[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-11 22:58:55 EDT --- resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-23 13:25:10 EDT --- resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Ade Lee a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-21 10:05:13 --- Comment #14 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-21 10:05:13 EDT --- non scratch build succeeded! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=308513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #10 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 09:39:40 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: resteasy Short Description: Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications Owners: vakwetu Branches: f17 InitialCC: goldmann, jhernand -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Ade Lee a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:37:55 EDT --- Please include a valid SCM request: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Ade Lee a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #12 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 10:47:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: resteasy Short Description: Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications Owners: vakwetu Branches: f17 InitialCC: goldmann jhernand -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:52:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720
--- Comment #9 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-19
05:26:11 EDT ---
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
Output of rpmlint of the source package:
$ rpmlint resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
resteasy.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy HTTP Error 403:
Forbidden
resteasy.src: W: invalid-url Source0: resteasy-2.3.2.Final.tgz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These warnings are acceptable.
Output of rpmlint of the binary packages:
$ rpmlint resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
resteasy-javadoc-2.3.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
resteasy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency cglib
resteasy.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
resteasy-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs - Java
docs, Java-docs, Avocados
resteasy-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy HTTP
Error 403: Forbidden
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.
The cglib dependency is not a library, but a legitimate package name.
These warnings are acceptable.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License issues have been cleared with legal. License type: ASL 2.0 and CDDL
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
The License.html file should go in the javadoc package.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Checked using a recursive diff.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[-] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[-] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3908511
=== Issues ===
No issues.
=== Final notes ===
Great work Ade,
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #8 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-18 22:57:06 EDT --- Juan, Resolved all of the above, using your suggestion for the %install section. Spec URL: http://vakwetu.fedorapeople.org/resteasy/resteasy.spec SRPM Url: http://vakwetu.fedorapeople.org/resteasy/resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #7 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-16 04:16:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Upstream confirms the files with LGPL notices (apart from eagledns) are an oversight and are intended to be covered by the Apache License 2.0. Assuming no subpackaging is done, and if it is correct that the eagledns code is not being built/packaged, then the License tag should simply be ASL 2.0 and CDDL. Thanks Richard! Ade, once you adjust the license tag and address issues #4, #5 and #6 I will approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rfont...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com 2012-03-15 23:08:21 EDT --- Upstream confirms the files with LGPL notices (apart from eagledns) are an oversight and are intended to be covered by the Apache License 2.0. Assuming no subpackaging is done, and if it is correct that the eagledns code is not being built/packaged, then the License tag should simply be ASL 2.0 and CDDL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720
--- Comment #4 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-14
07:39:18 EDT ---
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
Output of rpmlint of the source package:
$ rpmlint resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
resteasy.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C RESTEasy
resteasy.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy HTTP Error 403:
Forbidden
resteasy.src:217: W: macro-in-comment %{namedversion}
resteasy.src:218: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
resteasy.src:218: W: macro-in-comment %{_javadir}
resteasy.src:218: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
...
The rpmlint command complais about macros in the comments, but it has been
discussed and agreed in #fedora-java that these comments are acceptable in this
case.
Output of rpmlint of the binary packages:
$ rpmlint resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
resteasy-javadoc-2.3.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
resteasy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency cglib
resteasy.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C RESTEasy
resteasy.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
resteasy-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs - Java
docs, Java-docs, Avocados
resteasy-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy HTTP
Error 403: Forbidden
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
The cglib dependency is not a library, but a legitimate package name.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
The License.html file states that the license used is ASL 2.0, but them some
files contain different license statements:
* The files under tjws use a BDS style license. They are used mostly for
tests and we are building and packaging them.
* The files under the eagledns use a BSD style license. The latest upstream
version of this software uses LGPLv3. The resteasy upstream developers forked
it, but it is used only for some examples and tests and we are not building or
packaging it at the moment.
* These files tate that the license is CDDL:
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/PathParam.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/Consumes.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/PUT.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/DefaultValue.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/MessageBodyWriter.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/Providers.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/RuntimeDelegate.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/Provider.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/ContextResolver.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/ExceptionMapper.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/MessageBodyReader.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ext/FactoryFinder.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/DELETE.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/HEAD.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/POST.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/ApplicationPath.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/WebApplicationException.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/MatrixParam.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/Produces.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/GET.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/SecurityContext.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/UriBuilder.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/Variant.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/CacheControl.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/Context.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/Response.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/HttpHeaders.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/UriBuilderException.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/MediaType.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/StreamingOutput.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/NewCookie.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/GenericEntity.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/MultivaluedMap.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/Request.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/EntityTag.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/PathSegment.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/Application.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/Cookie.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/core/UriInfo.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/Path.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/HttpMethod.java
jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/OPTIONS.java
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgold...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-14 07:49:04 EDT --- Regarding licensing issues - legal and upstream were notified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #3 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-14 01:28:24 EDT --- Based on feedback from jhernand, I have updated the spec file and srpm. The new spec file and srpm can be downloaded from the same links as above: Spec URL: http://vakwetu.fedorapeople.org/resteasy/resteasy.spec SRPM Url: http://vakwetu.fedorapeople.org/resteasy/resteasy-2.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Bug 800720 depends on bug 796201, which changed state. Bug 796201 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Bug 800720 depends on bug 796204, which changed state. Bug 796204 Summary: Review Request: maven-jaxb2-plugin - Provides the capability to generate java sources from schemas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796204 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 13:18:13 EDT --- Now that all the dependencies are in rawhide I am taking it for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: Resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Depends on||796201 Summary|Review Request: Resteasy|Review Request: Resteasy - ||Framework for RESTful Web ||services and Java ||applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: Resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-07 04:26:46 EST --- I would like to take this for review, but someone has to review glassfish-jaxb and glassfish-fi first, as they are dependencies, otherwise I can't build in Koji. Meanwhile I would suggest the following minor changes in the spec: * Change the summary so that it doesn't contain the name of the package (rpmlint complains about that). * Remove commented out lines (otherwise rpmlint complains about macros in comments). * Include the license as %doc in the javadoc subpackage. * Replace tomcat6 with tomcat (version 7), if possible. * Add comments describing the purpose of the patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: Resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||790564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||796204 Summary|Review Request: Resteasy - |Review Request: resteasy - |Framework for RESTful Web |Framework for RESTful Web |services and Java |services and Java |applications|applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Bug 800720 depends on bug 790564, which changed state. Bug 790564 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-fastinfoset - Fast Infoset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790564 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
