[j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
Hello, I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e. I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to know the VLANs my customer is sending me. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
Hi, I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I did something similar on an SRX: - user@router show configuration interfaces fe-0/0/6 mtu 1800; encapsulation ethernet-ccc; unit 0; - This a pseudowire carrying a dot1q trunk. I suspect the config on an EX will be the same, but as I've said, I've only tried on SRX. Alex ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
It's probably easier to use QinQ. Doug -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. Crocker Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:08 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches Hello, I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e. I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to know the VLANs my customer is sending me. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
Can the MX80 handle QinQ? Can I run QinQ for this customer and MPLS in my 10GigE core? I don't think the EX 4200 can do that. If I wanted to stay MPLS would I need to configure each vlan on the customer interface and map it to a unqiue CCC to the other end (EX4200-MX80 MX80-EX4200)? - Original Message - From: Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net To: Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches It's probably easier to use QinQ. Doug -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. Crocker Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:08 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches Hello, I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e. I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to know the VLANs my customer is sending me. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
We've used EX4200s as 10Gig customer demarc in a few situations and
do just that. Q-in-Q on the EX4200 customer port so you don't care
what VLANs the cust is sending, trunk port out to your MX80, and use
'input-vlan-map pop' with something like 'encapsulation vlan-ccc' on
the MX80 to remove the outer tag. Not sure what you're planning to do
on the MX80, but we dump ours into customer-specific L2VPNs. I don't
have EX4200 configs handy, but your MX80 interface side might
resemble:
[edit interfaces xe-y/y/y]
snip MTU, autoneg, etc stuff
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit QinQtag { # Unit number is arbitrary, but keep it simple
and match the VLAN ID if you can.
vlan-id QinQtag;
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
input-vlan-map pop;
output-vlan-map push;
}
HTH,
David
On 17 July 2011 13:02, Matthew S. Crocker matt...@corp.crocker.com wrote:
Can the MX80 handle QinQ?
Can I run QinQ for this customer and MPLS in my 10GigE core? I don't think
the EX 4200 can do that.
If I wanted to stay MPLS would I need to configure each vlan on the customer
interface and map it to a unqiue CCC to the other end (EX4200-MX80
MX80-EX4200)?
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net
To: Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
It's probably easier to use QinQ.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S.
Crocker
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:08 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
Hello,
I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200
switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s
and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the
docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It
isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e.
I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can
I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across
my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to
know the VLANs my customer is sending me.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
The MX probably has the best support for QinQ I've seen. -Original Message- From: Matthew S. Crocker [mailto:matt...@corp.crocker.com] Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 12:02 PM To: Doug Hanks Cc: Matthew S. Crocker; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches Can the MX80 handle QinQ? Can I run QinQ for this customer and MPLS in my 10GigE core? I don't think the EX 4200 can do that. If I wanted to stay MPLS would I need to configure each vlan on the customer interface and map it to a unqiue CCC to the other end (EX4200-MX80 MX80-EX4200)? - Original Message - From: Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net To: Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches It's probably easier to use QinQ. Doug -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. Crocker Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:08 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches Hello, I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e. I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to know the VLANs my customer is sending me. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
You can create a ccc based on port and just everything that comes in the port to the other end regardless of vlan or encapsulation. There is also no mac learning to worry about. This in my experience is easier to manage than q-in-q which requires mac learning and spanning-tree. The down side is that each port requires a dedicated LSP, so 48 ports would create 48 new LSP's between the two devices. I'm not sure what the LSP limitations are but I would assume it's pretty high. 2011/7/17 Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com Hello, I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e. I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to know the VLANs my customer is sending me. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
