Re: [M100] VT100 Emulation and DVi
Seems like there are a lot of tough ones... Word wrap, relative position / simple windowing taking significant work. M100 is simpler than vt100. So it seems trivial to map m100 escapes to vt100. But mapping vt100 back to m100 would only be easy for a subset of vt100 escapes. But that "might* still be useful depending on what bbs's tend to use. -- John. On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 3:15 PM Stephen Adolph wrote: > There are a couple of hard ones John. > Didn't we go through them and conclude certain m100 sequences could not be > done on VT100? > Having said that I don't recall which ones for sure. > > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > >> How different is vt100 from the m100's native terminal emulation (mostly >> vt52). What's missing that you need... >> >> I could map necessary codes in HTERM. It already does a lot of >> processing to map utf8 characters and xterm escapes. In fact that's most of >> what HTERM does aside fromn hardware flow control. >> >> -- John. >> >>>
Re: [M100] VT100 Emulation and DVi
There are a couple of hard ones John. Didn't we go through them and conclude certain m100 sequences could not be done on VT100? Having said that I don't recall which ones for sure. On Sunday, November 26, 2023, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > How different is vt100 from the m100's native terminal emulation (mostly > vt52). What's missing that you need... > > I could map necessary codes in HTERM. It already does a lot of processing > to map utf8 characters and xterm escapes. In fact that's most of what HTERM > does aside fromn hardware flow control. > > -- John. > >>
Re: [M100] VT100 Emulation and DVi
How different is vt100 from the m100's native terminal emulation (mostly vt52). What's missing that you need... I could map necessary codes in HTERM. It already does a lot of processing to map utf8 characters and xterm escapes. In fact that's most of what HTERM does aside fromn hardware flow control. -- John. >
Re: [M100] VT100 Emulation and DVi
In 1991 I used to call text only BBSs all the time and even go on the internet a bit with my Model 100 at 300 baud. On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 12:51, grima...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently decided to take my main battle-station (apple iie) out of > service, so I can dedicate more space to my Tandy 102. > > What I have found though, is that the Model 100 isn’t quite ideal for > BBSing, even with the DVI. A lot of systems assume VT100 emulation, which > Apple did have. > > I tried using VTEMUL, but it assume you are using the the built in screen, > so it doesn’t work properly with the DVI. > > The creator of VTEMUL was looking to adapt the program to the DVI > according to this post. > > > https://github.com/LivingM100SIG/Living_M100SIG/blob/main/M100SIG/Lib-03-TELCOM/VTEMUL.THD > > Anyone know if the DVI compatible version exists? > > -George >
[M100] VT100 Emulation and DVi
Hi all, I recently decided to take my main battle-station (apple iie) out of service, so I can dedicate more space to my Tandy 102. What I have found though, is that the Model 100 isn’t quite ideal for BBSing, even with the DVI. A lot of systems assume VT100 emulation, which Apple did have. I tried using VTEMUL, but it assume you are using the the built in screen, so it doesn’t work properly with the DVI. The creator of VTEMUL was looking to adapt the program to the DVI according to this post. https://github.com/LivingM100SIG/Living_M100SIG/blob/main/M100SIG/Lib-03-TELCOM/VTEMUL.THD Anyone know if the DVI compatible version exists? -George
