RE: [nant-dev] 0.8.0.0 Release

2002-07-10 Thread Scott Hernandez

Good to hear Tomas.

I would agree with you but I expect that we will have more NAntContrib
releases than NAnt releases. Once we get to a 1.0 NAnt release we may
not have another NAnt release for a long time. At that point I would
expect that most changes will come from new tasks, not changes to the
core.

I'm happy to word it anyway you want. From the users point (the devs
using NAnt) of view all they should have to do is download
NAnt/NAntContrib bundles. We will distribute them so there is no
confusion or installation problem.

> -Original Message-
> From: Tomas Restrepo
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] 0.8.0.0 Release
> 
> Hi Scott,
> 
> > I've done a release build for testing purposes. Please try this out
> > tonight if you have any time,
> > http://nant.sourceforge.net/nant-src-0.8.zip
> 
> Looks good to me. Seems to work just fine here I just used it to
> recompile several of my projects with no problems at all (including
the
> one that has about 10 different buildfiles)
> 
> > After this release goes out we will do a NAntContrib release too.
Unless
> > anyone has any objections NAntContrib releases will include, and
depend
> > on a specific, NAnt release.
> 
> I'm all for that. The only question is: shouldn't it be the other way
> around? That is, shouldn't a NAnt release include a corresponding
> NAntContrib release?




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers



Re: [nant-dev] 0.8.0.0 Release

2002-07-10 Thread Tomas Restrepo

Hi Scott,

> I've done a release build for testing purposes. Please try this out
> tonight if you have any time,
> http://nant.sourceforge.net/nant-src-0.8.zip


Looks good to me. Seems to work just fine here I just used it to
recompile several of my projects with no problems at all (including the one
that has about 10 different buildfiles)

> After this release goes out we will do a NAntContrib release too. Unless
> anyone has any objections NAntContrib releases will include, and depend
> on a specific, NAnt release.

I'm all for that. The only question is: shouldn't it be the other way
around? That is, shouldn't a NAnt release include a corresponding
NAntContrib release?

--
Tomas Restrepo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers



[nant-dev] 0.8.0.0 Release

2002-07-10 Thread Scott Hernandez








Hi all,

 

I’ve done a release build for testing purposes. Please
try this out tonight if you have any time, http://nant.sourceforge.net/nant-src-0.8.zip

 

I’ve check in all these changes and will put down the
tag once we are happy.

 

Thanks you for all your efforts!

 

After this release goes out we will do a NAntContrib release
too. Unless anyone has any objections NAntContrib releases will include, and depend
on a specific, NAnt release.

 

Thank you,

Scott

 

PS. And again, if you have suggestions or comments please
let us know. :)








[nant-dev] NAnt Installer

2002-07-10 Thread Ian MacLean

I've just put together an installer for NAnt. It wraps up the nant 
binaries and the extra tasks from NAntContrib into a single installer. 
Right now you can download it from http://www26.brinkster.com/ianm74/. 
Let me know what you think - any problems, improvements, ideas. It uses 
nullsofts NSIS installer http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nsis/ which is 
nice and easy to use and is distributed under an open source licence ( 
not sure which one ).  Ideally I'd like to have a nightly build so that 
the latest binaries are alway available without having to compile from 
source.

Ian



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers



RE: [nant-dev] References and the Framework path

2002-07-10 Thread Scott Hernandez

If the framework dir is in the path, you can specify that the 'include'
should look there.

  

In my environment with VS.Net the %vscomntools%\vsvars32.bat sets this
correctly for me.

>where system.dll
\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.0.3705\system.dll

Does that work for you?

Side Note: This is probably a user list question. Most of us read both,
and if it isn't appropriate, we will just repost on dev and discuss...

Later,
Scott

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:nant-developers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:04 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [nant-dev] References and the Framework path
> 
> I apologize if this is a know or just plain a user issue.
> 
> In playing with the vbc task I attempted to add a reference to
System.dll.
> 
>  optionstrict="true">
>   
> 
> 
> Turning verbose on I saw that the reference was never made unless I
added
> the full path to the framework dlls
> 
> 
>  value="C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.0.3705"/>
> 
>  optionstrict="true">
>   
> 
> 
> Have I missed something. Is there an easier way to tell the task where
a
> framework Dlls are? The main problem is that on different machines
this
> directory is in different paths (c:\win nt\..., or c:\win\...) In
theory I
> could possibly derive the path using environment variables but the
sysinfo
> task only exposes a few.
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> test:
>   [sysinfo] Setting system information properties under sys.*
>   [sysinfo] nant.version = 0.7.9.0
>   [sysinfo] sys.os.folder.temp = C:\DOCUME~1\Foo\LOCALS~1\Temp\
>   [sysinfo] sys.clr.version = 1.0.3705.209
>   [sysinfo] sys.os.platform = Win32NT
>   [sysinfo] sys.os = Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600.0
>   [sysinfo] sys.os.version = 5.1.2600.0
>   [sysinfo] sys.os.folder.system = C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 
> Kevin Miller



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers



[nant-dev] References and the Framework path

2002-07-10 Thread Kevin Miller

I apologize if this is a know or just plain a user issue.

In playing with the vbc task I attempted to add a reference to System.dll. 





Turning verbose on I saw that the reference was never made unless I added
the full path to the framework dlls








Have I missed something. Is there an easier way to tell the task where a
framework Dlls are? The main problem is that on different machines this
directory is in different paths (c:\win nt\..., or c:\win\...) In theory I
could possibly derive the path using environment variables but the sysinfo
task only exposes a few. 





---

test:
  [sysinfo] Setting system information properties under sys.*
  [sysinfo] nant.version = 0.7.9.0
  [sysinfo] sys.os.folder.temp = C:\DOCUME~1\Foo\LOCALS~1\Temp\
  [sysinfo] sys.clr.version = 1.0.3705.209
  [sysinfo] sys.os.platform = Win32NT
  [sysinfo] sys.os = Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600.0
  [sysinfo] sys.os.version = 5.1.2600.0
  [sysinfo] sys.os.folder.system = C:\WINDOWS\System32

Kevin Miller


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers