RE: Hints being ignored

2002-07-08 Thread rabbit

I'm on 8.1.6 and the other day I was trying to use a hint on the
GL_INTERFACE table from Oracle Financials (i know OF is rule based)that I
had copied to another database instance and I couldnt get a hint to work.
And i know that Hint is not SQL supported and therefore the syntax has to
be 100% correct. I was busy so I jut deleted records I didnt need but I
will go back and try again later. On the whole though using 8.1.6 Ive
remember situations where hints have not taken.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Hints being ignored

2002-07-01 Thread Larry Elkins

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Connor
> McDonald
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:29 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Hints being ignored
>
>
> Are you sure?  I've seen two very common examples in
> the past which lead people to think that hints are
> ignored when in fact they have not been:
>
>
> Example 1:
>
> In SQL, select /*+HINT*/ will work, but in PL/SQL,
> select /*+HINT*/ fails since the space trailing the +
> is missing.
>
> Example 2:
>
> select /*+ USE_MERGE(e) */ ...
> from DEPT d, EMP e
>
> can come back with a hash join - but the hint has NOT
> been ignored, it has been 'avoided'.  USE_MERGE simply
> says if EMP is the *target* in the join, then make
> sure its a sort-merge.  That of course does not stop
> EMP being the *driver* table in a hash join.

And one of the reasons it is recommended to use the ORDERED hint when
specifying join methods. There is nothing to prevent the CBO, as Connor
pointed out, from calculating costs using other join orders, as is its
normal behavior. The hint didn't *exclude* the evaluation of the various
combinations of driving orders of tables. I think this is the most common
example I see -- ignoring join methods when the person failed to specify the
ORDERED hint.

And another more subtle one is even if E, in the above example, is *not* the
driving table in the plan and yet a HASH JOIN instead of a MERGE JOIN is
used. What happens there is that the CBO evaluates driving by E, deciding on
an HJ and throwing a "swap sides" at you.

Larry G. Elkins

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Larry Elkins
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Hints being ignored

2002-07-01 Thread Jared . Still

Lee, Lee, Lee...

This is a serious RTFM question.  :)

It should read:

SELECT /*+ INDEX(d CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK) */ 


Jared





Robertson Lee - lerobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/28/2002 07:13 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L

 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 
Subject:    Hints being ignored


All
 
Oracle 8.0.5.0.0
 
Tru64 4.0f
 
Select statement as follows. The hint is being totally ignored. Any ideas 
??
 
Regards
 
Lee
 
SELECT /*+ INDEX(CONSUMER_COMM_D2C CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK) */ 
i.household_id 
|| '|' || 'd'
|| '|' || d.promotion_item_id
|| '|' || xp.campaign_id
|| '|' || xp.document_id
|| '|' || xp.segment
|| '|' || xd.contact_type_code
|| '|'
FROM genex_individual i
, consumer_comm_d2c d
, x_promotion_item xp
, x_document xd
WHERE i.brief_name = '$brief_name'
AND i.individual_id = d.consumer_id
AND d.promotion_item_id = xp.promotion_item_id
AND xp.document_id = xd.document_id
ORDER
BY i.household_id
;
 
Table CONSUMER_COMM_D2C is as follows
 
NameNull?Type
 ---  
 CONSUMER_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
 PROMOTION_ITEM_ID   NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
 COMMUNICATION_DATE  NOT NULL DATE
 COMMUNICATION_STATUS_CODEVARCHAR2(2)
 COMMUNICATION_DETAIL VARCHAR2(500)
 BLOCK_LDT   NOT NULL DATE
 ROW_CHANGE_SOURCE   NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
 ROW_CHANGE_TIME  DATE
 ROW_CHANGE_USERIDVARCHAR2(50)
 
Index CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK  is built as follows
 
consumer_id
promotion_item_id
communication_date.
 
The table is partitioned on promotion_item_id and the indexes on the 
partitions are local
 
Explain plan is as follows
 
Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost TQ In/Out PStart PStop
SELECT STATEMENT 1440 G 106 G 
SORT ORDER BY 1440 G 171770G 106 G 
MERGE JOIN 1440 G 171770G 17 M 
SORT JOIN 13 M 1G 300284 
HASH JOIN 13 M 1G 10271 
TABLE ACCESS FULL X_PROMOTION_ITEM 7 K 409 K 10 
MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN 2 M 90 M 3206 
TABLE ACCESS FULL X_DOCUMENT 1 K 25 K 6 
SORT JOIN 1 K 31 K 3200 
TABLE ACCESS FULL GENEX_INDIVIDUAL 1 K 31 K 2 
SORT JOIN 1 G 39G 17 M 
PARTITION CONCATENATED 1 26
TABLE ACCESS FULL CONSUMER_COMM_D2C 1 G 39G 1352283 1 26
 


*

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and
delete the original message or any copy of it from your
computer system. Thank You.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Hints being ignored

2002-07-01 Thread Connor McDonald

Are you sure?  I've seen two very common examples in
the past which lead people to think that hints are
ignored when in fact they have not been:


Example 1:

In SQL, select /*+HINT*/ will work, but in PL/SQL,
select /*+HINT*/ fails since the space trailing the +
is missing.

Example 2:

select /*+ USE_MERGE(e) */ ...
from DEPT d, EMP e

can come back with a hash join - but the hint has NOT
been ignored, it has been 'avoided'.  USE_MERGE simply
says if EMP is the *target* in the join, then make
sure its a sort-merge.  That of course does not stop
EMP being the *driver* table in a hash join.

hth
connor

 --- "Miller, Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know in what version this became the case?  I
> certainly remember some
> hints being ignored in version 8.0.
> 
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 5:58 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> 
> 
> A hint is absolutely, positively a DIRECTIVE, not a
> suggestion.
> 
> Jonathan can explain if you have doubts.
> 
> 
> Cary Millsap
> Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
> http://www.hotsos.com
> 
> Upcoming events:
> - Hotsos Clinic, Jul 9-11 New York City
> - Hotsos Clinic, Jul 23-25 Chicago
> - 2003 Hotsos Symposium on OracleR System
> Performance, Feb 9-12 Dallas
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:08 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> 
> Hints used to be more like that.
> 
> hints are more like "do it" nowadays, their
> aggressiveness has gone up.
> 
> joe
> 
> 
> basher 59 wrote:
> 
> > When putting in hints, remember this bit of
> advise.   A hint is just a
> 
> > hint.  Oracle may choose today to use your hit and
> tomorrow it may 
> > not.   I don't like using hints for this reason,
> and I usually try and
> 
> > rewrite the query if I can.   Have you analyzed
> the table lately.  If 
> > the table is not analyzed, it may not use the
> indexes.
> >
> >
> >> From: Robertson Lee - lerobe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Subject: Hints being ignored
> >> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:13:19 -0800
> >>
> >> All
> >>
> >> Oracle 8.0.5.0.0
> >>
> >> Tru64 4.0f
> >>
> >> Select statement as follows. The hint is being
> totally ignored. Any 
> >> ideas ??
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Lee
> >>
> >> SELECT /*+ INDEX(CONSUMER_COMM_D2C
> CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK) */
> >> i.household_id
> >> || '|' || 'd'
> >> || '|' || d.promotion_item_id
> >> || '|' || xp.campaign_id
> >> || '|' || xp.document_id
> >> || '|' || xp.segment
> >> || '|' || xd.contact_type_code
> >> || '|'
> >> FROM genex_individual i
> >> , consumer_comm_d2c d
> >> , x_promotion_item xp
> >> , x_document xd
> >> WHERE i.brief_name = '$brief_name'
> >> AND i.individual_id = d.consumer_id
> >> AND d.promotion_item_id = xp.promotion_item_id
> >> AND xp.document_id = xd.document_id
> >> ORDER
> >> BY i.household_id
> >> ;
> >>
> >> Table CONSUMER_COMM_D2C is as follows
> >>
> >> NameNull?Type
> >>  ---  
> >>  CONSUMER_ID NOT NULL
> NUMBER(9)
> >>  PROMOTION_ITEM_ID   NOT NULL
> NUMBER(9)
> >>  COMMUNICATION_DATE  NOT NULL DATE
> >>  COMMUNICATION_STATUS_CODE   
> VARCHAR2(2)
> >>  COMMUNICATION_DETAIL
> VARCHAR2(500)
> >>  BLOCK_LDT   NOT NULL DATE
> >>  ROW_CHANGE_SOURCE   NOT NULL
> NUMBER(9)
> >>  ROW_CHANGE_TIME  DATE
> >>  ROW_CHANGE_USERID   
> VARCHAR2(50)
> >>
> >> Index CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK  is built as follows
> >>
> >> consumer_id
> >> promotion_item_id
> >> communication_date.
> >>
> >> The table is partitioned on promotion_item_id and
> the indexes on the
> >> partitions are local
> >>
> >> Explain plan is as follows
> >>
> >>
> >> Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost TQ
> In/Out PStart PStop
> >>
> >> SELECT STATEMENT 1440 G 106

RE: Hints being ignored

2002-07-01 Thread Miller, Jay

Do you know in what version this became the case?  I certainly remember some
hints being ignored in version 8.0.

-Original Message-
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 5:58 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


A hint is absolutely, positively a DIRECTIVE, not a suggestion.

Jonathan can explain if you have doubts.


Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com

Upcoming events:
- Hotsos Clinic, Jul 9-11 New York City
- Hotsos Clinic, Jul 23-25 Chicago
- 2003 Hotsos Symposium on OracleR System Performance, Feb 9-12 Dallas



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:08 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Hints used to be more like that.

hints are more like "do it" nowadays, their aggressiveness has gone up.

joe


basher 59 wrote:

> When putting in hints, remember this bit of advise.   A hint is just a

> hint.  Oracle may choose today to use your hit and tomorrow it may 
> not.   I don't like using hints for this reason, and I usually try and

> rewrite the query if I can.   Have you analyzed the table lately.  If 
> the table is not analyzed, it may not use the indexes.
>
>
>> From: Robertson Lee - lerobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Hints being ignored
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:13:19 -0800
>>
>> All
>>
>> Oracle 8.0.5.0.0
>>
>> Tru64 4.0f
>>
>> Select statement as follows. The hint is being totally ignored. Any 
>> ideas ??
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> SELECT /*+ INDEX(CONSUMER_COMM_D2C CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK) */
>> i.household_id
>> || '|' || 'd'
>> || '|' || d.promotion_item_id
>> || '|' || xp.campaign_id
>> || '|' || xp.document_id
>> || '|' || xp.segment
>> || '|' || xd.contact_type_code
>> || '|'
>> FROM genex_individual i
>> , consumer_comm_d2c d
>> , x_promotion_item xp
>> , x_document xd
>> WHERE i.brief_name = '$brief_name'
>> AND i.individual_id = d.consumer_id
>> AND d.promotion_item_id = xp.promotion_item_id
>> AND xp.document_id = xd.document_id
>> ORDER
>> BY i.household_id
>> ;
>>
>> Table CONSUMER_COMM_D2C is as follows
>>
>> NameNull?Type
>>  ---  
>>  CONSUMER_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
>>  PROMOTION_ITEM_ID   NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
>>  COMMUNICATION_DATE  NOT NULL DATE
>>  COMMUNICATION_STATUS_CODEVARCHAR2(2)
>>  COMMUNICATION_DETAIL VARCHAR2(500)
>>  BLOCK_LDT   NOT NULL DATE
>>  ROW_CHANGE_SOURCE   NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
>>  ROW_CHANGE_TIME  DATE
>>  ROW_CHANGE_USERIDVARCHAR2(50)
>>
>> Index CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK  is built as follows
>>
>> consumer_id
>> promotion_item_id
>> communication_date.
>>
>> The table is partitioned on promotion_item_id and the indexes on the
>> partitions are local
>>
>> Explain plan is as follows
>>
>>
>> Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost TQ In/Out PStart PStop
>>
>> SELECT STATEMENT 1440 G 106 G
>>
>> SORT ORDER BY 1440 G 171770G 106 G
>>
>> MERGE JOIN 1440 G 171770G 17 M
>>
>> SORT JOIN 13 M 1G 300284
>>
>> HASH JOIN 13 M 1G 10271
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL X_PROMOTION_ITEM 7 K 409 K 10
>>
>> MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN 2 M 90 M 3206
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL X_DOCUMENT 1 K 25 K 6
>>
>> SORT JOIN 1 K 31 K 3200
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL GENEX_INDIVIDUAL 1 K 31 K 2
>>
>> SORT JOIN 1 G 39G 17 M
>>
>> PARTITION CONCATENATED 1 26
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL CONSUMER_COMM_D2C 1 G 39G 1352283 1 26
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> The information contained in this communication is
>> confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
>> named above, and may be legally privileged.
>> If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
>> prohibited.
>> If you have received this communication in error,
>> please re-send this communication to the sender and
>> delete the original message

RE: Hints being ignored

2002-06-29 Thread Cary Millsap

A hint is absolutely, positively a DIRECTIVE, not a suggestion.

Jonathan can explain if you have doubts.


Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com

Upcoming events:
- Hotsos Clinic, Jul 9-11 New York City
- Hotsos Clinic, Jul 23-25 Chicago
- 2003 Hotsos Symposium on OracleR System Performance, Feb 9-12 Dallas



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:08 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Hints used to be more like that.

hints are more like "do it" nowadays, their aggressiveness has gone up.

joe


basher 59 wrote:

> When putting in hints, remember this bit of advise.   A hint is just a

> hint.  Oracle may choose today to use your hit and tomorrow it may 
> not.   I don't like using hints for this reason, and I usually try and

> rewrite the query if I can.   Have you analyzed the table lately.  If 
> the table is not analyzed, it may not use the indexes.
>
>
>> From: Robertson Lee - lerobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Hints being ignored
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:13:19 -0800
>>
>> All
>>
>> Oracle 8.0.5.0.0
>>
>> Tru64 4.0f
>>
>> Select statement as follows. The hint is being totally ignored. Any 
>> ideas ??
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> SELECT /*+ INDEX(CONSUMER_COMM_D2C CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK) */
>> i.household_id
>> || '|' || 'd'
>> || '|' || d.promotion_item_id
>> || '|' || xp.campaign_id
>> || '|' || xp.document_id
>> || '|' || xp.segment
>> || '|' || xd.contact_type_code
>> || '|'
>> FROM genex_individual i
>> , consumer_comm_d2c d
>> , x_promotion_item xp
>> , x_document xd
>> WHERE i.brief_name = '$brief_name'
>> AND i.individual_id = d.consumer_id
>> AND d.promotion_item_id = xp.promotion_item_id
>> AND xp.document_id = xd.document_id
>> ORDER
>> BY i.household_id
>> ;
>>
>> Table CONSUMER_COMM_D2C is as follows
>>
>> NameNull?Type
>>  ---  
>>  CONSUMER_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
>>  PROMOTION_ITEM_ID   NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
>>  COMMUNICATION_DATE  NOT NULL DATE
>>  COMMUNICATION_STATUS_CODEVARCHAR2(2)
>>  COMMUNICATION_DETAIL VARCHAR2(500)
>>  BLOCK_LDT   NOT NULL DATE
>>  ROW_CHANGE_SOURCE   NOT NULL NUMBER(9)
>>  ROW_CHANGE_TIME  DATE
>>  ROW_CHANGE_USERIDVARCHAR2(50)
>>
>> Index CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK  is built as follows
>>
>> consumer_id
>> promotion_item_id
>> communication_date.
>>
>> The table is partitioned on promotion_item_id and the indexes on the
>> partitions are local
>>
>> Explain plan is as follows
>>
>>
>> Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost TQ In/Out PStart PStop
>>
>> SELECT STATEMENT 1440 G 106 G
>>
>> SORT ORDER BY 1440 G 171770G 106 G
>>
>> MERGE JOIN 1440 G 171770G 17 M
>>
>> SORT JOIN 13 M 1G 300284
>>
>> HASH JOIN 13 M 1G 10271
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL X_PROMOTION_ITEM 7 K 409 K 10
>>
>> MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN 2 M 90 M 3206
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL X_DOCUMENT 1 K 25 K 6
>>
>> SORT JOIN 1 K 31 K 3200
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL GENEX_INDIVIDUAL 1 K 31 K 2
>>
>> SORT JOIN 1 G 39G 17 M
>>
>> PARTITION CONCATENATED 1 26
>>
>> TABLE ACCESS FULL CONSUMER_COMM_D2C 1 G 39G 1352283 1 26
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> The information contained in this communication is
>> confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
>> named above, and may be legally privileged.
>> If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
>> prohibited.
>> If you have received this communication in error,
>> please re-send this communication to the sender and
>> delete the original message or any copy of it from your
>> computer system. Thank You.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Over and out Basher 59
>
>
> _
> MSN Ph

Hints being ignored

2002-06-28 Thread Robertson Lee - lerobe



All
 
Oracle 
8.0.5.0.0
 
Tru64 
4.0f
 
Select statement as 
follows. The hint is being totally ignored. Any ideas ??
 
Regards
 
Lee
 
SELECT /*+ INDEX(CONSUMER_COMM_D2C 
CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK) */ 

i.household_id 
|| '|' || 'd'
|| '|' || d.promotion_item_id
|| '|' || xp.campaign_id
|| '|' || xp.document_id
|| '|' || xp.segment
|| '|' || xd.contact_type_code
|| '|'
FROM genex_individual i
, 
consumer_comm_d2c d
, 
x_promotion_item xp
, 
x_document xd
WHERE i.brief_name 
= '$brief_name'
AND i.individual_id 
= d.consumer_id
AND d.promotion_item_id = 
xp.promotion_item_id
AND xp.document_id 
= xd.document_id
ORDER
BY 
i.household_id
;
 
Table CONSUMER_COMM_D2C is as 
follows
 
Name    
Null?    Type ---  
 CONSUMER_ID 
NOT NULL 
NUMBER(9) PROMOTION_ITEM_ID   
NOT NULL 
NUMBER(9) COMMUNICATION_DATE  
NOT NULL 
DATE COMMUNICATION_STATUS_CODE    
VARCHAR2(2) COMMUNICATION_DETAIL 
VARCHAR2(500) BLOCK_LDT   
NOT NULL 
DATE ROW_CHANGE_SOURCE   
NOT NULL 
NUMBER(9) ROW_CHANGE_TIME  
DATE ROW_CHANGE_USERID    
VARCHAR2(50)
 
Index CONSUMER_COMM_D2C_PK  is 
built as follows
 
consumer_id
promotion_item_id
communication_date.
 
The table is 
partitioned on promotion_item_id and the indexes on the partitions are 
local
 
Explain plan is as follows
 


Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost TQ In/Out PStart 
PStop
SELECT STATEMENT 1440 G 106 G 
SORT ORDER BY 1440 G 171770G 106 G 
MERGE JOIN 1440 G 171770G 17 M 
SORT JOIN 13 M 1G 300284 
HASH JOIN 13 M 1G 10271 
TABLE ACCESS FULL X_PROMOTION_ITEM 7 K 409 K 10 

MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN 2 M 90 M 3206 
TABLE ACCESS FULL X_DOCUMENT 1 K 25 K 6 
SORT JOIN 1 K 31 K 3200 
TABLE ACCESS FULL GENEX_INDIVIDUAL 1 K 31 K 2 
SORT JOIN 1 G 39G 17 M 
PARTITION CONCATENATED 1 26
TABLE ACCESS FULL CONSUMER_COMM_D2C 1 G 39G 1352283 1 
26
 


*

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and
delete the original message or any copy of it from your
computer system. Thank You.