Re: [jcollins@asgardsrealm.net: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq withiptables]
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:05:34 -0500 "Jamin W.Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With the above to conditions met, there is nothing additional that is > needed for Licq to work. I run an iptables based firewall in several > locations based on my own firewall script. There have been no special > allowances made for Licq (or any icq clients for that matter) and they all > happily work. Same here. I have not made any special allowances in my iptables rules so that ICQ will work, and it does work. -- Andrew ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
Re: [jcollins@asgardsrealm.net: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables]
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 23:28:50 +0100 "Darren Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it me or is this not straight forward? I guess not as it's not in > the FAQ. > > A standard firewall generally denies all traffic by default, right? > So in order to enable functionality, what ports and hosts does licq use? Ah... now we start getting to the core of the problem. A different perception of "standard firewall". I will admit you have the correct technical definition of a firewall. However, from your own subject line you indicate "iptables". With iptables it is quite common to use the stateful connection tracking to allow response packets to existing established connections. Additionally, many implimentations of an iptables based firewalls that are providing NAT'ing server are intended to be transparent (as much as possible anyway) to the users they protect and NAT. With the above to conditions met, there is nothing additional that is needed for Licq to work. I run an iptables based firewall in several locations based on my own firewall script. There have been no special allowances made for Licq (or any icq clients for that matter) and they all happily work. > ps Jamin, no need to post message to list if it's only intended for >me. If it's sent to the list, then it's in the archives. Then the next person that looks for it can find it. -- Jamin W. Collins ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
Re: [jcollins@asgardsrealm.net: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables]
ok let's starts again. Is it me or is this not straight forward? I guess not as it's not in the FAQ. A standard firewall generally denies all traffic by default, right? So in order to enable functionality, what ports and hosts does licq use? -Darren ps thanks for forwarding the message Tim. ps Jamin, no need to post message to list if it's only intended for me. Friday, June 7, 2002, 11:12:20 PM, you wrote: TvE> - Forwarded message from "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - TvE> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 16:43:04 -0500 TvE> From: Jamin W.Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TvE> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables TvE> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TvE> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) TvE> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:38:10 +0100 TvE> "Darren Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Thomas, thanks for your email. I don't think it's unprecise. >> >> TCP and UDP ports that should be allowed so that licq can function >> in all configurations. TvE> Perhaps it is seen as "unprecise" as there is no "specific" configuration TvE> that is needed for Licq's current functionality. If you can give a better TvE> idea as to what you are having problems with, perhaps someone will be able TvE> to assist you. TvE> -- TvE> Jamin W. Collins ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:38:10 +0100 "Darren Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, thanks for your email. I don't think it's unprecise. > > TCP and UDP ports that should be allowed so that licq can function > in all configurations. Perhaps it is seen as "unprecise" as there is no "specific" configuration that is needed for Licq's current functionality. If you can give a better idea as to what you are having problems with, perhaps someone will be able to assist you. -- Jamin W. Collins ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables
Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:33:18 PM, you wrote: TR> On Friday 07 June 2002 20:04, Darren Evans wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can someone tell me tell me the best way to firewall >> >> * client to client and >> * server to server >> >> licq so that there is some firewalling. I noticed that there >> has been some changes in authentication lately, and am interested >> to know what has changed. TR> Please give us more information, since your question is too unprecise. Hi Thomas, thanks for your email. I don't think it's unprecise. TCP and UDP ports that should be allowed so that licq can function in all configurations. Did authentication go through different servers in previous versions of licq, im using licq 1.1.0-0.cvs20020416.1 (RPM) on Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18. Please cc: me as i'm not on the list. Thanks, Darren ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
Re: [Licq-main] licq with iptables
On Friday 07 June 2002 20:04, Darren Evans wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone tell me tell me the best way to firewall > > * client to client and > * server to server > > licq so that there is some firewalling. I noticed that there > has been some changes in authentication lately, and am interested > to know what has changed. Please give us more information, since your question is too unprecise. Thomas ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
[Licq-main] licq with iptables
Hi, Can someone tell me tell me the best way to firewall * client to client and * server to server licq so that there is some firewalling. I noticed that there has been some changes in authentication lately, and am interested to know what has changed. Can you cc: me as i'm not on the list. Thanks, Darren ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
[Licq-main] licq crashes all the time
i am on rh 7.3 i tried to use all sort of licq. rpm (of different versions) do crash immediately . i tried the licq-daily - can not find the licq.conf what can i do ? ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm ___ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
