Re: Major MySQL Revision Takes on NoSQL
- Original Message - > From: "Reindl Harald" > > does this also affect MyISAM or is the engine only a unloved child > since the switch to innodb as default engine? Both, I suspect :-) While MyISAM has certainly become the unloved child of late, from the point of view of engine interchangeability, it seems obvious to keep the presentation layer in the server (or even the client), and not the individual engines. I'm not familiar with the MySQL code, mind you, but it seems... unlikely to be any other way. -- Unhappiness is discouraged and will be corrected with kitten pictures. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
Re: Major MySQL Revision Takes on NoSQL
Am 08.02.2013 03:51, schrieb Peter Brawley: > On 2013-02-07 8:29 PM, Daevid Vincent wrote: >> http://adtmag.com/articles/2013/02/06/mysql-update.aspx > > The headline is weirdly deceptive. Mebbe they thought the headline would draw > eyes to their ads. > > This edition of MySQL is less like NoSQL, and more determinedly relational, > than any before. > > It'd be more accurate to say that Monty & David anticipated NoSQL by a > decade. The early editions of MySQL, with no > ACID compliance, no foreign keys, no transactions, were more like NoSQL than > any version of MySQL released since 2004. much more interesting: >> This release promises to crank up query execution times with pre-execution >> subqueries. Diagnostics are improved with EXPLAIN for INSERT, UPDATE, and >> DELETE operations, and the ability to output in JSON. And a new Optimizer >> Traces tool allows users to track the optimizer decision-making process does this also affect MyISAM or is the engine only a unloved child since the switch to innodb as default engine? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Major MySQL Revision Takes on NoSQL
On 2013-02-07 8:29 PM, Daevid Vincent wrote: http://adtmag.com/articles/2013/02/06/mysql-update.aspx The headline is weirdly deceptive. Mebbe they thought the headline would draw eyes to their ads. This edition of MySQL is less like NoSQL, and more determinedly relational, than any before. It'd be more accurate to say that Monty & David anticipated NoSQL by a decade. The early editions of MySQL, with no ACID compliance, no foreign keys, no transactions, were more like NoSQL than any version of MySQL released since 2004. PB -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
Major MySQL Revision Takes on NoSQL
http://adtmag.com/articles/2013/02/06/mysql-update.aspx
