Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
S.J.Chun pisze: Are you sure on disabling crypt at debian side? For me, it seems that you turned off crypt at centos(which is turned off by default), and debian, you did not(which might be turned on by default?) Crypt in server settings or in client settings? Where can I check this setting? I install and configure server the same on both machines although I do not change defaults embedded into the system. Client installation also have the same config settings for both systems. -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
[OpenAFS] Re: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
For debian, /etc/openafs/afs.conf.client in case you installed with package. There you can find AFS_CRYPT and which should be false to make crypt off - Original Message - From: Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cc: OpenAFS-Info openafs-info@openafs.org Sent: 08-04-08 15:12:25 Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS S.J.Chun pisze: Are you sure on disabling crypt at debian side? For me, it seems that you turned off crypt at centos(which is turned off by default), and debian, you did not(which might be turned on by default?) Crypt in server settings or in client settings? Where can I check this setting? I install and configure server the same on both machines although I do not change defaults embedded into the system. Client installation also have the same config settings for both systems. -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
S.J.Chun pisze: For debian, /etc/openafs/afs.conf.client in case you installed with package. There you can find AFS_CRYPT and which should be false to make crypt off On CentOS only options for AFS Client (located in /etc/sysconfig/openafs) are: AFSD_ARGS=-afsdb -fakestat On Debian in /etc/openafs/afs.conf.client there is AFS_CRYPT set to true. So maybe this is the solution to the speed difference. I do not know however how to turn this on on CentOS. Any ideas? -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
S.J.Chun pisze: For debian, /etc/openafs/afs.conf.client in case you installed with package. There you can find AFS_CRYPT and which should be false to make crypt off With crypt disabled I get major speedup (25-31MiB/s) and this is very similiar to the CentOS results. So this mistery is revealed ;) AFS_CRYPT is the culprit. Is AFS_CRYPT really that needed that debian is turning this _ON_ by default? -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
[OpenAFS] Re: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
I don't know why on is default; maybe for security reason? Our client using OpenAFS for service, does not use this feature. - Original Message - From: Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cc: OpenAFS-Info openafs-info@openafs.org Sent: 08-04-08 18:01:01 Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS S.J.Chun pisze: For debian, /etc/openafs/afs.conf.client in case you installed with package. There you can find AFS_CRYPT and which should be false to make crypt off With crypt disabled I get major speedup (25-31MiB/s) and this is very similiar to the CentOS results. So this mistery is revealed ;) AFS_CRYPT is the culprit. Is AFS_CRYPT really that needed that debian is turning this _ON_ by default? -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Michał Droździewicz wrote: Is AFS_CRYPT really that needed that debian is turning this _ON_ by default? One of the benefits that AFS provides over other file systems is privacy. For that you need crypt to be on. The Windows client defaults to use of encrypted sessions as well. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michał Droździewicz wrote: Jeffrey Altman pisze: Is AFS_CRYPT really that needed that debian is turning this _ON_ by default? One of the benefits that AFS provides over other file systems is privacy. For that you need crypt to be on. The Windows client defaults to use of encrypted sessions as well. Ok, but if I'll turn it of, files on the server still will be encrypted (scattered on the /vicep* partitions) and can't be accessed without proper login? Only files trensferred from the server to the client will be possible to read? The files on fileserver are NOT encrypted, just scattered. There are some python scripts around which put the data together. Short form: access to server = access to data without any pwd. AFAIK. MfG, Lars Schimmer - -- - - TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH+286mWhuE0qbFyMRAlRiAJ9BmXTQJghgYt/G/dyRLvs0gNoShACfeGq1 NVkcqm7ybx0GKU0siRuTxcg= =t5pd -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MichaÅ, Droździewicz wrote: Is AFS_CRYPT really that needed that debian is turning this _ON_ by default? One of the benefits that AFS provides over other file systems is privacy. For that you need crypt to be on. The Windows client defaults to use of encrypted sessions as well. I think the better question is why CentOS has it _OFF_ by default. Packages should fail safe by being in the safest operating mode by default. CDC ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Christopher D. Clausen wrote: I think the better question is why CentOS has it _OFF_ by default. Packages should fail safe by being in the safest operating mode by default. Agreed but then you get the folks who install AFS and perform some tests and say NFS is 20 times faster, AFS sucks. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher D. Clausen wrote: I think the better question is why CentOS has it _OFF_ by default. Packages should fail safe by being in the safest operating mode by default. Agreed but then you get the folks who install AFS and perform some tests and say NFS is 20 times faster, AFS sucks. Anyone performing such tests should know about and be able to issue a fs setcrypt off command before running benchmarks. What if OpenSSH left encryption turned off by default so people could benchmark it against FTP? CDC ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Jeffrey Altman pisze: Is AFS_CRYPT really that needed that debian is turning this _ON_ by default? One of the benefits that AFS provides over other file systems is privacy. For that you need crypt to be on. The Windows client defaults to use of encrypted sessions as well. Ok, but if I'll turn it of, files on the server still will be encrypted (scattered on the /vicep* partitions) and can't be accessed without proper login? Only files trensferred from the server to the client will be possible to read? -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Jeffrey Altman wrote: Christopher D. Clausen wrote: I think the better question is why CentOS has it _OFF_ by default. Packages should fail safe by being in the safest operating mode by default. Agreed but then you get the folks who install AFS and perform some tests and say NFS is 20 times faster, AFS sucks. Does turning crypt off mean data in transit can be read *and* tampered with? Or read, but still safe from tampering? Wes ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
What if OpenSSH left encryption turned off by default so people could benchmark it against FTP? According to http://www.globus.org/security/overview.html that's exactly what the globus versions of the ssh stuff does: As default turn encryption off in the gsi-ssh so it does not get in the way of fast file transfers. The problem is as usual that the end user, the ones who are using and not the ones which have been setting up the software (it's ssh, it's safe, yeah) has no idea what is going on an happily will send confidential stuff (read passwords) over any ssh connection. But has anyone here on this list experimented with HW-acceleration for encryption? It might be a good investment for a server (I hope that my clients should cope). Harald. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Does turning crypt off mean data in transit can be read *and* tampered with? Or read, but still safe from tampering? Also, does this imply that a server participating in the public directory is trusting that all clients are using encryption to connect to it? Is there a way for a server to force encryption on any clients accessing its volumes? Wes ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Wesley Chow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does turning crypt off mean data in transit can be read *and* tampered with? Or read, but still safe from tampering? Also, does this imply that a server participating in the public directory is trusting that all clients are using encryption to connect to it? Is there a way for a server to force encryption on any clients accessing its volumes? Encryption in OpenAFS is a per-client command and only operates when one is using tickets. IP based ACLs and system:anyuser anonymous access cannot be encrypted. There is not currently a way to enforce encryption from the server-side. CDC ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Harald Barth wrote: But has anyone here on this list experimented with HW-acceleration for encryption? It might be a good investment for a server (I hope that my clients should cope). I doubt you will find a hw engine engine for fcrypt. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Christopher D. Clausen writes: setcrypt off command before running benchmarks. What if OpenSSH left encryption turned off by default so people could benchmark it against FTP? openssh sucks. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Wesley Chow wrote: Does turning crypt off mean data in transit can be read *and* tampered with? Or read, but still safe from tampering? Also, does this imply that a server participating in the public directory is trusting that all clients are using encryption to connect to it? Is there a way for a server to force encryption on any clients accessing its volumes? The choice of encryption is client only. We do not have a refuse non-encrypted connections option. Anonymous connections cannot be encrypted. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Jeffrey Altman wrote: Harald Barth wrote: But has anyone here on this list experimented with HW-acceleration for encryption? It might be a good investment for a server (I hope that my clients should cope). I doubt you will find a hw engine engine for fcrypt. I agree, but what kind of crypto acceleration could a DSP (digital signal processor) give? Many handhelds come with DSPs now. Jason ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Derrick Brashear pisze: I care about kernel, not OS. What kernel version on those machines? Default distribution kernel: on Debian: 2.6.18-6-686 i686 on CentOS: 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 i686 -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear pisze: I care about kernel, not OS. What kernel version on those machines? Default distribution kernel: on Debian: 2.6.18-6-686 i686 on CentOS: 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 i686 Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? :§ T˘új)b b˛ÓŠzpJ)ߢ^§ě˘¸!śÚl˙ůb˛Ű(ĽéÚ~Ę+ůYůb˛Ř§~čĽéÚ~ȧ~
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've build a debian package using default debian options (1.4.6) and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Michał Droździewicz wrote: Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've build a debian package using default debian options (1.4.6) and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) Are you sure your network interface is used in GBit/s mode with Debian and not just 100MBit-mode? This could easily explain the low throughput. Hartmut - Hartmut Reuter e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone+49-89-3299-1328 fax +49-89-3299-1301 RZG (Rechenzentrum Garching)webhttp://www.rzg.mpg.de/~hwr Computing Center of the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) and the Institut fuer Plasmaphysik (IPP) - ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Hartmut Reuter, dnia 2008-04-07 16:59 napisal: Are you sure your network interface is used in GBit/s mode with Debian and not just 100MBit-mode? 1) Iface is in 1000Mib mode 2) copying files from local disk to AFS structure (iface is omitted in this test) was slow, not the network copying -- Mike D ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:04 napisal: and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) Parameters you gave to afsd, in both (CentOS and Debian) cases? If that doesn't tell us, next thing is to look at kernel config options. The same in both configs. -- Mike D ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've build a debian package using default debian options (1.4.6) Ok. and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) Parameters you gave to afsd, in both (CentOS and Debian) cases? If that doesn't tell us, next thing is to look at kernel config options.
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:04 napisal: and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) Parameters you gave to afsd, in both (CentOS and Debian) cases? If that doesn't tell us, next thing is to look at kernel config options. The same in both configs. Well, the kernel config options certainly aren't if you're using CentOS's kernel in one case and Debian's in another.
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:40 napisal: The same in both configs. Well, the kernel config options certainly aren't if you're using CentOS's kernel in one case and Debian's in another. :�§ I've compiled debian kernel package using kernel config from CentOS but this was no help at all. AFS client configs were the same. -- Mike D ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:40 napisal: The same in both configs. Well, the kernel config options certainly aren't if you're using CentOS's kernel in one case and Debian's in another. :�§ I've compiled debian kernel package using kernel config from CentOS but this was no help at all. AFS client configs were the same. Well, all that's left is compiling CentOS' kernel on Debian; If you're willing it's certainly a valuable data point. :�� T���j)b� b�өzpJ)ߢ�^��좸!��l��b��(���~�+Y���b�ا~�~ȧ~
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
What happens if you compare with memory cache in both cases? Could it be the HD driver? A strace with the times for the different syscalls might be interresting. And, eh, good luck. Harald. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 18:13 napisal: Well, all that's left is compiling CentOS' kernel on Debian; If you're willing it's certainly a valuable data point. I'll try to test it tomorrow and will submit some new data. -- Mike D ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Harald Barth, dnia 2008-04-07 18:21 napisal: What happens if you compare with memory cache in both cases? Could it be the HD driver? A strace with the times for the different syscalls might be interresting. And, eh, good luck. Can't be HD driver - dd in both cases (Debian and CentOS) shows transfer around 120MiB/s (RAID 0 on 2 SATA disks). -- Mike D ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
[OpenAFS] Re: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
Are you sure on disabling crypt at debian side? For me, it seems that you turned off crypt at centos(which is turned off by default), and debian, you did not(which might be turned on by default?) - Original Message - From: Micha?Dro?ziewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cc: OpenAFS-Info openafs-info@openafs.org Sent: 08-04-07 23:15:10 Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've build a debian package using default debian options (1.4.6) and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
For starters: I'm replying to the list - maybe somebody would be interested. Sergio Gelato, dnia 2008-04-06 21:20 napisal: * Michał Droździewicz [2008-04-06 10:07:18 +0200]: First I've tried to install OpenAFS with Debian 4.0 (etch) on 3 different machines (beginning from old Celeron, through Pentium 4 and at the end on Xeon 3GHz). Speed was pretty much the same when coping files from local disk to AFS (transfer without the network). It was about 8 to 9 MiB/s and it didn't depend on machine RAM memory nor processor power). Tuning the afs client haven't helped at all (speed was rather dropping than going up). Local disk to AFS isn't a very interesting use case for most people since AFS fileservers tend to be dedicated machines. Some people don't even install an AFS client on their fileservers. Besides, if there is a bottleneck it would be nice to know whether it's on the server or on the client side, and for that the tests over a Gigabit network are probably best. Then you could even test a Debian server with a CentOS client and vice-versa. Local disk to AFS is interesting for me as a benchmark and as a restoring client data from back up, because when machine fails you have to pump it up to the AFS structure somehow, over a network or from a local disk (in both cases using AFS client). Doing a backup also requires local reading. Unless there is better way of doing/restoring incremental backups. Bottleneck is on the server side (as far as I've tested it). When testing server (both on Debian and on CentOS) besides of the local AFS client there were one Ubuntu client and two Fedora 7 clients. Every client had small disk cache and I was testing write using large file (10 GiB) with mc (not very sophisticated, but the same in every try). Using Debian as operating system, local AFS client was transferring data @ max speed of 20MiB when alone. When other client connected, transfer rate was divided equally between two clients. When network client was transferring data, on 100Mib network it was 7MiB and on 1000Mib network it was 12-15MiB @ max. Using Centos local AFS client transfer speed was 38-40MiB, but when I've connected three clients (one Ubuntu and 2 Fedora 7) on the 100Mib network they divided bandwidth quite equally, but local AFS client transfer speed wasn't affected. Top speed for disk write was 120MiB (two SATA disks in software RAID 0) in both cases - Debian and CentOS. Lets say that the performance was like 250% better with 1.4.6 on CentOS 5 than with 1.4.2 on Debian 4.0. I've even compiled 1.4.6 and 1.5.34 on Debian 4.0 but performance was the same. I'd move to 1.4.6 on etch in any case. I like to have software installed from packages, so first I have to build 1.4.6 for etch and then install it ;) -- Mike D ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS
I care about kernel, not OS. What kernel version on those machines? Lets say that the performance was like 250% better with 1.4.6 on CentOS 5 than with 1.4.2 on Debian 4.0. I've even compiled 1.4.6 and 1.5.34 on Debian 4.0 but performance was the same. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
