Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply doesn´t work...
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:32, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:02, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10 > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > blubber bleh silly me. I implemented ipcalc.pl in my brain now ;) hmm, now what: setting up that script gives me a default route to the 1st providers default gateway and all traffic is going through that gateway (1st provider) and the 2nd isn't touched in any way. Any idea about it? -- ciao, Marc ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply doesn´t work...
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:02, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10 > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument blubber bleh silly me. I implemented ipcalc.pl in my brain now ;) -- ciao, Marc ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply doesn´t work...
On Thursday 26 August 2004 15:06, Marcos Schonfeld wrote:
Hi Marcos,
> ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table 10
> ip route add default via $P1 table 10
> ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2 table 20
> ip route add default via $P2 table 20
>
> ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 # This may be not necessary
> ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2 # This may be not necessary
>
> ## ip route add default via $P1 ## You don't have to set this default
> gw, because you'll be routing accross this gateway instead of doing
> load-balance
>
> ip rule add from $IP1 table T1
> ip rule add from $IP2 table T2
shouldn't this be table 10 and table 20? :)
anyway, I have a problem settings this up. I get:
ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
ip route add default via 212.71.142.209 table 10
ip route add 61.212.57.152/29 dev eth2 src 61.212.57.152 table 20
ip route add default via 61.212.57.153 table 20
ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
ip route add 61.212.57.152/29 dev eth2 src 61.212.57.152
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
ip rule add from 212.71.142.210 table 10
ip rule add from 61.212.57.152 table 20
strace from 1st RTNETLINK invalid argument:
controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 36
dup(2) = 4
fcntl64(4, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE)
fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 0), ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x4b3ed000
_llseek(4, 0, 0xb8526df0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
write(4, "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argum"..., 36) = 36
close(4)= 0
munmap(0x4b3ed000, 4096)= 0
brk(0)
any idea what I am doing wrong?
Thanks alot.
--
ciao, Marc
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Dual Internet Connection
On Thursday 26 August 2004 15:07, Marcos Schonfeld wrote: Hi Marcos, > Try http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html > I think this is the solution. perfect :-) Thank you. -- ciao, Marc ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Dual Internet Connection
Hi all, I have two internet connections, both connected to eth0 and eth1, one is 1mbit, the other one is 3mbit. Now I want to use _both_ at one time via round robin or such. Anyone have an idea/docu how to set that up? Thanks in advance. -- ciao, Marc ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] IMQ patch for 2.6.3 kernel
On Friday 05 March 2004 16:12, Andre Correa wrote: Hi Andre, > Sorry, but the patch is not broken. It compiles without errors. You just > have to choose the right options in your config: > CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_IMQ=y > and > CONFIG_IMQ=y > and avoid using modules. which is, in short words, broken :p ciao, Marc ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] IMQ patch for 2.6.3 kernel
On Friday 05 March 2004 00:00, The Codrinus wrote:
Hi Codrin,
> I downloaded the latest imq patch for 2.6.x kernels from
> http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.6.2-imq-4.diff
> I successfully applied the patch but when compiling IMQ I get the
> following error messages:
> What might be the problem ?
that patch is b0rked. Use attached one.
--
ciao, Marc
# 2.6.3-WOLK1.1
# Patch from: http://www.linuximq.net/
# Build fixes: me
diff -urN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/Kconfig linux-2.6.new/drivers/net/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/Kconfig 2004-01-21 19:33:36.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/net/Kconfig 2004-01-25 15:08:20.0 +0100
@@ -85,6 +85,20 @@
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
will be called eql. If unsure, say N.
+config IMQ
+ tristate "IMQ (intermediate queueing device) support"
+ depends on NETDEVICES && NETFILTER
+ ---help---
+ The imq device(s) is used as placeholder for QoS queueing disciplines.
+ Every packet entering/leaving the ip stack can be directed through
+ the imq device where it's enqueued/dequeued to the attached qdisc.
+ This allows you to treat network devices as classes and distribute
+ bandwidth among them. Iptables is used to specify through which imq
+ device, if any, packets travel.
+
+ To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+ will be called imq. If unsure, say N.
+
config TUN
tristate "Universal TUN/TAP device driver support"
depends on NETDEVICES
diff -urN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/Makefile linux-2.6.new/drivers/net/Makefile
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/Makefile 2004-01-21 19:33:36.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/net/Makefile 2004-01-25 15:08:20.0 +0100
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_DUMMY) += dummy.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IMQ) += imq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DE600) += de600.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DE620) += de620.o
obj-$(CONFIG_AT1500) += lance.o
diff -urN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/imq.c linux-2.6.new/drivers/net/imq.c
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/imq.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/net/imq.c 2004-01-25 15:08:51.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+/*
+ * Pseudo-driver for the intermediate queue device.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * Authors:Patrick McHardy, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ *
+ * The first version was written by Martin Devera, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ *
+ * Credits:Jan Rafaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * - Update patch to 2.4.21
+ * Sebastian Strollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * - Fix "Dead-loop on netdevice imq"-issue
+ * Marcel Sebek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * - Update to 2.6.2-rc1
+ */
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined (CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
+#include
+#endif
+#include
+#include
+
+static nf_hookfn imq_nf_hook;
+
+static struct nf_hook_ops imq_ingress_ipv4 = {
+ .hook = imq_nf_hook,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pf = PF_INET,
+ .hooknum = NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING,
+ .priority = NF_IP_PRI_MANGLE + 1
+};
+
+static struct nf_hook_ops imq_egress_ipv4 = {
+ .hook = imq_nf_hook,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pf = PF_INET,
+ .hooknum = NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+ .priority = NF_IP_PRI_LAST
+};
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined (CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
+static struct nf_hook_ops imq_ingress_ipv6 = {
+ .hook = imq_nf_hook,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pf = PF_INET6,
+ .hooknum = NF_IP6_PRE_ROUTING,
+ .priority = NF_IP6_PRI_MANGLE + 1
+};
+
+static struct nf_hook_ops imq_egress_ipv6 = {
+ .hook = imq_nf_hook,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pf = PF_INET6,
+ .hooknum = NF_IP6_POST_ROUTING,
+ .priority = NF_IP6_PRI_LAST
+};
+#endif
+
+static unsigned int numdevs = 2;
+
+module_param(numdevs, int, 0);
+
+static struct net_device *imq_devs;
+
+
+static struct net_device_stats *imq_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+}
+
+/* called for packets kfree'd in qdiscs at places other than enqueue */
+static void imq_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct nf_info *info = skb->nf_info;
+
+ if (info) {
+ if (info->indev)
+ dev_put(info->indev);
+ if (info->outdev)
+ dev_put(info->outdev);
+ kfree(info);
+ }
+}
+
+static int imq_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats*) dev->priv;
+
+ stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
+ stats->tx_packets++;
+
+ skb->imq_flags = 0;
+ skb->destructor = NULL;
+
+ dev->trans_start = jiffies;
+ nf_reinject(skb, skb->nf_info, NF_ACCEPT);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int imq_nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_info *info,
+ vo
Re: [LARTC] Kernel config for HTB
On Friday 22 November 2002 18:00, Benjamin Goedeke wrote: Hi Benjamin, > tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1:0 htb default 5 > all I get is > HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 > HTB: need tc/htb version 3 (minor is 7), you have 10 > "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument" wrong tc version :) > Can anyone please point me to the relevant section in menuconfig to > enable the CONFIG_*NETLINK options CONFIG_NETLINK does not exist anylonger on any 2.4 kernel. 2.2 have this config option. Download this: http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz extract it, you'll see a "tc" binary. Do a "mv ./tc /sbin" and try the above again and you'll see that it works :) ... That binary has the needed patches for tc already applied to use HTB. have fun :) -- Kind regards Marc-Christian Petersen http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16 Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16 Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] HTB on 2.4.20pre10 kernel
On Sunday 13 October 2002 02:13, Ethy H. Brito wrote:
Hi Ethy,
> (tchtb is the tc program I downloaded from HTB home page - I renamed it so
> I can have both tc's - currently I use iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try -
> don't know if it already supports HTB)
wrong.
Download: http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz
and use the tc binary in it.
--
Kind regards
Marc-Christian Petersen
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] HTB
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:55, Rimas wrote: Hi Rimas, > I tried the "patch -p1 --dry-run ./htb3.6_2.4.17.diff" but nothing > happened, no error message, nothing. err, you forget < ! Look carefully to what I've posted :) root@codeman:[/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-vanilla] # patch -p1 --dry-run < htb2_2.4.17.diff patching file net/sched/Config.in patching file net/sched/Makefile patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h patching file net/sched/sch_api.c -- Kind regards Marc-Christian Petersen http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16 Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16 Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] HTB
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:12, Rimas wrote:
Hi Rimas,
> How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?
patching? :)
If you wanna try 3.6 code, download the tgz, untargzip it (tar xzpf) and
you'll see a diff/patch. Just "patch -p1 --dry-run < patchname" and see if it
succeed, if, leave out --dry-run, if not, fix the errors. If you have
questions when errors occur, don't hesitate to ask.
for HTB2 code, just download the patch and follow the same as above (patch -p1
...)
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
--
Kind regards
Marc-Christian Petersen
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] [htb3] patch errors on 2.4.19mdk
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 21:52, raptor wrote: Hi Raptor, > When I apply HTB3 paches to 2.4.19 (mandrake kernel) I get this : > (NO to all questions) > --- >- [root@qos test]# patch -p1 -b patching file net/sched/Config.in > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sched/Config.in.rej > patching file net/sched/Makefile > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sched/Makefile.rej > patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c > patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file > include/linux/pkt_sched.h.rej patching file net/sched/sch_api.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1205 with fuzz 2. > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej > patching file lib/Makefile > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/Makefile.rej > patching file lib/rbtree.c > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/rbtree.c.rej > patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file > include/net/pkt_sched.h.rej > --- hmm, maybe htb is already in the mdk kernel? anyway, you should patch with "patch -p1 --dry-run < patchname" FIRST, before applying and see if it succeed. -- Kind regards Marc-Christian Petersen http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16 Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16 Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
