[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 02:13:09 EDT --- ghc-hslogger-1.1.0-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hslogger-1.1.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #41 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-10-03 02:17:03 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=198590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639671] New: Review Request: apache-commons-validator - rename of jakarta-commons-validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-validator - rename of jakarta-commons-validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639671 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-validator - rename of jakarta-commons-validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.sp...@arcor.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is a re-review of existing package! Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-validator/apache-commons-validator.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-validator/apache-commons-validator-1.3.1-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: A common issue when receiving data either electronically or from user input is verifying the integrity of the data. This work is repetitive and becomes even more complicated when different sets of validation rules need to be applied to the same set of data based on locale for example. Error messages may also vary by locale. This package attempts to address some of these issues and speed development and maintenance of validation rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630272] Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-10-03
03:59:24 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-tagsoup-0.11-2.fc14.src.rpm ghc-tagsoup-0.11-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm
ghc-tagsoup-devel-0.11-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm
ghc-tagsoup-prof-0.11-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm
ghc-tagsoup.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-tagsoup.src: W: strange-permission ghc-tagsoup.spec 0640L
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
ghc-tagsoup.src: W: strange-permission tagsoup-0.11.tar.gz 0640L
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
ghc-tagsoup.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-tagsoup-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-tagsoup-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-tagsoup-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-tagsoup-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/tagsoup-0.11/libHStagsoup-0.11_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings
Comments : Usage documentation is included as tagsoup.htm
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK
%clean is ignored - present anyway. OK
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum ghc-tagsoup-0.11-2.fc14.src/tagsoup-0.11.tar.gz
275999b35f81b1abc4292d8299eec76c
ghc-tagsoup-0.11-2.fc14.src/tagsoup-0.11.tar.gz
md5sum ~/Downloads/tagsoup-0.11.tar.gz
275999b35f81b1abc4292d8299eec76c ~/Downloads/tagsoup-0.11.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on i686, x86_64
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro
[NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
developer documentation goes into the devel package
[+]MUST: If a package includes
[Bug 639652] Review Request: python-pika - AMQP client library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639652 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-03 04:10:45 EDT --- Another one valuable addition to Fedora, indeed. I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639678] New: Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639678 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.sp...@arcor.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is a re-review of existing package! Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-modeler/apache-commons-modeler.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-modeler/apache-commons-modeler-2.0.1-6.fc13.src.rpm Description: Commons Modeler makes the process of setting up JMX (Java Management Extensions) MBeans easier by configuring the required meta data using an XML descriptor. In addition, Modeler provides a factory mechanism to create the actual Model MBean instances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639678] Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639678 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||588764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635256] Review Request: qtop - tool for monitoring PBS systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635256 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-10-03 05:38:25 EDT --- Did you have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join as suggested by Martin in comment #1 ? There's currently more than a hundred people waiting in queue for a sponsor (I counted something of the order of 160 packages that are blocked by FE-NEEDSPONSOR). The idea of the sponsorship process is to check that anyone doesn't do anything stupid with his/her package(s), we have a lot of packaging guidelines for this. When you become a Fedora packager, you'll get the right to perform package reviews of your own; this also requires that you know the guidelines. If you want to help your getting sponsored, I suggest you make another submission (check that it isn't in Fedora or in the review queue already), and that you do a couple of informal reviews of other packages that have been submitted. It's best to stick to bugs that are not tagged with FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as your sponsor will have to check your informal review (and possibly approve the package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] New: Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/perl-Pegex.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/perl-Pegex-0.10-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Pegex is a Acmeist parser framework. It is a PEG parser grammar syntax, combined with PCRE compatible regular expressions as the match tokens. Pegex draws heavily from Perl 6 rules, but works equivalently in many modern programming languages. The rpmlint output from the specfile, binary rpm and source rpm is without errors and warnings. Successfully completed scratch builds for F13 - F15 are at: F15-URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508862 F14-URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508860 F13-URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508854 It should be a easy to review package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://search.cpan.org/dist ||/Pegex/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #42 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-10-03 11:18:46 EDT --- Thanks for doing this. I'll be using this as a dependency shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-10-03 11:21:35 EDT --- Cool, I think that's everything :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639719] New: Review Request: apache-commons-cli - rename of jakarta-commons-cli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-cli - rename of jakarta-commons-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639719 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-cli - rename of jakarta-commons-cli Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.sp...@arcor.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is a re-review of existing package! Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-cli/apache-commons-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-cli/apache-commons-cli-1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The CLI library provides a simple and easy to use API for working with the command line arguments and options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639719] Review Request: apache-commons-cli - rename of jakarta-commons-cli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639719 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||588764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639727] New: Review Request: dia-optics - Dia Optics shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-optics - Dia Optics shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639727 Summary: Review Request: dia-optics - Dia Optics shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thibault.no...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/dia-optics/dia-optics.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/dia-optics/dia-optics-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * Polarisation Controller * Directional Coupler * Tuneable Coupler * DFB Laser * Long Fibre * Detector * Osilloscope * Spectrum Analyser * Optical Isolator * EDFA * Variable Attenuator * MZ Modulator * Phase Modulator * Sine Wave Source * Square Wave Source * Long Period Grating * Light Beam * Wave -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639727] Review Request: dia-optics - Dia Optics shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639727 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||chitl...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chitl...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630272] Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-03 12:40:39 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ghc-tagsoup Short Description: Parsing HTML/XML documents library Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-10-03 12:58:13 EDT --- $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm postgresql-plparrot-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639636] Review Request: rubygem-poppler - Ruby binding of poppler-glib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639636 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 13:24:51 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-poppler/rubygem-poppler.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-poppler/rubygem-poppler-0.90.2.3-1.fc.src.rpm * Mon Oct 4 2010 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 0.90.2.3-1 - 0.90.2.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621017] Review Request: rubygem-scruffy - A powerful, clean graphing library for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621017 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 13:43:38 EDT --- Please build this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633549] Review Request: rubygem-linode - Ruby wrapper for the Linode API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633549 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-10-03 13:41:36 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 13:41:36 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091
--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-10-03
13:46:26 EDT ---
You've a tiny mistake in your *.spec file. The correct way should be:
make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
This mistake causes the result posted in comment #1.
According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make,
you should use parallel make where ever possible. I tried this and it does not
work, so please add e.g. the following comment before the make call:
# No %{?_smp_mflags}, parallel build clean
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-10-03 13:49:25 EDT --- Eh, I meant not parallel build clean of course... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #43 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-10-03 13:55:41 EDT --- Are you planning to also do an F13 build eventually? Knowing this will help me plan what I want to do for a hedgewars update for F13. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616779] Review Request: rubygem-json_pure - JSON implementation in pure Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616779 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 14:02:24 EDT --- Umm... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2509174 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2509176 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2509178 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091
--- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-10-03
14:12:05 EDT ---
May you explain please, why you would need postgresql-server, parrot and
parrot-tools as build requirements? From my point of view, postgresql-server
doesn't make any sense at buildtime. And parrot is a dependency of -devel;
but why would you need parrot-tools as well? I removed the previously three
mentioned packages from the BuildRequires and rebuild still works for me.
Shouldn't the runtime requirement be postgresql-server rather postgresql? I
might be wrong, but the parrot extension is only useful for server, right?
I think, the group Applications/Databases makes more sense, given that 3+
other postgresql packages being another pl/something use this group.
You might want to remove TODO file from %doc, as this doesn't make that much
sense to users. In most cases, a TODO file is a reminder for developers...
And %{_datadir}/pgsql/contrib/plparrot.sql doesn't seem to be the right place;
%{_datadir}/pgsql/contrib/ isn't owned by any package. Beside of this, other
similar packages are doing something like %{_datadir}/%{name}/plparrot.sql in
such a case - which seems here to be suitable, too.
I'm wondering about your Source0 specification a bit. Why do you use
ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/plparrot/plparrot-%{version}.tar.gz
rather
http://github.com/downloads/leto/plparrot/plparrot-%{version}.tar.gz
which seems to be the official upstream URL?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606430] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606430 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(ianrichardba...@g | |mail.com) | Last Closed||2010-10-03 14:10:40 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 14:10:40 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please create a new review request and mark this package as a duplicate of the new one, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Flag||needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-10-03 14:27:05 EDT --- Fedora Legal might want to correct me, but I don't see a proper licensing in the upstream sources. There is only a pristine LICENSE file containing the Artistic 2.0 license. But none of the source code files contains a licensing header nor can I find a statement telling that the software is Artistic 2.0. Tom, may you enlight us here, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgresSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004
--- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-10-03
14:34:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
the SVN metadata is discarded in the 'svn export' step. How about putting this
in the osm2pgsql.spec:
make %{?_smp_mflags} SVN=%{svn_ver}
This addition shouldn't be a problem.
What do you want here, a copy of the GPL COPYING file added into the osm2pgsql
SVN tree?
Yes, please add file COPYING containing the GPLv2 license text to the SVN repo,
and also include it in future source tarballs of officially released versions.
Your source file headers also refer to it: You should have received a copy of
the GNU General Public License along with this program.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622314] Review request: 3Depict- Valued point cloud visualisation and analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622314 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-10-03 15:07:56 EDT --- File src/tree.hh seems to be licensed under GPLv3 only. Thus, you can't include it in a GPLv3+ program. Could you please clarify with the author whether GPLv3 is actually intended, or if GPLv3+ is also OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632912] Review Request: rubygem-robots - Simple robots.txt parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632912
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03
15:22:36 EDT ---
Sorry for late response.
Well,
* %check issue
- rubygem(jeweler) is not strictly needed for $ rake test
- also rubygem(shoulda) is only for gem.add_development_dependency and
not needed for $ rake test
- However Rakefile itself is broken for $ rake test.
Please consider to apply the following patch and enable $ rake test on
%check.
-
$ diff -u Rakefile.debug Rakefile
--- Rakefile.debug 1970-01-01 09:00:00.0 +0900
+++ Rakefile 2010-09-13 02:32:52.0 +0900
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
require 'rake/testtask'
Rake::TestTask.new(:test) do |test|
test.libs 'lib' 'test'
- test.pattern = 'test/**/*_test.rb'
+ test.pattern = 'test/**/test_*.rb'
test.verbose = true
end
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
end
end
-task :test = :check_dependencies
+#task :test = :check_dependencies
task :default = :test
-
* Creating -doc subpackage
- For rubygem based rpms, We usually suggest to create -doc subpackages,
make -doc subpackage have Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
and move the following files / directories to -doc subpackage.
%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}
%{geminstdir}/Rakefile
%{geminstdir}/test
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621015] Review Request: rubygem-authlogic - A simple ruby authentication solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621015 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 15:33:01 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(rtn...@gmail.com) --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 15:36:48 EDT --- Please post the URLs of the new spec and srpm. Also, please change the release version (when version number does not change) every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593559] Review Request: protobuf-c - C bindings for Google's Protocol Buffers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593559 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(zxvdr...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 15:41:52 EDT --- David, would you answer the question from Martin (comment 10 and comment 8)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616983] Review Request: yarssr - Yet Another RSS Reader is an RSS reader for GNOME notification area
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616983 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(f.grutsc...@lubyt | |e.de) | Last Closed||2010-10-03 15:40:06 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 15:40:06 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639350] Review Request: gio-sharp - C# bindings for gio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639350 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||da...@gnsa.us AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|da...@gnsa.us Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622314] Review request: 3Depict- Valued point cloud visualisation and analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622314
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-10-03
15:52:40 EDT ---
The package looks fine so far. As the tarball contains the LaTeX sources of a
manual, I suggest to create a PDF file from it and add it to the package.
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
- GPLv3+ according to source file headers
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum 3Depict-0.0.2.tar.gz*
49cb2a46bafcc8afa13889490f341963 3Depict-0.0.2.tar.gz
49cb2a46bafcc8afa13889490f341963 3Depict-0.0.2.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: .desktop files must be installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) ...
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
- seems to work as expected
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[X] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:24:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629326] Review Request: mysql-workbench - A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629326 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:28:00 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624471] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger - Part-of-speech tagger for English natural language processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624471 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:25:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:30:00 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630272] Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:30:30 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:31:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:29:14 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). I assume you also want f14? Processed with that as well as f13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639290] Review Request: perl-threads - Perl interpreter-based threads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639290 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:36:30 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638126] Review Request: motoya-lcedar-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638126 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:35:09 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:33:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:34:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:35:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639350] Review Request: gio-sharp - C# bindings for gio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639350
--- Comment #1 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2010-10-03 16:43:29 EDT ---
Here's my first pass. I'll admit I don't have a ton of experience with
mono-specific reviews, but here we go:
FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
[ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gio-sharp-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
../RPMS/i686/gio-sharp-* ./gio-sharp.spec
gio-sharp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: mono-gio-sharp-0.2-0-g07ac6ea.tar.gz
gio-sharp.i686: E: no-binary
gio-sharp.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gio-sharp-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
gio-sharp-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
./gio-sharp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: mono-gio-sharp-0.2-0-g07ac6ea.tar.gz
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings.
The biggest issue I see is empty-debuginfo.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#Empty_debuginfo
Also - I am concerned that you have put things in /usr/lib/
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#File_Locations
I am willing to be persuaded otherwise.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
FIX: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
Do you need to run gacutil on the dll?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#gacutil_in_a_spec_file
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
FIX: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
-devel should include COPYING as a %doc as well unless -devel requires %name
(which would obviate the issue) See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
[ke4...@nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum mono-gio-sharp-0.2-0-g07ac6ea.tar.gz*
f619624cad668b5c5c7f0f0f51a4616c mono-gio-sharp-0.2-0-g07ac6ea.tar.gz
f619624cad668b5c5c7f0f0f51a4616c mono-gio-sharp-0.2-0-g07ac6ea.tar.gz.2
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a
blocker.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must
[Bug 632919] Review Request: rubygem-anemone - Anemone web-spider framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 16:53:51 EDT --- Almost okay. * Explicit version specific dependency - We usually don't write explicit version specific dependency (like = 1.3.0 part on Requires: rubygem(nokogiri) when all packages on currently supported Fedora (or EPEL) branches statisfied such dependency because it is just redundant: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires * %doc in -doc subpackage - %doc attribute in -doc subpackage is redundant because the name of the rpm already indicates that the files in the rpm is for documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639350] Review Request: gio-sharp - C# bindings for gio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639350 --- Comment #2 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2010-10-03 17:36:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/banshee/gio-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/npmccallum/banshee/fedora-14/SRPMS/gio-sharp-0.2-2.fc14.src.rpm * Sun Oct 03 2010 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com - 0.2-2 - Fix -devel requires (pkgconfig, base package) - Disable debuginfo Other info: - I've updated the other 3 related new packages based on these critiques - There are no files in /usr/lib, they are in /usr/lib64 per the mono guidelines - gacutil is run by the upstream makefiles where required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639351] Review Request: gtk-sharp-beans - C# bindings for GTK+ API not included in GTK#
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639351 --- Comment #2 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2010-10-03 17:37:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/banshee/gtk-sharp-beans.spec SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/npmccallum/banshee/fedora-14/SRPMS/gtk-sharp-beans-2.14.0-2.fc14.src.rpm * Sun Oct 03 2010 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com - 2.14.0-2 - Fix -devel requires (pkgconfig, base package) - Disable debuginfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639346] Review Request: gudev-sharp - C# bindings for gudev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639346 --- Comment #1 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2010-10-03 17:40:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/banshee/gudev-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/npmccallum/banshee/fedora-14/SRPMS/gudev-sharp-0.1-2.fc14.src.rpm * Sun Oct 03 2010 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com - 0.1-2 - Fix -devel requires (pkgconfig, base package) - Disable debuginfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639348] Review Request: gkeyfile-sharp - C# bindings for glib2's keyfile implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639348 --- Comment #1 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2010-10-03 17:39:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/banshee/gkeyfile-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/npmccallum/banshee/fedora-14/SRPMS/gkeyfile-sharp-0.1-2.fc14.src.rpm * Sun Oct 03 2010 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com - 0.1-2 - Fix -devel requires (pkgconfig, base package) - Disable debuginfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639350] Review Request: gio-sharp - C# bindings for gio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639350 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2010-10-03 18:07:47 EDT --- This isn't a blocker, but you might consider annotating in a comment that there are GPLv2 licensed files included in the source, that appear to not 'sublicense' (they aren't in gio) The rest looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639350] Review Request: gio-sharp - C# bindings for gio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639350 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2010-10-03 18:30:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gio-sharp Short Description: C# bindings for gio Owners: npmccallum chkr Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgreSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004 --- Comment #5 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org 2010-10-03 19:55:58 EDT --- It is not PostgresSQL -- It is PostgreSQL. Could you please fix it in spec, too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgreSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev...@gunduz.org Summary|Review Request: osm2pgsql - |Review Request: osm2pgsql - |Imports map data from |Imports map data from |OpenStreetMap to a |OpenStreetMap to a |PostgresSQL database|PostgreSQL database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 21:35:07 EDT --- Yes let's do f13 and f12 too - no reason not too really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 21:40:09 EDT --- nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 21:40:16 EDT --- nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 21:40:00 EDT --- nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638127] Review Request: motoya-lmaru-fonts - Japanese Round Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638127 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||du...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|du...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 21:59:10 EDT --- - rpmlint is silent. - repo-font-audit reports 4 warnings, but most of them are upstream task (one is bad font naming, but I think we can ignore it this time). Looks fine. Suggestions: 1) archivename is defined but not used 2) If package is needed only for F-13 and above then you can do following in spec a) %clean not needed b) cleaning of buildroot at start of %install also not needed APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:06:30 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-binary New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:05:08 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: darcs New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558058] Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Haskell encoding library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558058 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:08:55 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-dataenc New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:07:23 EDT --- oops sorry please ignore comment 7: getting a bit ahead of myself there... Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-mmap New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:11:57 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-hashed-storage New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555653] Review Request: ghc-haskeline - Haskell command-line interface for user input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555653 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? Bug 555653 depends on bug 620046, which changed state. Bug 620046 Summary: Review Request: ghc-terminfo - Haskell terminfo binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620046 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:13:27 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-haskeline New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 --- Comment #3 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-10-03 22:18:56 EDT --- Ok , i removed all the binary files. What about including text files in http://sqlninja.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sqlninja/scripts/ ? Any clues? Is it allowed to include those *.scr files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:16:42 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-utf8-string New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555638] Review Request: ghc-html - Haskell HTML combinator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555638 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:20:59 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-html New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555948] Review Request: ghc-regex-base - Haskell regex base library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555948 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:23:07 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-regex-base New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556727] Review Request: ghc-regex-compat - Haskell regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556727 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:25:42 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-regex-compat New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556723] Review Request: ghc-regex-posix - Haskell posix regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556723 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:24:50 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-regex-posix New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 22:51:43 EDT --- ghc-hslogger-1.1.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-hslogger'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hslogger-1.1.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 22:51:33 EDT --- nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nautilus-terminal'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638126] Review Request: motoya-lcedar-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638126 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-10-03 22:54:48 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 22:54:48 EDT --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635515] Review Request: libphidget - Drivers and API for Phidget devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635515 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 23:18:02 EDT --- libphidget-2.1.7.20100621-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libphidget-2.1.7.20100621-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635515] Review Request: libphidget - Drivers and API for Phidget devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635515 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 23:17:55 EDT --- libphidget-2.1.7.20100621-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libphidget-2.1.7.20100621-5.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635515] Review Request: libphidget - Drivers and API for Phidget devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635515 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-03 23:18:08 EDT --- libphidget-2.1.7.20100621-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libphidget-2.1.7.20100621-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 --- Comment #6 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-10-03 23:19:41 EDT --- The specfile (postgres-plparrot.spec) is linked to the new SPEC file: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/postgresql-plparrot.spec.2 The URL of the new SRPM is: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/postgresql-plparrot-0.03-2.fc13.src.rpm Things that are not yet fixed with the new second release are: - place of plparrot.sql - licensing in upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638127] Review Request: motoya-lmaru-fonts - Japanese Round Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638127 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2010-10-03 23:34:26 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: motoya-lmaru-fonts Short Description: Japanese Round Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD Owners: tagoh Branches: f12 f13 f14 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #46 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-10-04 00:24:43 EDT --- For f13 and f12, ghc-rpm-macros 0.8.1 is not available as an update. Should I create a spec file for hslogger with the appropriate versions of ghc-rpm-macros (and cabal2spec)? In that case, I will keep the spec files ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #47 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-04 00:32:38 EDT --- For F13, changing the version to 0.7.0 has worked for me. I'm not sure what F12 wants, but some of my packages wouldn't build for it. I can look at it tomorrow if the version change doesn't fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
