Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp
I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963 And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between each "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like something that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else would always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you could correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.) Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it does/doesn't belong? John =:-> -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
Re: Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp
+1 Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel : > I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963 > > And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have > some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between each > "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like something > that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else would > always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you could > correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.) > > Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it > does/doesn't belong? > > John > =:-> > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
Re: Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp
Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > +1 > > Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel > : >> >> I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963 >> >> And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have >> some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between each >> "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like something >> that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else would >> always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you could >> correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.) >> >> Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it >> does/doesn't belong? >> >> John >> =:-> >> >> -- >> Juju-dev mailing list >> Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
Re: Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp
I'm also +1 on a timestamp. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Jason Hobbs wrote: > Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate. > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel > > : > >> > >> I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug: > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963 > >> > >> And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have > >> some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between > each > >> "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like > something > >> that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else > would > >> always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you > could > >> correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.) > >> > >> Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it > >> does/doesn't belong? > >> > >> John > >> =:-> > >> > >> -- > >> Juju-dev mailing list > >> Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > > > > > -- > > Juju-dev mailing list > > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev