[Leaf-user] George Metz' 2.4.3 image
Howdy all- I recently started toying with the idea of deploying a LEAF based firewall/VPN in our colo after I saw Exodus wants $4000/mo. for a "managed" Cisco Pix. I figure LEAF probably can save me some of that $48,000. So my questions revolve around the possibilities of using 2.4.3+ kernels in production and how exactly I get custom built kernels to boot. I would like to use a 2.4 kernel because I want the functionality of iptables, especially one-to-one NAT (what's that, static NAT?) for my production environment. I have an LRP 2.9.8 router (2.2.18) here at the corporate office, but it took me some while to get port forwarding working to my satisfaction (actually it was screwing around with BIND for an internal DNS, but then Jacques Nilo came out with the wonderful Tinydns package, hats off to you). So knowing that 2.4 kernels are definitely experimental, I grabbed George Metz' 2.4.3 distribution of his site and booted it up. It booted up fine (though I had issues with the newest syslinux, had to use 1.54 instead of 1.62), but it doesn't include IDE support (unless I totally missed something), so I can't mount and configure my HDD to boot off of... I didn't see any modules that looked like they provided IDE support and I thought that IDE was not a modularizable feature to begin with. Do I have this wrong? In hopes that I could do better myself, I compiled a 2.4.5 kernel off my Redhat 7.1 box and made it as a bzipped image... I replaced the 2.4.3 kernel with the new one and I get as far as "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel" when it stalls. The kernel I built with initrd support and ramdisk support in hopes of using it with LEAF... What I don't know is if I compressed right (should I have included UPX support?). I read through the LEAF-devel guide, but this 2.4.3 distro looked to be using gcc 2.95? So I figured that I should be able to kernel compile on my RH7.1 box. Somebody please straighten me out! Thanks again... Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Write protected flash memory
Hey all- I have been trying to figure out if write-protecting CF or PCMCIA flash memory when mated to a CF/PCMCIA-to-IDE converter is possible and I have found some interesting stuff, but I am not technically proficient enough to decode it... So perhaps someone out there on the list could help me with this? This is from http://copper.he.net/~whiteedc/pdf/ATA10.pdf and it describes the function of the "write protect" pin (33) for PCMCIA ATA flash: Write Protect, 16 bit I/O port: In memory mode, WP i s hel d low: always writable). In I/O mode , IOIS16# is asserted low when Task File Registers are accessed in 16 bit mode. In True IDE mOde this signal i s asserted low when this device i s expecting a word data transfer cy cle. From my understanding, the last mode, True IDE, is what we would want to use for our LEAF boxes as it allows the card to look and act like an IDE drive. So what I would like to know is if pin 33 is held high (and I have a very weak idea of what that means) and the card is in True IDE mode, what exactly will that do? i.e. what the heck is a word data transfer cycle and what happens if we block it? I am thinking that if pulling this pin high we can disable writes, then a modification can be done to the CF/PCMCIA-2-IDE adapters to enable/disable writes via a switch mounted on the front of the LEAF box. Or another possibility is to use these cards in mode 1, memory mode, which seems to fully support write-protect. But I don't know if there is kernel/bootloader support for this mode of flash. This company does make PCMCIA flash cards with *hardware* write protect switches on them, but I haven't been able to get a hold of them to find out who they resell these through. http://copper.he.net/~whiteedc/pcmcia/pcmcia_flash.php (look under Features section). Would anyone else be interested in these flash cards with write-protect switches on them? Or am I barking up the wrong tree here? Searching for a boot medium greater than the sum of two floppies ;) Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
RE: [Leaf-user] Write protected flash memory
Charles- CS>If anyone knows of a CF or PCMCIA flash card with a physical write-protect CS>switch, please let the rest of us know. I have sitting in front of me an Intel 20 meg PCMCIA flash card that has a write protect switch on it. I pulled it out of a Cisco 5000, it says "FLASH Intel Series 2+" on the front side, on the back it is stamped with the following: iMC020FLSP-15/25-S M7320011 . When I popped it into a Win98 laptop here at work I got nothing after trying drivers for both Series 1 and Series 2 Memory Technology Devices (as per windows, they were the only drivers). It detected the card as a "MTD-A089". A google search and microsoft knowledgebase search on this returned nothing. I have no experience with PCMCIA or flash memory, so my inepituted is showing through here. I can't sacrifice the laptop to a linux install (the marketing folk would kill me for playing with "their" laptop), so does anyone have any idea how to test this bugger out in win98? I did a quick search on ebay and it looks like there are plenty of these cards floating around, even an 8meg card would suffice if the write protect actually does work! TIA, Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
RE: [Leaf-user] Write protected flash memory
Luis + et al.- >The PCMCIA flash card you have is unusable as a boot device. >I had several of those also from Cisco routers but until now I had no >success using them. I did some research this morning and I have been able to reformat and use one of these Intel cards as a regular drive (under Win98). Also the good news is that the hardware write-protect switch *DOES* work. What I did to get this bad boy working under win98 is as follows: 1)downloaded TrueFFS from http://www.pretec.com/ftp/TrueFFS-9x.zip (this is probably an illegal and very old version, so you might want to try going to http://www.m-sys.com to see if you can download a newer copy there.) 2)followed the install directions provided 3)used the DOS TFORMAT utility, or use the windows shell integrated Flash disk format command and format it... I don't know much about trying to boot off of this device as I don't have a PCMCIA to IDE adapter (do these exist? similar to CF->IDE except for pin-outs), so I don't know if you can force the device into the IDE compatible mode automatically on power up. But if you could then I think this document might help us understand how to prepare it for booting ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/cvs/mtd/mtd-jffs-HOWTO.txt I am still reading through this article but if anyone has any insights, I would love to hear them! The main Linux-MTD page is located at: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/ Thanks again, Zack P.S. I think that I may be confusing ATA-Flash with some other kind of flash memory, but please help straighten me out if I am... This may be obvious to some, but I am new to the flash memory, PCMCIA, all that crap... ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
RE: [Leaf-user] Write protected flash memory <-SUCCESS!
I really have to cut back on the coffee and concentrate on what I am writing... I apologize to the list for the barrage of messages, but this is pretty much the only thing preventing me from dropping a Cisco PIX purchase in favor of a LEAF box (storage space that is). As soon as I dashed off that last email in my excitement, I realized that if you could push the card into TrueIDE mode, then you could simply format it as an MSDOS partition and syslinux it, then everything else would be a standard LEAF install. The only PCMCIA adapter that I was able to find was from EMJ embedded, the 3.5" mounting kit, floppy style, is $80 (http://www.emjembedded.com/products/solidstate/ata.html part no. 1sdda01), and I haven't been able to find a retailer who carries flash ATA cards with the write-protect switch on them. A quick check on Ebay for "cisco flash card" turned up some 8meg and 6meg cards, but you'd have to check with the seller about whether or not they have the write protect switch. Some one might want to check with the big boys (Kingston, Sandisk and the like) to see if they have such cards in production. Anyhow, my converter has been ordered, so hopefully I will have good news soon! Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] DAC960.o module needed
Howdy all- I need the module for a DAC960 SCSI RAID card (Mylex Acceleraid 250) for kernel 2.2.16 (I'm running lrp2.9.8). Does anyone have this module that they can send me? Or know of anyplace that I can download it? I don't have a 2.2.16 box around to compile on and I need this for my LRP disaster recovery disk. Thanks again, Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Iptables issues
Hey all- A quick question about iptables... My FW is running a 2.4.5 kernel and iptables. I've been doing benchmarking on the web farm behind the FW and I have been hitting some limit with the ip_conntrack module... I get the following error: >ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet Where can I adjust the table size and what is the max of the table? When I boot I get the following: >ip_conntrack (1014 buckets, 8112 max) So I assume that I have to up the max for the hash table. Any ideas, or suggestions? Thanks again, Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Dachstein, Bearing, and DHCP
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 15:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings, > Last week I tried Bearing. It worked fine for about a day, > then (when the previous lease expired?) my windows98 machine > was assigned a local network address in the 169.-.-. range. > The standard Bearing release evidently does not support DHCP > for the local network. I forgot to go back and reconfigure > the win machine not to use DHCP. Evidently, if windows is > configured for DHCP and does not find a DHCP server, it auto > assigns IP addresses. Just another of those 'special' > features that is not well documented and causes confusion. > Actually, that 169.x.x.x address is part of the DHCP RFC. So it's not windows being stupid again, it's just doing what it should. > Thanks in advance, > Frank Kamp > DHCP is nice because you can update your DNS cache servers or whatever and not have to go and log into 5 different machines to change the settings. Makes it easy when a friend comes over and wants to plug in their laptop. Z signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Leaf-user] motherboard with no vid card
www.soekris.com Z DC On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 12:41, Bernie Berg wrote: > howdy... I'd like to make a minimalistic "network appliance" looking bearing >firewall box... Is there a motherboard out there that will boot without a video >card? since after the load all that would be needed is a network or serial >connection... > > thanks for the info > > bernie > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [leaf-user] WISP and orinoco wireless?
Vladimir- Is there a problem with PLX based cards? Just wondering because I picked up a set of USR prism based cards with PLX PCI adapters (model 2445, $80 for two, one with an external antenna on a 4ft extension, from TigerDirect) with the intention of using them with WISP. I was going to start working on the node tonight, but would greatly appreciate any tips for working with these cards. Thanks, Zack On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 09:24, Vladimir I. wrote: > > Do you know if this card utilizes something like PLX adapter or has an > PCMCIA-PCI bridge? > > Basicly, please tell the model of the card. > --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] IDE install with linux?
Hello all- I am having a rather baffling problem with installing WISP/Bearing on to a 1.0G IDE harddrive. The funny thing is, I can get the drive to work if I partition it and format it in Windows, but I can't get it to work if I do the same in linux. Here's what I am doing in linux: 1)fdisk /dev/hda 2)add 50MB FAT16 (type 6) partition as /dev/hda1 3)toggle bootable flag to true on /dev/hda1 4)use mkdosfs to create a FAT16 file system on the /dev/hda1 5)syslinux /dev/hda1 (using v1.52, also tried the -s option to no avail) 6)mount partition to /wisp (mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /wisp) 7)unzip wisp-dist_2290_pkg_wdist.zip to /wisp 8)edit /wisp/syslinux.cfg 9)install disk in router box and boot it, but it never finds the MBR that syslinux should have installed (right?)... It just sits there saying "Invalid media or replace system disk" (or whatever that error says). The destination box is a Dell XPS P200s with 32MB, and I've installed full distros on this box (and drive) before without any issues. I know that I must be missing something totally obvious, but I can't figure it out. At this point it's purely academic, as I can get it to work when installed under windows, but being that I don't run windows any more (had to take over a coworkers box to do it) it's a matter of pride that I can get it to work under Linux ;) Thanks, Zack --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: IDE install with linux?
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 10:08, Zachariah Mully wrote: > Hello all- > I am having a rather baffling problem with installing WISP/Bearing on > to a 1.0G IDE harddrive. The funny thing is, I can get the drive to work > if I partition it and format it in Windows, but I can't get it to work Well, I ended up using Free FDISK to put a DOS MBR on the drive, as I couldn't get the win98 fdisk to put a new MBR on the hard drive (strange). It works so I now have other problems to address now like why WISP refuses to set my prism card in master mode, but no magical syslinux incantations would get the box to boot syslinux's supposed MBR that it installs. Oh well. Chalk it up to BillG and the hard drive kieretsu's. Thanks for all the suggestions... Z --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Re: IDE install with linux?
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:57, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > 2) If you are running from a windows 95/98 startup disk, you have to run > 'lock' to allow low-level access to the hard drive. If you do not do > this, syslinux will be unable to install the boot loader on the hard > disk, and you will be unable to boot. You can skip this step if you are > running a 'real' version of dos instead of a windows startup disk. I knew that was the case when running windows (perhaps also the reason why the win98 fdisk that I copied on to a win98 boot floppy refused to /MBR the hdd), but the original problem was why the linux version of syslinux when installed on the hdd wouldn't boot it... I don't run windows anymore (switched my desktop to Redhat, Gnome and evolution about a year ago) so breaking my Windowsless streak sucked ;) Z --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Where to get PrismII w/ Dongle?
Jason- I am not sure what type of connector it has but the USRobotics kit 2445 contains two PLX PCI adapter boards and two Prism based PCMCIA cards, one with an internal antenna for either desktop or laptop and the other with an antenna jack and a magnetic rubber ducky antenna on a 4 ft lead. The kit is $80 at TigerDirect.com. Other than having to load the hostap_plx module (in WISP) and do some funky device renaming (WISP expects the wireless interfaces to be named netcsX whereas in my experience wifi cards are usually named wlanX), they work fine with LEAF/WISP/Linux. I'd be interested to know what type of connector they use, it's small (has to fit in the thickness of a PCMCIA card) and snaps in, it's not a screw in. Z On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 14:07, Jason C. Leach wrote: > hi, > > > Does anyone know of a wireless card based on PrismII that > accepts an external antenna (dongle)? > > Thanks, > j. > > -- > .. > . Jason C. Leach > .. > > Current PGP/GPG Key ID: 43AD2024 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Where to get PrismII w/ Dongle?
Oops, forgot the link: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?sku=u13-4052 Z On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 14:07, Jason C. Leach wrote: > hi, > > > Does anyone know of a wireless card based on PrismII that > accepts an external antenna (dongle)? > > Thanks, > j. > > -- > .. > . Jason C. Leach > .. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ne.o
You need to get the ns8390 module as well as the ne module. Doing the same, adding an old ISA AT/LANTIC card to my WISP box. If the Addtron is ISA, then you'll need to know the io address and IRQ, check www.scyld.com/diag for programs to help. Z On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 17:15, Webmaster - Mars Society wrote: > Bering RC3 > Added an Addtron AE-200 (NE2000 clone) to my existing natsemi team of 4 > NIC's. > Included ne.o from the Bering RC3 site in my modules lib and file. > > Insmod reports Unresolved Symbols upon boot-up (ei-open, ehterdev_init, > ei-interrupt, NS8390_Init and ei-close) > > Is there a different version available? > > Thank you, > harold miller > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by NW.NET's MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] WISP and Prism based PLX cards problems
Hello all- I am struggling to get my WISP (v.2290) AP up and running, I was hoping to have it done today (DSL router came today, woohoo!) but I am definitely missing a key part of the setup entirely. Here's the issue. I am using a USR 2445 PLX based PCI adapter with a USR prism2 based PCMCIA card. When I insert the hostap_plx module, it correctly finds the card and configures it as wlan0. Following the instructions in previous post about this device name problem with WISP, I added the following to my /etc/init.d/networking script: echo eth1 > /tmp/newname.wlan0 ip link set wlan0 name eth1 before the call to "ifup -a" in the "start)" case. The renaming works, so that now I can config eth1 through wdistconfig, but I can't get the wireless configs to stick (i.e. ESSID,channel,rate, etc.). From looking at the directory /etc/network, it would appear that these parameters are set by the wireless-start script which reads from the config file "wireless.config". For the life of me I can't 1)find what calls the wireless-start script in the startup routine and 2) how the device renaming that this script does works in my setup. To run the wireless-start, I first have to disable the interface: wisprouter: -root- $ ip link show 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: dummy0: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:90:d1:06:19:a7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:60:b0:a4:ba:db brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff wisprouter: -root- $ ip link set eth1 down wisprouter: -root- $ ./wireless-start eth1 RTNETLINK answers: File exists wisprouter: -root- $ ip link show 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: dummy0: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: netcs: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:90:d1:06:19:a7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:60:b0:a4:ba:db brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff wisprouter: -root- $ iwconfig netcs netcs IEEE 802.11-DS ESSID:"test" Mode:Master Frequency:2.422GHz Access Point: 00:90:D1:06:19:A7 Bit Rate:2Mb/s Tx-Power:0 dBm Sensitivity=1/3 Retry min limit:8 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:off Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0 Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 (^ are the default options for the card, the ESSID should be "zack") Can anyone offer some insight into this? I am sure that I am not the only person to be running a PLX card and WISP. Thanks, Z --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] WISP-DIST hostap_plx issues
Hello all- I am having a strange issue with my Prism 2.5 card (USR 2445)... Unfortunately my WISP box is sufficiently fubar'ed that it really didn't provide much good diagnostic information, so I threw it into my RH7.3 box and got the following: hermes.c: 16 Jan 2002 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> orinoco.c 0.09b (David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others) orinoco_plx.c 0.09b (Daniel Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) orinoco_plx: CIS: 5201:CA03:5600:F800:85FF:C817:2A04:8A67:7C5A:CE08:7EFF:801D:A505:C603:E567:C85A: orinoco_plx: Local Interrupt already enabled Detected Orinoco/Prism2 PLX device at 00:0d.0 irq:9, io addr:0xf080 eth1: Station identity 001f:0009:0001:0004 eth1: Looks like an Intersil firmware version 1.04 eth1: Ad-hoc demo mode supported eth1: IEEE standard IBSS ad-hoc mode supported eth1: WEP supported, 104-bit key eth1: MAC address 00:90:D1:06:19:A7 eth1: Station name "Prism I" eth1: ready eth1: Channel out of range (0)! eth1: Channel out of range (0)! hermes @ 0xf080: Timeout waiting for card to reset (reg=0x8000)! eth1: orinoco_reset failed in orinoco_plx_open()<3>eth0: Bus master arbitration failure, status 88f3. I've been on hold all night with USR about the problem, but of course as soon as I said "linux", I was off their diagnostic chart and they refused to help until I had installed Windows (like that'll happen). I'm going to take the card to work and try it in one of our Windows 2000 laptops, but I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions as to what the problem might be... Thanks, Zack --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Anyone tried USR2415 card in Dachstein?
Lee- I briefly had one working in WISP-DIST using the hostap_plx driver, BUT you need to upgrade the firmware on the card for all the goodies to work. I purchased the combo pack from TigerDirect for $80 which includes two PCI/Wifi cards (USR 2415 and 2445). They seem to be an Intersil 2.5 reference implementation and could probably be flashed with any Intersil firmware. The one strange thing is that the 2415 is a 5v part whereas the 2445 is a 3.3v part. Dunno why USR did this... Mine were shipped with firmware 0.7 or 0.8, USR has an upgrade to 1.03 availible. You, of course, need winblows to flash the card. Good luck. Z On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 10:41, Lee Kimber wrote: > Hi, > > Wondered if anyone has tried the US Robotics 2415 combined PCI adapter and > 802.11b PC Card in a Dachstein box? > > A post on Seattlewireless says this Prism 2.5 chipset card works with the > "deprecated wvlan_cs" driver so I'm wondering if this will work on > Dachstein, where there only seems to be a wavelan.o module. See: > http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/files/diskimages/dachstein-CD/CD-Contents/lib/mo > dules/net/ > > Manufacturer's page is: > http://www.usrobotics.com/products/networking/wireless-product.asp?sku=USR2415 > > I'm seeing a $76 price on it - prior to $30 mail in rebate - at: > http://www.ecost.com/ecost/shop/detail.asp?dpno=975350 > > Thanks! > > Lee > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] D Link 520+
Sorry, but the DWL-520+ (or any dlink + card) uses an unsupported Ti chipset. You're out of luck, best go pick up a prism 2/3 based card. Z On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Robert Chambers wrote: > Which driver is used for the D Link 520+ > > Thank you > Robert Chambers --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] D Link 520+
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 22:46, wing newton wrote: > How about the latest version of DWL 650 ? Is there an > AP driver for the latest 650 which is no longer using > the Intersil chipset ? > > Thanks. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. From what I've heard, the newest revisions of the DWL-650 don't use the Intersil chipset, I could be wrong, best call Dlink about it. The linux-wlan-ng page has a pretty good summary of what cards are Intersil Prism based: http://www.linux-wlan.com/linux-wlan/ Good luck. Z --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
