Re: something not working as I expect it to
Hi Brill, could you post some more info, more stack trace? If you run OJB in 2-tier app, you could use SequenceManagerInMemoryImpl for testing. Does this solve your problem? regards, Armin - Original Message - From: "Brill Pappin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:51 AM Subject: Re: something not working as I expect it to > Thanks for the info. > > I change the default values, and am now getting: > ERROR: Can not get next org.apache.ojb.broker.util.sequence.HighLowSequence > for next scope of keys null > > in my tests... any ideas? > > - Brill Pappin > > - Original Message - > From: "Lance Eason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:22 AM > Subject: RE: something not working as I expect it to > > > OJB looks for a value of 0. If the id value is 0 and it is set to > auto-increment then OJB will generate a value for it. I ran into the same > thing myself not to long ago. > > -Original Message- > From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:00 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: something not working as I expect it to > > > I have a fairly simple object, who's ID I need to access. > > in my descriptor for the object, I have the id field set to auto-increment > and as a primary key. > > In the class, the id is initialized to -1 (All my classes, in all my > libraries initialize all instance members, even if only to null. this is > part of our standards and good programming practice in general). > > What I am expecting, is that because I've set the id to auto-increment in > the descriptor, that when I create a new class, the ID is auto generated... > however what I get is the default value of the new object (-1 in this case). > Can I force ID's for a particular object to always be generated by the > database? > > If not, what is the recommended way to force that generation? > > I need the ID's because I'm working in a web environment and the id's are > often called from remote applications... not to mention legacy data/apps ;) > So, I need the ID field, but I also want the system to generate it for new > objects. > > - Brill Pappin > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: something not working as I expect it to
Thanks for the info. I change the default values, and am now getting: ERROR: Can not get next org.apache.ojb.broker.util.sequence.HighLowSequence for next scope of keys null in my tests... any ideas? - Brill Pappin - Original Message - From: "Lance Eason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:22 AM Subject: RE: something not working as I expect it to OJB looks for a value of 0. If the id value is 0 and it is set to auto-increment then OJB will generate a value for it. I ran into the same thing myself not to long ago. -Original Message- From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:00 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: something not working as I expect it to I have a fairly simple object, who's ID I need to access. in my descriptor for the object, I have the id field set to auto-increment and as a primary key. In the class, the id is initialized to -1 (All my classes, in all my libraries initialize all instance members, even if only to null. this is part of our standards and good programming practice in general). What I am expecting, is that because I've set the id to auto-increment in the descriptor, that when I create a new class, the ID is auto generated... however what I get is the default value of the new object (-1 in this case). Can I force ID's for a particular object to always be generated by the database? If not, what is the recommended way to force that generation? I need the ID's because I'm working in a web environment and the id's are often called from remote applications... not to mention legacy data/apps ;) So, I need the ID field, but I also want the system to generate it for new objects. - Brill Pappin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: something not working as I expect it to
OJB looks for a value of 0. If the id value is 0 and it is set to auto-increment then OJB will generate a value for it. I ran into the same thing myself not to long ago. -Original Message- From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:00 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: something not working as I expect it to I have a fairly simple object, who's ID I need to access. in my descriptor for the object, I have the id field set to auto-increment and as a primary key. In the class, the id is initialized to -1 (All my classes, in all my libraries initialize all instance members, even if only to null. this is part of our standards and good programming practice in general). What I am expecting, is that because I've set the id to auto-increment in the descriptor, that when I create a new class, the ID is auto generated... however what I get is the default value of the new object (-1 in this case). Can I force ID's for a particular object to always be generated by the database? If not, what is the recommended way to force that generation? I need the ID's because I'm working in a web environment and the id's are often called from remote applications... not to mention legacy data/apps ;) So, I need the ID field, but I also want the system to generate it for new objects. - Brill Pappin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something not working as I expect it to
I have a fairly simple object, who's ID I need to access. in my descriptor for the object, I have the id field set to auto-increment and as a primary key. In the class, the id is initialized to -1 (All my classes, in all my libraries initialize all instance members, even if only to null. this is part of our standards and good programming practice in general). What I am expecting, is that because I've set the id to auto-increment in the descriptor, that when I create a new class, the ID is auto generated... however what I get is the default value of the new object (-1 in this case). Can I force ID's for a particular object to always be generated by the database? If not, what is the recommended way to force that generation? I need the ID's because I'm working in a web environment and the id's are often called from remote applications... not to mention legacy data/apps ;) So, I need the ID field, but I also want the system to generate it for new objects. - Brill Pappin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
