RE: [BTMO] Today's Fiver

[Jeremy Tonks]

We obviously need more in the management team. No wonder we're
underperforming - Mick's overworked!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 9:45 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Today's Fiver

 

In Mick's case it seems he can't breath and manage a football team at the
same time (unless we beat Man Utd - then he's a genius again)

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 9:40 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Today's Fiver

 

That's what TC's there for Rog. Everyone knows men can't multi task.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 9:38 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Today's Fiver

He averages one kilometre an hour over the season.

Even at that lowly speed he can't manage to walk and think at the same time.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 9:21 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Today's Fiver

 

At least we are getting our monies worth Marcus.

 

I bet Clipboard makes the most notations as well?

 

BTMO.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 8:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Today's Fiver

 

And Wolves boss Mick McCarthy has been revealed as the Premier League
manager who covers the most ground on the touchline, according to a cheap
marketing stu... top researchers . McCarthy covers 36.1 miles a season.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

We're playing amazingly good football.

 

Yay! Magic Mick Manager for life

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 9:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

On the whole we deserved nothing less than a draw and we should feel
aggrieved that we didn't get the win.

 

* Fletcher should hang his head in shame for that miss that would
have sealed our comeback (and victory).

* Jarvis looked pretty good (but he was only up against Wes Brown)

* Hunt should be given about 5 years off to try and find his match
fitness, first touch, passing ability etc (in 5 years he should be due to
retire)

* Ebanks-Blake has found his coring boots this season but obviously
has done something to upset TM.

* Miljas actually broke  a sweat and deserved his rest at the end.

* Everyone on our team looked twice as good as Bebe.  What a joke he
was.

* Once again TM put on a good post match interview.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 8:55 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Points of contention;

 

*   Ward's mistakes almost cost us a couple of times
*   Doyle cannot do it alone
*   Ebanks Blake should be playing more often
*   Hunt needs a lot more time, his passes and timing were often wayward
*   The Yanky keeper was lucky a couple of times
*   Fletcher is not worth the money we payed for him
*   Jarvis continues to impress

 


...

 

We need to replace Ward with a more reliable left back, but I think the team
that has been put out against Man City and Man U can win us enough games to
keep us in this division.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Agreed - but we only have to keep playing this standard of football to be
out of danger and ready for glory next season when Manure and Liverpool
implode.

 

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 9:12 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Unfortunately Jeremy, the result of our amazing football against Utd equated
to nil points.  As Thick Mick said in his post match interview "I don't go
for all that heroic failure c...@p".

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 9:07 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

We're playing amazingly good football.

 

Yay! Magic Mick Manager for life

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 9:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

On the whole we deserved nothing less than a draw and we should feel
aggrieved that we didn't get the win.

 

* Fletcher should hang his head in shame for that miss that would
have sealed our comeback (and victory).

* Jarvis looked pretty good (but he was only up against Wes Brown)

* Hunt should be given about 5 years off to try and find his match
fitness, first touch, passing ability etc (in 5 years he should be due to
retire)

* Ebanks-Blake has found his coring boots this season but obviously
has done something to upset TM.

* Miljas actually broke  a sweat and deserved his rest at the end.

* Everyone on our team looked twice as good as Bebe.  What a joke he
was.

* Once again TM put on a good post match interview.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 8:55 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Man U v Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Points of contention;

 

*   Ward's mistakes almost cost us a couple of times
*   Doyle cannot do it alone
*   Ebanks Blake should be playing more often
*   Hunt needs a lot more time, his passes and timing were often wayward
*   The Yanky keeper was lucky a couple of times
*   Fletcher is not worth the money we payed for him
*   Jarvis continues to impress

 


...

 

We need to replace Ward with a more reliable left back, but I think the team
that has been put out against Man City and Man U can win us enough games to
keep us in this division.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Well entrenched

[Jeremy Tonks]

Don't panic - we'll come good.

 

We are a fantastic championship side.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Sunday, 14 November 2010 10:00 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Well entrenched

 

Good to see Bothroyd recognised.

15 goals in 16 games so far this season.

More than Mick's huffandpuff bum boy got in his 816 starts.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 14 November 2010 9:30 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Well entrenched

 

We're well and truly entrenched in the bottom 3 needing at least 2 wins to
get out of trouble.

Great performances mean nothing if they don't amount to any points.

Also see that our great England hope Jarvis didn't get a call-up but
Bothroyd did. How embarrassing?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Great ad for the Chump League

[Jeremy Tonks]

Look on the bright side -Walsall had a win!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Sunday, 21 November 2010 8:45 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Great ad for the Chump League

 

Didn't think our game against Notlob was that bad.

Last night however...

Blackpool were rubbish and there for the taking.

Mystified Mick had other ideas (definitely not the right word there).

Suppose he has got us playing Chump football already.

 

 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] silence

[Jeremy Tonks]

Now now lads - Rog, when was the last time we scored three in the Prem?

 

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:02 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

Yes, noticed McCarthy managed his 14th win in 91 tries in the Greed League.

Amazing as he once again sent out a team to avoid yet another defeat.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 12:40 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] silence

 

Did anyone notice we beat Sunderland last week ? 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] silence

[Jeremy Tonks]

I don't think it was. but you're doing better than me to remember that far
back (and my liver's only half the age of yours).

 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:35 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

I was there when we scored 5 at Chelsea.

My memory is going so don't know if it was called the Greed League when
everything was in black and white.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:29 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

Now now lads - Rog, when was the last time we scored three in the Prem?

 

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:02 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

Yes, noticed McCarthy managed his 14th win in 91 tries in the Greed League.

Amazing as he once again sent out a team to avoid yet another defeat.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 12:40 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] silence

 

Did anyone notice we beat Sunderland last week ? 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] silence

[Jeremy Tonks]

No - impaled it on a fence post when I dropped my bicycle in last week's
Bundanoon dash.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:43 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

Transplants are amazing aren't they.

Did you bury your old one under your Passionfruit vine or was it too
buggered?

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:39 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

I don't think it was. but you're doing better than me to remember that far
back (and my liver's only half the age of yours).

 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:35 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

I was there when we scored 5 at Chelsea.

My memory is going so don't know if it was called the Greed League when
everything was in black and white.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:29 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

Now now lads - Rog, when was the last time we scored three in the Prem?

 

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:02 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] silence

 

Yes, noticed McCarthy managed his 14th win in 91 tries in the Greed League.

Amazing as he once again sent out a team to avoid yet another defeat.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 12:40 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] silence

 

Did anyone notice we beat Sunderland last week ? 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] silence [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Taylor - and look what we did to him.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:56 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] silence [sec=unclassified]

 

Yeah, but they all think we'll get someone better, like O'Neill, etc., when
he gets the boot. Whereas the reality is it will be more like Jewell, and
then the cycle will repeat yet again.  When was the last time we got a new
manager who had proven success in the PL/Div 1 ?

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Morris, Lee SGT 
wrote:

Most people are secretly dissapointed that MM got to keep his job for
another few weeks.

 

If West Brom give us a pasting things could get ugly.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 30 November 2010 23:40
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] silence

Did anyone notice we beat Sunderland last week ? 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Newcastle job

[Jeremy Tonks]

Magic Mick Manager for life!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2010 6:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Newcastle job

 

I'll drive him up there!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Tue Dec 07 18:20:46 2010
Subject: [BTMO] Newcastle job 

Anybody want to second Mick for the Newcastle job?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Newcastle job

[Jeremy Tonks]

.at Newcastle!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2010 6:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Newcastle job

 

I'll drive him up there!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Tue Dec 07 18:20:46 2010
Subject: [BTMO] Newcastle job 

Anybody want to second Mick for the Newcastle job?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Keane

[Jeremy Tonks]

I see MM didn't get the St James job.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 10 December 2010 8:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Keane

 

Does anyone think there is any credibility or likelihood to our Robbie
coming back to us in January?  I'd certainly welcome him with open arms
simply because he knows where the net is.  He could play a similar role to a
Paul Scholes, sitting just behind a lone striker.

 

Cheers,

Marcus

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Keane

[Jeremy Tonks]

He's nearly old enough to qualify as a Wolves' striker.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Friday, 10 December 2010 9:09 AM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Keane

 

I don't know about any credibility, and whether it's media beating up what
the fans may want. I'd welcome him back to into a similar role. Doyle and
Keane has a nice ring to it.

  _  

Subject: [BTMO] Keane
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:50:14 +1100
From: marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Does anyone think there is any credibility or likelihood to our Robbie
coming back to us in January?  I'd certainly welcome him with open arms
simply because he knows where the net is.  He could play a similar role to a
Paul Scholes, sitting just behind a lone striker.

 

Cheers,

Marcus

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.
 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] YMMMFL

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm assuming we're all too gob smacked to say anything this morning?

I'm smiling.

JT

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Why do other fans have all the luck?

[Jeremy Tonks]

A couple of unknown assumptions in that question. Watch this space.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 14 December 2010 9:56 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Why do other fans have all the luck?

 

What are the odds on Thick Mick going after losing to WBA, then we appoint
Big Sam the Wolves fan?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 14 December 2010 9:55 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Why do other fans have all the luck?

 

Newcastle and now Blackburn.

WHEN'S OUR TURN?

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Wolves sign up Zeli Ismail and Liam McAlinden

[Jeremy Tonks]

Good,

 

I was asking my mate Steve the Academy chaplain (some of you met him a
couple of years ago) about Zeli. Injury and lack of growth slowed him down.
He was massive for his age and as the other lads caught up he lost some
confidence. 

 

Apparently the psychs have done a brilliant job with him following his knee
probs and he is back and full of potential - barring injury (this is Wolves
after all). I hope a real star of the future for the old gold and black.

 

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Sunday, 19 December 2010 10:55 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Wolves sign up Zeli Ismail and Liam McAlinden

 

Read more:

http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2010/12/15/wo
lves-sign-up-zeli-ismail-and-liam-mcalinden/#ixzz18Viok0WJ

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Crap

[Jeremy Tonks]

MMMFL!

S Ward to win EPL golden boot!


(give me the odds on that Rog)

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul 
Sent: Thursday, 30 December 2010 9:37 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Crap

Egg on my face but who cares, go Ward!

Can we beat West Ham and move out of the bottom 3?

Happy New Year to everyone!

Cheers

Paul  
--Original Message--
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Crap
Sent: Dec 5, 2010 09:19

Ward looks sublime in central midfield!

--Original Message--
From: Rog & Reet
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Crap
Sent: Dec 5, 2010 09:34

Confused? Clueless? Calamity? Cack?
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Raymond Orr Sent: Sunday, 5 December 2010 3:17 AM To:
nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Crap
 
CRAP, crap , crap , crap , crap is there another term for it
-- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
-- Boo! Thick Mick Out! 
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Crap

[Jeremy Tonks]

That's better odds than I would have given!

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 30 December 2010 12:35 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Crap

About the same as Bliar and Kissinger ending up in the dock at The Hague.




-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Thursday, 30 December 2010 11:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Crap

MMMFL!

S Ward to win EPL golden boot!


(give me the odds on that Rog)

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul 
Sent: Thursday, 30 December 2010 9:37 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Crap

Egg on my face but who cares, go Ward!

Can we beat West Ham and move out of the bottom 3?

Happy New Year to everyone!

Cheers

Paul  
--Original Message--
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Crap
Sent: Dec 5, 2010 09:19

Ward looks sublime in central midfield!

--Original Message--
From: Rog & Reet
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Crap
Sent: Dec 5, 2010 09:34

Confused? Clueless? Calamity? Cack?
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Raymond Orr Sent: Sunday, 5 December 2010 3:17 AM To:
nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Crap
 
CRAP, crap , crap , crap , crap is there another term for it
-- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
-- Boo! Thick Mick Out! 
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

[Jeremy Tonks]

Thanks Rog - I've been telling you that Magic Mick isn't the problem ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 12:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/pound-of-flesh-20101230-19b6d.html

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

[Jeremy Tonks]

Amen to that.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Saturday, 1 January 2011 1:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

That's true you have, not come remotely close to believing you though
Jeremy.

 

Will be good to see pounds per point of Blackpool and Man Shitty at the end
of this season.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 4:00 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

Thanks Rog - I've been telling you that Magic Mick isn't the problem ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 12:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/pound-of-flesh-20101230-19b6d.html

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'd love to see detailed figures on manager performance compared to money
spent.

I still don't think MM is the problem. Maybe Houlier was at Liverpool? ;)

 

And I think you're right about Manure and couple of other nearly bankrupt
sides.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Sunday, 2 January 2011 11:48 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

He showed yet again he's not part of the solution.

 

On the bright side we weren't as inept as against Wigan, just poor
everywhere except perhaps Stearman.

Luckily for us they had Cole and Pickyournose up front.

Was Cole as useless as his recent performances when he played for us?

 

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 4:00 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

Thanks Rog - I've been telling you that Magic Mick isn't the problem ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 12:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/pound-of-flesh-20101230-19b6d.html

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

[Jeremy Tonks]

You didn't did you?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 2 January 2011 12:56 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

Why do we submit ourselves to the torture of sitting up until 4am to watch
that drivel?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Sun Jan 02 11:48:21 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link 

He showed yet again he's not part of the solution.

 

On the bright side we weren't as inept as against Wigan, just poor
everywhere except perhaps Stearman.

Luckily for us they had Cole and Pickyournose up front.

Was Cole as useless as his recent performances when he played for us?

 

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 4:00 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

Thanks Rog - I've been telling you that Magic Mick isn't the problem ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 12:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/pound-of-flesh-20101230-19b6d.html

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

[Jeremy Tonks]

There's a lot to be said for having to work Sundays :-)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 2 January 2011 3:03 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

I did!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Sun Jan 02 14:53:19 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link 

You didn't did you?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 2 January 2011 12:56 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

Why do we submit ourselves to the torture of sitting up until 4am to watch
that drivel?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Sun Jan 02 11:48:21 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link 

He showed yet again he's not part of the solution.

 

On the bright side we weren't as inept as against Wigan, just poor
everywhere except perhaps Stearman.

Luckily for us they had Cole and Pickyournose up front.

Was Cole as useless as his recent performances when he played for us?

 

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 4:00 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

Thanks Rog - I've been telling you that Magic Mick isn't the problem ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 31 December 2010 12:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Pay As You Play - link

 

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/pound-of-flesh-20101230-19b6d.html

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Chel$ki odds [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Just tried a Knappstein reserve lager with my lunch in Bowral. Very pleasant
indeed.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 4 January 2011 4:08 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Chel$ki odds [sec=unclassified]

 

A couple of Murray Anniversary Ales and I'd back Paris Hilton to be Virgin
of the Year at $1.75

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 4 January 2011 3:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Chel$ki odds [sec=unclassified]

 

Terrible odds Rog...you won't be having us at that price will you?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 4 January 2011 14:07
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Chel$ki odds

We're $7, the draw is $4 and Chel$ki are $1.50

 

If Mick grows some testes, odds 50,000-1, and tries to win this game rather
than avoid a thrashing we could do the grossly overpaid flops.

Will need a few beers though before any dosh passes over the counter.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?

[Jeremy Tonks]

Frankly my dears - I no longer give a stuff about cricket!!! 

 

It already is the perfect day

 

 

Yay! Magic Mick Manager for life!

 

What say you now Rog? Getting warm?

 

 

 

I had my day at the cricket yesterday :-)

 

I also bumped into Mr Parry - are you meeting next Wed? If so put some
pressure on him to attend.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 9:33 AM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?

 

I'd be putting some money down on it finishing today. 

  _  

Subject: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:10:36 +1100
From: marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Wolves beat Chelsea.
Can England knock over Australia today whilst I'm in the crowd at the SCG?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.
 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?

[Jeremy Tonks]

What a result!

32% possession and 3 shots to 19.

How good am we?

 

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 9:41 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?

 

Frankly my dears - I no longer give a stuff about cricket!!! 

 

It already is the perfect day

 

 

Yay! Magic Mick Manager for life!

 

What say you now Rog? Getting warm?

 

 

 

I had my day at the cricket yesterday :-)

 

I also bumped into Mr Parry - are you meeting next Wed? If so put some
pressure on him to attend.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 9:33 AM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?

 

I'd be putting some money down on it finishing today. 

  _  

Subject: [BTMO] Can today be the perfect day?
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:10:36 +1100
From: marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Wolves beat Chelsea.
Can England knock over Australia today whilst I'm in the crowd at the SCG?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.
 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

[BTMO] Superior tactics?

[Jeremy Tonks]

I fear the sh*te may have outfoxed us this morning.

 

.not sure I can be as kind to Chunderland, Pukecastle or Slackpool.

 

MM obviously wanted this one - what team will he field for the replay?

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Superior tactics?

[Jeremy Tonks]

Only by WBA - he should have fielded 14 changes and kicked the ball in the
Doncaster net a few times.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Sunday, 9 January 2011 10:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Superior tactics?

 

Are you implying that our manager has been outsmarted?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 9 January 2011 6:41 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Superior tactics?

 

I fear the sh*te may have outfoxed us this morning.

 

.not sure I can be as kind to Chunderland, Pukecastle or Slackpool.

 

MM obviously wanted this one - what team will he field for the replay?

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Superior tactics?

[Jeremy Tonks]

O good - Manshitty have something else to distract them ahead of the Wolves
visit (shame we do as well :-()

 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Hammill

[Jeremy Tonks]

Only if you're referring to a Baldrick style cunning plan.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 4:33 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

 

Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of other clubs coming in for
Jarvis and us buying another (potential replacement) winger are a cunning
plan to make some $$$ ?

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew
 wrote:

I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 24 million on Darren Bent and we get
Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our ambition eh? Surely if we just
spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up front) we'd be well clear
of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We obviously didn't realise
Bent was available but every player has his price. I reckon if we offered
Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up then. Definitely.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

 

Yet another debatable signing from a team lower than us. Sigh. 

 

We need another Paul Ince right now. :-)

 

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

I've had a look at the Actim Index numbers for both players and Hammill
scores much higher than Jarvis.  Could be a good signing.  Jarvis' return of
2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

 

 

 
 


 

On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot better than Jarvis.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [BTMO] Hammill

 

Seems like a good signing.  Super Mick strikes again. 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill

[Jeremy Tonks]

This is all too positive – let’s talk cricket :-(

 

I thought after the tests we were serious World Cup contenders…

And suddenly our blokes are making Shane Watson look like he can run between
the wickets.

We haven’t got it for the WC.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 9:53 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill

 

: D

On 21 January 2011 21:52, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

In my opinion Jarvis is shite. The Actim Index somehow has him ranked as the
78th best player in the Premier League. Some stupid experienced managers
allegedly want to pay 10m for him based on him being sub-standard for the
England squad.  I would rather Wolves had 10m in the bank than a pacey
attacking winger who according to Actim Index has contributed 2 assists all
season when we are fighting for survival. Hammill seems a much better option
and when we get relegated we will have next to no chance of attracting
anyone of quality.

Good to have you back. 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  

Sent: Fri Jan 21 21:45:23 2011


Subject: Re: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill 

 

I see, so you use stats to make a point but when it's pointed out that they
are specious, we are supposed to move on and ignore that it ever happened.
What a wonderful, magical world you inhabit.

I'd be happy with your email if you said:

"In my opinion Jarvis is shite, but I accept that it Actim Index he's ranked
as the 78th best player in the Premier League, allegedly wanted by several
experienced managers of big clubs and is on the verge of the England squad.
I would rather Wolves had 10m in the bank than a pacey attacking winger when
we are fighting for survival and have next to no chance of attracing anyone
of better quality than Jarvis."

I'll say it again:  It's good to be back.





On 21 January 2011 21:36, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Don't let stats get in the way of a good story. The simple matter is Jarvis
is shite and if someone is willing to give us decent money for 2 or 4
assists from 21 games then show me the money. Hammill can't be any worse. 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  

Sent: Fri Jan 21 21:33:42 2011
Subject: Re: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill 

The comparable stats have Jarvis with 4 assists.  It's only one goal
difference, which is hardly statistically significant.  I note that the
Actim stats you use have Hahnemann in the Premier League team of the season.
They must be really good stats.

On 21 January 2011 21:23, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

I'm sure the Actim Index doesn't factor is the quality of the opponent but
I'm more than happy to flog Jarvis to the highest bidder. Aside from running
around a lot I don't think Jarvis has added anything that Ward couldn't
provide (and that's saying something). 

I don't see how you can compare 2 goals & 2 assists from 21 games against
any of the 3 you have listed. Aside from Hleb who has mainly made substitute
appearances, the others have better stats from less appearances. Just accept
that Jarvis is pants and we could make £10 million quid if we can find some
sucker willing to buy him. 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  

To: nswolves  
Sent: Fri Jan 21 21:17:00 2011
Subject: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill 

 

And yet he got named in the provisional England squad at one point.  We
established some time ago that he got between you and Mick in Perth and
that's why you hold a grudge.

As for comparing his and Hammill's Actim Index numbers, does that take
account of one playing against premier league opposition and one playing
against Championship opposition.

Jarvis is also ranked 78th in the Premier league, above great wingers such
as Luk Modric.

The stats I've got say it's 2 goals and 4 assists

What have the other good wingers in lower ranked teams got

Rodriguez (LIV) 16p 3g 1a
Kuyt (LIV) 17p 4g 3a
NZogbia (WIG) 18p 3g 3a
Hleb (BIR) 14p 1g 1 a

The last two are very highly rated footballers.  Jarvis's stats are on a
par.

It's great to be back.  There's nothing like that feeling of being right all
the time.





On 21 January 2011 18:25, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Why sell Jarvis when he is one of our best player's?
No need at the moment, he is under contract and we can sell him if we go
down.
Another WUM!
2 - 1 to the Wolves on Saturday!

He looks flash but adds nothing. 2 assists in 21 games and 2 goals from 25
shots. That's not premier league quality (or England international quality).


 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  

Sent: Fri Jan 21 18:23:06 2011
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill 

Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra

  _  

From: Steven Millward  

Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:08:06 +1100

To: 

ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

 

I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves pl

RE: [BTMO] I give up

[Jeremy Tonks]

I think Millwall have active fans?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 9:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] I give up

 

Why not go back to supporting Ipswich?

On 25 January 2011 08:14, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

I have finally lost any respect for Mick McCarthy now that he has given that
total waste of space back-pass Henry a new 4 year contract.

 

I'm going to make up 91 slips of paper, representing each of the other
football league teams and pick a new one to support.

 

Mick. you are a plonker.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] I give up

[Jeremy Tonks]

Or Barcelona?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 9:54 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] I give up

 

If I were you I'd support Man Utd.  Given your erhigh expectations, I
think you'll find yourself happier with them in the long run.

On 25 January 2011 09:51, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Now that Keane has gone it might be an option.  I guess they're not as
popular as they were back in the late 70's and early 80's

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 9:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] I give up

 

Why not go back to supporting Ipswich?

On 25 January 2011 08:14, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

I have finally lost any respect for Mick McCarthy now that he has given that
total waste of space back-pass Henry a new 4 year contract.

 

I'm going to make up 91 slips of paper, representing each of the other
football league teams and pick a new one to support.

 

Mick. you are a plonker.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] I give up

[Jeremy Tonks]

Wolfsburg would be rather fitting - except they play in green don't they?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 10:38 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] I give up

 

Maybe I'll have to switch to the German side of my heritage.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 10:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] I give up

 

Or Barcelona?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 9:54 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] I give up

 

If I were you I'd support Man Utd.  Given your erhigh expectations, I
think you'll find yourself happier with them in the long run.

On 25 January 2011 09:51, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Now that Keane has gone it might be an option.  I guess they're not as
popular as they were back in the late 70's and early 80's

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 9:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] I give up

 

Why not go back to supporting Ipswich?

On 25 January 2011 08:14, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

I have finally lost any respect for Mick McCarthy now that he has given that
total waste of space back-pass Henry a new 4 year contract.

 

I'm going to make up 91 slips of paper, representing each of the other
football league teams and pick a new one to support.

 

Mick. you are a plonker.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

[Jeremy Tonks]

Because that would be a good idea.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant that is going to be out
of date before it's even rolled out.  That would give them about $40b to
rebuild infrastructure.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

And so true.  They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by 2013
and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do in this
situation.  

 

You can also guarantee that if the budget is suddenly further in the black
one year than expected they'll find some waste of money to spunk it on
rather than give it back.

 


 

On 27 January 2011 15:49, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about
the flood levy:

 

So swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and
throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma
tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because
suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic
mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school
canteen

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm with you apart from the private school bit - if we stopped funding them
the education system would collapse within 2 years. It's much cheaper to
make the rich richer than to try and bring everyone to the lowest common
denominator.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 7:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?

Middle class welfare would be a great start.

Health insurance subsidies that are a middle class tax dodge and also give
money to hypochondriacs who visit charlatans like reiki practitioners.

The billions wasted on stinking rich private and religious schools.

School chaplaincy program.

Baby bonuses and associated perks that encourage over population.

Involvement in unwinnable wars started by the war mad septics.

MPs and ex MPs outrageous perks. We'd save millions straight away by sending
the lying Rodent to the Hague to be tried with other war criminals.

 

Then get some proper money in.

Make the corporate tax for rip off merchants, such as mining companies and
banks, 75%.

All corporate bonuses to be taxed at a flat rate of 80%.

Make religious organisations pay tax and rates.

The tax rate for junk food companies should be 98%, the same level as the
fat and sugar in their garbage.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant that is going to be out
of date before it's even rolled out.  That would give them about $40b to
rebuild infrastructure.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

And so true.  They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by 2013
and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do in this
situation.  

 

You can also guarantee that if the budget is suddenly further in the black
one year than expected they'll find some waste of money to spunk it on
rather than give it back.

 


 

On 27 January 2011 15:49, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about
the flood levy:

 

So swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and
throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma
tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because
suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic
mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school
canteen

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

[Jeremy Tonks]

It would be cheaper - and probably speed up the banking sector!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 10:03 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Took all my will power not to get political and mention Abbot wanting to go
back to stagecoach and carrier pigeons.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 8:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!! 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy 

Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?

Middle class welfare would be a great start.

Health insurance subsidies that are a middle class tax dodge and also give
money to hypochondriacs who visit charlatans like reiki practitioners.

The billions wasted on stinking rich private and religious schools.

School chaplaincy program.

Baby bonuses and associated perks that encourage over population.

Involvement in unwinnable wars started by the war mad septics.

MPs and ex MPs outrageous perks. We'd save millions straight away by sending
the lying Rodent to the Hague to be tried with other war criminals.

 

Then get some proper money in.

Make the corporate tax for rip off merchants, such as mining companies and
banks, 75%.

All corporate bonuses to be taxed at a flat rate of 80%.

Make religious organisations pay tax and rates.

The tax rate for junk food companies should be 98%, the same level as the
fat and sugar in their garbage.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant that is going to be out
of date before it's even rolled out.  That would give them about $40b to
rebuild infrastructure.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

And so true.  They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by 2013
and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do in this
situation.  

 

You can also guarantee that if the budget is suddenly further in the black
one year than expected they'll find some waste of money to spunk it on
rather than give it back.

 


 

On 27 January 2011 15:49, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about
the flood levy:

 

So swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and
throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma
tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because
suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic
mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school
canteen

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

[Jeremy Tonks]

She's dead in the water - just doesn't get it. Can someone explain to her
that the issue is not that we spend the money but rather where the money
comes from.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 8:35 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

I think Gillard has made a huge gaffe with this one.  The people have
spoken.

 

Double dissolution and let's get the Libs back in.  They know what they're
doing.

On 28 January 2011 08:23, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

It would be cheaper - and probably speed up the banking sector!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 10:03 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Took all my will power not to get political and mention Abbot wanting to go
back to stagecoach and carrier pigeons.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 8:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!! 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy 

Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?

Middle class welfare would be a great start.

Health insurance subsidies that are a middle class tax dodge and also give
money to hypochondriacs who visit charlatans like reiki practitioners.

The billions wasted on stinking rich private and religious schools.

School chaplaincy program.

Baby bonuses and associated perks that encourage over population.

Involvement in unwinnable wars started by the war mad septics.

MPs and ex MPs outrageous perks. We'd save millions straight away by sending
the lying Rodent to the Hague to be tried with other war criminals.

 

Then get some proper money in.

Make the corporate tax for rip off merchants, such as mining companies and
banks, 75%.

All corporate bonuses to be taxed at a flat rate of 80%.

Make religious organisations pay tax and rates.

The tax rate for junk food companies should be 98%, the same level as the
fat and sugar in their garbage.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant that is going to be out
of date before it's even rolled out.  That would give them about $40b to
rebuild infrastructure.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

And so true.  They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by 2013
and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do in this
situation.  

 

You can also guarantee that if the budget is suddenly further in the black
one year than expected they'll find some waste of money to spunk it on
rather than give it back.

 


 

On 27 January 2011 15:49, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about
the flood levy:

 

So swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and
throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma
tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because
suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic
mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school
canteen

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

[Jeremy Tonks]

I was half hoping no one would raise this nasty. You're right. And many of
them are uninsured because they live in flood prone areas and are,
therefore, by definition uninsurable. But what do you do when everything you
have, house and possessions, is destroyed. A $15,000 handout from the govt
won't do a great deal.

 

It must also be very frustrating for people who have been in isolated
pockets of flooding (6 to 20 homes effected - like in the Illawarra floods
in the late 90's) over the last 20 years to see the amount of money flowing
in when they got very little to nothing.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:00 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

I guess the lesson is dont waste your money paying for insurance as the
council will pay through a relief fund, and the govt will levy money, from
those who did pay for insurance (and who paid higher premiums because of
those who took the risk and didnt get insurance and got burned). Same
happened with the NSW bushfires.

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about
the flood levy:

 

So swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and
throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma
tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because
suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic
mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school
canteen

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Man Utd

[Jeremy Tonks]

There's only one problem with that Rog.

.they are beatable apparently ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 10:46 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

I watched the Chel$ki game.

Lucky we've played them twice already.

Hope they have games left against our rival no-hopers.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 9:06 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

Sorry "Any of those 3"

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Wed Feb 02 09:04:13 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man Utd 

"..either of those 3.." ???

Stop listening to TM's waffle and bullshite.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 8:57 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

I've just watched Man Utd beat Villa 3-1 but I reckon we've got chance to
beat them on the weekend if we can stop Rooney, Berbatov, Giggs, Nani,
Vidic, Evra and Vand Der Sar.  The rest of them are rubbish.

I also don't understand how Carrick, O'Shea and Anderson get to wear a Man
Utd shirt; I wouldn't have either of those 3 in our team. 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Man Utd

[Jeremy Tonks]

I certainly hope so - like you said.

 

I'm glad we've played them twice (and got 3 pts!).

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 1:15 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

On this morning's showing and with Torres in the team you'd need 6 goals
against them for the chance of a draw.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 1:07 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

There's only one problem with that Rog.

.they are beatable apparently ;)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 10:46 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

I watched the Chel$ki game.

Lucky we've played them twice already.

Hope they have games left against our rival no-hopers.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 9:06 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

Sorry "Any of those 3"

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Wed Feb 02 09:04:13 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Man Utd 

"..either of those 3.." ???

Stop listening to TM's waffle and bullshite.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 8:57 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Man Utd

 

I've just watched Man Utd beat Villa 3-1 but I reckon we've got chance to
beat them on the weekend if we can stop Rooney, Berbatov, Giggs, Nani,
Vidic, Evra and Vand Der Sar.  The rest of them are rubbish.

I also don't understand how Carrick, O'Shea and Anderson get to wear a Man
Utd shirt; I wouldn't have either of those 3 in our team. 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] 89th minute

[Jeremy Tonks]

Yeah that'd be right - plenty of time for the *(&**&( s to score a 98th
minute winner!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 8:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] 89th minute

 

Let's bring on a striker to try and win the game.  Should be plenty of time.

 

 

Marcus Chantry 
Associate Director  *  Senior Product Manager  *  Macquarie Life

Banking and Financial Services Group * Macquarie Group Limited * 1 Shelley
St, Sydney, NSW, 2000

T 02 8232 4259* M 0448 887 627 * marcus.chan...@macquarie.com

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] RE: Who's on the list?

[Jeremy Tonks]

It's sounds like you need Magic Mick to sort out the team and the
arrangements!

Wish I could be with you - it will happen this year.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 11:47 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] RE: Who's on the list?

 

Ok, I'm now proposing we postpone the Summer meeting until 19th Feb to
coincide with Millward's Birthday middy party.  Any objections to that? 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 10:15 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] RE: Who's on the list?

 

Does anyone know when Steve and Jim can make it? Maybe Mr. Millward's
birthday might be the go?

 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 10:10 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] RE: Who's on the list?

 

Not sure about Elliott, but Jim and Steve can't do tomorrow.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 9:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Who's on the list?

Does anyone know whether Codsall Jim, Elliot, Steve Edwards etc are still on
this mailing list?  If not can someone let them know about the catch-up
tomorrow.

 

Cheers,

Marcus

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] I'll have half whatever he's on

[Jeremy Tonks]

It's bloody frustrating isn't it? We've won 7 games (I think). 4 of those
are Manure, Chelski, Manshitty and L'pool at Anfield. And we're still at the
bottom. I know it's hard to play well against crap teams. But really!

 

Magic Mick Manager for Life!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 6 February 2011 6:46 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] I'll have half whatever he's on

 

Moan, moan, whinge, whinge, we only beat Man U by one goal, we were lucky,
Mick got lucky, Man U were bound to lose sometime, we'd never do it again,
he's still a rubbish manager etc etc

There, saved you all the effort.

On 4 February 2011 16:28, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

For most human beings with any form of affliction, the hardest part of all
is accepting or admitting that you have a problem so you spend a lot of time
in a state of denial and delusion.   I fear that Mick might not know yet
that he has a problem.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 9:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] I'll have half whatever he's on

 

"We'd actually played alright in the game and scrapped it out like we always
do.

''We'd actually played well with a really solid performance away from home
against a good team."

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

And by association.

.Magic Mick Manager For Life!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:34 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Rog just compared Henry's passing to Milijas's...I'm converted.

 

Foley to the bench instead

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 09:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

Yes, even a monkey typing will come up with something that's not total
rubbish eventually.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:22 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Are you supporting Mick in his choice to play Henry there Rog?

On 7 February 2011 10:18, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Er, can I be a dissenting voice?

Think Henry does his job of protecting the back line well and he even tried
a 50 yard Milijas type pass, once.

 

Never watched the match Steve??

Did you think the castrati would put out the reserves again?

 

We certainly deserved the win.

Thought the inclusion from the start of players who can hold and pass the
ball like Milijas and O'Hara made the difference from the Notlob
abomination.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Everyone finally starting to realise that Henry is over hyped and
useless...and now I'm hearing he's in the England squad...what is this world
coming to?

 

He's the most negative player evercan't hold onto the ball and just has
to pass it back...he frustrates me so much.

 

On a more positive note...Hamill and O'hara making a difference already...if
Macarthy plays Hunt ahead of Hamill he should be white coated.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 08:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

Definitely deserved to get the result.  United didn't create much after the
first 15-20 minutes.  Henry is still tripe though.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:52 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

 

Did anyone watch the Wolves match?  I am recording it tomorrow.  Was it
deserved?

On 7 February 2011 09:48, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Fickle supporters.  Surely there's nothing else to do in Newcastle so not
sure why they left.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:45 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

 

Happier than those Newcastle fans who walked out after 26 minutes.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:24 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

 

http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/10-11/comment/fan/17142.html

 

 

Marcus Chantry 
Associate Director  *  Senior Product Manager  *  Macquarie Life

Banking and Financial Services Group * Macquarie Group Limited * 1 Shelley
St, Sydney, NSW, 2000

T 02 8232 4259* M 0448 887 627 * marcus.chan...@macquarie.com

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

I've been a Milijas fan since I saw the Bolton game 14 months ago. Decent
workrate and he scored a screamer.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:59 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Milijas is my man and my head's not for turning.

Sure you'd be a fan as well if you watched us.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

No need to deny that you love Mick and Henry.

On 7 February 2011 10:40, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Hey, hang on a minute, it was only one pass.

Maybe he thought Hennessey was running down the right and instinct took
over.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:34 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Rog just compared Henry's passing to Milijas's...I'm converted.

 

Foley to the bench instead

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 09:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

Yes, even a monkey typing will come up with something that's not total
rubbish eventually.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:22 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Are you supporting Mick in his choice to play Henry there Rog?

On 7 February 2011 10:18, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Er, can I be a dissenting voice?

Think Henry does his job of protecting the back line well and he even tried
a 50 yard Milijas type pass, once.

 

Never watched the match Steve??

Did you think the castrati would put out the reserves again?

 

We certainly deserved the win.

Thought the inclusion from the start of players who can hold and pass the
ball like Milijas and O'Hara made the difference from the Notlob
abomination.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Everyone finally starting to realise that Henry is over hyped and
useless...and now I'm hearing he's in the England squad...what is this world
coming to?

 

He's the most negative player evercan't hold onto the ball and just has
to pass it back...he frustrates me so much.

 

On a more positive note...Hamill and O'hara making a difference already...if
Macarthy plays Hunt ahead of Hamill he should be white coated.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 08:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

Definitely deserved to get the result.  United didn't create much after the
first 15-20 minutes.  Henry is still tripe though.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:52 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

 

Did anyone watch the Wolves match?  I am recording it tomorrow.  Was it
deserved?

On 7 February 2011 09:48, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Fickle supporters.  Surely there's nothing else to do in Newcastle so not
sure why they left.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:45 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

 

Happier than those Newcastle fans who walked out after 26 minutes.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:24 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves

 

http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/10-11/comment/fan/17142.html

 

 

Marcus Chantry 
Associate Director  *  Senior Product Manager  *  Macquarie Life

Banking and Financial Services Group * Macquarie Group Limited * 1 Shelley
St, Sydney, NSW, 2000

T 02 8232 4259* M 0448 887 627 * marcus.chan...@macquarie.com

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Does that mean we still have to play Manure, Shitty, L'pooh and Chelsea?

Cos we sure as hell can't beat anyone else.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 1:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

I've just been looking at the fixtures for the bottom six teams.  My
informed guess at this point is that the three relegated teams will be:

 

18. West Ham

19. Wigan

20. West Brom

 

I think Birmingham and Wolves will get enough points from the teams they
have to play.  Blackpool will just scrape by.

 

Anyone else care to stick their neck out now and we'l compare at the end of
the season?


 

On 7 February 2011 12:48, Steven Millward  wrote:

Don't have HD.  I couldn't see it on the normal 2

On 7 February 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Failure number 2.  It was shown again in all it's glory on Fox Sports 2 HD
yesterday afternoon.  They replay all of the matches back-to-back every
Sunday.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 11:34 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 


Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

I am ashamed.  I didn't realise it was tea time kick off.  If it had been
shown again I would have watched it but I did trawl through three days of
Foxtel programme info to find the replay, which surely is a small form of
contrition?

 

What shall we do on my birthday/Wolves do?  I like the idea of a Middy
Marathon but I think my brain is writing cheques that my body can't cash any
more.

On 7 February 2011 11:06, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

You should be ashamed Steve.  4:30am kick-off should be a reasonable time
for a parent with a young child.  Surely it would be very close to your
normal wake up time and for a match of such magnitude any extra effort
required should have been made, but to watch it 3 days late is just
appalling!!

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 11:02 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

I need my sleep.  I shall watch it on Tuesday night.

On 7 February 2011 10:59, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Milijas is my man and my head's not for turning.

Sure you'd be a fan as well if you watched us.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:50 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

No need to deny that you love Mick and Henry.

On 7 February 2011 10:40, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Hey, hang on a minute, it was only one pass.

Maybe he thought Hennessey was running down the right and instinct took
over.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:34 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Rog just compared Henry's passing to Milijas's...I'm converted.

 

Foley to the bench instead

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 09:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

Yes, even a monkey typing will come up with something that's not total
rubbish eventually.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:22 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Are you supporting Mick in his choice to play Henry there Rog?

On 7 February 2011 10:18, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Er, can I be a dissenting voice?

Think Henry does his job of protecting the back line well and he even tried
a 50 yard Milijas type pass, once.

 

Never watched the match Steve??

Did you think the castrati would put out the reserves again?

 

We certainly deserved the win.

Thought the inclusion from the start of players who can hold and pass the
ball like Milijas and O'Hara made the difference from the Notlob
abomination.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]

 

Everyone finally starting to realise that Henry is over hyped and
useless...and now I'm hearing he's in the England squad...what is this world
coming to?

 

He's the most negative player evercan't hold onto the ball and just has
to pass it back...he frustrates me so much.

 

On a more positive note...Hamill and O'hara making a difference already...if
Macarthy plays Hunt

RE: [BTMO] Fw: Wolves will beat you 2 - 1 on...

[Jeremy Tonks]

Good value - but not worth much with the bookies!

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul 
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 11:55 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Fw: Wolves will beat you 2 - 1 on...

Hello Rog!
My prediction last week to my brother in law.
-- SMS --
To: +61405363673
Sent: 5 Feb 2011 08:29
Subject: Wolves will beat you 2 - 1 on...

Wolves will beat you 2 - 1 on Sunday. Cheers Paul
Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!


-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Season starts here

[Jeremy Tonks]

I agree with Steve's predictions..

 

However if:

Shit 2 - Wolves 0 

Blackpool 3 - Wolves 1

 

I don't think we move out of the relegation zone.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 13 February 2011 9:17 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [BTMO] Season starts here

 

The game against the shit next week is so big.  The Manure win was a big one
as it has kept us in touch, and only losing by two to Arsenal has left our
goal difference intact.

Shit 0 - Wolves 2, we move out of the relegation zone.
Blackpool 0 - Spurs 3
Wolves 3 - Blackpool 1 and we're up to 16th

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Season starts here [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'd be surprised if we have that many draws! Almost as many as we've had all
season.

But even 3 or 4 wins should be enough as the other strugglers draw.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 14 February 2011 9:33 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Season starts here [sec=unclassified]

 

I have taken a look at our final fixtures and this is how I reckon things
will transpire:

 


Baggies

Away

0

 


Blackpool

Home

3

 


Spurs

Home

0

 


Villa

Away

0

 


Newcastle

Away

0

 


Everton

Home

1

 


Stoke

Away

0

 


Fulham

Home

3

 


Blues

Away

0

 


Baggies

Home

3

 


Sunderland

Away

0

 


Blackburn

Home

1

 


 

 

11

points

 

So 11 points from the remaining games gives us 35 points, which will be a
relegation spot.

 

The reduced crowds from being in the Championship next year means that it
will be an ideal time to undertake the first phase of the Molineux
redevelopment, which in turn will help us attract new players when we get
promoted the following season.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 14 February 2011 9:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Season starts here [sec=unclassified]

 

I think if we beat them at the Whorethorns the thicko Tesco supporters will
be on his back straight away and they'll sink.  The Anfield debarcle is too
fresh in people's memories and he's arriving at the club with baggage. 

His success at Fulham was on the back of high wages.  He has no chance to
sign any players.  At Fulham he got nine points from his first thirteen
league games, so it's not really a choice between Fulham Woy and Liverpool
Woy.  Both are poor in the short term.

 

Several Liverpool players said he was not motivating, and motivation is
really the only tool he has at his disposal to turn this around.  

 

Albion 0 Wolves 2

37'  Miljas corner nodded in by Berra

61'  Doyle from a Hammill cross-cum-through-ball

 

Watch them stuff us now I've said all that ; )

 

I think we'll be too good for Blackpool too.  We are finally getting to a
point where our best team is becoming clear.  

 



 

On 14 February 2011 08:46, Morris, Lee SGT 
wrote:

I must comment on the way Arsenal play football, absolutely superb to
watch...they ripped us apart...not that that is difficult.

 

I think we may get 4 points out of the next two games...could be enough...If
we loose one game we are fooked I reckon. 

 

I honestly think beating Blackpool will be vital...got a sneaky feeling
Albion will get out of trouble with Hodgson.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 14 February 2011 07:39
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Season starts here

They'd be excellent odds if TM realises we have to win this one and doesn't
send out a team for a draw.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 14 February 2011 7:37 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Season starts here

 

Wolves $3.60 for the win

On 13 February 2011 11:16, Steven Millward  wrote:

I'll put a ton on the Albion result and then invest the winnings on the
blackpool result.

 

On 13 February 2011 10:39, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Found an early opener and  started celebrating your birthday already?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 13 February 2011 9:17 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [BTMO] Season starts here

 

The game against the shit next week is so big.  The Manure win was a big one
as it has kept us in touch, and only losing by two to Arsenal has left our
goal difference intact.



Shit 0 - Wolves 2, we move out of the relegation zone.
Blackpool 0 - Spurs 3
Wolves 3 - Blackpool 1 and we're up to 16th

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Title winners: Non-Wolves related

[Jeremy Tonks]

Yes.

 

My prediction is Manure or Chelski.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 14 February 2011 9:41 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Title winners: Non-Wolves related

 

After seeing Rooney's brilliant winner against Man City on Saturday night,
it seems it is turning into a 2 horse race for the title; but looking at Man
Utd's remaining fixtures they still have to play Chelsea, Liverpool and
Arsenal away and Chelsea at home so that could smash the whole race wide
open again.

 

Anyone willing to make a prediction on who is going to win the title?

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Away form

[Jeremy Tonks]

Forget stats - we're either coming good or going to hell in a handbasket.

 

It's 19 points or 7 and grudge matches against Leyton Orient :-P

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 14 February 2011 12:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Away form

 

So far this season we have averaged 0.31 points per game, so with 6 away
games remaining we should expect a return of 1.85 points.  Given 1.85 is an
impossibility, we are either going to draw one game or over-achieve and draw
2 games.  Either way, it doesn't look particularly rosy.

 

But we should never let stats get in the way of a good story or prediction.

 

 

Marcus Chantry 
Associate Director  *  Senior Product Manager  *  Macquarie Life

Banking and Financial Services Group * Macquarie Group Limited * 1 Shelley
St, Sydney, NSW, 2000

T 02 8232 4259* M 0448 887 627 * marcus.chan...@macquarie.com

 

 
macquarie-life-beaton-email-sig.jpg

 

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!
<>

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Yuw weall ave we Spweach Wimparied Pweoples Lwiberwation Fwont wafter yuw
fwor thwat.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Me to too.  I think it is going to be much harder to twy and get a very ware
away win at the weekend.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 2:21 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Seriously I weally weally wate him. He's a good manager.

 

  _  

From: Morris, Lee SGT 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:19
To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

Wowwied

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Woy

So how does everyone feel about nice Woy Hodgson being appointed as the
Baggies manager?.  I reckon he's a good bet to keep them up (unfortunately).

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm not saying it should be - there seems to be a lot of people here
thinking Woy will save Albion. I don't think that's the case - but if he
does (and we lose the next game) then Marcus has to be favourite.

 

I'm still backing you Steve (and Magic Mick Manager for life)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:10 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Why is it?  Roy was rubbish when he started at Fulham, as he has been
rubbish at many other clubs.  The Liverpool players have said he didn't
motivate so what is he going to do exactly when he can't buy players?  He's
coming with a big cloud over his head.


 

On 15 February 2011 15:40, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Yuw weall ave we Spweach Wimparied Pweoples Lwiberwation Fwont wafter yuw
fwor thwat.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Me to too.  I think it is going to be much harder to twy and get a very ware
away win at the weekend.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 2:21 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Seriously I weally weally wate him. He's a good manager.

 

  _  

From: Morris, Lee SGT 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:19
To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

Wowwied

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Woy

So how does everyone feel about nice Woy Hodgson being appointed as the
Baggies manager?.  I reckon he's a good bet to keep them up (unfortunately).

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Shame I live where I do - 20k drive to put something on that. I feel good
about Wolves for this one.

 

Run away He's put the mockers on them.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

$1.91

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:16 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

What odds are the baggies?

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:13 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

He hasn't put his money where his mouth is, we're $4.00 now.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Yuw weall ave we Spweach Wimparied Pweoples Lwiberwation Fwont wafter yuw
fwor thwat.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Me to too.  I think it is going to be much harder to twy and get a very ware
away win at the weekend.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 2:21 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Seriously I weally weally wate him. He's a good manager.

 

  _  

From: Morris, Lee SGT 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:19
To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

Wowwied

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Woy

So how does everyone feel about nice Woy Hodgson being appointed as the
Baggies manager?.  I reckon he's a good bet to keep them up (unfortunately).

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

Go for it Marcus!

Sandwell 1 - Yams 3

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Rog, what are the odds for the Baggies to win 4-1?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Shame I live where I do - 20k drive to put something on that. I feel good
about Wolves for this one.

 

Run away He's put the mockers on them.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

$1.91

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:16 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

What odds are the baggies?

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:13 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

He hasn't put his money where his mouth is, we're $4.00 now.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Yuw weall ave we Spweach Wimparied Pweoples Lwiberwation Fwont wafter yuw
fwor thwat.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Me to too.  I think it is going to be much harder to twy and get a very ware
away win at the weekend.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 2:21 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Seriously I weally weally wate him. He's a good manager.

 

  _  

From: Morris, Lee SGT 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:19
To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

Wowwied

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Woy

So how does everyone feel about nice Woy Hodgson being appointed as the
Baggies manager?.  I reckon he's a good bet to keep them up (unfortunately).

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

ID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 3 - 0   56.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 3 - 1   31.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 3 - 2   34.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 4 - 0   201.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 4 - 1   101.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 4 - 2   101.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 4 - 3   151.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 5 - 0   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 5 - 1   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 6 - 0   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 6 - 1   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 7 - 0   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 7 - 1   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 8 - 0   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 8 - 1   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 9 - 0   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 10 - 0   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 5 - 2   476.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

Wolves 5 - 3   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C> 

Wolves 5 - 4   501.00
<https://www.sportsbet.com.au/sports/event/SportID/71/CompetitionPID/9454/Ro
undPID/29880/EventID/162/MenuLevel/C>  

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Rog, what are the odds for the Baggies to win 4-1?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Shame I live where I do - 20k drive to put something on that. I feel good
about Wolves for this one.

 

Run away He's put the mockers on them.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

$1.91

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:16 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

What odds are the baggies?

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:13 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

He hasn't put his money where his mouth is, we're $4.00 now.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

It'd be just our luck though

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 6:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

On the highlights show they said he'd improved Fulham's defence.

Only one clean sheet when he joined and then quite a few for the rest of the
season.

The next season they had the second best defence after Manure.

Bit too much to expect him to work a miracle on Albion's defence in a week
though.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 5:57 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

But presumably he was trying really hard to win over the Liverpool fans and
the Fulham fans?  I'm not sure what skill he'll be drawing on to make this
miraculous change to Albion as he's never demonstrated it before.  

 

He's there to rebuild and bring them up again.

On 15 February 2011 16:14, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

He's going to be twying weally, weally hard to win over the West bwom fans
so that makes him vewy dangerwous to wolves.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:10 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Why is it?  Roy was rubbish when he started at Fulham, as he has been
rubbish at many other clubs.  The Liverpool players have said he didn't
motivate so what is he going to do exactly when he can't buy players?  He's
coming with a big cloud over his head.


 

On 15 February 2011 15:40, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Yuw weall ave we Spweach Wimparied Pweoples Lwiberwation Fwont wafter yuw
fwor thwat.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Me to too.  I think it is going to be much harder to twy and get a very ware
away win at the weekend.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 2:21 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Seriously I weally weally wate him. He's a good manager.

 

  _  

From: Morris, Lee SGT 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:19
To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

Wowwied

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Woy

So how does everyone feel about nice Woy Hodgson being appointed as the
Baggies manager?.  I reckon he's a good bet to keep them up (unfortunately).

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

What he said.

(do dah, do dah)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 6:42 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Only in that he bought good players on high wages.  I could do that.  I
reckon I could motivate people more than Roy too.  He claims he's the
"European Alex Fergusson".  What a bunch of arse.  If he was any good he'd
have stayed at one club and made them great rather than being a journeyman
around the small leagues of Europe.

Sandwell Town are going down, do dah, do dah.

On 15 February 2011 23:13, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Are you saying improved results are nothing to do with the manager???

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 7:36 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Nine points from his first thirteen games at Fulham, shipping eight goals in
the first four games.  I doubt that would be enough points.  West Brom
haven't conceded fewer than two in a game since last year.

Surely the improvement of Fulham's defence came from signing the likes of
Schwarzer and Hangeland?

Come on you miserable fuckers, get behind your club.

On 15 February 2011 18:34, Rog & Reet  wrote:

On the highlights show they said he'd improved Fulham's defence.

Only one clean sheet when he joined and then quite a few for the rest of the
season.

The next season they had the second best defence after Manure.

Bit too much to expect him to work a miracle on Albion's defence in a week
though.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 5:57 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

But presumably he was trying really hard to win over the Liverpool fans and
the Fulham fans?  I'm not sure what skill he'll be drawing on to make this
miraculous change to Albion as he's never demonstrated it before.  

 

He's there to rebuild and bring them up again.

On 15 February 2011 16:14, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

He's going to be twying weally, weally hard to win over the West bwom fans
so that makes him vewy dangerwous to wolves.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:10 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Why is it?  Roy was rubbish when he started at Fulham, as he has been
rubbish at many other clubs.  The Liverpool players have said he didn't
motivate so what is he going to do exactly when he can't buy players?  He's
coming with a big cloud over his head.


 

On 15 February 2011 15:40, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Suddenly the smart money is on Mr Chantwy rather than Mr Millrard

 

But that might change. 

 

Too late in the season - Baggies still going down.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 3:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Yuw weall ave we Spweach Wimparied Pweoples Lwiberwation Fwont wafter yuw
fwor thwat.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

Me to too.  I think it is going to be much harder to twy and get a very ware
away win at the weekend.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 2:21 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

 

Seriously I weally weally wate him. He's a good manager.

 

  _  

From: Morris, Lee SGT 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:19
To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Woy [sec=unclassified]

Wowwied

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Woy

So how does everyone feel about nice Woy Hodgson being appointed as the
Baggies manager?.  I reckon he's a good bet to keep them up (unfortunately).

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick 

RE: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

[Jeremy Tonks]

Where's your optimism? Surely, once Henry's passed it back to the keeper it
must go somewhere near the front two.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 2:02 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

Do you have $50 on every game?  You must be impoverished if so,

 

SEB and Fletcher could have a nice chat while they watch the ball getting
kicked about behind them.

 

Do you think the odds will go any higher?

On 16 February 2011 13:57, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Sadly my $50 went on at $4.00 which I thought was a very good price.

If I knew we were starting with SEB & Fletcher up the bet would have been at
least doubled.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 1:46 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

That is outstanding value for a derby game

 

How much have you had Rog?  I shall have $50 I think.

 

 

 

 

 


 

On 16 February 2011 13:28, Rog & Reet  wrote:

We're now $4.33

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Saturday

[Jeremy Tonks]

Very reluctantly giving my apologies. I'd love to be there.

Never been opposed to beer and a good laugh.

 

And it may well be the pre-relegation party.

.but I'm hoping it won't happen in my lifetime ;)

 

Jeremy

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 2:42 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Saturday

 

How many takers have we got for the pre-relegation party on Saturday?

 

I know for the Official Pre-meeting Meeting there will be:

* Roger

* Lee Morris

* UK Steve

* Marcus

* Les

* Graham Spittles (colleague of Marcus)

* Martin Poole

*  Who else

 

How many have we got for Steve's Birthday Party (aka Official NSWolves
Summer Meeting)?

 

Use the voting buttons and let me know who's coming.  See you all there.

 

Cheers,

Marcus

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm right behind you in the silliness. Today I drove those 20kms and put
money on a football match for the first time in my life.

 

 

 

O yes - I backed Wolves to win in case some smart. was wondering.

 

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 7:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

I've made this game against the shit as big as it can be:

It's against our biggest rivals
I've had a sizable cash bet
I'm staking my right to free thought and this game is heavily connected to
the outcome of that bet.
The team I love could go down if we lose.
The manager I love could get sacked if we go down.

But if we win




On 16 February 2011 19:11, Steven Millward  wrote:

I have had $70 on the win at 4.33.  Silly.

 

On 16 February 2011 13:57, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Sadly my $50 went on at $4.00 which I thought was a very good price.

If I knew we were starting with SEB & Fletcher up the bet would have been at
least doubled.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 1:46 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

That is outstanding value for a derby game

 

How much have you had Rog?  I shall have $50 I think.

 

 

 

 

 


 

On 16 February 2011 13:28, Rog & Reet  wrote:

We're now $4.33

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm sure I remember M subsequently claiming that there were mitigating
circumstances.

Was it something about not being able to feel his legs? I don't remember the
details??

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 8:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

...didn't look you loved our manager anywhere near as much as Marcus did in
Perth.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 7:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

I've made this game against the shit as big as it can be:

It's against our biggest rivals
I've had a sizable cash bet
I'm staking my right to free thought and this game is heavily connected to
the outcome of that bet.
The team I love could go down if we lose.
The manager I love could get sacked if we go down.

But if we win




On 16 February 2011 19:11, Steven Millward  wrote:

I have had $70 on the win at 4.33.  Silly.

 

On 16 February 2011 13:57, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Sadly my $50 went on at $4.00 which I thought was a very good price.

If I knew we were starting with SEB & Fletcher up the bet would have been at
least doubled.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 1:46 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Someone thinks Roy's ok

 

That is outstanding value for a derby game

 

How much have you had Rog?  I shall have $50 I think.

 

 

 

 

 


 

On 16 February 2011 13:28, Rog & Reet  wrote:

We're now $4.33

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

RE: [NSWolves]

[Jeremy Tonks]

It's ok Marcus. We won't concede a goal in the 99th minute again :-(

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 12:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] 

 

Effin useless cnts. 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

[Jeremy Tonks]

I must have missed the news that MM had been made England manager.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 7:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Ok, can someone please let me know what parallel universe I have found
myself in?  It is a universe where Karl "must back pass, can't run, can't
tackle, can't shoot" Henry is deemed worthy of an England call-up.

 

What the heck is going on?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

[Jeremy Tonks]

Does that mean I'm on my own in YMMMFL club? That's tough - especially as
his ineptitude as cost me money!

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Baffling substitutions.  I'm going off Mick (as I might have to anyway I
might as well ease the transition).

On 21 February 2011 07:58, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Ok, can someone please let me know what parallel universe I have found
myself in?  It is a universe where Karl "must back pass, can't run, can't
tackle, can't shoot" Henry is deemed worthy of an England call-up.

 

What the heck is going on?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

[Jeremy Tonks]

Lobster for me - my first only and last :-(

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:42 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Only $20 for me. I wasn't that confident.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

70 at 4.33, roughly 300 in total

On 21 February 2011 14:18, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA 
wrote:

Marcus,

My first bet of the season: $50 on Wolves at $4.20.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:50 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

We should do a tally of how much dough we collectively lost on The Baggies
game based on Thick Mick's substitution blunder.

 

I lost $50.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:39 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Does that mean I'm on my own in YMMMFL club? That's tough - especially as
his ineptitude as cost me money!

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Baffling substitutions.  I'm going off Mick (as I might have to anyway I
might as well ease the transition).

On 21 February 2011 07:58, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Ok, can someone please let me know what parallel universe I have found
myself in?  It is a universe where Karl "must back pass, can't run, can't
tackle, can't shoot" Henry is deemed worthy of an England call-up.

 

What the heck is going on?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

  _  

CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be
unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will
not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any
views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action
taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this
message.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

[Jeremy Tonks]

I wish we were 9th against the top half and 10th against the bottom half :-(

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/teams/Wolverhampton.html

 

Goals let in during the last 5 makes you want to weep.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:52 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Someone on Mol Mix calculated that we've lost seven points this season to
late goals.

Thick Mick Out

On 21 February 2011 15:41, LEESE Matthew 
wrote:

Only $20 for me. I wasn't that confident.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward

Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:22 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

70 at 4.33, roughly 300 in total

On 21 February 2011 14:18, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA 
wrote:

Marcus,

My first bet of the season: $50 on Wolves at $4.20.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:50 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

We should do a tally of how much dough we collectively lost on The Baggies
game based on Thick Mick's substitution blunder.

 

I lost $50.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:39 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Does that mean I'm on my own in YMMMFL club? That's tough - especially as
his ineptitude as cost me money!

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Baffling substitutions.  I'm going off Mick (as I might have to anyway I
might as well ease the transition).

On 21 February 2011 07:58, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Ok, can someone please let me know what parallel universe I have found
myself in?  It is a universe where Karl "must back pass, can't run, can't
tackle, can't shoot" Henry is deemed worthy of an England call-up.

 

What the heck is going on?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

  _  

CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be
unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will
not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any
views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action
taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this
message.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
in this message are those of the individual send

RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

[Jeremy Tonks]

But if you take the last 5 + injury we're only -2 (9 for and 11 against) 

Gobsmacked to see that we've scored 4-1 in injury time (or can't I read?)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/teams/Wolverhampton.html

 

Goals let in during the last 5 makes you want to weep.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:52 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Someone on Mol Mix calculated that we've lost seven points this season to
late goals.

Thick Mick Out

On 21 February 2011 15:41, LEESE Matthew 
wrote:

Only $20 for me. I wasn't that confident.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward

Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:22 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

70 at 4.33, roughly 300 in total

On 21 February 2011 14:18, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA 
wrote:

Marcus,

My first bet of the season: $50 on Wolves at $4.20.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:50 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

We should do a tally of how much dough we collectively lost on The Baggies
game based on Thick Mick's substitution blunder.

 

I lost $50.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:39 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Does that mean I'm on my own in YMMMFL club? That's tough - especially as
his ineptitude as cost me money!

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Baffling substitutions.  I'm going off Mick (as I might have to anyway I
might as well ease the transition).

On 21 February 2011 07:58, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Ok, can someone please let me know what parallel universe I have found
myself in?  It is a universe where Karl "must back pass, can't run, can't
tackle, can't shoot" Henry is deemed worthy of an England call-up.

 

What the heck is going on?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

  _  

CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be
unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will
not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any
views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action
taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this
message.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail o

RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

[Jeremy Tonks]

I thought I might not be able to read. 

Let me make sure I've got it - in the league 85-90 means 85-90+. Is that
correct?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 5:05 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

The "injury time goals" are extra time goals in cup matches.

The last 5 minutes in the league we are 4 to 9.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 4:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

But if you take the last 5 + injury we're only -2 (9 for and 11 against) 

Gobsmacked to see that we've scored 4-1 in injury time (or can't I read?)

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/teams/Wolverhampton.html

 

Goals let in during the last 5 makes you want to weep.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:52 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Someone on Mol Mix calculated that we've lost seven points this season to
late goals.

Thick Mick Out

On 21 February 2011 15:41, LEESE Matthew 
wrote:

Only $20 for me. I wasn't that confident.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward

Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:22 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

70 at 4.33, roughly 300 in total

On 21 February 2011 14:18, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA 
wrote:

Marcus,

My first bet of the season: $50 on Wolves at $4.20.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:50 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

We should do a tally of how much dough we collectively lost on The Baggies
game based on Thick Mick's substitution blunder.

 

I lost $50.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:39 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Does that mean I'm on my own in YMMMFL club? That's tough - especially as
his ineptitude as cost me money!

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 1:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Parallel Universe

 

Baffling substitutions.  I'm going off Mick (as I might have to anyway I
might as well ease the transition).

On 21 February 2011 07:58, Marcus Chantry 
wrote:

Ok, can someone please let me know what parallel universe I have found
myself in?  It is a universe where Karl "must back pass, can't run, can't
tackle, can't shoot" Henry is deemed worthy of an England call-up.

 

What the heck is going on?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

  _  

CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be
unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will
not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any
views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action
taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this
m

RE: [NSWolves] Easy money?

[Jeremy Tonks]

In last week's conversation about Henry's England call up I naively assumed
we were talking football.

Judging by England's performance against Nederlanders last night he was
opening the bowling.

Bleedin' heck we're in woeful form!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:06 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Easy money?

 

NSW TAB $1.85

Bookie $1.91

 

Blackpool are $4.00 with both.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm still a bit confident v Blackpool. Perhaps MM will tell the lads we're
playing Chelsea.

I'm tipping a win - any other result will see us playing Leyton Orient all
too soon.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 5:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

I have to agree Steve but I didn't want to post anything about the Blackpool
result, or its possible implications, for fear of being dismissed as being
my normal 'negative' self.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 5:26 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

I lost my faith last night.  I believe we will get relegated now. 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

[Jeremy Tonks]

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 27 February 2011 7:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

Should have been five.  Don't know what was wrong with BGG's goal from the
corner.

There's always a welcome from the Happy Clappers.  I only really went for a
little holiday.  Marcus will be welcome in May as a permanent member.  You
might find it a little lonely on your own then Rog.



On 27 February 2011 09:12, Rog & Reet  wrote:

How the hell did that shower beat Spurs?

Adam must be even better than Milijas, gasp.

 

How was your welcome back to the fold Steve?

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 27 February 2011 5:37 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

Melchester Wanderers it is then.  I've got the faith back.  Now we're out of
the bottom three I fancy us to stay there.  We have a much easier run in th
than the others and we have the team to do it.

I'm a bit embarrassed to have started this email in the week to be honest.

On 23 February 2011 19:52, Steven Millward  wrote:

Blackpool look to be out of it though.  I still fancy us to win against them
but it won't pull them back into it.  It's now any three from four and to
come from behind is pure Roy of the Rovers

 

On 23 February 2011 19:34, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

I'm still a bit confident v Blackpool. Perhaps MM will tell the lads we're
playing Chelsea.

I'm tipping a win - any other result will see us playing Leyton Orient all
too soon.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 5:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

I have to agree Steve but I didn't want to post anything about the Blackpool
result, or its possible implications, for fear of being dismissed as being
my normal 'negative' self.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 5:26 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

I lost my faith last night.  I believe we will get relegated now. 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'll say it again,

 

Yay! Magic Mick Manager for life

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 27 February 2011 8:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

Are you speaking in tongues Jez?

Everyone should be happily clapping O'hara.  How long since we've had
someone that can pick the ball up on the edge of the circle, run ten paces
and then score?




On 27 February 2011 19:48, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 27 February 2011 7:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

Should have been five.  Don't know what was wrong with BGG's goal from the
corner.

There's always a welcome from the Happy Clappers.  I only really went for a
little holiday.  Marcus will be welcome in May as a permanent member.  You
might find it a little lonely on your own then Rog.

On 27 February 2011 09:12, Rog & Reet  wrote:

How the hell did that shower beat Spurs?

Adam must be even better than Milijas, gasp.

 

How was your welcome back to the fold Steve?

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 27 February 2011 5:37 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

Melchester Wanderers it is then.  I've got the faith back.  Now we're out of
the bottom three I fancy us to stay there.  We have a much easier run in th
than the others and we have the team to do it.

I'm a bit embarrassed to have started this email in the week to be honest.

On 23 February 2011 19:52, Steven Millward  wrote:

Blackpool look to be out of it though.  I still fancy us to win against them
but it won't pull them back into it.  It's now any three from four and to
come from behind is pure Roy of the Rovers

 

On 23 February 2011 19:34, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

I'm still a bit confident v Blackpool. Perhaps MM will tell the lads we're
playing Chelsea.

I'm tipping a win - any other result will see us playing Leyton Orient all
too soon.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 5:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

I have to agree Steve but I didn't want to post anything about the Blackpool
result, or its possible implications, for fear of being dismissed as being
my normal 'negative' self.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 5:26 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Lost the faith

 

I lost my faith last night.  I believe we will get relegated now. 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Kick-off

[Jeremy Tonks]

I think Karl was still adjusting his armband?

YMMMFL

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 28 February 2011 12:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Kick-off

 

I'm surprised Roger hasn't made mention of the fact that from the kick-off
we actually went forward with O'Hara dribbling the ball straight in to the
Blackpool half.  Absolutely no intention whatsoever to try and pass it all
the way back to Hennessey.  Perhaps Henry isn't the midfield boss anymore
and we have adopted an attacking mindset?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

[Jeremy Tonks]

Yeah but Spurs are easy. What's our record like against them in the previous
three matches?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 2:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

I hardly think this is must win against Spurs.  You're getting the jitters
Paul

On 1 March 2011 09:37, Paul Crowe  wrote:

Baggies should have won at the death, I watched the last 20 minutes as well.
Their equaliser was offside but that Vela kid should have scored again at
the end.

 

Another must win against game against Spurs, hoping their European exertions
decimate their team!!

 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 9:07 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

Shame we've slipped back into the bottom three but at least we aren't rock
bottom.

 

We have a good run of games from here.  There are lots of teams that can get
pulled into this fight.

On 1 March 2011 08:58, Rog & Reet  wrote:

That's about it, one reasonable cross all game.

 

The Baggies have just had two good chances, good goalkeeping, in the final
minute to get the winner.

All over Stoke for the 20 or so minutes I watched though an offside goal for
their equaliser.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 7:28 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

I agree Steve, Jarvis did cross the ball better this match. Doyle should
have done a bit better with one late on.

 

Hammill also looks a good crosser of the ball but nowhere near our best
crosser by far Milijas, who remains on the bench for reasons beyond me?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 28 February 2011 7:32 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

It's true.  He can hit the corner flag avery time.

In all seriousness his crosses weren't bad against Blackpool.  He tends to
get right to the line near the 18 yard box and tehre isn't a lot of time to
react.  He needs to float them in more rather than always rely on pace.

On 28 February 2011 18:57, Rog & Reet  wrote:

"..and he can deliver pinpoints crosses with either foot" Waffler on
highlights show regarding Mr M Jarvis.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus? [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

I, for one, am glad that they're lined up to be our last victims (as we
finish 14th).

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 3:38 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus? [sec=unclassified]

 

Put me down for Blackburn to finish 18th.

$7 is a bit short but easy come easy go.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 3:27 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus? [sec=unclassified]

 

Agree, some quick points would be very very useful.

 

Whatever the result against Spurs there will still be plenty of interesting
scenarios to discuss before this season is over.

 

For what its worth I now think the last relegation spot will be between us
and West Brom. Blackpool and Wigan joining one of us for the drop, West Ham
escaping, but there are so many more possibilities.


 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 13:32
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

Steve, the quicker we win games the better as far as I am concerned. We need
to accumulate points quickly to get out of the drop zone, ease pressure on
our own team and put pressure on the other relegation threatened teams.  

 

A win against Spurs ticks all those boxes for me. We also have 2 away games
against Villa and Newcastle after this game, so would be good to get a few
points of breathing space if we don't pick up any points from these two.

 

A 2 - 1 win for me. Doyle to score the winner, he has to score some time!!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 2:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

I hardly think this is must win against Spurs.  You're getting the jitters
Paul

On 1 March 2011 09:37, Paul Crowe  wrote:

Baggies should have won at the death, I watched the last 20 minutes as well.
Their equaliser was offside but that Vela kid should have scored again at
the end.

 

Another must win against game against Spurs, hoping their European exertions
decimate their team!!

 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 9:07 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

Shame we've slipped back into the bottom three but at least we aren't rock
bottom.

 

We have a good run of games from here.  There are lots of teams that can get
pulled into this fight.

On 1 March 2011 08:58, Rog & Reet  wrote:

That's about it, one reasonable cross all game.

 

The Baggies have just had two good chances, good goalkeeping, in the final
minute to get the winner.

All over Stoke for the 20 or so minutes I watched though an offside goal for
their equaliser.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 7:28 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

I agree Steve, Jarvis did cross the ball better this match. Doyle should
have done a bit better with one late on.

 

Hammill also looks a good crosser of the ball but nowhere near our best
crosser by far Milijas, who remains on the bench for reasons beyond me?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 28 February 2011 7:32 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Did you write this Marcus?

 

It's true.  He can hit the corner flag avery time.

In all seriousness his crosses weren't bad against Blackpool.  He tends to
get right to the line near the 18 yard box and tehre isn't a lot of time to
react.  He needs to float them in more rather than always rely on pace.

On 28 February 2011 18:57, Rog & Reet  wrote:

"..and he can d

RE: [NSWolves] One for Rog

[Jeremy Tonks]

Preach it to 'em brother!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 4:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] One for Rog

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/n/notts_county/9409127.stm

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

[Jeremy Tonks]

I thought Mrs Jarvis would be belting the corner flag with her handbag?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 3:17 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

 

Mrs McCarthy would be standing by drooling as Mrs Keogh, with nobody near
her, missed the purse by a mile.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 1:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

 

If it was Mrs Ebanks-Blake, she'd successfully buy the shoes but then
realise later that they made her arse look big.

 

If it was Mrs McCarthy, she'd realise that she didn't have any shoes but
would go out wearing saucepans on her feet instead.

 



 

On 3 March 2011 12:03, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

No, if it was Mrs Henry she'd turn around and pass the purse all the way to
the back of the queue!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Thu Mar 03 11:53:25 2011 


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman 

 

If it was Mrs Henry she'd go to the bank and pay all the money in.



 

On 3 March 2011 11:44, mark worrall  wrote:

If it was Mrs Doyle, she'd catch the purse and end up flat on her face on
the floor. 

 

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steven Millward 
wrote:

Nice one. 

 

On 3 March 2011 09:33, mark worrall  wrote:

If it was Mrs Jarvis, she'd catch the purse, be first to the counter, then
spill the contents all over the floor and end up with nothing. 

 

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Derek Hughes 
wrote:

Very good this one !! 

 

 

 You're in a shoe shop, second in the queue for the till. Behind the shop
assistant on the till is a pair of shoes which you have seen and which you
must have. The female shopper in front of you has seen them also and is
eyeing them with desire. Both of you have forgotten your purses. It would be
totally rude to push in front of the first woman if you had no money to pay
for the shoes. The shop assistant remains at the till waiting. 

Your friend is trying on another pair of shoes at the back of the shop and
sees your dilemma. She prepares to throw her purse to you. If she does so,
you can catch the purse, then walk round the other shopper and buy the
shoes. At a pinch she could throw the purse ahead of the other shopper and,
*whilst it is in flight* you could nip around the other shopper, catch the
purse and buy the shoes. Always remembering that until the purse had
*actually been thrown* it would be plain wrong to push in front of the other
shopper.

 

 

 

  _  

Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a
look
 .


 

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
The sender cannot guarantee that this email or any attachment to it is free
of computer viruses or other conditions which may damage or interfere with
data, hardware or software with which it might be used. It is sent on the
strict condition that the user carries out and relies on its own procedures
for ensuring that its use will not interfere with the recipients systems and
the recipient assumes all risk of use and absolves the sender of all
responsibility for any consequence of its use.


 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 

Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the

RE: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

[Jeremy Tonks]

Now that was just plain embarrassing.

 

.the fastest world cup century in history - by an Irishman (not MM).

 

Against England - not in my wildest nightmares.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 4:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

 

Could any of you Mrs Strauss fans tell us about her attempts to grab the
purse?

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 4:06 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

 

I thought Mrs Jarvis would be belting the corner flag with her handbag?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 3:17 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

 

Mrs McCarthy would be standing by drooling as Mrs Keogh, with nobody near
her, missed the purse by a mile.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 1:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman

 

If it was Mrs Ebanks-Blake, she'd successfully buy the shoes but then
realise later that they made her arse look big.

 

If it was Mrs McCarthy, she'd realise that she didn't have any shoes but
would go out wearing saucepans on her feet instead.

 



 

On 3 March 2011 12:03, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

No, if it was Mrs Henry she'd turn around and pass the purse all the way to
the back of the queue!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Thu Mar 03 11:53:25 2011 


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fw: How to explain the offside rule to a woman 

 

If it was Mrs Henry she'd go to the bank and pay all the money in.



 

On 3 March 2011 11:44, mark worrall  wrote:

If it was Mrs Doyle, she'd catch the purse and end up flat on her face on
the floor. 

 

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steven Millward 
wrote:

Nice one. 

 

On 3 March 2011 09:33, mark worrall  wrote:

If it was Mrs Jarvis, she'd catch the purse, be first to the counter, then
spill the contents all over the floor and end up with nothing. 

 

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Derek Hughes 
wrote:

Very good this one !! 

 

 

 You're in a shoe shop, second in the queue for the till. Behind the shop
assistant on the till is a pair of shoes which you have seen and which you
must have. The female shopper in front of you has seen them also and is
eyeing them with desire. Both of you have forgotten your purses. It would be
totally rude to push in front of the first woman if you had no money to pay
for the shoes. The shop assistant remains at the till waiting. 

Your friend is trying on another pair of shoes at the back of the shop and
sees your dilemma. She prepares to throw her purse to you. If she does so,
you can catch the purse, then walk round the other shopper and buy the
shoes. At a pinch she could throw the purse ahead of the other shopper and,
*whilst it is in flight* you could nip around the other shopper, catch the
purse and buy the shoes. Always remembering that until the purse had
*actually been thrown* it would be plain wrong to push in front of the other
shopper.

 

 

 

  _  

Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a
look
<http://au.rd.yahoo.com/galaxy/mail/tagline2/*http:/au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/s
marterinbox> .


 

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
The sender cannot guarantee that this email or any attachment to it is free
of computer viruses or other conditions which may damage or interfere with
data, hardware or software with which it might be used. It is sent on the
strict condition that the user carries out and relies on its own procedures
for ensuring that its use will not interfere with the recipients systems and
the recipient assumes all risk of use and absolves the sender of all
responsibility for any consequence of its use.


 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was k

RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

[Jeremy Tonks]

I think you're being a bit harsh Mr Worrall.

. I reckon Hennessy would make it into the second half.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 2:56 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

http://au.sports.yahoo.com/football/news/article/-/9005651/tottenham-to-get-
space-age-jerseys/

 

So whats MM going to do when after 20 mins he's got 11 shirts saying they're
all knackered  ?

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

[Jeremy Tonks]

You've all overlooked a small problem.

 

. we can't afford said 'space age' shirts :-(

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

Actually that could work to our benefit mark.  If there is a player that we
want to substituted (aka Henry or Doyle) the crowd can turn on them, their
stress levels will increase and the shirts will get them substituted.
Master stroke!!!

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:13 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

Hows that going to work when the crowd know that dissing a player will put
their stress level up ? 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

The thing that made me laugh was it says they can measure "acceleration".
That feature would be of no use on Henry, Craddock, Ward or Berra.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:01 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

I think you're being a bit harsh Mr Worrall.

. I reckon Hennessy would make it into the second half.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 2:56 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

http://au.sports.yahoo.com/football/news/article/-/9005651/tottenham-to-get-
space-age-jerseys/

 

So whats MM going to do when after 20 mins he's got 11 shirts saying they're
all knackered  ?

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

[Jeremy Tonks]

What? Used ones from Spurs? Yeah probably!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

Surely they'll offer them at a discount to NPower Championship clubs?

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:42 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

You've all overlooked a small problem.

 

. we can't afford said 'space age' shirts :-(

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

Actually that could work to our benefit mark.  If there is a player that we
want to substituted (aka Henry or Doyle) the crowd can turn on them, their
stress levels will increase and the shirts will get them substituted.
Master stroke!!!

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:13 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

Hows that going to work when the crowd know that dissing a player will put
their stress level up ? 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

The thing that made me laugh was it says they can measure "acceleration".
That feature would be of no use on Henry, Craddock, Ward or Berra.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 3:01 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

I think you're being a bit harsh Mr Worrall.

. I reckon Hennessy would make it into the second half.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 14 March 2011 2:56 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Tottenham to get 'space age' jerseys

 

http://au.sports.yahoo.com/football/news/article/-/9005651/tottenham-to-get-
space-age-jerseys/

 

So whats MM going to do when after 20 mins he's got 11 shirts saying they're
all knackered  ?

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM [sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

And Big Jez!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 17 March 2011 4:27 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM [sec=unclassified]

 

Im a bit p*ssed with MM, as it used to be hard to worship him, then he went
and spoilt it by going and beating Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea and Man Utd.
Now it's too easy.

 

At least we have Henry, Ward, Stearman and Fletcher to keep us grounded.

 

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Marcus Chantry
 wrote:

I did watch a few Ipswich games but they are worse than Wolves so now I'm
committed to following Wolves and have even pledged to support Thick Mick,
if we get more than 4 away points and stay up.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 17 March 2011 4:17 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM [sec=unclassified]

 

Lol. But I thought I remember reading something about Marcus going back to
supporting Ipswich ?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Steven Millward 
wrote:

Mark, Rog is just anti-Mick.  You can't persuade him otherwise.  He's still
be moaning if we won a treble of trebles back to back

 

Once Marcus comes over to the fold though, Rog will find it very lonely and
will convert then.



 

On 17 March 2011 14:37, mark worrall  wrote:

If MM has the talent of a chair leg, what does that make Ferguson, Mancini,
Hodgson and Ancelotti and their teams then, all beaten by MM this season ? 

 

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Rog & Reet 
wrote:

No matter what "better players" were in a Mick squad we'd still be battling
relegation.

Anybody with a hint of talent is either buggered off, Bothroyd, or spend an
eternity in the reserves, Milijas.

Instead we're lumbered with mediocre huffers and puffers and told we're
aiming to finish 17th.

Got the ambition, adventure and talent of a chair leg.

 

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 16 March 2011 3:58 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM [sec=unclassified]

 

"He has built this club how the fans wanted to see it - prior to Mick coming
here, people used to say 'the players don't play for the shirt.'"

 

...is very true. Everyone used to complain about slack performances, and
wasters. Now MM has every player putting in a 100% shift every week, playing
near beyond their ability.

 

Would be interesting to see what he could do with better players.



Read more:

http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/15/je
z-moxey-reveals-wolves-ambitions/#ixzz1GjXpsN7D

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Morris, Lee SGT 
wrote:

I'd be very happy to say something similar...but not forever...maybe not
even for a "long time"

 

Incidentally I read somewhere that Villa have a defensive crisis ahead of
our game?

 


  _  


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 March 2011 13:19
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM

A win at Villa this weekend and you'll be having to say "Thanks goodness
we've got Mick forever"

 

On 16 March 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/15/je
z-moxey-reveals-wolves-ambitions/

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A Th

RE: [NSWolves] What's Jez on ?

[Jeremy Tonks]

Where's the controversy? - once we beat the Magpies at St James (or wherever
they play now) all the talk will be of how long it'll be before we finish
top 5.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2011 2:52 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] What's Jez on ?

 

He's either modelling himself on Gaddafi or using the same tailor.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2011 1:14 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Whats Jez on ?

 

Goes a long way to explaining why he thinks Thick Mick is the best manager
in the world.  The guy is clearly delusional.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2011 1:10 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Whats Jez on ?

 

 

http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/18/je
z-moxeys-wolves-aim-is-crackers/ 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Choosing another team

[Jeremy Tonks]

What was my answer again?

 

The only other club I could possibly go near would be my birthplace at
Walsall.

(although I do spend a bit of time around Oswestry and my grandparents'
funerals were at Shrewsbury so.)

 

 

[my autocorrect wants 'sweaty' instead of Oswestry]

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2011 12:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Choosing another team

 

Fellow old farts, did you think about supporting another team when we almost
vanished and if yes who would it have been?

We know your answer Jeremy but you can still answer.

In those days it would have been Watford but now it'd be Barnet even if they
look like dropping into the Conference again.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] England matches live

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm not sure you're helping your case Marcus. I'd let the defence rest and
let the rest of us say what we really think!

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 5:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] England matches live

 

Right, so in the intervening fourteen weeks, how many have been negative?  I
assume all of them.  This in spite of some marvellous wins against top
opposition.

 


 

On 25 March 2011 16:26, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

December 13th 2010:

 

I never thought I'd see the day that Ward actually looked like someone who
deserved to wear the Old Gold shirt.  Ward, Hunt and Ebanks-Blake were all
immense this morning.  SEB ran his bug butt into the ground chasing
everything.  Ward showed some great attacking touches and demonstrated that
he should never be allowed to play in defence again.  Hunt had his best game
so far for us.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 4:22 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] England matches live

 

Utter tripe.

 

You constantly slate Jarvis but this is not balanced by constat positive
comments about another player.  

 

Give us an example of the last time you said something clearly positive
about a player

 

 

 

On 25 March 2011 16:01, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

I am entirely confident that you could go back through all of my emails over
the past few years and not only would they offer clear, concise, objective
and rational discussions, but there would be an even split between positive
& negative posts.  I am not always negative, but I do have a tendency to get
negative about certain players (Henry & Jarvis in particular) and also our
Manager.  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 3:17 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] England matches live

 

Got me thinking did that.

 

If someone holds a permanently negative view of the club they claim to
'support', can they really call themselves a 'supporter'? Should you not
just say that that is the club you associate yourself with, not to support,
but to give you something to moan and be negative about. 

 

Its like people who say they hate the very sight of their husband/wife and
yet stay with them year after year. If something gave me that much
displeasure I'd find an alternative that gave me reason to be cheerful.
Life's too short. 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 3:01 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] England matches live

Have you got anything good to say about any aspect of Wolves management or
players?



 

On 25 March 2011 13:47, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

Only if he qualifies through his parents for Jamaica.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 1:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] England matches live

 

He's irish.  As is Foley and Hunt

 

And apparently so might by Stearman and O'Hara.

 

Fletcher is scottish.  Most of our team plays for a national side at some
point.  Henry will too one day.

On 25 March 2011 13:24, mark worrall  wrote:

Don't we have another Welsh player ?  Ward ?  (Good utility player, puts in
a good shift, must make him International quality?) 

 

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Steven Millward 
wrote:

Elokobi.

On 24 March 2011 14:19, mark worrall  wrote:

Wales is on ESPN live early Sunday morning, and Ghana is on Setanta live. 

 

Who do we have playing ? Hennessey, Jones, Jarvis ?

-- 

Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 

Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change

RE: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

[Jeremy Tonks]

Are you waving your flag in Boambee or Sirte?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 29 March 2011 8:41 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

 

When Gaddafi and maybe even Assad are kicked out I'll be able to concentrate
on football, or anti-football in Mick's case, again.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 29 March 2011 7:39 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

 

You'll have to do better than that to keep these debates going Rog.  You're
the only person I'll have to argue with once Marcus comes to Mick's side. 

 



 

On 28 March 2011 20:36, Rog & Reet  wrote:

You're right Steve, 4-4-2 wouldn't be any good for us, we've got Mick in
charge.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 28 March 2011 7:34 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

 

For a team that cost 15m to assemble I think we do quite well.  You said
you'd be happy when we competed with the likes of Fulham, Everton and Villa.
I reckon we are competing with them but they have all bought single players
that cost about the same as our entire first XI.  We have no right to be any
higher than we are, and I reckon under manay managers we would have been
relegated by now.

As for 451, it gets us results and is in line with the way that many of the
top teams around the world set up their formations.  We control the midfield
and with two attacking wingers and two attacking midfielders we have enough
scoring options.  It's paid off against some very good teams.

Putting a second man up front doesn't guarantee goals if you can't get the
ball to them or the defenders cover them in the absence of any other
attacking threat.

You must be getting mixed up with netball where only the front two are
allowed to score.
 
Now, you were about to explain the benefits of 442? 



On 28 March 2011 13:29, Rog & Reet  wrote:

I struggle to understand your love of our 4-5-1-0 formation.

Doyle's credited with 5 goals this season, that includes 2 penalties and a
Big George effort.

He'd at least have doubled his tally playing in any other team in this
division.

With almost any other manager from this division we wouldn't have spent two
seasons bouncing along the bottom.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 28 March 2011 12:12 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

 

I'm struggling to understand your love of 442 Rog.

 

Have you got any examples of modern teams that play a true 442 formation?
By modern, I measn not from the 1970s to the 1990s


 

On 28 March 2011 09:49, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Play someone up front to score goals Paul?

Hang on, now you're suggesting we might play two forwards?

Hope Mick doesn't read that, his 97 year old heart couldn't take it.

 

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 28 March 2011 8:30 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

 

Maybe cruciate ligament damage and out for the rest of the season. Just our
luck!!

 

SEB does not have the engine to play the same role as Doyle. Fletcher will
get the nod to play or we might change tactics and play both of them up
front! 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 27 March 2011 10:51 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury

 

Scan tomorrow.  Could be out for a bit.  Time for Fletch and/or SEB to step
up, and a big chance for them.

International football is toss.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A

RE: [NSWolves] Ince

[Jeremy Tonks]

Shrewsbury are looking good.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 8:40 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Ince

 

I am willing to admit that both Ince and Mooney have failed to deliver at
their respective clubs, however, I am not aware of their individual
circumstances with regards to playing personnel, funds available to them,
the level of control they may been given to influence the directions of
their clubs.  How will we ever know how either of them would have performed
with better quality players and money available to re-build.  It is a
hypothetical discussion that should be had during the off-season.

 

As for now I want to discuss something that is very real (although quite
unbelievable) and that is the fate of Wolves under the guidance of one Magic
Mick/Thick Mick depending on which way you view him.  Again, assuming you
watched the match Steve, how can you explain & support his tactics on the
weekend?  I don't know as much as you might think I do about football
management but receiving an explanation on Saturday's match will very much
help with my education, as clearly I must have missed some vital concept or
tactic.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 8:29 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince

 

I raise Paul Ince because in spite of my repeated requests for you to
suggest an alternative to Mick, Ince and Richard Money are the only two that
you've ever suggested.  (Money is currently unemployed, by the way, after
leaving conference side Luton Town last year).  

 

If you know so much about what makes a good football manager, how come you
got it so wrong about those two?  Why don't you put another couple of
suggestions forward now, and we'll track their careers into oblivion too.

 

My detailed analysis of away performance is that it's not the away fixture
iteself but actual distance that's important.  We got good results at Villa,
Stoke and West Brom but clearly Newcastle is a long way away so we got the
worst possible result there.  It was a mathematical certainty.

 

 

On 4 April 2011 08:12, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

Forget Paul Ince, he's not our manager and never will be.  This is simply a
diversionary tactic to avoid discussing Thick Mick's own inadequacies. 

 

As Roger & I are the only ones who don't support Thick Mick, there should be
plenty of people on this list who can explain to me his tactics in
Saturday's game?  It's strange how there's been no discussion on this at
all.  Does silence indicate that he is indefensible?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 5:31 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Ince

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/12951734.stm 



Is this now sufficient proof that he would have been rubbish as Wolves
manager?

-- 

Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Ince

[Jeremy Tonks]

Now we're getting close to a winning strategy. We need a more accurate
goalkeeper.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 9:53 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince

 

You can't exepct everything for 175,000 pounds.



 

On 4 April 2011 09:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

You almost had me convinced there Steve, but then there is one major flaw, a
huge flaw, an insurmountable flaw in your strategy;  The strategy that was
so well described relies on the ball winning midfielder to pass it to the
creative midfielder and this is where the flaw is for Wolves.  Unless said
attacking midfielder (O'Hara, Milijas, Gascoigne, Cantona, Scholes) is stood
somewhere just in front of Hennessey, he is never ever going to receive the
ball from Henry.  Henry simply refuses to pass the ball in any direction
other than backwards so we may as well play with just him in midfield and 5
Peter Crouch's up front to try and win the headers from Hennessey's long
punts that are constantly necessitated by Henry making the backpass in the
first place.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 9:33 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince

 

You'll have to take this up with Rog.  He's the biggest fan of 442.  You
know that I prefer 451.

 

Marcus's Management Education Tip #1

Overview

In terms of who you have on the pitch in central midfield in 442, the choice
needs to support the following flow:

1.  Win the ball

2.  Give it to a flair player

3.  Create a scoring opportunity.

4.  Score

You're on the right lines with your thinking but you overlooked point 1.

 

Real world example

This is very much in the Ince/Gascoigne mold from England at the 1990 World
Cup finals in Italy.  I'd like to quote Matt Leese's opinion of Bobby
Robson's England team briefing:  "You (Ince) get the ball and give it to him
(Gascoigne)."  You can see the problems that recent England managers have
had trying to shoehorn our best flair players into a midfield two.  In the
end, they conclude that someone like Barry is required to play the
holding/ball-winning role.

 

Application to Wolves

It seems sensible to have a ball winning midfielder in Henry and a flair
player in O'Hara.  Having two flair players, as well as two attacking
midfielders, means that we don't get hold of the ball, don't create chances
and don't score.

 


 

On 4 April 2011 09:06, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

As the owner of the club and the board have clearly stated that they will
not be relieving Mick of his duties under any circumstances, it would be a
pointless exercise to discuss who I would rather have in place of Thick
Mick.

 

Aside from the complete lack of any organisation in the defence, the main
tactic that I have an issue with is this - he decided to switch to a 4-4-2
formation, which was a nice, bold attacking move to try and get something
from the game.  However, if you're going to play two attackers then you need
to make sure that they receive decent service from midfield, so one would
safely assume that you keep your attacking/flair midfielders on the pitch to
provide the ammunition for the strikers.  Unless you're Thick Mick.  His
attacking change of tactics involved removing Milijas, perhaps our best
passer of the ball, choosing instead to keep his incompetent buddy Karl
Henry on the field.  I can only assume this decision was made to ensure we
met our quota of back-passes for the match.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 8:58 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince

 

Thank-you.  Now can you suggest a couple of other managers that you would
have in to replace Mick please?  I feel unfair in asking you as it will
surely be the kiss-of-death for them but we should see anyway.  

 

Perhaps Mick got the tactics wrong for this game.  I don't feel the need to
defend him for a single game, nor would I use the wins against Chelsea,
Liverpool, Man Utd etc to claim that he is a master tactician.  If I could
explain it at all it's the experiement of trying to work our how to play
with Doyle out of the side.

 

Which specific tactics did you most take umbrage with?  

 

 

On 4 April 2011 08:39, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

I am willing to admit that both Ince and Mooney have failed to deliver at
their respective clubs, however, I am not aware of their individual
circumstances with regards to playing personnel, funds available to them,
the level of control they may been given to influence the directions of
their clubs.  How will we ever know how either of them would have performed
with better quality players and money available to re-build.  It is a
hypothetical discussion that should be had during the off-season.

 

As for now I want to 

[NSWolves] Toffees

[Jeremy Tonks]

Well we're in good shape according the soccernet gamecast.

We're playing 442 against Everton's 441 (I think they've forgotten to put
Osman on the park).

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] WTF

[Jeremy Tonks]

Were we seriously banking on taking three points off Everton?

 

Although the way our back four are playing we'd be lucky to hold Walsall
out.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 10 April 2011 7:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] WTF

 

Ah it doesn't work like that though.  Very good chance were down now.

On 9 April 2011 23:05, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

I just hope Mr Millward is preparing his dossier of McCarthy insults for
when we're relegated. 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Sat Apr 09 22:47:57 2011
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] WTF 

You give up too easily.

Don't you know our manager is brilliant and will turn things around at half
time?

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Saturday, 9 April 2011 10:32 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] WTF

 

We're down. 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Politically savvy football fans?

[Jeremy Tonks]

Wasn't he our fitness trainer?

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 21 April 2011 7:00 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Politically savvy football fans?

 

That 1 bloke must eat a lot food. 

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com  
Sent: Thu Apr 21 18:53:56 2011
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Politically savvy football fans? 

Put it like this:

1 million children can avoid starving to death if one political prisoner is
held or tortured or executed.  

Would you think that is acceptable?



On 21 April 2011 14:16, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Thought of having your family and friends tortured so you can get more dosh?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 21 April 2011 8:57 AM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Politically savvy football fans?

 

India is blighted by corruption and its GDP per capita is 1/3 of China's.


How many people's lives are saved in China compared to India because the
speed of economic growth has been much faster than might have been achieved
in a free economy? 

 


 

On 21 April 2011 07:22, Rog & Reet  wrote:

?

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 21 April 2011 6:17 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Politically savvy football fans?

 

Not on the same scale, and that's the point.

On 20 April 2011 22:41, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Democratic India has done it with a free press and without state sanctioned
mass murder and torture.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2011 6:55 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Politically savvy football fans?

 

I think I'm the only one that struggles with the China problem.  I've
mentioned this to others and they've been horrified.  But...

I realise that there are human rights problems there in vast number.
However, the Chinese government has succeeded in moving hundreds of millions
of people out of abject poverty over the last two decades.  I seriously
doubt if that could have been acheived in a free democracy.  I come back to
the Vulcan philosophy that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the
few.  There might be a million people who are in jail for political crimes
but what if the life of hundreds of millions has been improved?

Tough one eh?

On 17 April 2011 20:36, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Last week, when Sydney FC played against Shanghai Shenhua in the Asian
Champions League, the fans in The Cove entertained the small crowd with
several pithy ditties, including: "One Dalai Lama, there's only one Dalai
Lama," and, to the tune of Yellow Submarine, "We all live in a free
democracy, free democracy, a free democracy ."

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Predictions

[Jeremy Tonks]

Can't be bothered making predictions - I'm about as good at that as Mick is
at team selection.

I will be very disappointed if we can't scrape the points we need against
the also crap opposition we have left to face.

 

Death knell - I fancy three points against Brum.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 29 April 2011 4:07 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Predictions

 

I noted that Wolves were $1.61 to get relegated and thought about putting a
couple of hundred on that.  At least then if they go down I've got some
solace.

On 29 April 2011 16:03, Steven Millward  wrote:

Thank heavens for some positivity!  Eight points from four games, including
three clean sheets is champions league form 

 

On 29 April 2011 15:48, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA 
wrote:

Brum 0 Wolves 0 

Wolves 1 Albion 1 

Sunderland 0 Wolves 1  

Wolves 1 Blackburn 0

 

Blackpool, Blackburn & Wigan relegated.

 

  _  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Friday, 29 April 2011 3:35 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Predictions

 

Brum 1 Wolves 0 (Jerome scores a very rare goal)

Wolves 1 Albion 3 (One of our 7 CBs scores)

Sunderland 2 Wolves 0 (Due to even more injury problems, Bruce puts out his
yoof team) 

Wolves 1 Blackburn 0 (Blackburn are relegated. This joyous betting related
news is boosted by Mick getting the boot)

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 29 April 2011 2:01 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Predictions

 

Here are my predictions for the last four games

 

Brum 0 Wolves 1 

We score early (Foley) and then hold on for the rest of the 90 minutes.

 

Wolves 0 Albion 2

Wild scenes after the match including many injuries

 

Sunderland 0 Wolves 0 

Noted by many as one of the worst games of the season

 

Wolves 0 Blackburn 0

Both sides need a draw to stay up because of other results going in our
favour, and we get it 

 

We finish on 38 points, with Wigan, West Ham and Blackpool going down.  

We survive by only scoring one more goal.

 

 

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

  _  

CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be
unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will
not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any
views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action
taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this
message.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

[Jeremy Tonks]

Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk
directly yourself!!

 

Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but
(but had publicly hoped for).

 

It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come
down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and Blackpool
to survival.

 

 

A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only need
a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them promoted.
Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated. Wolves.? Glad
I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in recent weeks.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally inept and
impotent performance!

 

I admire some of your continued optimism but my rose coloured glasses now
lie smashed on the floor. Time to wake up to the reality that we are going
down, only a miracle can save us! Over to you Jeremy!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:09 PM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Has he ever taken off Henry? I don't think I've ever seen him subbed. Would
like to have seen Henry subbed by Guedioura on 65 mins last night. 

  _  

Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:25:57 +1000
Subject: [NSWolves] Team for Albion
From: millward@gmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

My choice:

 

Henessey-

FoleyStearmanCraddockGeorge

Hunt---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis

-Fletcher

 

 

Chance of it being picked:

 

0%


-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

[Jeremy Tonks]

I've been going to mass and my prayers aren't being answered - I think I'll
go back to being Anglican!

 

Too cup focussed - and the ^*&%*() opposition is too good (but I did beat
Chelseadrid yesterday - :-) :-)

 

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 7:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You can't let the Wombat's drop down to V.  It's only bots and newbies in
there.  What's gone wrong?

On 2 May 2011 17:32, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk
directly yourself!!

 

Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but
(but had publicly hoped for).

 

It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come
down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and Blackpool
to survival.

 

 

A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only need
a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them promoted.
Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated. Wolves.? Glad
I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in recent weeks.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe


Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally inept and
impotent performance!

 

I admire some of your continued optimism but my rose coloured glasses now
lie smashed on the floor. Time to wake up to the reality that we are going
down, only a miracle can save us! Over to you Jeremy!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:09 PM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Has he ever taken off Henry? I don't think I've ever seen him subbed. Would
like to have seen Henry subbed by Guedioura on 65 mins last night. 

  _  

Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:25:57 +1000
Subject: [NSWolves] Team for Albion
From: millward@gmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

My choice:

 

Henessey-

FoleyStearmanCraddockGeorge

Hunt---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis

-Fletcher

 

 

Chance of it being picked:

 

0%


-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

[Jeremy Tonks]

Your lack of experience in these matters is getting the best of you Rog. You
should experiment more. I am convinced that it is very effective (in
important matters!).

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

If you blokes had spoken to wiser heads on this list you'd have known that
praying is just like Mick.

A total waste of time as it's guaranteed to achieve  all.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 8:12 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

I've been going to mass and my prayers aren't being answered - I think I'll
go back to being Anglican!

 

Too cup focussed - and the ^*&%*() opposition is too good (but I did beat
Chelseadrid yesterday - :-) :-)

 

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 7:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You can't let the Wombat's drop down to V.  It's only bots and newbies in
there.  What's gone wrong?

On 2 May 2011 17:32, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk
directly yourself!!

 

Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but
(but had publicly hoped for).

 

It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come
down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and Blackpool
to survival.

 

 

A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only need
a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them promoted.
Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated. Wolves.? Glad
I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in recent weeks.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe


Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally inept and
impotent performance!

 

I admire some of your continued optimism but my rose coloured glasses now
lie smashed on the floor. Time to wake up to the reality that we are going
down, only a miracle can save us! Over to you Jeremy!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:09 PM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Has he ever taken off Henry? I don't think I've ever seen him subbed. Would
like to have seen Henry subbed by Guedioura on 65 mins last night. 

  _  

Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:25:57 +1000
Subject: [NSWolves] Team for Albion
From: millward@gmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

My choice:

 

Henessey-

FoleyStearmanCraddockGeorge

Hunt---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis

-Fletcher

 

 

Chance of it being picked:

 

0%


-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

[Jeremy Tonks]

I may get to a longer response. but probably not.

 

The standard argument goes something like: If God is all powerful and all
loving how come there is suffering in the world?

The basic premise is flawed from my point of view. I'd respond something
like:

If God is all powerful and all loving and there is suffering in the world
then God must have an important purpose involving suffering.

 

As in all theological discussions Jesus needs be kept at the centre - and
there he is as soon you raise the issue of suffering.

 

God's purposes in creation are centred on Jesus. Jesus' own suffering, death
and resurrection are the guarantee that, when he returns, death will have no
power and suffering will be ended. Forever.

 

There's my briefest theodicy. I can trust God now and into the future
because of what Jesus has done in the past.

 

I'll just duck down while you all start shooting.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 10:17 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You'd better give us a run down on your views on theodicy then Jeremy.  I
don't think most of us get it.

On 3 May 2011 09:53, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Your lack of experience in these matters is getting the best of you Rog. You
should experiment more. I am convinced that it is very effective (in
important matters!).

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet 


Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 7:27 AM

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

If you blokes had spoken to wiser heads on this list you'd have known that
praying is just like Mick.

A total waste of time as it's guaranteed to achieve  all.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 8:12 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

I've been going to mass and my prayers aren't being answered - I think I'll
go back to being Anglican!

 

Too cup focussed - and the ^*&%*() opposition is too good (but I did beat
Chelseadrid yesterday - :-) :-)

 

JT

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 7:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You can't let the Wombat's drop down to V.  It's only bots and newbies in
there.  What's gone wrong?

On 2 May 2011 17:32, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk
directly yourself!!

 

Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but
(but had publicly hoped for).

 

It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come
down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and Blackpool
to survival.

 

 

A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only need
a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them promoted.
Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated. Wolves.? Glad
I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in recent weeks.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe


Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally inept and
impotent performance!

 

I admire some of your continued optimism but my rose coloured glasses now
lie smashed on the floor. Time to wake up to the reality that we are going
down, only a miracle can save us! Over to you Jeremy!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com <http://www.contechengineering.com/> 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:09 PM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Has he ever taken off Henry? I don't think I've ever seen him subbed. Would
like to have seen Henry subbed by Guedioura on 65 mins last night. 

  _  

Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:25:57 +1000
Subject: [NSWolves] Team for Albion
From: millward@gmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

My choice:

 

Henessey-

FoleyStearmanCraddockGeorge

Hunt---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis

-Fletcher

 

 

Chance of it being picked:

 

0%


-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves

RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

[Jeremy Tonks]

I'm also happy to talk politics (and explain why Catastrophic Anthropogenic
Global Warming is a complete crock of .).

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 2:02 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

I don't think that you, I or anyone else that doesn't believe has any right
to expect to receive protection from someone/something that they don't
believe in.  It's like expecting to win the lottery without buying a ticket.

 

As an atheist I've chosen to believe that I'm responsible for my own destiny
and that it's up to me to make decisions and face crisis without any
guidance or assistance from any form of God or higher spirit.  As such I
don't hope to benefit from the good fortune or otherwise of the people who
do believe (except to benefit from public holidays).

 

Maybe we should switch to politics?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 1:54 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Some good points raised Marcus.

 

I think there are plenty in Eastern Europe and South America.  As for the
others, you're saying that it's their bad luck to be born in the wrong
country as God is spiteful and will only help believers?

 

If that's the case, it's a risk practicing any religion isn't it?  I mean
suppose the Jehohah's Witnesses are the ones who are right.  Jeremy is just
making God even more mad by doing the wrong thing whereas I fly under the
radar.

 

Does the halo effect of me living in a Christian society/nation mean that I
get the protection afforded to my Christian neighbour whilst also still
being an atheist?  I've got a sort of human sheild around me.

On 3 May 2011 13:38, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

I'm happy to be corrected but I would suspect that the vast majority of
those 2 million children would not be part of a Christian society/nation, so
the God of which Jeremy speaks is unlikely to help them.  That's not to say
that they don't have their own 'spiritual' leader/icon that may or may not
have let them down.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 1:18 PM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Still, it seems a trifle unfair that two million children worldwide are
forced to work as prostitutes and barely know anything else, when God could
end it all with a wave of the wand.  I'm sure even if they knew about Jesus,
it would be of little comfort whilst they are getting beaten and sodomized.

On 3 May 2011 13:00, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

I may get to a longer response. but probably not.

 

The standard argument goes something like: If God is all powerful and all
loving how come there is suffering in the world?

The basic premise is flawed from my point of view. I'd respond something
like:

If God is all powerful and all loving and there is suffering in the world
then God must have an important purpose involving suffering.

 

As in all theological discussions Jesus needs be kept at the centre - and
there he is as soon you raise the issue of suffering.

 

God's purposes in creation are centred on Jesus. Jesus' own suffering, death
and resurrection are the guarantee that, when he returns, death will have no
power and suffering will be ended. Forever.

 

There's my briefest theodicy. I can trust God now and into the future
because of what Jesus has done in the past.

 

I'll just duck down while you all start shooting.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 10:17 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You'd better give us a run down on your views on theodicy then Jeremy.  I
don't think most of us get it.

On 3 May 2011 09:53, Jeremy Tonks  wrote:

Your lack of experience in these matters is getting the best of you Rog. You
should experiment more. I am convinced that it is very effective (in
important matters!).

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet 


Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 7:27 AM

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

If you blokes had spoken to wiser heads on this list you'd have known that
praying is just like Mick.

A total waste of time as it's guaranteed to achieve  all.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 8:12 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

I've been going to mass and 

RE: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt...[sec=unclassified]

[Jeremy Tonks]

That's not surprising - it was the off season.

 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 4 May 2011 12:36 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt...[sec=unclassified]

 

If you were going to pick a team of religious nutters you want David Koresh
in it.

 

Oustanding defender.  Didn't let anything in for 51 days.

On 4 May 2011 11:30, Morris, Lee SGT  wrote:

No, lets get back to politics and religionOsama on the left wing, Usama
on the rightdeadly combination.

 

Hamill for PM 

  _  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 4 May 2011 11:24
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt...

Let's hope it doesn't go to his head like it did with Jarvis

On 4 May 2011 11:21, mark worrall  wrote:

but did anyone notice Hammill got named in the England U21s  ?

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13273721.stm

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.