[MMouse]: Re: Nader

2000-07-27 Thread LWirbel

In a message dated 07/27/2000 11:52:45 AM Mountain Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 how so?  if you aren't in favor of any of the candidates should you vote 
for
 someone just for the sake of feeling obligated to vote???  now thats sad...
 -- Tour de Force, Defacto, Ayuchuco! --
 chris 

Bravo!  Never, never, NEVER vote lesser of two evils.  Vote ONLY for someone 
you truly believe in.  Gore has enraged me so much with his opinion on Elian 
and his out-hawk opinion vs. Bush on nukes and NMD weapons, when people tell 
me my vote for Nader might help get Bush elected, I answer, "Like I fucking 
care."

Loring Wirbel
Monument, Colo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [MMouse]: Re: Nader

2000-07-27 Thread amy and her computer

 Bravo!  Never, never, NEVER vote lesser of two evils.  Vote ONLY for
someone 
 you truly believe in.  Gore has enraged me so much with his opinion on
Elian 
 and his out-hawk opinion vs. Bush on nukes and NMD weapons, when people
tell 
 me my vote for Nader might help get Bush elected, I answer, "Like I
fucking 
 care."

alright..say that you're back in elementary school and you sit next to a
kid that snorts pen ink.  after he snorts pen ink he starts talking to
himself about how delicious the pen ink felt in his nose.  it would be
strange, and it would be bad.  i don't know about you, but i wouldn't wanna
sit next to someone who talks to himself and snorts pen ink considering
that he's fucking INSANE.  this is how i feel about george w. bush.
and as for gore's opinion on elian..he's a fucking politician.  what do you
expect?  of course he's gonna do things to suck up to the people of his
party so he can get his presidency.  politicians are like this, and it's
why they've been in office before and they'll be in office again.  i think
once he was actually the president he'd do a fine job, and he wouldn't suck
up so much as he's doing right now while he's just the nominee.
you do what you want, but i don't want an insane person in office just so
that people could have rebelled against gore.
- amy




[MMouse]: Re: Nader (of the same opinion)

2000-07-26 Thread Jacob Parker

Hey,

I agree with Rachel here, very much. Basically, no matter what, Gore and 
Bush WILL ultimately be the 2 choices to be "reasonable" about voting in the 
next race... not that I care at all about either, but, since I am Anti-Bush 
(crooked, face-value liaden Republican... look at the man's eyes!... there's 
gotta be something evil about him), I think I'm going to register to vote to 
essentially vote Gore because, in carrying my voice of reason, I think Gore 
will do less damage or, likewise, more reform... even though he strikes me 
as a patsy, who should have stopped at Vice President (hell, it seems like 
Tipper did more than him-- but I don't bother with politics too much, so 
maybe I'm wrong).

NOTE!: I in no way agree with the action of voting for the people "bound" 
for office, but I'm trying to think rationally, as the human that I am, and 
vote for someone, in this case, I detest the least-- cuz HELL, if others 
actually thought for once, I might vote differently (i.e. I don't promote 
such thinking)

On a similar note: I was thinkin' today: "What if Hillary Clinton, or some 
other female, ran for President and won?" ... for the reason that we'll say 
Bill is still married to the old bag... so my thought is: do you think he'd 
divorce her after the race... in fear of being known as [the] First Bitch, 
among his colleagues and the nation? (emphasis on both words btw)

ahh well--

I'm off to apply some Icy Hot, in case "the mob" (or should I call it "the 
posse"?) decides to flame my ass.

and then, Rachel, don't fret... "when in Rome, does as the Romans do"-- but 
you got you're own style so flaunt it if you can, within reason... who can 
help it if most Romans are thoughtless?

Raining on the ashes,

.Jacob.


In reply to:
--- MESSAGE modestmouse.v001.n1072.10 ---

From: Rachel  White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nader
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

OK, here's the question that will probably make me look really stupid but
that's nothing new.
I love Nader to death and would LOVE it if, in my perfect world, he became
our next president.  But, that's not going to happen.  It's basically up to
us to choose the lesser of two evils.  This is where I'll probably piss a
lot of you off, but isn't voting Nader this time (where the race is pretty
close) like wasting an anti-Bush vote?  If I vote Nader, that's one less
vote that helps Gore defeat Bush, and I sure as hell don't want another Bush
to be president.  I know the electoral college..blah blah blah..but
still 

I feel guilty not voting Nader this time, so ya'll feel free to try and set
me straight.  My conscience needs to be at peace.help.

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com