Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts?
v-d is deprecated. v-r has not received it yet only in viewer-beta > > From: Twisted Laws >To: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) ; >opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com >Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2013 8:40 PM >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? > > > >Maybe I’m missing something here... or did someone forget to hg add this file? Its not in viewer-release or viewer-development. > >Twisted >From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) >Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 2:03 PM >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? > On 2013-05-01 09:50 , Lance Corrimal wrote: > >Hi, I just noticed that a commit in viewer-beta removed the two scripts build_version.py and update_version_files.py from the scripts/ directory, is that supposed to be that way? What should be used now to update the different version files, other than vi? >See >https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Channel_and_Version_Requirements#Version_Number > >To update the first three levels of the version number, edit just one file: indra/newview/VIEWER_VERSION.txt > >That value is then propagated everywhere it needs to be (more places than it used to be, in fact). > >The fourth level number can be set manually at build time by the 'revision' environment variable; if that is not set, the build will try to use the Mercurial revision number of the current repo, or zero if it can't use that. > > > >-- > >Scott Lawrence | Director of Open Development >Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden > >Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces >SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU > > ___ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges >___ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > >___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts?
Maybe I’m missing something here... or did someone forget to hg add this file? Its not in viewer-release or viewer-development. Twisted From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 2:03 PM To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? On 2013-05-01 09:50 , Lance Corrimal wrote: Hi, I just noticed that a commit in viewer-beta removed the two scripts build_version.py and update_version_files.py from the scripts/ directory, is that supposed to be that way? What should be used now to update the different version files, other than vi? See https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Channel_and_Version_Requirements#Version_Number To update the first three levels of the version number, edit just one file: indra/newview/VIEWER_VERSION.txt That value is then propagated everywhere it needs to be (more places than it used to be, in fact). The fourth level number can be set manually at build time by the 'revision' environment variable; if that is not set, the build will try to use the Mercurial revision number of the current repo, or zero if it can't use that. -- Scott Lawrence | Director of Open Development Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab | Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] linux viewer building
>>Has anyone built 2.8.10 from source on debian squeeze? If so, how did it go? Smooth as silk. I wish the viewer would compile and install that simply. Using 2.8.2 resulted in a problem late in the process when the version was trying to be set. > > From: Nicky Perian >To: "opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com" >; "kokua-...@lists.kokuaviewer.org" > >Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2013 9:15 AM >Subject: [opensource-dev] linux viewer building > > > >LL has placed a cmake minimum required version of 2.8.8. debian squeeze has >2.8.2 as a default install and 2.8.7 available from squeeze backports. > > >I have the string compare fix from nickyD / firestorm and reducing to a >minimum required version in indra/CMakeLists.txt did not reveal any build >errors. > > >cmake is to version 2.8.10 and has the sources for download. > > >Has anyone built 2.8.10 from source on debian squeeze? If so, how did it go? > > >nicky > > >___ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > >___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
