[Bug 591482] Review Request: forge-parent - Sonatype Forge Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591482 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 03:13:21 EDT --- I'm taking this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589833] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Lite - Lightweight HTTP implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589833 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 03:31:35 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589833] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Lite - Lightweight HTTP implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589833 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 03:31:40 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591482] Review Request: forge-parent - Sonatype Forge Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591482 Weinan Li w...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 03:36:33 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-Cache New Branches: EL-6 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591032] Review Request: R-xtable - Export tables to LaTeX or HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591032 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 03:49:45 EDT --- R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591032] Review Request: R-xtable - Export tables to LaTeX or HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591032 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 03:50:31 EDT --- R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 436737] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436737 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 03:50:38 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode New Branches: EL-6 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 03:53:09 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-Services-Weather New Branches: EL-6 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 03:54:35 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-Services-Twitter New Branches: EL-6 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 03:55:49 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth New Branches: EL-6 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591433] Review Request: R-hgu133acdf - HG-U133A.cdf data file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 04:02:59 EDT --- Sandro, I'm sure that it would be better for stupid guys like me to hear something about what does 'HG-U133A' acronym stand for? The same question should be applied to the ticket #591435. Nothing personal here, but I would like to know what kind of stuff people is pusiong into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591482] Review Request: forge-parent - Sonatype Forge Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591482 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 04:07:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) I'm taking this one Please, take in account that (in order to Fedora guidelines) you must sponsor Weinan too. I mean, that only sponsor is allowed to make formal review of newly sponsored Fedora member and vice versa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591454] Review Request: spice-parent - Sonatype Spice Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591454 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 04:27:23 EDT --- I'll do the review for this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581280] Review Request: erlang-oauth - An Erlang OAuth implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581280
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 05:06:52 EDT
---
*Almost* done:
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-oauth.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-oauth-0-0.2.gite8aecf0.fc12.src.rpm
Unfortunately I was wrong previously - I can't remove %global debug_package
%{nil} because it does produces empty *-debuginfo w/o this line.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 05:12:03 EDT --- New build: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-ibrowse.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-ibrowse-1.5.6-2.fc12.src.rpm Narrowed explicit requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 05:31:23 EDT --- Sure. I just sent an email upstream. Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lv2-c++-tools Short Description: Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ Owners: oget Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581104] Review Request: lv2-EQ10Q-plugins - Parametric equalizer lv2 plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581104 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 05:33:39 EDT --- I will finish this review once we have lv2-c++-tools in the repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591828] New: Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591828 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jo...@x-tnd.be QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pecl-solr/php-pecl-solr.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pecl-solr/php-pecl-solr-0.9.10-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Feature-rich library that allows PHP developers to communicate easily and efficiently with Apache Solr server instances using an object-oriented API. It effectively simplifies the process of interacting with Apache Solr using PHP5 and it already comes with built-in readiness for the latest features available in Solr 1.4. The extension has features such as built-in, serializable query string builder objects which effectively simplifies the manipulation of name-value pair request parameters across repeated requests. The response from the Solr server is also automatically parsed into native php objects whose properties can be accessed as array keys or object properties without any additional configuration on the client-side. Its advanced HTTP client reuses the same connection across multiple requests and provides built-in support for connecting to Solr servers secured behind HTTP Authentication or HTTP proxy servers. It is also able to connect to SSL-enabled containers. More info on PHP-Solr can be found at: http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.solr.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591482] Review Request: forge-parent - Sonatype Forge Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591482 --- Comment #4 from Weinan Li w...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 06:04:49 EDT --- After fixed some problem: Spec URL: http://www.box.net/shared/kzjq1x9nog SRPM URL: http://www.box.net/shared/6t4kirgqrz Description: Sonatype Forge is an open-source community dedicated to the creation of the next-generation of development tools and technologies. Note: this needs to be built in the dist-f14-maven221 koji tag. Here is a successful koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2184868 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ta...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #8 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 06:12:37 EDT --- Currently, I have modified spec file to http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ISO8859-2-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583058] Review Request: grantlee - Qt string template engine based on the Django template system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583058
--- Comment #6 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 06:22:55 EDT ---
%{_docdir}/HTML/en/grantlee-apidocs still seems a bit strange, maybe
%{_docdir}/HTML/grantlee-apidocs/en is more appropriate if we consider the
fedora-release-notes package.
ls /usr/share/doc/HTML/fedora-release-notes/
cs-CZ es-ES index.html nl-NL pt-PT uk-UA
en-US fr-FR it-IT pl-PL sv-SE zh-CN
The installation path and subpackage name for html documentation is really a
mess in fedora and need further consideration.
The guideline only has one line about this - if there's a lot of documentation,
consider putting it into a subpackage.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Documentation
Actually, we now have several subpackage name for html documention.
E.g
-doc
-docs
-devel-doc
-devel-docs
-apidocs
-manual
We also have several installation path for those html files(normally built by
docbook or doxygen).
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
%{_docdir}/%{name}-[subpackagename]-%{version}
%{_docdir}/%{name}
%{_docdir}/HTML/%{name}
%{_docdir}/HTML/[locale]/%{name}
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}
In java package guideline,we have
%{_datadir}/javadoc/%{name}-%{version} for -javadoc subpackage
%{_docdir}/%{name}-[subpackagename]-%{version} for -manual subpackage
I think add a fixed installation path for html apidocs or enduser manuals like
man or info will benefit all of us a lot .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591482] Review Request: forge-parent - Sonatype Forge Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591482
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-13
06:57:34 EDT ---
Review:
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. OUTPUT:
forge-parent.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Sonatype - Sonatina,
Sonata, Resonate
forge-parent.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Sonatype -
Sonatina, Sonata, Resonate
Not a problem.
forge-parent.noarch: W: no-documentation
Nothing suitable as a doc.
forge-parent.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/forge-parent
Not a problem.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly.
FIXIT: Each package must consistently use macros.
You have both %{_rm} and rm.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application.
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
There should be a Requires: jpackage-utils because it installs files in a
directory owned by jpackage-utils
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591857] New: Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857 Summary: Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huw...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://code.google.com/p/tobepackagemaintaner/downloads/detail?name=maven-resources-plugin.speccan=2q=#makechanges SRPM URL: http://code.google.com/p/tobepackagemaintaner/downloads/detail?name=maven-resources-plugin-2.2-1.src.rpmcan=2q=#makechanges Description: The Resources Plugin handles the copying of project resources to the output directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857 huwang huw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576685] Review Request: pekwm - A small and flexible window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576685 --- Comment #20 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 07:49:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) Sorry, my bad. I should have set the flags and I should have noticed that this is an orphaned package. So this means I don't have to import the package yet? German, there are indeed some interesting features in the old package, most notably pekwm-xdg-menu.py. Take a look at the old files at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/pekwm/devel/ and then lets discuss what is useful and what not. Ok, I'm going to take a look at the files there. Cheers, German. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #18 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-05-13 08:04:31 EDT --- I think it would be a good idea to rename rabbitvcs subpackage to rabbitvcs-core for the following reasons: 1) the name rabbitvcs-core is more consistent with Debian package naming; 2) we could drop rabbitvcs-core Obsoletes/Provides which are right now there to preserve upgrade path from upstream binary packages; 3) currently rabbitvcs package cannot be built as noarch as it's the main package, but renaming it to rabbitvcs-core would fix that; 4) I believe it's confusing for end users if a package is named rabbitvcs. If I see a package named like that, I'd expect it to actually provide some functionality. In reality one needs to install one of the -nautilus, -gedit etc subpackages for basic functionality. Renaming the package to -core would make it more obvious that it only contains shared components. What do you think? There was a recent thread on fedora-devel list about -core subpackages and metapackages: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-April/134735.html I am really not sure if it's a good idea, but perhaps there should also be a metapackage which pulls in all other rabbitvcs-* subpackages. P.S. Can you fix the commented out thunar sections wrt Requiring fully versioned main package and the mv - cp change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590660] Review Request: apache-commons-lang - rename of jakarta-commons-lang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590660 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 08:04:35 EDT --- Thank you. Package built. Closing as NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 08:24:32 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=413737)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=413737)
build.log
mock rebuild failed:
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %{_fontbasedir}ISO8859-2
File must begin with /: %{_fontbasedir}ISO8859-2/misc
File must begin with /: %{_fontbasedir}ISO8859-2/misc/*.gz
File must begin with /: %{_fontbasedir}ISO8859-2/misc/fonts.alias
File must begin with /: %{_fontbasedir}ISO8859-2/misc/fonts.dir
I guess you need to add BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel or define own
_fontbasedir to get it fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591305] Review Request: apache-commons-digester - XML to Java object mapping module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591305 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 08:28:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Sure, I can submit the apache-commons-beanutils package for review too, if you'd like? That would be great. Just don't forget to cc current owner of jakarta-commons-beanutils (ideally also add him as co-maintainer at the end of review if he doesn't mind). (In reply to comment #2) (since apache-commons-loggins is already in rawhide)? Also you have old changelog included, it would probably be better to start from scratch. I have nothing against elderly changelogs, and it's not particularly long. I know packages like Kernel and Eclipse trim them periodically because they get absurdly long, but I thought it would be frowned upon to trim it for purely aesthetic reasons... I wouldn't say it's aesthetic reason...You are creating a new package so if anyone is looking for history of the older package they can check its history. At least that's what I did with my commons packages: trimmed changelog, started counting from revision 1. But this is just my preference, AFAIK there is no policy forcing either way. I'll take this for review once beanutils is in rawhide (so maybe I'll review that first..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-05-13 08:42:18 EDT --- Forgot to mention this: the scratch build is done at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2185045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-05-13 08:45:18 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589866] Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 08:53:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) For the exit calls and the rpath problem I will try to contact the author. You can ask the author to build libdarktable as a static lib. For the warning about the gconf schema file I only have to mark it as %config ? Or I have to follow these instructions http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf ? Yes, you should follow this guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591900] New: Review Request: libcapifax - Support for Sending/receiving faxes over CAPI capable devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libcapifax - Support for Sending/receiving faxes over CAPI capable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591900 Summary: Review Request: libcapifax - Support for Sending/receiving faxes over CAPI capable devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/libcapifax/libcapifax.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/libcapifax/libcapifax-0.7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: libcapifax is a library that supports sending/receiving faxes over capi via soft DSP (spandsp). It was originally released as part of the capifax package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583102] Review Request: radiotray - Radio Tray is a streaming player for listening to online radios
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583102 --- Comment #4 from Jean-Francois Saucier jfsauc...@infoglobe.ca 2010-05-13 09:14:36 EDT --- I have a question before posting a new package : 1. please check the license, the COPYING and source files feature a GPLv1+ Done. You are right, the website mention GPL and I assume GPLv3... It's clearly a GPLv1+ in the COPYING file. 2. please comment the spec file and add reasons for patching in there too. Done. I added the comments to patches and 1-2 other places in the SPEC file. 3. why are explicit requires used in the spec? Please add comments justifying them This is my question. I don't see the explicit requires in my SPEC file. I think I don't have any but maybe it's something I don't know. Can you enlight me on this? Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(pnem...@redhat.co ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583102] Review Request: radiotray - Radio Tray is a streaming player for listening to online radios
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583102 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 09:24:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) hey, 3. why are explicit requires used in the spec? Please add comments justifying them This is my question. I don't see the explicit requires in my SPEC file. I think I don't have any but maybe it's something I don't know. Can you enlight me on this? Thanks for the review. That would be line 18. Requires: gstreamer-python pygtk2 pygobject2 python-lxml python-inotify regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591298] Review Request: apache-commons-codec - Implementations of common encoders and decoders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591298 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591926] Review Request: erlang-mochiweb - An Erlang library for building lightweight HTTP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591926 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||581284 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581280] Review Request: erlang-oauth - An Erlang OAuth implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581280
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-05-13
09:52:05 EDT ---
Ah, okay. So that is definitely something we should write up as Packaging
Guidelines for erlang (or, if possible, fix so that there is useful debuginfo).
=== REVIEW ===
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
erlang-oauth.src: W: invalid-url Source0: erlang-oauth-0.gite8aecf0.tar.bz2
erlang-oauth.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
erlang-oauth.x86_64: E: no-binary
erlang-oauth.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
All are safe to ignore.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, source is missing license attribution, but
upstream has been notified
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream (can't do tarball comparison because it is generated
from git, but diff of checkout and source matches)
- package compiles on F-13 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
This is APPROVED.
One extremely minor suggestion: In the comments on how to make the source
tarball from the git repo, you reference %{git_commit}, but you don't
actually define it in the spec anywhere. It would be nice if you would do that,
or at least, remove it from the comments so it doesn't confuse anyone.
P.S. I'd love a review on 566560.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591926] New: Review Request: erlang-mochiweb - An Erlang library for building lightweight HTTP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-mochiweb - An Erlang library for building lightweight HTTP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591926 Summary: Review Request: erlang-mochiweb - An Erlang library for building lightweight HTTP servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemen...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-mochiweb.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-mochiweb-0-0.1.svn154.fc12.src.rpm Description: An Erlang library for building lightweight HTTP servers. This library is bundled with CouchDB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583102] Review Request: radiotray - Radio Tray is a streaming player for listening to online radios
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583102 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 09:59:46 EDT --- It's clearly a GPLv1+ in the COPYING file. The COPYING file contains GPL version 1. The 1+ comes from the .py file headers. The Fedora license tag for that is GPL+ not GPLv1+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 10:26:37 EDT
---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is almost silent
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/libaesgm-*
libaesgm.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cryptographic - cryptographer,
cryptography, cryptogram
libaesgm.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -
cryptographer, cryptography, cryptogram
libaesgm-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
These messages may be ignored.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD).
0 The package does not include the text of the license(s) in its own file.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum aes-src-29-04-09.zip*
0b6d09c741dcd1c100cdcdd8b5f5bf85cfe54bdd7bea1f96916c2471280ddf03
aes-src-29-04-09.zip
0b6d09c741dcd1c100cdcdd8b5f5bf85cfe54bdd7bea1f96916c2471280ddf03
aes-src-29-04-09.zip.1
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2185723
0 No additional build dependencies.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package isn't designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries.
+ The library file that ends in .so (without suffix) is in a -devel package.
+ The devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The packages does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ All filenames in the packages are valid UTF-8.
I've got only one simple note - if you plan to provide package also for EPEl,
then you will need to add rm -rf %{buildroot} in the %install section.
This package is
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581280] Review Request: erlang-oauth - An Erlang OAuth implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581280 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 10:26:45 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581164] Review Request: maven-timestamp-plugin - Provides formatted timestamps for maven builds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581164 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 10:34:40 EDT --- RAWHIDE is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591947] New: Review Request: maven-jar-plugin - Maven JAR Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-jar-plugin - Maven JAR Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591947 Summary: Review Request: maven-jar-plugin - Maven JAR Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurt...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-jar-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-jar-plugin-2.3-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Builds a Java Archive (JAR) file from the compiled project classes and resources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581280] Review Request: erlang-oauth - An Erlang OAuth implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581280 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 10:31:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: erlang-oauth Short Description: An Erlang OAuth implementation Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 EL-6 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591947] Review Request: maven-jar-plugin - Maven JAR Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591947 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 10:42:02 EDT --- Notes about this package: - It requires maven-plugin-testing in the dist-f14-maven221 tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576685] Review Request: pekwm - A small and flexible window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576685 --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 10:46:03 EDT --- We should look at the differences to the previous package and discuss what is interesting for us. This process should happen in public for transparency, so bugzilla is a good place. Once we are both fine with the package, you can import it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591298] Review Request: apache-commons-codec - Implementations of common encoders and decoders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591298
--- Comment #7 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-05-13
10:46:30 EDT ---
Noted that this is re-review
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
OUTPUT:
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/{SRPMS,RPMS/noarch}/apache-commons-codec*-1.4-6*rpm
apache-commons-codec.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/apache-commons-codec
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
False positive, OK
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. .
OK : The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
OK: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly
if it is not present.
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Other problems:
- required for renames: check for proper Provides/Obsoletes was OK
- these are quite old:
Provides: %{short_name} = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{short_name} %{version}-%{release}
And should be fairly safe to remove them for rawhide F14+ (currently on F-12
only plexus-xmlrpc does and it will have to be revised anyway)
What is the reason to have:
# enable OSGi automatic dep solving
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
%define __find_provides /usr/lib/rpm/osgideps.pl -p
%define __find_requires /usr/lib/rpm/osgideps.pl -r
I believe they are not used/needed anywhere in the spec file. If they really
are needed, define them with %global. Isn't maven supposed to take care of
this?
- javadoc sub-package must have jpackage-utils in Requires (it is
owner of javadoc directory
- jpackage-utils should be required in post/postun for %update_maven_depmap
- provide backward compatible pom file with old GROUP_ID/ARTIFACT_ID.
jakarta-commons-codec
used %add_to_maven_depmap %{short_name} %{short_name} %{version} JPP
%{short_name}
Suggestions (Not required for + :-) ):
- since you are already using install for copying files, why not use
it for creating dirs too? Instead of:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
use
install -d -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
- another one:
(cd %{buildroot}%{_javadocdir} ln -sf %{name}-%{version} %{name})
Why create subshell when simple
ln -s %{name}-%{version} %{buildroot}%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
would be enough?
- You also have more commons packages so I suggest you use %global to
define base_name as codec, short_name as commons-%{base_name} and use
[Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:17:26 EDT --- rubygem-shotgun-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-shotgun-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532276] Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532276 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:18:44 EDT --- python-googlevoice-0.5-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-googlevoice-0.5-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591424] Review Request: R-statmod - Statistical modeling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591424 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:31:56 EDT --- R-statmod-1.4.6-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-statmod-1.4.6-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591424] Review Request: R-statmod - Statistical modeling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591424 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:31:17 EDT --- R-statmod-1.4.6-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-statmod-1.4.6-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 ro...@nibor.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro...@nibor.org Bug 561484 depends on bug 561455, which changed state. Bug 561455 Summary: Review Request: yecht - A YAML processor based on Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561455 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591828] Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591828 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591828] Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591828 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 11:39:43 EDT --- Quick notes - macro usage should be consistent (pecl-name) - a minimal %check could be great - %description -l fr should be the same as english (or omitted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579514] Review Request: pyaudio - Python bindings for PortAudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579514 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:43:06 EDT --- pyaudio-0.2.3-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyaudio-0.2.3-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591433] Review Request: R-hgu133acdf - HG-U133A.cdf data file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591433 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2010-05-13 11:41:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Sandro, I'm sure that it would be better for stupid guys like me to hear something about what does 'HG-U133A' acronym stand for? HG-U133A is a chip type. I *think* HG means Human Genome but this package really is about the data file for that chip type and therefore I think this should be clear enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591982] New: Review Request: batti - Simple battery monitor for the system tray
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: batti - Simple battery monitor for the system tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591982 Summary: Review Request: batti - Simple battery monitor for the system tray Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwick...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/batti.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/batti-0.3.5-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Batti is a simple battery monitor for the system tray, similar to batterymon. Unlike the latter batti uses UPower, and if that is missing DeviceKit.Power, for it's power information. Features * one tray icon per inserted battery * tray icons (dis-)appear with the battery (un-)plugging * notification on low and critical battery status * use of GTK icon-theme * suspend/hibernate menu on left-click, if allowed by PolicyKit $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/b batti-0.3.5-1.fc14.noarch.rpm batti-0.3.5-1.fc14.src.rpm build.log [ch...@wicktop SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/batti-0.3.5-1.fc14.* batti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US batterymon - battery, batterer, batter batti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US un - UN, nu, in batti.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://batti-gtk.googlecode.com/ IncompleteRead(0 bytes read) batti.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US batterymon - battery, batterer, batter batti.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US un - UN, nu, in batti.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://batti-gtk.googlecode.com/ IncompleteRead(0 bytes read) batti.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://batti-gtk.googlecode.com/files/batti-0.3.5.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. The URLs are valid, they work with wget. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579514] Review Request: pyaudio - Python bindings for PortAudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579514 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:44:06 EDT --- pyaudio-0.2.3-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyaudio-0.2.3-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579514] Review Request: pyaudio - Python bindings for PortAudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579514 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 11:44:49 EDT --- pyaudio-0.2.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyaudio-0.2.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
--- Comment #40 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2010-05-13
11:45:56 EDT ---
Sorry for this long silence, you can find an update with the last tested
version :
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-3208-1/josm-0-0.1.3208svn.fc12.src.rpm
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-3208-1/josm.spec
oauth is disabled until maven is updated on fedora or an other solution is
found.
org.apache.tools.bzip2 is removed from source file and it is ant package which
is used.
org.apache.commons.codec is removed from source file to use
jakarta-commons-codec package.
Actually theses jar files are added to josm final jar, is there a method to
link dynamically theses jar files ?
I don't know if it is possible to use %find_lang macro with this package. I
don't know how, because lange file aren't names %{name}.lang, but lang.po
rpmlint output :
josm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata - meta data,
meta-data, metatarsus
josm.src: W: strange-permission josm-generate-tarball.sh 0744
josm.src: W: invalid-url Source0: josm-0.3208svn.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
josm-generate-tarball is executable because it is needed to get source code
invalid-url : source code only available on svn (without tag)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-05-13 12:07:04 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-Distribution New Branches: EL-6 Updated EPEL Owners: pghmcfc cweyl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591828] Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591828 --- Comment #2 from Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be 2010-05-13 12:42:40 EDT --- Okay, I've updated the package according to the notes here and what we've talking about on IRC, thanks :) Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pecl-solr/php-pecl-solr.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pecl-solr/php-pecl-solr-0.9.10-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-05-13 12:43:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-curl Short Description: MinGW Windows port of libcurl Owners: epienbro Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591828] Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591828 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-05-13 12:44:47 EDT --- REVIEW : + rpmlint is ok php-pecl-solr.src: I: checking php-pecl-solr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l fr sérialisable - sérialisation, sérialisée, sérialise php-pecl-solr.src: I: checking-url http://pecl.php.net/package/solr (timeout 10 seconds) php-pecl-solr.src: I: checking-url http://pecl.php.net/get/solr-0.9.10.tgz (timeout 10 seconds) php-pecl-solr.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-solr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serializable - serialization, serialize, materialization php-pecl-solr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l fr sérialisable - sérialisation, sérialisée, sérialise php-pecl-solr.x86_64: I: checking-url http://pecl.php.net/package/solr (timeout 10 seconds) php-pecl-solr-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-solr-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://pecl.php.net/package/solr (timeout 10 seconds) php-pecl-solr.spec: I: checking-url http://pecl.php.net/get/solr-0.9.10.tgz (timeout 10 seconds) 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 83 warnings. = (false spelling-error from french removed and ignored) + package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + spec file name ok + The package meet the Packaging Guidelines and PHP Guidelines + license ok (PHP) and match upstream + license provided + spec file is legible + sources match upstream fe7a9d778c8c3b1fd930de65174c0357ae9e2a23 solr-0.9.10.tgz + source URL ok + build on F13 x86_64 (php 5.3.3dev) + build on mock/koji (F12 ref in previous post) + build on all arch (F-12 + rawhide, i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2185982 2185982 build (dist-rawhide, php-pecl-solr-0.9.10-2.fc8.src.rpm) completed successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186012 2186012 build (dist-f12, php-pecl-solr-0.9.10-2.fc8.src.rpm) completed successfully + BuildRequires + no locale + no shared library (extension are not lib.) + no system library + own all directories that it creates + not list a file more than once in the spec + Permissions on files are set properly. + %clean ok + consistently use macro + contain code + small doc, no sub package + doc not required to run + no -devel + no -static + no .pc + no .la + not own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + all files are UTF-8 + %check ok (only load test) + load in httpd ok + test suite ok (after install) TEST RESULT SUMMARY Number of tests : 2117 Tests skipped :4 ( 19.0%) Tests warned:0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) Tests failed:0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) Expected fail :0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) Tests passed: 17 ( 81.0%) (100.0%) + provides config(php-pecl-solr) = 0.9.10-2.fc8 php-pecl(solr) = 0.9.10 php-solr = 0.9.10 solr.so()(64bit) php-pecl-solr = 0.9.10-2.fc8 php-pecl-solr(x86-64) = 0.9.10-2.fc8 + requires /bin/sh /usr/bin/pecl config(php-pecl-solr) = 0.9.10-2.fc8 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) php(api) = 20090626 php(zend-abi) = 20090626 php-xml = 5.2.3 + scriptlet ok * APPROVED * -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591828] Review Request: php-pecl-solr - Object oriented API to Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591828 Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be 2010-05-13 12:50:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pecl-solr Short Description: Object oriented API to Apache Solr Owners: trasher Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-6 InitialCC: trasher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #11 from Chess Griffin ch...@chessgriffin.com 2010-05-13 13:02:12 EDT --- John - thank you for the ping. As I mentioned in my last comment, I am definitely interested in co-maintaining and was just waiting for some feedback on the last spec/srpm. Since I am interested in packaging, I do plan to try and focus on some reviews, but in the meantime, I welcome further feedback on the tint2 spec/srpm. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583643] Review Request: tigase-xmltools - Tigase XML Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583643 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 13:08:18 EDT --- tigase-xmltools-3.3.4-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tigase-xmltools-3.3.4-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563013] Review Request: gnome-applet-remmina - GNOME panel applet for Remmina remote desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563013 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 13:18:11 EDT --- Updated to 0.7.3: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-applet-remmina.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-applet-remmina-0.7.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Please somebody review this package. Naveen was already kind enough to perform a detailed review, now we just need somebody to approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583643] Review Request: tigase-xmltools - Tigase XML Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583643 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 13:55:51 EDT --- tigase-xmltools-3.3.4-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tigase-xmltools-3.3.4-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579369] Review Request: kanjistrokeorders-fonts - Font to view stroke order diagrams for Kanji, Kana and etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579369
--- Comment #5 from René Ribaud rene.rib...@free.fr 2010-05-13 13:58:48 EDT
---
Hi Parag,
Thanks for the review, I have fixed the package.
Suggestions:
1) remove following comments from SPEC
#ln -s /dev/null \
# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
Removed
2) Give newline after each changelog entry and also between BuildRequires:
line
and %description line
Done
3) Instead of adding BuildRequires: dos2unix, you can do following in %prep.
==
for file in copyright.txt readme_en_v2.014.txt; do
sed s|\r||g $file $file.new \
touch -r $file $file.new \
mv $file.new $file
done
===
This will help not to increase build time dependency on dos2unix package.
Done, I used sed -i instead of dos2unix.
Anyway we will find the updated package here :
Spec URL: http://uggla.free.fr/rpmbuild/SPECS/kanjistrokeorders-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://uggla.free.fr/rpmbuild/SRPMS/12/kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.014-4.fc12.src.rpm
RPMLINT output :
[...@uggla SRPMS]$ rpmlint kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.014-4.fc12.src.rpm
kanjistrokeorders-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kanji -
Kantian, Kanpur, Kansas
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[...@uggla noarch]$ rpmlint kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.014-4.fc12.noarch.rpm
kanjistrokeorders-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kanji
- Kantian, Kanpur, Kansas
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
KOJI output :
-
I have built the package with koji on all architectures for F12, F13 and
rawhide.
You can look at the F12 result here :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186156
F13 here :
and F14 here :
Waiting for your feedbacks.
Best regards.
René
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579369] Review Request: kanjistrokeorders-fonts - Font to view stroke order diagrams for Kanji, Kana and etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579369 --- Comment #6 from René Ribaud rene.rib...@free.fr 2010-05-13 14:03:22 EDT --- I have just forgotten to paste the Koji URL in the above msg... You can look at the F12 result here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186156 F13 here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186166 and F14 here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186173 Best regards. René. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #12 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2010-05-13 14:37:50 EDT --- Today I tried building GNUnet version 0.8.1b on F13. It fails with the message that it requires libextractor. However libextractor as well as libextractor-devel are installed during build. Maybe you could further investigate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532276] Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532276 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 14:38:09 EDT --- python-googlevoice-0.5-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-googlevoice-0.5-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588474] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - zipfile support in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588474 --- Comment #13 from Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com 2010-05-13 14:51:25 EDT --- OK, split out into two RPMs, and all the RPM lint errors are gone, although some wanrings persist. I'm waiting on guidance from the developer as far as how to address those. http://github.com/admiyo/MySpecs/blob/46f558a62b20a4669dd8ee0db7c5f9f263f1958f/rubygem-rubyzip.spec http://admiyo.fedorapeople.org/buildr-repo/rubygem-rubyzip-0.9.4-2.young.src.rpm I've also gone back to the 0.9.4 codebase, but with a patch to make buildr work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be 2010-05-13 14:50:46 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli New Branches: EL-6 Owners: trasher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #12 from Chess Griffin ch...@chessgriffin.com 2010-05-13 15:12:28 EDT --- I can confirm it still builds ok in dist-f13, dist-f14, and dist-rawhide in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590733] Review Request: bsp - The most popular node builder for Doom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590733 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:23:04 EDT --- bsp-5.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:23:27 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591032] Review Request: R-xtable - Export tables to LaTeX or HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591032 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:23:42 EDT --- R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590733] Review Request: bsp - The most popular node builder for Doom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590733 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||bsp-5.2-4.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591032] Review Request: R-xtable - Export tables to LaTeX or HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591032 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590733] Review Request: bsp - The most popular node builder for Doom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590733 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bsp-5.2-4.fc13 |bsp-5.2-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592074] New: Review Request: R-SparseM - Sparse linear algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: R-SparseM - Sparse linear algebra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592074
Summary: Review Request: R-SparseM - Sparse linear algebra
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: s...@sandro-mathys.ch
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/R-SparseM.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/R-SparseM-0.85-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
Basic linear algebra for sparse matrices.
rpmlint {SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/i686}/R-SparseM*
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592072] New: Review Request: R-fibroEset - ExprSet for karaman et al. (2003) fibroblasts data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: R-fibroEset - ExprSet for karaman et al. (2003)
fibroblasts data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592072
Summary: Review Request: R-fibroEset - ExprSet for karaman et
al. (2003) fibroblasts data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: s...@sandro-mathys.ch
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/R-fibroEset.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/R-fibroEset-1.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
ExprSet for Karaman et al. (2003) human, bonobo and gorilla fibroblasts data.
rpmlint {SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/noarch}/R-fibroEset*
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) karaman - Karamazov,
Karaganda, Karakorum
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) et - ET, wt, rt
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) al - AL, la, Al
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fibroblasts - fibrillates,
fibrosis, fibrillation
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et - ET, wt, rt
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al - AL, la, Al
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bonobo - Bono,
bonbon, bonito
R-fibroEset.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fibroblasts -
fibrillates, fibrosis, fibrillation
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) karaman - Karamazov,
Karaganda, Karakorum
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) et - ET, wt, rt
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) al - AL, la, Al
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fibroblasts -
fibrillates, fibrosis, fibrillation
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et - ET, wt, rt
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al - AL, la, Al
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bonobo - Bono,
bonbon, bonito
R-fibroEset.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fibroblasts -
fibrillates, fibrosis, fibrillation
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings
All warnings can be safely ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590733] Review Request: bsp - The most popular node builder for Doom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590733 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:27:19 EDT --- bsp-5.2-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:28:38 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590733] Review Request: bsp - The most popular node builder for Doom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590733 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:26:14 EDT --- bsp-5.2-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589833] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Lite - Lightweight HTTP implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589833 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:27:47 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Lite'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12|java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589833] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Lite - Lightweight HTTP implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589833 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:32:08 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Lite'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:30:40 EDT --- php-pear-HTML-Template-IT-1.3.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTML-Template-IT'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT-1.3.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591032] Review Request: R-xtable - Export tables to LaTeX or HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591032 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:31:20 EDT --- R-xtable-1.5.6-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589833] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Lite - Lightweight HTTP implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589833 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:34:16 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Lite'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Lite-2.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
