[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias|Elm |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2018-01-09 05:28:09



--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen  ---
Deprecated in Hackage in favor of elm-compiler

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||peter...@redhat.com
   Assignee|peter...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #11)
 I wonder if it is better to use the tarball releases from github for now
 which includes the standard library.

Seems this is not necessary actually.
The Elm package already includes the compiled libraries, see:

 https://github.com/elm-lang/Elm/issues/580

Though I dunno if it would still not be better to do so strictly
- more Fedora-esque perhaps?  (building from source afap)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
I wonder if it is better to use the tarball releases from github for now
which includes the standard library.

Otherwise the following spec file seems to build okay
with fedora macros/cabal-rpm without libraries/ from hackage:

http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/Elm.spec

but probably better to include libraries/?

I opened https://github.com/elm-lang/Elm/issues/580
to request including the libs in the hackage releases.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Bug 982204 depends on bug 1058174, which changed state.

Bug 1058174 Summary: Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing 
library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058174

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Actually Elm  0.10.0.2 requires binary = 0.6.4.0, ie ghc-7.8!

So targeting 0.10.0.2 currently seems best
at least until ghc-7.8 is in rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Latest now 0.12 - I /think/ still no more deps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1058174




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058174
[Bug 1058174] Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing
library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Bug 982204 depends on bug 1023601, which changed state.

Bug 1023601 Summary: Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing 
library and command-line tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1023601 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
[Bug 1023601] Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing
library and command-line tool
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Latest version is now 0.11 with some news features:
http://elm-lang.org/blog/announce/0.11.elm

Even better no additional deps afaics.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Bug 982204 depends on bug 1023605, which changed state.

Bug 1023605 Summary: Review Request: ghc-language-ecmascript - JavaScript 
parser and pretty-printer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Leon Neo from comment #6)
 Actually, elm isnt as easy and isnt as good.

compared to what?

There is also helm, though I haven't tried it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Leon Neo leonleon...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||leonleon...@gmail.com



--- Comment #6 from Leon Neo leonleon...@gmail.com ---
Actually, elm isnt as easy and isnt as good.
It kind of sucks because its hard, useless, complicated, none helpful comments
and so on and so forth. I wont use that anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||NotReady



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Bug 982204 depends on bug 1023603, which changed state.

Bug 1023603 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default-class - A class for types 
with a default value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023603

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
   |project.org |
Summary|Review Request: elm - The   |Review Request: Elm - The
   |Elm language module |Elm language module



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i4JH558s3Xa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rc040...@freenet.de



--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #2)

 Well it seems to build and install okay here but I still
 recommend using Elm 

Just a remark: I guess you are aware, there once was a then-very-popular email
client called elm [1]. Though I am not aware about any current Linux distro
is shipping it, I'd expect finding a package named elm would cause some
confusion *nix old-timers ;)

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elm_%28e-mail_client%29

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dpShZcANkYa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
 Just a remark: I guess you are aware, there once was a then-very-popular
 email client called elm [1]. Though I am not aware about any current Linux
 distro is shipping it, I'd expect finding a package named elm would cause
 some confusion *nix old-timers ;)

Right - it had crossed my mind.
I did a little digging and as far as I can tell
the last release that shipped with elm was RHL 7.3 (2002).
(I don't see it in Fedora Extras either.)
So I hope this is not a big concern still now.
But it might be an additional argument for
calling this package Elm instead of elm. :)

(If it is really is a concern perhaps we could call
it elm-lang in line with the upstream website
but this will only makes maintenance life harder.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xS8MUu0GAoa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Some more comments:

- Perhaps the Summary could be more descriptive.
  How about: Functional reactive web programming lanaguage?

- Latest upstream version is now 0.9.0.2 though it needs union-find.

- You will probably have to ExcludeArch armv7hl for now since pandoc
  refuses to build there currently with ghc-7.6.3 and llvm-3.3 (f20).
  Hopefully that should improve in F21 when we move to ghc-7.8.

(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1)
 I think it might be better to call the package Elm.
 
 At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
 for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
 in the Haskell Guidelines.  (Failing that probably need to replace
 %{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)

Well it seems to build and install okay here but I still
recommend using Elm since it is more consistent and
I think some of the haskell-sig script might get confused
if the package and hackage names are different.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tEfycInop5a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Bug 982204 depends on bug 982189, which changed state.

Bug 982189 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hjsmin - Haskell implementation of a 
javascript minifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982189

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zz00JxAxGaa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||Elm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gcvQV92ILPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
I think it might be better to call the package Elm.

At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
in the Haskell Guidelines.  (Failing that probably need to replace
%{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tOX2UNEZg6a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||982189, 982192

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yPIEdR0p6Ha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review