Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback
> Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked > (8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to. Yep. 8.14.9 still has the bug that I see first referenced back in 2004. The routine in sendmail/srvrstmp.c where I suspect the bug resides is a small 2800 lines long. I'll be happy to see what I can accomplish. Dale Moore ___ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback
On 11/7/2014 2:00 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked (8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to. Accurate last time I checked. Which reminds me that I have a sendmail patch to discuss... ___ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:06:29 -0500
"Dale Moore" wrote:
> Client: Helo naughtywords
> Mimedefang filter_helo: return('REJECT', 'I do not like
> naughtywords'); Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu Hello
> someclient.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.x.x], pleased to meet you
> Client: Mail From:
> Mimedefang filter_sender: return('CONTINUE');
> Server: 554 5.7.1 I do not like naughtywords
[...]
> Explanations appreciated.
Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked
(8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
[Mimedefang] helo callback
Perhaps someone can explain this behavior..
Below is what happens in chronological order.
Client: connect to server (sendmail 8.14.9)
Mimedefang filter_relay: return('CONTINUE');
Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.9/8.14.9; Fri, 7 Nov 2014
12:56
Client: Helo naughtywords
Mimedefang filter_helo: return('REJECT', 'I do not like naughtywords');
Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu Hello someclient.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.x.x],
pleased to meet you
Client: Mail From:
Mimedefang filter_sender: return('CONTINUE');
Server: 554 5.7.1 I do not like naughtywords
Note how the mimedefang filter_helo does not affect the SMTP response
immediately,
but is instead delayed until after the sender has been specified.
I would have instead expected it to happen immediately.
Details: Sendmail 8.14.9 Solaris 10 (and linux has same behaivor)
Sendmail is not configured with delay_checks.
Mimedefang version 2.75 .
Explanations appreciated.
Dale Moore
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
