Re: Building kernel with fedpkg and custom config
Excellent suggestion, and I'd like to contribute, but I'm still something of a novice and apart from small suggestions like the above, I doubt I currently have much to contribute for real world practical application, so I haven't bothered to get a FAS account. (to be honest I don't even know what a FAS account is, just assuming it's related to the fedora project website and wiki) But perhaps one day... perhaps someone could hire me to spend my time to go over documentation, test recipes and improve upon them to make life easier for developers, packagers, testers, and end users. ;-) regards, ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Building kernel with fedpkg and custom config
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, wrote: > > Hi Laura, > > Thanks for the reply, and indeed it works like a charm when I put that > #x86_64 header in the config file, likewise the kernel-local file also works > perfectly, when I keep the header in the file. > > One of the very few things I didn't try... > > I would suggest updating the wiki to reflect this. and avoid stupid questions > like this again. ;-) It's a wiki. If you have a FAS account, you can contribute by updating it yourself :). josh > "If adding configuration options to the kernel-local file remember to keep > the original header" or something like that. > > However I stumbled upon another issue, when trying a "make localyesconfig" > fedpgk fails with the message that "modules.list" is empty, which isn't > surprising if it's supposed to be built without modules. > > Thanks again. > regards > > ___ > kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Building kernel with fedpkg and custom config
Hi Laura, Thanks for the reply, and indeed it works like a charm when I put that #x86_64 header in the config file, likewise the kernel-local file also works perfectly, when I keep the header in the file. One of the very few things I didn't try... I would suggest updating the wiki to reflect this. and avoid stupid questions like this again. ;-) "If adding configuration options to the kernel-local file remember to keep the original header" or something like that. However I stumbled upon another issue, when trying a "make localyesconfig" fedpgk fails with the message that "modules.list" is empty, which isn't surprising if it's supposed to be built without modules. Thanks again. regards ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
