Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Thanks, My mistake was trying to enter the \begin{multline} and \end{multline} as ert. It seems to stop the conversion when you use C-m. Rod On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > What about > > > > Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline} > > Mark it, > > Press C-m? > > Or just type \begin{multline}\end{multline}, > mark it, press C-m, and then use mathed to enter the text inside, > using ctrl+enter to add new rows (\\ in latex). > > _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / | I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea." | They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
> What about > > Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline} > Mark it, > Press C-m? > Yup, that does it. BTW, looking throught the mail list, the was a reference to some docs for math mode for 1.2.0, on Herbert Voss's hints & tricks page. The link to the doc is broken however. Thanks, Rod _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / | I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea." | They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > What about > > Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline} > Mark it, > Press C-m? Or just type \begin{multline}\end{multline}, mark it, press C-m, and then use mathed to enter the text inside, using ctrl+enter to add new rows (\\ in latex).
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:57:03PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached. > > Basically, > > Type \begin{multline} as ert > enter inline formula > type \end{multline} as ert That translates to \begin{multline}$...$\end{multline} and LaTeX's choking is to be expected.. What about Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline} Mark it, Press C-m? [I know, this should be documented somewhere. In 1.3 it's at least accessible through Insert->Math->AMS multline. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached. Basically, Type \begin{multline} as ert enter inline formula type \end{multline} as ert Rod On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > > Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which > > seems to make latex fall over. > > What exactly are you doing? > > Andre' > > -- > Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, > will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson) > _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / | I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea." | They Might Be Giants, Lincoln #LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 220 \textclass article \language english \inputencoding auto \fontscheme default \graphics default \paperfontsize default \spacing single \papersize Default \paperpackage a4 \use_geometry 0 \use_amsmath 1 \use_natbib 0 \use_numerical_citations 0 \paperorientation portrait \secnumdepth 3 \tocdepth 3 \paragraph_separation indent \defskip medskip \quotes_language english \quotes_times 2 \papercolumns 1 \papersides 1 \paperpagestyle default \layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status Collapsed \layout Standard \backslash begin{multline} \end_inset \begin_inset Formula $x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\ +10+11+12+13+14+15$ \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status Collapsed \layout Standard end{multline} \end_inset \the_end %% LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/. %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing. \documentclass[english]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \makeatletter %% LyX specific LaTeX commands. \providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@} \usepackage{babel} \makeatother \begin{document} \begin{multline}$x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\ +10+11+12+13+14+15$end{multline} \end{document}
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which > seems to make latex fall over. What exactly are you doing? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in "gridded" > structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined > formulas, so you have to switch this to "displayed" (S-M-m) and back. > > Andre' Andre, Thanks. Just compiling the doc now. M-m w i seems to work fine in 1.2.0 in inline math. However, doing this I now get an error compiling...the latex should be \begin{multline} equation \end{multline} Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which seems to make latex fall over. Rod _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / | I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea." | They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:58:30PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0. Should work [well, if called 'multline' at least] > At the moment I tried > > ERT[\begin{mutiline}] > enter formula > ERT[\end{multiline}] > > I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I > seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching > through has failed to reveal it. M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in "gridded" structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined formulas, so you have to switch this to "displayed" (S-M-m) and back. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Multiline and 1.2.0
Hi all, Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0. At the moment I tried ERT[\begin{mutiline}] enter formula ERT[\end{multiline}] I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching through has failed to reveal it. Thanks, Rod _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / | I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea." | They Might Be Giants, Lincoln