[Bug 657908] Review Request: esniper - A lightweight console application for sniping eBay auctions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657908

--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking  2010-12-02 
02:41:59 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I excluded NEWS, README and TODO on purpose, because their content is 
> dead-old.
> Should I add them anyway?
No. Sorry, I obviously didn't read them properly enough.


> The sample configuration is also on the man page. Do you think I should add it
> still?

Yes, I think so. It doesn't hurt to have them as separate files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 606003] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003

--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Zemlyak  2010-12-02 00:58:10 
EST ---
Thanks for reviewing.

I've updated package to version 0.8.1 released few days ago. Spec has been
updated to use python2-devel and %{}-style for consistency. I'll keep
%{?fedora} > 12 for now since I'm still running f12 myself.

http://aura.zartsoft.ru/~zart/fedora/ has both src and noarch rpms from koji's
scratch builds:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638340
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638385
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638409

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 611372] Review Request: perl-Net-Twitter - Perl interface to Twitter

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611372

--- Comment #4 from Julian C. Dunn  2010-12-02 00:10:56 EST 
---
I don't see this problem; my webhost is up for me. The following URLs return
data:

SPEC: http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian/devel/fedora/perl-Net-Twitter.spec
SRPM:
http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian/devel/fedora/perl-Net-Twitter-3.14002-1.fc14.src.rpm

Note that I've bumped this to version 3.14002 since it's been a while and a new
version was released.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 620191] Review Request: clawsker - Dialog to edit Claws Mail's hidden preferences

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620191

--- Comment #5 from Germán Racca  2010-12-01 23:48:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Germán, did you intend to review this package?

Jason: I'm out of time by the moment, so feel free to take it :)

Christoph: sorry for not reviewing this package :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 622630] Review Request: pcalc - A program for calculating and converting between different bases

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622630

--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 23:37:38 EST 
---
In addition to Dmitrij's comment above which still needs to be addressed, could
you comment on where you see that this software is under GPLv2?  I can't see
anything execpt the COPYING file (which does not imply that the software is
GPLv2) and the pcalc.c and pcalc.h files, which are GPLv3+ with the special
exception which doesn't impose GPLv3+ on the whole work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615428] Review Request: olfs - OPeNDAP Lightweight Frontend Servlet - client interface for Hyrax

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615428

--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  2010-12-01 23:30:49 
EST ---
Yeah, it's a bad description.  It is a web application that runs under tomcat
that can connect to a OpenDAP server to serve out data files.

http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/olfs.spec
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/olfs-1.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm

* Wed Dec 1 2010 Orion Poplawski  1.7.1-1
- Update to 1.7.1
- Rename jakarta-commons-cli to apache-commons-cli for f15+

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638183

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 618155] Review Request: python-SciMath - Scientific and Mathematical calculations

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618155

--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 23:24:12 EST 
---
I think something must have gone wrong, because with the -2 srpm above, I still
get loads of non-executable-script complaints.  That might have something to do
with:

  python-SciMath.src:44: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep
   for file in %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch}/enthought/units/*.py; do
You can't access %{buildroot} in %prep; it doesn't exist yet (and gets cleaned
at the start of %install anyway, so anything you could do there would be
erased).

I also get:
  python-SciMath.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/enthought/interpolate/_interpolate.so 
   _interpolate.so()(64bit)
which indicates that you need to filter out that erroneous dependency
information.

In addition, you need to explain which parts of the package are under which
license. 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 620191] Review Request: clawsker - Dialog to edit Claws Mail's hidden preferences

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620191

--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 23:26:10 EST 
---
Germán, did you intend to review this package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 620242] Review Request: python-ETSDevTools - Enthought tools to support Python development

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620242

--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 23:09:00 EST 
---
Builds OK; rpmlint says:

python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: E: no-binary
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo-readstate
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ets_endo
python-ETSDevTools-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package

Are you sure this should be an arch-specific package?

With a license tag that complicated, you definitely need to indicate which part
of the package is under which license.  Please read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

Nothing seems to own [...]/sitepackages/enthought

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800

--- Comment #55 from Ratnadeep Debnath  2010-12-01 22:39:33 
EST ---
It seems that python-keyring-0.5 is failing to run in gnome

Importing keyring module installed by python-keyring-0.5 gives the following
error:

>>> import keyring
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in 
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/keyring/__init__.py", line 9, in

from core import set_keyring, get_keyring, set_password, get_password
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/keyring/core.py", line 12, in 
from keyring import backend
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/keyring/backend.py", line 171, in

if not kwallet.hasFolder('Python'):
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'hasFolder'

Seems, even in gnome, it is calling for kwallet. This was not the case with
python-keyring-0.4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112

--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 22:41:51 EST 
---
Were you going to post the fixed package anywhere?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 616935] Review Request: gworkspace - The official GNUstep workspace manager

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616935

--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 22:14:42 EST 
---
Is it possible for you to comment on the large number of rpmlint complaints
this package produces?  You should be running rpmlint yourself and addressing
the complaints as part of the submission process, but here's a list of the
complaints for reference:

gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSInvalidArgumentException
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSMallocException
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSInternalInconsistencyException
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSRecursiveLock
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSException
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSConstantString
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSMutableSet
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSNumber
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSMutableData
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSAutoreleasePool
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSMutableArray
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSData
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSObject
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_Protocol
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSFileManager
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSMutableDictionary
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSFileHandle
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_class_name_NSString
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
_NSRangeExceptionRaise
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSDefaultMallocZone
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
objc_get_class
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
objc_msg_lookup
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
__objc_exec_class
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSZoneFree
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSZoneCalloc
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
objc_msg_lookup_super
gworkspace.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libDBKit.so.0.0.1
NSZoneRealloc
gworkspace.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Bundles/NSColorViewer.inspector/Resources/English.lproj/Help.rtfd/.gwdir
gworkspace.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/Inspector.framework/Inspector
./Versions/Current/Inspector
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/FSNode.framework/Versions/0/Headers/FSNodeRep.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/Inspector.framework/Versions/0/Headers/Inspector.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/Inspector.framework/Resources
Versions/Current/Resources
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/FSNode.framework/Versions/0/Headers/FSNBrowserMatrix.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/libInspector.so.0.1.0
./GNUstep/Frameworks/Inspector.framework/Versions/Current/libInspector.so.0.1.0
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/Operation.framework/Versions/1/Headers/Operation.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/Inspector.framework/Versions/0/Headers/ContentViewersProtocol.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/FSNode.framework/Versions/0/Headers/FSNIcon.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/FSNode.framework/Versions/0/Headers/FSNPathComponentsViewer.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Frameworks/FSNode.framework/Versions/0/Headers/FSNListView.h
gworkspace.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Fr

[Bug 656082] Review Request: libcprops - library of C prototyping functions, mostly searching

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656082

--- Comment #5 from Philip Prindeville  
2010-12-01 21:48:15 EST ---
Wrong URL's:

Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/libcprops.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/libcprops-0.1.8-0.1.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573

--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen  2010-12-01 21:44:37 EST 
---
Thanks for catching that - yes I had forgotten the ghc-binary-devel dependency.

Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-2.fc14.src.rpm


* Thu Dec  2 2010 Jens Petersen  - 0.1.1.6-2
- also depends on binary (#652573)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 630260] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec - Fast combinator parsing for bytestrings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615428] Review Request: olfs - OPeNDAP Lightweight Frontend Servlet - client interface for Hyrax

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615428

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||BuildFails

--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 21:25:27 EST 
---
This failed to build for me:

build-jar-repository -s -p lib commons-codec commons-httpclient commons-logging
jakarta-commons-cli jdom junit4 log4j logback/core logback/classic saxon
servlet slf4j/api tomcat6/catalina.jar xalan-j2 xalan-j2-serializer
/usr/bin/build-jar-repository: error: Could not find jakarta-commons-cli Java
extension for this JVM
/usr/bin/build-jar-repository: error: Some specified jars were not found for
this jvm
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ejFeqN (%prep)

Unfortuantely I don't know enough about Java to say what's wrong.

Also, I have to say that even reading the %description doesn't give me any clue
at all as to what this package is supposed to do.

A scratch build is at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638118

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 648244] Review Request: ghc-base64-bytestring - Fast base64 encoding and deconding for ByteStrings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648244

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
21:22:23 EST ---
ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.1-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 648244] Review Request: ghc-base64-bytestring - Fast base64 encoding and deconding for ByteStrings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648244

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
21:22:30 EST ---
ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.1-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 648244] Review Request: ghc-base64-bytestring - Fast base64 encoding and deconding for ByteStrings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648244

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 630260] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec - Fast combinator parsing for bytestrings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
21:23:23 EST ---
ghc-attoparsec-0.8.2.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-attoparsec-0.8.2.0-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 630260] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec - Fast combinator parsing for bytestrings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
21:23:29 EST ---
ghc-attoparsec-0.8.2.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-attoparsec-0.8.2.0-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 616251] Review Request: uptrack - Client for the Ksplice Uptrack rebootless kernel update service

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616251

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||NotReady

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615428] Review Request: olfs - OPeNDAP Lightweight Frontend Servlet - client interface for Hyrax

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615428

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615108] Review Request: cpuset - Allows easy use of cpugroup and application mapping

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615108

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 612671] Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612671

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 21:07:29 EST 
---
Is anything happening here?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 611372] Review Request: perl-Net-Twitter - Perl interface to Twitter

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611372

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||NotReady

--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 21:05:48 EST 
---
www.aquezada.com does not respond for me; I cannot fetch the srpm to have a
look at this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615047] Review Request: scim-panel-vkb-gtk - A GTK Virtual Keyboard for SCIM

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615047

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||BuildFails

--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 21:02:13 EST 
---
This fails to build for me:

configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0
gtk+-2.0 >= 2.14
gthread-2.0
scim >= 1.4.9
scim-gtkutils >= 1.4.9
dbus-glib-1) were not met:
No package 'dbus-glib-1' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.
Alternatively, you may set the environment variables SCIM_PANEL_VKB_GTK_CFLAGS
and SCIM_PANEL_VKB_GTK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tfYsIX (%build)

Maybe a missing build dependency?  A scratch build is at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638101

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 613766] Review Request: python-xlwt - Library to generate files compatible with Microsoft Excel

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613766

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 20:37:16 EST 
---
So what's up with this ticket?  It still has the file-not-utf8 complaint, so
Athmane's comments don't seem to have had any effect.  Jef, do you still wish
to submit this package?

Additional comments:

The license is wrong; this is the old, bad 4-clause "BSD with advertising"
license.

There's a tests directory; is it not possible to run those tests in a %check
section?

There's some stuff you don't need since you're not targeting RHEL4/5
(BuildRoot, %clean, first line of %install).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 656892] Review Request: ghc-augeas - Haskell bindings for the augeas library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892

--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen  2010-12-01 20:02:50 EST 
---
Also it would be nice to hear what you plan to use augeas for in fedora
in terms of further dependencies, etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 656892] Review Request: ghc-augeas - Haskell bindings for the augeas library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||peter...@redhat.com
   Flag||needinfo?(j...@pwan.org)

--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen  2010-12-01 19:59:46 EST 
---
Can I ask you to update to cabal2spec-0.22.2, please?
(Sorry I only just get round to backporting it to F13 until now.)

Also please add a changelog entry and fill in the license.
We use ghc_pkg_deps for the haskell dependencies rather
than direct Buildrequires.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 618145] Review Request: python-CodeTools - Code Analysis and Execution Tools

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618145

--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 19:47:08 EST 
---
The upstream URL seems to be invalid:
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
   http://code.enthought.com/projects/code_tools.php HTTP Error 404: Not Found

Even though you convert a bunch of line endings, I still get several
wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding complaints from rpmlint:
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_blocks.txt
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_bcem_pattern.txt
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_tcw.txt
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_cxt_functions.txt
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_adapted.txt
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_datacontexts.txt
  python-CodeTools.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/python-CodeTools-3.1.1/html/_sources/tut_multicontext.txt
I'm not sure what those files are supposed to be used for, or if there's some
reason not to convert them as well.

There's also
  python-CodeTools.noarch: E: non-executable-script
  
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/enthought/blocks/compiler_/ast/extract_children_trees.py
0644L /usr/bin/env
which you can fix by deleting the first line if you like.  (Don't make it
executable; it shouldn't be.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187

--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 19:40:54 EST 
---
Well, read these:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#How_should_I_handle_multiple_licensing_situations.3F
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field

Do those not answer your question?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 657908] Review Request: esniper - A lightweight console application for sniping eBay auctions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657908

--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich  2010-12-01 19:08:02 EST 
---
Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/esniper.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/esniper-2.24.0-2.fc13.src.rpm

I excluded NEWS, README and TODO on purpose, because their content is dead-old.
Should I add them anyway?

The sample configuration is also on the man page. Do you think I should add it
still?

I did the rest.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608509] Review Request: python-subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 18:52:25 EST 
---
While reviewing this I noticed that you've submitted around 138 packages (158
minus about 20 duplicates and reviews that were closed for various reasons)
while reviewing only 38.  Since I have no package submissions pending, would
you consider doing the courtesy of reviewing someone else's package?  If you
do, I'll look at some of your other pending submissions.

Builds fine; rpmlint complains only about the lack of a manpage for
subvertpy-fast-export.

I'm afraid I don't understand why the tests directory is part of the final
package.  What purpose does it serve?

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
  c43782ef281f347a1c4fe02e5cab4dd361fe228a6c3186f2d76ec01daca9bb5e
   subvertpy-0.7.5.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   python-subvertpy = 0.7.5-2.fc15
   python-subvertpy(x86-64) = 0.7.5-2.fc15
  =
   libapr-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_client-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_delta-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_fs-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_ra-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_repos-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_subr-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   libsvn_wc-1.so.0()(64bit)  
   python(abi) = 2.7
   /usr/bin/python  

* %check is present and all tests pass:
  Ran 129 tests in 25.772s
  OK
* no bundled libraries.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 657795] Review Request: libspatialite - Enables SQLite to support spatial data

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657795

--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich  2010-12-01 18:33:11 EST 
---
Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/libspatialite.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.geofrogger.net/review/libspatialite-2.4.0-0.2.RC4.fc13.src.rpm

I stepped back from the alternative summary again. Libspatialite is originally
distributed including SQLite and I think this summary reflects that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187

--- Comment #17 from Thomas Spura  2010-12-01 
18:24:54 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Depends; I haven't built the package to see if the MIT-license code appears by
> itself in any binary files.  I also didn't audit for GPLv3 vs. GPLv3+.  That's
> all something you need to do.  I was just commenting on the fact that your
> comments before the license tag refer to the source code, when what's 
> important
> is the licenses on the files in the binary package.

"Binary" is only GPLv3, the python source code, but because there is the C++
lib installed later to be used, when actually building the translated C++
programm, you use MIT code.

So I'd use "GPLv3 and MIT" in this case, but if license should only apply to
'binary', it's GPLv3 (that would make me wonder...).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601

--- Comment #12 from Ville Skyttä  2010-12-01 18:18:31 EST 
---
Hm, it builds fine for F-13 and F-14 mock here, but IIRC it ends up being built
with openjdk for me and not gcj like the koji log indicates.

There's a leftover buglet from my Saxon tries which I suppose may cause this;
"export CLASSPATH=$(build-classpath saxon)" should be replaced by "export
CLASSPATH=$(build-classpath xalan-j2)" at start of %build.  Can't test right
now, but probably can tomorrow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187

--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 18:06:35 EST 
---
Depends; I haven't built the package to see if the MIT-license code appears by
itself in any binary files.  I also didn't audit for GPLv3 vs. GPLv3+.  That's
all something you need to do.  I was just commenting on the fact that your
comments before the license tag refer to the source code, when what's important
is the licenses on the files in the binary package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187

--- Comment #15 from Thomas Spura  2010-12-01 
17:52:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> BTW, I also asked about the murmurhash license and the result is that we'll
> just use it under the MIT license.

ok, thanks.

> Is there some other part of the software
> that is public domain?

Just some examples or scripts, which are not installed or used later on.
So I guess Public Domain can be deleted now...

> Also, keep in mind that the license tag reflects the
> binary package, not the source package, so it is not useful to indicate which
> parts of the source are under which license.

Yes, the python part of shedskin is GPLv3 and the c++ library is MIT (used for
linking later on).
So "GPLv3 and MIT" should be correct, isn't it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 659106] New: Review Request: pam_otpw - one-time-password module for PAM

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - one-time-password module for PAM

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659106

   Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - one-time-password module
for PAM
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mweet...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
 Group: private
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://killboy.yourdevlab.com/rpms/pam_otpw.spec
SRPM URL: http://killboy.yourdevlab.com/rpms/pam_otpw-1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: The OTPW package consists of the one-time-password generator
otpw-gen plus two
verification routines otpw_prepare() and otpw_verify() that can easily be added
to programs such as login or ftpd on POSIX systems. For platforms that support
the Pluggable Authentication Method (PAM) interface, a suitable wrapper is
included as well. Login software extended this way will allow reasonably secure
user authentication over insecure network lines. The user carries a password
list on paper. The scheme is designed to be robust against theft of the paper
list and race-for-the-last-letter attacks. Cryptographic hash values of the
one-time passwords are stored for verification in the user’s home directory.

Notes: 
This was requested for review previously by Luke Ross here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 but seems to have fallen by
the wayside.

I used the latest development snapshot dated 28-Mar-2004 from
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/download/otpw-snapshot.tar.gz, it's listed in
the README as 1.4 but not officially released, not sure if this is ok ?

I also modified Makefile in accordance with the notes in BZ188014 and added the
GPL LICENSE file, please review this too.

This package will need a sponsor.

cheers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.f |adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.f
   |c14 |c13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 17:03:09 EST ---
adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 635654] Review Request: perl-Text-Hunspell - Perl interface to the Hunspell library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635654

Bug 635654 depends on bug 636763, which changed state.

Bug 636763 Summary: English hunspell dictionary missing from RHEL-6 Server Beta 
2 Refresh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636763

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
 Status|NEW |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 632970] Review Request: rec-applet - An audio recording applet for the GNOME-desktop

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632970

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:58:41 EST ---
rec-applet-0.2.3-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rec-applet'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rec-applet-0.2.3-3.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||freemind-0.9.0-0.7.rc11.fc1
   ||4
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642985] Review Request: rubygem-timecop - Provides a unified method to mock Time.now, Date.today in a single call

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642985

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:58:07 EST ---
rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc13   |rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590

--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 17:02:20 EST ---
freemind-0.9.0-0.7.rc11.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 17:01:07 EST ---
rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:58:33 EST ---
django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update django-addons'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645760] Review Request: django-ajax-selects - Enables editing of ForeignKey, ManyToMany and simple text fields

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 17:00:06 EST ---
django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update django-ajax-selects'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 653049] Review Request: perl-File-Path-Tiny - Recursive versions of mkdir() and rmdir() without as much overhead as File::Path

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653049

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-File-Path-Tiny-0.1-1.f
   ||c14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2010-12-01 16:57:27

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 653049] Review Request: perl-File-Path-Tiny - Recursive versions of mkdir() and rmdir() without as much overhead as File::Path

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653049

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-File-Path-Tiny-0.1-1.f |perl-File-Path-Tiny-0.1-1.f
   |c14 |c13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642985] Review Request: rubygem-timecop - Provides a unified method to mock Time.now, Date.today in a single call

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642985

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc1 |rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc1
   |4   |3

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 653049] Review Request: perl-File-Path-Tiny - Recursive versions of mkdir() and rmdir() without as much overhead as File::Path

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653049

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
16:59:39 EST ---
perl-File-Path-Tiny-0.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||gmpy-1.14-1.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed|2010-11-06 09:13:51 |2010-12-01 16:54:41

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 649777] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649777

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2010-12-01 16:57:06

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc13
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2010-12-01 16:55:36

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 649781] Review Request: cortado - Java media framework

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 653049] Review Request: perl-File-Path-Tiny - Recursive versions of mkdir() and rmdir() without as much overhead as File::Path

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653049

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
16:57:22 EST ---
perl-File-Path-Tiny-0.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:55:30 EST ---
rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|gmpy-1.14-1.fc14|gmpy-1.14-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 649777] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649777

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:56:56 EST ---
cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14, jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462

--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:54:33 EST ---
gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462

--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:57:36 EST ---
gmpy-1.14-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.f
   ||c14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2010-12-01 16:53:49

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642985] Review Request: rubygem-timecop - Provides a unified method to mock Time.now, Date.today in a single call

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642985

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc1
   ||4
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642985] Review Request: rubygem-timecop - Provides a unified method to mock Time.now, Date.today in a single call

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642985

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:53:56 EST ---
rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 649781] Review Request: cortado - Java media framework

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:57:01 EST ---
cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14, jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 16:53:44 EST ---
adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|658489(FE-BUNDLEDLIBS)  |

--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-01 16:29:29 EST 
---
BTW, I also asked about the murmurhash license and the result is that we'll
just use it under the MIT license.  Is there some other part of the software
that is public domain?  Also, keep in mind that the license tag reflects the
binary package, not the source package, so it is not useful to indicate which
parts of the source are under which license.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796

--- Comment #11 from Jon Kent  2010-12-01 16:19:27 EST ---
Thats annoying and interesting at the same time as I thought I'd done all the
relevant searches before creating this.

>From that original package it was withdrawn, as opposed to any official line
taken, so I assume this now needs to wait for FE-Legal?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 659082] New: Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082

   Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings
for redland
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: tho...@apestaart.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-14-i386-updates/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-2.fc14/redland-bindings.spec
SRPM URL:
http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-14-i386-updates/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-2.fc14/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
Description:

Redland is a library that provides a high-level interface for RDF
(Resource Description Framework) implemented in an object-based API.
It is modular and supports different RDF/XML parsers, storage
mechanisms and other elements. Redland is designed for applications
developers to provide RDF support in their applications as well as
for RDF developers to experiment with the technology.

This package provides Python, Perl, Ruby and PHP bindings for redland.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
15:31:16 EST ---
django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 640742] Review Request: drupal6-ckeditor - Replace textarea fields with the CKEditor - a visual HTML editor

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640742

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |drupal-ckeditor - Replace   |drupal6-ckeditor - Replace
   |textarea fields with the|textarea fields with the
   |CKEditor - a visual HTML|CKEditor - a visual HTML
   |editor  |editor

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608509] Review Request: python-subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: subvertpy - |Review Request:
   |Python bindings for |python-subvertpy - Python
   |Subversion  |bindings for Subversion

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 15:32:38 EST ---
django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 15:34:00 EST ---
django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 15:24:14 EST ---
django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796

Bill Nottingham  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |182235(FE-Legal)

--- Comment #10 from Bill Nottingham  2010-12-01 15:23:15 
EST ---
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556611#c9

Adding to FE-Legal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-01 
15:22:43 EST ---
django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 15:25:25 EST ---
django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796

Bill Nottingham  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187

--- Comment #13 from Thomas Spura  2010-12-01 
15:02:45 EST ---
"Exception granted."

-> provide bundled(murmurhash)

SPEC: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/shedskin.spec
SRPM: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/shedskin-0.6-2.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 659005] Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005

Eric Christensen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||658989

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 634909] Review Request: v8 - JavaScript Engine

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909

Anthony Green  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gr...@redhat.com

--- Comment #9 from Anthony Green  2010-12-01 14:39:28 EST ---
Could you please add a pkg-config file to v8-devel?  It would make it easier to
use as a library.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 659005] New: Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling 
tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005

   Summary: Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for
scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or
periodically at a fixed interval
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler.spec
SRPM URL:
http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm
Description: Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or
periodically at a fixed interval.

rpmlint output:

[as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-job_scheduler.spec
../SRPMS/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm 
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

koji output:

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637675
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
2637675 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm):
open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
  2637676 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch):
free
  2637676 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch):
free -> open (x86-13.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
  2637676 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch):
open (x86-13.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
  0 free  1 open  1 done  0 failed
2637675 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm):
open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
  0 free  0 open  2 done  0 failed

2637675 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm)
completed successfully

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047

Paul W. Frields  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed|2010-11-22 09:58:52 |2010-12-01 13:49:03

--- Comment #15 from Paul W. Frields  2010-12-01 13:49:03 
EST ---
OK, I'll reclose this then, Jason -- thanks.

Peter, we'll have to handle this as a separate bug.  I'll file one and then
we'll take it from there.  In the meantime, I've sent negative karma to the
update in updates-testing so hopefully it will not be pushed anywhere else.  It
automatically gets pushed to Rawhide and it is now broken there.

New bug 658989 filed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 646686] Review Request: mod_xsendfile - Apache module to send files efficiently

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646686

--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  2010-12-01 12:31:19 
EST ---
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mod_xsendfile.spec
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mod_xsendfile-0.12-2.fc14.src.rpm

* Wed Dec 1 2010 Orion Poplawski  0.12-2
- Upstream fixed tar ball packaging

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 12:29:24 EST ---
emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2010-12-01 12:29:31 EST ---
emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588470] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-layout - An extension to Prawn that provides table support and other layout functionality

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588470

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588471] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-security Popular Password Protection & Permissions for Prawn PDFs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588471

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588466] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-core - Common file for Prawn, Prawn is a PDF generator for Ruby

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588466

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588469] Review Request:rubygem-prawn-format - an extension of Prawn that allows inline formatting

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588469

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588477] Review Request: rubygem-webmock - mock object support for web dev in ruby.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588477

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588442] Review Request: rubygem-heckle - unit test sadism(tm) at it's core

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588442

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 588437] Review Request: rubygem-fakefs - A fake filesystem for Ruby

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588437

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review