMetrics PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 397994) Time Spent: 5.5h (was: 5h 20m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 5.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=397980=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-397980 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 04/Mar/20 23:40 Start Date: 04/Mar/20 23:40 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049#issuecomment-594938392 This PR further excludes conscrypt from vendored grpc jar, which is a subsequent work of https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 397980) Time Spent: 5h 20m (was: 5h 10m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 5h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=397957=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-397957 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 04/Mar/20 23:16 Start Date: 04/Mar/20 23:16 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF/ URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049#issuecomment-594923827 Tested by running ``` jar tvf vendor/grpc-1_26_0/build/libs/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0-0.3.jar | grep conscrypt ``` This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 397957) Time Spent: 5h 10m (was: 5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 5h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=397956=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-397956 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 04/Mar/20 23:16 Start Date: 04/Mar/20 23:16 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on pull request #11049: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor in META-INF/ URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11049 R: @lukecwik @sunjincheng121 Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] [**Choose reviewer(s)**](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-your-change) and mention them in a comment (`R: @username`). - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles`, where you replace `BEAM-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue. - [ ] Update `CHANGES.md` with noteworthy changes. - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf). See the [Contributor Guide](https://beam.apache.org/contribute) for more tips on [how to make review process smoother](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-reviewers-job-easier). Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch) Lang | SDK | Apex | Dataflow | Flink | Gearpump | Samza | Spark --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- Go | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/) Java | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow_Java11/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow_Java11/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=397896=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-397896 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 04/Mar/20 21:15 Start Date: 04/Mar/20 21:15 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-594847927 @sunjincheng121 This PR seems not stop adding conscrypt native libraries as part in META-INF. ``` $ jar tvf beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0-0.3.jar | grep conscrypt 2218176 Mon Sep 17 10:36:24 CEST 2018 META-INF/native/libconscrypt_openjdk_jni-linux-x86_64.so 1720832 Mon Sep 17 10:36:24 CEST 2018 META-INF/native/conscrypt_openjdk_jni-windows-x86.dll 2637496 Mon Sep 17 10:36:24 CEST 2018 META-INF/native/libconscrypt_openjdk_jni-osx-x86_64.dylib 2557952 Mon Sep 17 10:36:24 CEST 2018 META-INF/native/conscrypt_openjdk_jni-windows-x86_64.dll ``` I am not familiar with this part of build system but I am willing to help. Is there a known resolution in your mind that you can share to remove `conscrypt` from META-INF? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 397896) Time Spent: 4h 50m (was: 4h 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 4h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396915=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396915 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:26 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:26 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029#issuecomment-594097214 O actually this is just bumping version so no need to run tests. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396915) Time Spent: 4h 40m (was: 4.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 4h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396914=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396914 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on pull request #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396914) Time Spent: 4.5h (was: 4h 20m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 4.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396911=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396911 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029#issuecomment-594096915 LGTM This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396911) Time Spent: 4h (was: 3h 50m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 4h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396912=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396912 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: robinyqiu commented on issue #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029#issuecomment-594096949 LGTM This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396912) Time Spent: 4h 10m (was: 4h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 4h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396913=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396913 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:25 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029#issuecomment-594097023 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396913) Time Spent: 4h 20m (was: 4h 10m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 4h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396909=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396909 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:22 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:22 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029#issuecomment-594095248 R: @robinyqiu @iemejia @amaliujia This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396909) Time Spent: 3h 50m (was: 3h 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 3h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396908=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396908 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:21 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:21 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029#issuecomment-594095248 R: @robinyqiu @iemejia This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 396908) Time Spent: 3h 40m (was: 3.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 3h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=396907=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-396907 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 03/Mar/20 18:21 Start Date: 03/Mar/20 18:21 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on pull request #11029: [BEAM-9288] Bump version number vendored gRPC build. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11029 Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] [**Choose reviewer(s)**](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-your-change) and mention them in a comment (`R: @username`). - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles`, where you replace `BEAM-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue. - [ ] Update `CHANGES.md` with noteworthy changes. - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf). See the [Contributor Guide](https://beam.apache.org/contribute) for more tips on [how to make review process smoother](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-reviewers-job-easier). Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch) Lang | SDK | Apex | Dataflow | Flink | Gearpump | Samza | Spark --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- Go | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/) Java | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow_Java11/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow_Java11/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/) Python |
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395760=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395760 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 02/Mar/20 03:47 Start Date: 02/Mar/20 03:47 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on pull request #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395760) Time Spent: 3h 20m (was: 3h 10m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 3h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395396=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395396 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 29/Feb/20 04:49 Start Date: 29/Feb/20 04:49 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592871735 Run Java PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395396) Time Spent: 3h 10m (was: 3h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 3h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395323=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395323 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Feb/20 22:50 Start Date: 28/Feb/20 22:50 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592765216 Run Java PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395323) Time Spent: 3h (was: 2h 50m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 3h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395256=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395256 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Feb/20 20:16 Start Date: 28/Feb/20 20:16 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: amaliujia commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592709535 Run Java PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395256) Time Spent: 2h 50m (was: 2h 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 2h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395223=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395223 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Feb/20 19:36 Start Date: 28/Feb/20 19:36 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592691649 Run Python PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395223) Time Spent: 2h 40m (was: 2.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 2h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395176=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395176 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Feb/20 17:25 Start Date: 28/Feb/20 17:25 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592624173 Run Python PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395176) Time Spent: 2.5h (was: 2h 20m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 2.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=395175=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-395175 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Feb/20 17:25 Start Date: 28/Feb/20 17:25 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukecwik commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592623918 Run Java PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 395175) Time Spent: 2h 20m (was: 2h 10m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 2h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=394719=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-394719 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Feb/20 08:28 Start Date: 28/Feb/20 08:28 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-592405805 @lukecwik I have checked that `conscrypt` is only used internally by `ConscryptAlpnSslEngine`, so I agree with you that it should be a runtime dependency. @kennknowles If we change `conscrypt` to runtme dependency, the concern you have will not be a problem any more. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 394719) Time Spent: 2h 10m (was: 2h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 2h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=394532=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-394532 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 27/Feb/20 23:44 Start Date: 27/Feb/20 23:44 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: kennknowles commented on pull request #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#discussion_r385434469 ## File path: buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/VendorJavaPlugin.groovy ## @@ -286,8 +288,23 @@ artifactId=${project.name} pom.withXml { def root = asNode() def dependenciesNode = root.appendNode('dependencies') +def unshaded = { dependency -> + if (dependency instanceof ProjectDependency) { +def groupId = dependency.getDependencyProject().mavenGroupId +def artifactId = dependency.getDependencyProject().archivesBaseName +def version = dependency.version +return config.unshadedDependencies != null && config.unshadedDependencies.contains("$groupId:$artifactId:$version") + } else { +def groupId = dependency.group +def artifactId = dependency.name +def version = dependency.version +return config.unshadedDependencies != null && config.unshadedDependencies.contains("$groupId:$artifactId:$version") Review comment: This does not include the classifier. And since leaving out the classifier is equal to `jar` (I think always?) it is not just a string comparison. Does Gradle utilities have anything to parse the `unshadedDependencies` into `ProjectDependency` objects and then use equality on that object? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 394532) Time Spent: 2h (was: 1h 50m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 2h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391309=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391309 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 23/Feb/20 08:41 Start Date: 23/Feb/20 08:41 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-590045796 R: @lukecwik @kennknowles This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391309) Time Spent: 1h 50m (was: 1h 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391191=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391191 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 17:07 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 17:07 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972650 Run CommunityMetrics PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391191) Time Spent: 1h 40m (was: 1.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391190=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391190 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 17:06 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 17:06 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972718 Run PythonLint PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391190) Time Spent: 1.5h (was: 1h 20m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391189=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391189 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 17:06 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 17:06 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972779 Run Python2_PVR_Flink PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391189) Time Spent: 1h 20m (was: 1h 10m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391184=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391184 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 16:30 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 16:30 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972718 Run PythonLint PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391184) Time Spent: 1h (was: 50m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391185=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391185 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 16:30 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 16:30 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972779 Run Python2_PVR_Flink PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391185) Time Spent: 1h 10m (was: 1h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391182=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391182 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 16:29 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 16:29 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972650 Run CommunityMetrics PreCommit This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391182) Time Spent: 50m (was: 40m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391179=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391179 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 16:28 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 16:28 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972337 R: @kennknowles @lukecwik This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391179) Time Spent: 40m (was: 0.5h) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391178=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391178 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 16:27 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 16:27 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940#issuecomment-589972337 R: @kennknowles @lukecwik This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 391178) Time Spent: 0.5h (was: 20m) > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system >Reporter: Esun Kim >Assignee: sunjincheng >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=391177=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-391177 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 22/Feb/20 16:24 Start Date: 22/Feb/20 16:24 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on pull request #10940: [BEAM-9288] Not bundle conscrypt in gRPC vendor URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10940 Exclude conscrypt from the vendored grpc for now, more detail of discussion can be found in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288. Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch) Lang | SDK | Apex | Dataflow | Flink | Gearpump | Samza | Spark --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- Go | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/) Java | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/) Python | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python2/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python2/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python35/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python35/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python36/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python36/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python37/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Python37/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Py_VR_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Py_VR_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build
[jira] [Work logged] (BEAM-9288) Conscrypt shaded dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?focusedWorklogId=385136=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-385136 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9288: Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 11/Feb/20 13:37 Start Date: 11/Feb/20 13:37 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: stankiewicz commented on pull request #10829: [BEAM-9288] Upload graph option in dataflow's python sdk URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10829 Added support for upload_graph option in dataflow's python sdk. Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] [**Choose reviewer(s)**](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-your-change) and mention them in a comment (`R: @username`). - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles`, where you replace `BEAM-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue. - [ ] Update `CHANGES.md` with noteworthy changes. - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf). See the [Contributor Guide](https://beam.apache.org/contribute) for more tips on [how to make review process smoother](https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#make-reviewers-job-easier). Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch) Lang | SDK | Apex | Dataflow | Flink | Gearpump | Samza | Spark --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- Go | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/) | --- | --- | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/) Java | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Apex/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Dataflow/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Streaming/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Gearpump/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Samza/lastCompletedBuild/) | [![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Spark/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Spark_Batch/lastCompletedBuild/)[![Build Status](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/badge/icon)](https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/lastCompletedBuild/) Python | [![Build