Re: Patch on unsupported AT command
Hi Yang, If some unsupported AT command is issued, different modem may have their own response. Now at my hand is a Huawei modem (EM770W), and it returns COMMAND NOT SUPPORT. In my case, this modem doesn't support AT+CGAUTO=0 in atmodem/gprs.c. Current oFono will hang there for it's not a valid return. We may have some quirk to handle this problem, the same way as current code in network-registration.c with CALYPSO. But I wonder if it's better to add the response string into terminator table, so that we don't need this kind of quirk here and there. I'm not sure if this is the better/best way to handle this problem. After all, the table may become larger and larger is more and more specific terminator like this are added. Comments are welcome! this lovely broken Huawei modem where the firmware developers were incapable of reading the specification and just made up a new response. I think this might need a GAtChat quirk function where we can add extra terminator responses that will be recognized. And maybe even translated into something meaningful. Denis, or do you want this quirked in every plugin or modem driver? Regards Marcel ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Re: ppp
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:39:40 + (GMT), Chris Pitchford of...@intrepid.cx wrote: I'm not sure if the requirements of ppp in the kernel have chagned, but couldn't something like this be repeated in this situation.. allowing pppd to speak to a local socket/fifo/pair of pipes that is terminated in user space? In my understanding, PPP is a line discipline, meaning it can only run on a TTY character device device, not just any character device, and definitely not any random file descriptor. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Re: ppp
Quoting Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:39:40 + (GMT), Chris Pitchford of...@intrepid.cx wrote: I'm not sure if the requirements of ppp in the kernel have chagned, but couldn't something like this be repeated in this situation.. allowing pppd to speak to a local socket/fifo/pair of pipes that is terminated in user space? In my understanding, PPP is a line discipline, meaning it can only run on a TTY character device device, not just any character device, and definitely not any random file descriptor. turns out that the software I mentioned (virtmodem from 1995) does indeed use a pty pair. Although I've not had time during the week to get it running again, I suspect it would probably work on a recent kernel/pppd. Is the line discipline so much of an issue when using ppp connected to a fake tty? could that not be handed on the proxy side inside ofono? ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Re: Patch on unsupported AT command
Hi Denis, I think this might need a GAtChat quirk function where we can add extra terminator responses that will be recognized. And maybe even translated into something meaningful. Originally I had the terminators freely definable on the GAtChat + some hardcoded ones, but abandoned that approach since it didn't seem useful. Perhaps this needs to be resurrected. Denis, or do you want this quirked in every plugin or modem driver? I do prefer non-standard terminators to be setup in the plugin/driver. I meant adding something like g_at_chat_add_terminator() or so. Regards Marcel ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Re: Patch on unsupported AT command
Hi Marcel, Hi Denis, I think this might need a GAtChat quirk function where we can add extra terminator responses that will be recognized. And maybe even translated into something meaningful. Originally I had the terminators freely definable on the GAtChat + some hardcoded ones, but abandoned that approach since it didn't seem useful. Perhaps this needs to be resurrected. Denis, or do you want this quirked in every plugin or modem driver? I do prefer non-standard terminators to be setup in the plugin/driver. I meant adding something like g_at_chat_add_terminator() or so. Yes, that is what I meant as well. Regards, -Denis ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
