Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Fun :)
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:11:54 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: Apart from keeping the number_of_unconfirmed low, I also find it useful to try to make summaries as clear as possible: looking at the result of a query, that helps a lot to pick the right issues to look e.g. for duplicates. Kind regards, Cor +1 a good summary description is crucial ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla version 4.1.1.2 still credited as rc
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 01:07:26 +0200, Tommy wrote: On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:13:51 +0200, Tommy wrote: since 4.1.1.2 has been subsequently released as final I suggest to change the label to 4.1.1.2 release as done before in previous versions. bye, TOMMY the same applies to 3.6.7.2 and 4.0.5.2 which are still labeled as rc and not as release filed a fdo report here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69197 ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Fun :)
Hi Joel, Joel Madero wrote (09-09-13 17:24) A bug a day (you choose which one ;) ) shouldn't take more than 10ish minutes. Hopefully despite busy schedules we can make the commitment - ultimately we still need 25 people making this commitment to keep up with demand (or a few people able to commit to a higher number). Thanks for this encouraging idea (one a day saves me a lot of time :-p ) and your good work & help! Apart from keeping the number_of_unconfirmed low, I also find it useful to try to make summaries as clear as possible: looking at the result of a query, that helps a lot to pick the right issues to look e.g. for duplicates. Kind regards, Cor -- - Cor Nouws - http://nl.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:37:59AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Having said that - I guess investing more cycles into a dashboard / > homepage for developers that shows where the fires are burning, the new > MAB's etc. would prolly be a more useful investment of time. Fully agree there -- that would be totally awesome. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 11:37 +0200, bjoern wrote: > FWIW, I had a bibisected charting query sometime ago, you find it in > bugzilla->reports->new charts and then select the > LibreOffice->LibreOffice->bibsected-unresolved. I just added a > bibisected-total > there too, so one can now get these as extremely ugly plots out of bugzilla > itself (on a positive note, you can also download the history as CSV there). Neato :-) well - anyone that wants to do the automating of that lot and generation of pretty charts with long data series so that I don't have to is more than welcome to. Having said that - I guess investing more cycles into a dashboard / homepage for developers that shows where the fires are burning, the new MAB's etc. would prolly be a more useful investment of time. Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
Hi, On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:56:57AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > I guess so ;-) or bugzilla changed in some way, or someone went on a > rampage removing the 'bibisect' keyword (or whatever). The stats are > generated by: > > dev-tools/scripts/esc-bug-stats.pl Hmm, looks sane to me -- still wonder what happened to the total. > Improvements to the script [ that don't break the historic series for > bugs etc. ] appreciated :-) FWIW, I had a bibisected charting query sometime ago, you find it in bugzilla->reports->new charts and then select the LibreOffice->LibreOffice->bibsected-unresolved. I just added a bibisected-total there too, so one can now get these as extremely ugly plots out of bugzilla itself (on a positive note, you can also download the history as CSV there). Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 00:37 +0200, bjoern wrote: > > > > * Bibisected bugs open: whiteboard 'bibsected' > > > > + 35/140 36/167 37/137 41/137 33/128 33/125 34/124 34/123 > > > > 36/122 38/119 > > > > + http://bit.ly/VQfF3Q > > > > > > Dumb question: > > > Whats that second number on the bibisected bugs stats, btw ? > > > > As with the MAB; it is open vs. total. > > So in the last week 27 bibisected bugs (either open or closed) where eaten by > a > grue? (167 -> 140) I guess so ;-) or bugzilla changed in some way, or someone went on a rampage removing the 'bibisect' keyword (or whatever). The stats are generated by: dev-tools/scripts/esc-bug-stats.pl It's not the most beautiful script / approach in the world but - it produces a consistent, and longer-term series (of whatever merit) and is automated => saving me a lot of time ;-) Improvements to the script [ that don't break the historic series for bugs etc. ] appreciated :-) HTH, Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
