[packman] Re : Re: Looking for a co-ordination on https://code.opensuse.org/leap/features/issue/22
Hi Lubos! - Lubos Kocman a écrit : > Hello team, > > I m just trying to make sure that the idea was not overlooked as I have > not seen any response. > > Thank you > > On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 14:24 +0200, Lubos Kocman wrote: > > Hello packman team, > > > > > > openSUSE Release team would like to ask the community around packman > > for inputs on one of Leap feature requests regarding multimedia > > enablement. https://code.opensuse.org/leap/features/issue/22 > > > > This particular feature was created as an action item to the Leap > > 15.3 > > retro feedback regarding multimedia > > https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:15.3/Retrospective#Multimedia > > > > What we're looking for is an as-easy-as-possible multimedia codec- > > only > > enablement on Leap (With respect to factory first / TW). Ideally one > > click from the welcome dialog on the first boot experience > > > > Our current recommendation is following > > https://en.opensuse.org/Codecs > > If we could have somebody from the packman team active on the ticket > > that would be perfect. > > > > The scope of installation is currently the "regular" codecs that > > people > > expect to be available while browsing the web and playing common > > multimedia files. > > > > Ideally, we'd like to utilize existing packman project efforts, since > > the project is known to the community. However, we're open to any > > suggestions. I am not sure what is missing. I think Packman provides all the packages you requires. So, a simple one-click install link on the openSUSE welcome page would be enough, I guess. Also, there is already https://www.opensuse-community.org/ Cheers, Guillaume > > > > Let's continue in the > > https://code.opensuse.org/leap/features/issue/22, > > so all parties have a chance to participate in discussion. > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > Lubos Kocman > > openSUSE Leap Release Manager > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Aarch64 version of obs-studio?
Hi, - Freek de Kruijf a écrit : > Is it possible to build an aarch64 version for openSUSE Tumbleweed of obs- > studio? I did find a source rpm and tried to build from it, but it failed om > aarch64, although I added this architecture in ExclusiveArch. Do you have a link to share where we can see the failure? Cheers, Guillaume > > -- > fr.gr. > > member openSUSE > Freek de Kruijf > > > > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: Is it possible to have a packman version for Tumbleweed for the Raspberry Pi 3/4 (aarch64)?
- Dave Plater a écrit : > On 12/2/20, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:56:20 +0100 (CET) > > schrieb Guillaume GARDET : > > > >> Any objections? > > > > The publisher may need adjustments, perhaps it has a fixed list of > > architectures. > > > > It also means all 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' *.repo files out there become > > invalid. The published directory may stay on the mirrors, unless someone > > removes it manually and the mirrors pickup this change. > > > > A number of pkg's may need adjustment in case they have special handling for > > a 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' repository, but not for 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' or > > 'arch='. Each one should probably be reevaluated if such knob is still > > justified. > > > > Olaf > > > I also had this problem with Factory on a raspberry pi but it seems > that there isn't a problem anymore. I chose Tumbleweed because it had > more built packages and used the same repository definition that I use > for my x86_64 computer. I was able to install the ffmpeg-4 libs which > is all I needed anyway. > The repository definition is: > http://packman.inode.at/suse/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/ I added aarch64 and armv7 to Tumbleweed repo on some projects lately, as a test. Guillaume > > Regards > Dave ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: Re : Is it possible to have a packman version for Tumbleweed for the Raspberry Pi 3/4 (aarch64)?
- Olaf Hering a écrit : > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:56:20 +0100 (CET) > schrieb Guillaume GARDET : > > > Any objections? > > The publisher may need adjustments, perhaps it has a fixed list of > architectures. No, currently mirrors take care of projects and repos only and that's why adding new architectures to openSUSE_Tumbleweed will just work, whereas nobody took care to add openSUSE_Factory_ARM in the past. > > It also means all 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' *.repo files out there become > invalid. The published directory may stay on the mirrors, unless someone > removes it manually and the mirrors pickup this change. No, it is not part of the mirrors, which was the original reason for this change. Cheers, Guillaume > > A number of pkg's may need adjustment in case they have special handling for > a 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' repository, but not for 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' or > 'arch='. Each one should probably be reevaluated if such knob is still > justified. > > Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] swrj01 worker is broken
swrj01 worker is broken. All build fails with: [ 14s] [30/32] preinstalling aaa_base... [ 14s] /var/run/obs/worker/1/build/build-pkg-rpm: line 179: zstd: command not found [ 14s] [31/32] preinstalling rpm-config-SUSE... [ 14s] /var/run/obs/worker/1/build/build-pkg-rpm: line 179: zstd: command not found [ 14s] [32/32] preinstalling rpm... [ 15s] [ 15s] initializing rpm db... [ 15s] chroot: failed to run command '/usr/bin/rpmdb': No such file or directory [ 16s] [ 16s] swrj01 failed "build x265.spec" at Wed Dec 2 03:34:25 UTC 2020. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: Re : Is it possible to have a packman version for Tumbleweed for the Raspberry Pi 3/4 (aarch64)?
- Luigi Baldoni a écrit : > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2020 at 10:56 AM > From: "Guillaume GARDET" > > > > Packman build already for Arm (aarch64, armv7 and armv6). > > > > For Leap, Arm packages are built in the same repo and thus, are released > > under the same directories as x86. > > But for Tumbleweed, it currently uses different repo (openSUSE_Factory_ARM > > vs openSUSE_Tumbleweed for x86). > > So, we should redo the Packman setup to build Arm in openSUSE_Tumbleweed > > project as well. Any objections? > > Building for both Tumbleweed and Factory looks like a waste of resources, > which as I understand are strained as it is. It would a switch instead of additional builds. Once openSUSE_Tumbleweed looks ok, we could just drop openSUSE_Factory_ARM . Guillaume > > What's the rationale behind the request? > > Regards > > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Is it possible to have a packman version for Tumbleweed for the Raspberry Pi 3/4 (aarch64)?
Hi, Packman build already for Arm (aarch64, armv7 and armv6). For Leap, Arm packages are built in the same repo and thus, are released under the same directories as x86. But for Tumbleweed, it currently uses different repo (openSUSE_Factory_ARM vs openSUSE_Tumbleweed for x86). So, we should redo the Packman setup to build Arm in openSUSE_Tumbleweed project as well. Any objections? Guillaume - Freek de Kruijf a écrit : > Hi, whoever it concerns. > > The subject says it all. > > -- > fr.gr. > > member openSUSE > Freek de Kruijf > > > > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : PMBS mode - done
Hi, - Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi packmans, > > the server is moved and running again. > I have not tested publishing yet, and will have a look at it later > today, or tomorrow. > > There are no x86_64 workers ATM. I will address this later - I am > swamped at work and at home also, but I promise, I will do something > about it. ARM workers are up and working hard! :) Thanks, Guillaume > > Greetings, > > Stefan > -- > Stefan Botter zu Hause > Bremen ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: Stats on pmbs not shown anymore
Thanks a lot! Guillaume - Stefan Botter a écrit : > On Friday, August 30, 2019 5:02:28 PM CEST Guillaume GARDET wrote: > > Hi, > > > > on monitor page, stats are not shown anymore. I guess a service needs > > to be restarted. > > I have restarted the services. I will have to do something about that, > probably... > > > Guillaume > > Greetings, > > Stefan > -- > Stefan Botter zu Hause > Bremen ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Stats on pmbs not shown anymore
Hi, on monitor page, stats are not shown anymore. I guess a service needs to be restarted. Cheers, Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: Monitor page is broken
- Stefan Botter a écrit : > On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 5:48:55 PM CEST Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2019, 17:02:58 CEST schrieb Guillaume GARDET: > > > Hi, > > > > > > It seems that OBS get updated (new UI) and graphics on > > > https://pmbs.links2linux.de/monitor are now blank. > > > > Most probably, it's missing: > > > > systemctl enable --now obs-api-support.target > > > > See https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/issues/7912 > > Thank you guys, I have enabled obs-api-support.target and the statistics > are showing again. Thanks for the quick fix! Guillaume > > I am usually waiting with updating PMBS a little while, but this time I > was forced to jump because of the expiry of 42.3 and our datacenter > rules with only security-update-provided installations. > > I most probably will move PMBS to a different location in the upcoming > months, then the "bleeding-edge" update restriction will be lifted. This > will be accompanied with some unfortunate changes, but more on that, > when time is right. > > Greetings, > > Stefan > -- > Stefan Botter zu Hause > Bremen ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Monitor page is broken
Hi, It seems that OBS get updated (new UI) and graphics on https://pmbs.links2linux.de/monitor are now blank. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: PMBS broken for aarch64?
Hi, It is working fine! \o/ Thanks. Guillaume - Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi Guillaume, > > can you please try again, I have updated build to the version from 42.3- > Update (20190128), along with obs 2.9.6. > > Greetings, > > Stefan > -- > Stefan Botter zu Hause > Bremen ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: PMBS broken for aarch64?
Hi, I tried this morning and I still have this problem. Guillaume - Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi Guillaume, > > I completely forgot about your request. > > I have updated PMBS to OBS 2.9.5 about two weeks ago. > With the OBS repo is a build-20180111-1.5, which is older than the one > delivered with Leap 42.3, but I am not sure if > a) it is a good a idea to use a different version than delivered with > OBS, and > b) it is installable without initiating a huge dependency hell. > > Is the 20180111 version not solving your build problem? > > Greetings, > > Stefan > -- > Stefan Botter zu Hause > Bremen > > On Monday, March 18, 2019 6:30:07 PM CET Guillaume GARDET wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > > > Any update? there is still this problem. > > FYI, my worker runs Tumbleweed. > > > > Cheers, > > Guillaume > > > > - Guillaume GARDET a écrit : > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > > > Here is a follow-up. > > > > > > Now, I have the following error printed in the build log: > > > Block format 'raw' does not support the option 'serial' > > > > > > I think my current qemu (from TW) is too new for PMBS. > > > I think PMBS sends some build script to the worker. Those scripts > > > probably need to be updated on PMBS side? As a n' osc build' works > > > properly now. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Guillaume > > > > > > - Guillaume GARDET a écrit : > > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > > > > > aarch64 scheduled jobs are not starting whereas there is a worker > > > > available, in idle state. Could you have a look, please? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Guillaume > > > > ___ > > Packman mailing list > > Packman@links2linux.de > > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman > > ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re : PMBS broken for aarch64?
Hi Stefan, Any update? there is still this problem. FYI, my worker runs Tumbleweed. Cheers, Guillaume - Guillaume GARDET a écrit : > > Hi Stefan, > > Here is a follow-up. > > Now, I have the following error printed in the build log: > Block format 'raw' does not support the option 'serial' > > I think my current qemu (from TW) is too new for PMBS. > I think PMBS sends some build script to the worker. Those scripts probably > need to be updated on PMBS side? As a n' osc build' works properly now. > > Thanks, > Guillaume > > > > - Guillaume GARDET a écrit : > > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > aarch64 scheduled jobs are not starting whereas there is a worker > > available, in idle state. > > Could you have a look, please? > > > > Thanks, > > Guillaume > ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : PMBS broken for aarch64?
Hi Stefan, Here is a follow-up. Now, I have the following error printed in the build log: Block format 'raw' does not support the option 'serial' I think my current qemu (from TW) is too new for PMBS. I think PMBS sends some build script to the worker. Those scripts probably need to be updated on PMBS side? As a n' osc build' works properly now. Thanks, Guillaume - Guillaume GARDET a écrit : > > Hi Stefan, > > aarch64 scheduled jobs are not starting whereas there is a worker available, > in idle state. > Could you have a look, please? > > Thanks, > Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] PMBS broken for aarch64?
Hi Stefan, aarch64 scheduled jobs are not starting whereas there is a worker available, in idle state. Could you have a look, please? Thanks, Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : ffmpeg-4 for Leap 15.0
It seems to be available: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Essentials/A_15.0-ffmpeg-4 Guillaume - David Walker a écrit : > Ffmpeg-4 doesn't seem to be available for openSUSE Leap 15.0, only > Tumbleweed. Any chance of making it available? I'm having problems > with audio playback in Youtube, etc. that seem to be related to not > having ffmpeg-4 installed. > > Thanks for all the work you guys do! > > David ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : New package for obs-studio plugin
Hi Jimmy, why it is not submitted to OBS instead? It seems there is no reason to submit it to packman. Guillaume - Jimmy Berry a écrit : > I created a new package obs-v4l2sink [1] and submitted to Multimedia > project. Since I see there is an 11 month old request against > Multimedia I figured I would send an e-mail. > > [1] https://pmbs.links2linux.de/request/show/4338 > > -- > Jimmy > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] armv6 jobs on PMBS (nearly) never scheduled
Hi, on pmbs, armv6 jobs are nearly never scheduled (seen only once on kamionche worker), wheras all armv7 (and also the current aarch64 worker) are able to build armv6 since we switched to native compilation long time ago. So, I think the scheduler (or something) has some problem. Maybe a restart (or update?) of pmbs would help? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] SLE 15
Hi, Le 18/07/2018 à 13:49, Samu Voutilainen a écrit : Hi, Guillaume GARDET kirjoitti keskiviikkona 18. heinäkuuta 2018 14.40.49 EEST: Only 'Essentials' project enables SLE15 build. Would be a good idea to enable SLE15 on other project and aggregate them to output a single packman repo. I haven’t contributed to Packman before, so I don’t know how it works, so say if I get something wrong. Looks like there is already some SLE packages, but seems no mirror has them included? For contribution, I’d like to have new ffmpeg4 too. Is the preferred way of contribution to have them inside a single repository inside build.opensuse.org and then aggregate that repo to Packman? I can modify my repository for that. Packman repo are separate from build.opensuse.org on purpose (mainly licensing issues). The problem here is to enable a build repo for SLE15 for each packman project and add it to aggregated published repo. Stefan, could you do it, please? Guillaume Guillaume Samu ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : SLE 15
Hi, - Samu Voutilainen a écrit : > Hi, > > Has there been any plans to also include packages for SLE 15? Only 'Essentials' project enables SLE15 build. Would be a good idea to enable SLE15 on other project and aggregate them to output a single packman repo. Guillaume > > I’ve moved to use SLE 15, and I’d at least like to have multimedia packages. > I > did my own copies ( https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:Smar:mpv ), > but to get proper codecs requires compiling local packages, so it’s a bit of > hassle. I can contribute to SLE 15 packages if there is need for help. > > -- > Regards, > Samu Voutilainen > > > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Packman issue
Hi, it seems there are some problems on PMBS. There are lots differences between monitor and monitor/old pages. For example, on one side, you can see an aarch64 builder, whereas on the other one, you cannot find any. I think few services need to be restarted. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Advance notice of PMBS shutdown from next Weekend on
Le 03/02/2018 à 08:08, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi Guillaume, On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:44:03 +0100 Guillaume Gardet wrote: Another problem. When you click on the RPM link here: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/binary/Multimedia/kodi?arch=x86_64&filename=kodi-17.6-2.6.x86_64.rpm&repository=openSUSE_Tumbleweed The host is set to 'localhost' instead of 'pmbs.links2linux.de' which is a broken link, of courses. I cannot reproduce this ATM, the link above is invalid now, as there is a new version live: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/binary/Multimedia/kodi?arch=x86_64&filename=kodi-17.6-3.1.x86_64.rpm&repository=openSUSE_Tumbleweed and this one is working perfectly - at least from my home computer right now. I admit, this might not be 100% fool proof testing method, as I may shortcutting a little bit through my firewalls and NAT's. Please try again. If it still fails for you, I will try to reproduce a little harder. I did not change anything in obs' configuration regarding web server setup, and if this worked before, it should work now (at least for me it does). If not, then there should have been something changed by the update procedure inside obs between 2.7 and 2.8, although I checked all config files for possible changes and applied them manually - and I do not recall changing anything with respect to the web server handling. It is working now. Thanks. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Advance notice of PMBS shutdown from next Weekend on
Le 27/01/2018 à 11:46, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:14:52 +0100 Stefan Botter wrote: On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:11:38 -0600 Malcolm wrote: On Mon 22 Jan 2018 09:04:08 AM CST, Stefan Botter wrote: I will have to shut down PMBS until either - I find the time and a machine to host PMBS outside of our data center, or - a stable branch is published for a supported version of Leap. Hi Stefan Any updates or still the same status? I am sorry, that I am not more responsive ATM - well, I never really am fast in replying :). This week I am extremely tight with time, pressing deadlines, a welcome event for new students and a well-organized competence fight. For the coming days I will willfully break the compliance regulation on account that I have no time to comply. I will try to update PMBS and the obs software during the weekend or early next week. So everything will stay online, but I will try to find a different hosting location in the long run. I have updated PMBS to openSUSE 42.3 and used the obs repo for 42.2, ignoring the unavailable dependencies - which are few due to the similarity between 42.2 and 42.3. If you see any odd behavior, please reply here. Another problem. When you click on the RPM link here: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/binary/Multimedia/kodi?arch=x86_64&filename=kodi-17.6-2.6.x86_64.rpm&repository=openSUSE_Tumbleweed The host is set to 'localhost' instead of 'pmbs.links2linux.de' which is a broken link, of courses. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Advance notice of PMBS shutdown from next Weekend on
Hi, Le 27/01/2018 à 11:46, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:14:52 +0100 Stefan Botter wrote: On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:11:38 -0600 Malcolm wrote: On Mon 22 Jan 2018 09:04:08 AM CST, Stefan Botter wrote: I will have to shut down PMBS until either - I find the time and a machine to host PMBS outside of our data center, or - a stable branch is published for a supported version of Leap. Hi Stefan Any updates or still the same status? I am sorry, that I am not more responsive ATM - well, I never really am fast in replying :). This week I am extremely tight with time, pressing deadlines, a welcome event for new students and a well-organized competence fight. For the coming days I will willfully break the compliance regulation on account that I have no time to comply. I will try to update PMBS and the obs software during the weekend or early next week. So everything will stay online, but I will try to find a different hosting location in the long run. I have updated PMBS to openSUSE 42.3 and used the obs repo for 42.2, ignoring the unavailable dependencies - which are few due to the similarity between 42.2 and 42.3. If you see any odd behavior, please reply here. If you branch a project and then try a 'osc linkdiff' you get an error: diff working copy against last commited version Server returned an error: HTTP Error 400: home guillaume branches Multimedia/omxplayer/c17cabe623d842b69a1d0626edd6 not in repository. Either not existing or misconfigured server setting for '$nosharedtrees' setting in BSConfig.pm home:guillaume:branches:Multimedia/omxplayer/c17cabe623d842b69a1d0626edd6: not in repository. Either not existing or misconfigured server setting for '$nosharedtrees' setting in BSConfig.pm Not sure if that worked previously. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Advance notice of PMBS shutdown from next Weekend on
Hi, Le 22/01/2018 à 09:04, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi all, due to new compliance regulations in our data center I am not allowed to run systems there without available security updates. As openSUSE Leap 42.2's support period ends on Jan 26th 2018, and there is no published openSUSE Leap 42.3 repository for OBS' stable branch, I cannot update PMBS to openSUSE 42.3, and am thus unable to fulfill the compliance criteria. I will have to shut down PMBS until either - I find the time and a machine to host PMBS outside of our data center, or - a stable branch is published for a supported version of Leap. OBS from 42.2 repo shoud run fine on 42.3. You could ask Adrian Schröter to check that: Guillaume I am sorry for the inconvenience caused, greetings, Stefan ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] state of Leap 42.3 Ports repository
Hi, Le 11/10/2017 à 09:29, Stefan Botter a écrit : On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:19:10 +0200 Olaf Hering wrote: Why was a new openSUSE_Leap_42.3_Ports repository added? Does the publisher even handle this new repo? I think it would have been easier to just extend the arch= list of the existing openSUSE_Leap_42.3 repository. That way the existing meta data of some packages would also cover the ARM build. Now each affected package has to be adjusted to handle also openSUSE_Leap_42.3_Ports. Please talk to Guillaume Gardet, I believe he added that for AArch64 build test. Where is it? AArch64 should be part of standard Leap:42.3 repo. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Future of openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv6l
Hi, Le 07/05/2017 à 20:14, Stefan Seyfried a écrit : Am 07.05.2017 um 14:35 schrieb Olaf Hering: Unfortunately openSUSE_Factory_ARM builds almost the full set of the available source packages. I think only a very tiny subset of them would actually be useful on this lowend hardware. Well, it's the raspberry pi 1/2. But apart from ffmpeg, i cannot imagine what I'd need from packman on the RPI. You have omxplayer and kodi. I sent some time ago an e-mail about the armv6l building problem (no more worker allowed armv6l build). It seems to be the case again: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/monitor/old Guillaume Therefore I think armv6l should either be wiped to free resources, or the list of packages to be build should be reduced to a minimum. Disable and wipe all and enable only the things people complain about. I am still not using openSUSE on my raspi (a few bugs and yocto/OE is just neat), so I will not complain about anything yet ;-) ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] no armv6l builds since a while
Hello, It seems that armv6l packages did not build at all since a while. I guess current x86_64 workers do not allow the armv6l builds using qemu? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] ARM workers idle whereas jobs are waiting...
Le 21/11/2016 à 14:33, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : Hello, All ARMv7 workers are idle whereas jobs are waiting... 5 in waiting and 329 in blocked. Why the 5 waitings are not building? Maybe the scheduler need a reboot? It seems that all scheduled packages (wxWidgets-3_0-nostl and opencv) have a _constraint file. I am not familiar enough with this file to know if it applies on chroot armv7 workers or not. Guillaume Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] ARM workers idle whereas jobs are waiting...
Hello, All ARMv7 workers are idle whereas jobs are waiting... 5 in waiting and 329 in blocked. Why the 5 waitings are not building? Maybe the scheduler need a reboot? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 multimedia not updated since 2015
Le 18/11/2016 à 10:45, Oscar C a écrit : El 2016-11-18 10:43, Guillaume Gardet escribió: Le 18/11/2016 à 10:33, Olaf Hering a écrit : On Fri, Nov 18, Guillaume Gardet wrote: I think the fix is provided by the PMBS server. Isn't it? I dont know what the fix is and how it gets deployed, sorry. A few days ago some Arndale* host failed to build pkgs with _service files. Ok. Stefan, what was your fix for the _service problem encountered on pmbs (ARM) workers? Guillaume First of all, thank you guys, having all the arm packages for opensuse is really nice! If I'm not wrong, this problem was caused by insufficient arm power, right?. Since one of my boards does nothing most of the time, I think it could be used to build packages on pmbs. Is there a guide or something? You should contact Stefan about that. Then, if you have any ARM specific problem, send me an e-mail. Guillaume Thanks! ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 multimedia not updated since 2015
Le 18/11/2016 à 10:33, Olaf Hering a écrit : On Fri, Nov 18, Guillaume Gardet wrote: I think the fix is provided by the PMBS server. Isn't it? I dont know what the fix is and how it gets deployed, sorry. A few days ago some Arndale* host failed to build pkgs with _service files. Ok. Stefan, what was your fix for the _service problem encountered on pmbs (ARM) workers? Guillaume Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 multimedia not updated since 2015
Le 18/11/2016 à 09:49, Olaf Hering a écrit : On Fri, Nov 18, Guillaume Gardet wrote: Since I re-enabled one of my ARM workers, it seems to be better. ;) Make sure the fix to handle _service files properly is deployed on these workers. I think the fix is provided by the PMBS server. Isn't it? Guillaume Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 multimedia not updated since 2015
Le 13/11/2016 à 18:22, Olaf Hering a écrit : On Thu, Nov 10, Guillaume Gardet wrote: So, it may be due to never ending builds. I will try to set-up new ARM workers for packman on my side. Let's see if with more ARM workers it gets better. I wonder how this should be handled in the long run. Essentials+Multimedia have ~700 packages targeted for armv7l. Even if we manage to disable 10% of the packages because they are not useful on armv7l (or %arm in general), the remaining ~600 packages will take a very long time to build. Perhaps *_ARM should be set to block=local, or whatever OBS scheduling strategy makes sense. I think rebuild block=local is not a good idea. OBS did it for Factory:ARM repo and there are lots of problems with deps. Since I re-enabled one of my ARM workers, it seems to be better. ;) Guillaume Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 multimedia not updated since 2015
Le 09/11/2016 à 20:52, Oscar C a écrit : El 2016-11-06 16:00, Olaf Hering escribió: Am 5. November 2016 13:03:48 MEZ, schrieb Oscar C : Hi, I see on the pbs that the mythtv package is at version 0.28+git.20160823 but the published version is at 0.27. The URL for the repo I have is http://pmbs.links2linux.de:82/Multimedia/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/. The last update for armv7hl is 2015-08-30 whie for >> armv6hl is 2016-10-31, which is what I would expect. Could anyone look at it? I usually do not follow ARM, is there a slim chance that the few workers just can't keep up? If new checkins into Factory appear faster than ARM can build them, then the repository will will never reach the "publishing" state. Olaf Thanks. uhmm, I'm not sure if its because works can't keep up. The fact is that armv6hl doesn't have this problem and I suspect that the workers are quite similar. But honestly, obs is not my strongest point. @Guillaume, do you have any idea why the multimedia repo for armv7 is frozen in 2015? My ARM workers did not build for packman since a while since I had a storage failure and few free time to work on it. So, it may be due to never ending builds. I will try to set-up new ARM workers for packman on my side. Let's see if with more ARM workers it gets better. Guillaume Thanks! ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] experienced linux user who has never packaged anything wants to make opensuse package for gitlab
Hi, Some people started to do it. See: https://software.opensuse.org/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=gitlab&search_devel=false&search_unsupported=false&baseproject=openSUSE%3AFactory There is no need to do it on packman server, you can do it on build.opensuse.org (Official openSUSE build service). Guillaume Le 07/10/2016 à 00:25, Warren Postma a écrit : I found your site as a possible entity that hosts lots of community driven packages. I'm a fan/user of gitlab and OpenSUSE LEAP and TUMBLEWEED are my favorite distros and I want to package GItlab for it. Can you point me at some FAQs/Required-Reading to let me know how do I get started? I assume I need to provide the hosting and the bandwidth for the http served files, but I have never set up a "PPA" thing for an .rpm based distro, only ever done that with a debian .deb style package distro. Warren ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] FAT support on swkj12 worker (and others ?)
Hi, swkj12 worker (and maybe others) has no FAT32 support which lead to the following error while trying to build a KODI image for Raspberry Pi (currently in a home project, but may go to an official pmbs project when all will be ok). swkj16 works fine. Here are the logs: [ 4457s] Sep-12 09:46:31 <1> : EXEC [mount -n /dev/mapper/loop0p1 /tmp/kiwiloop.rmYFty/vboot 2>&1] [ 4457s] [ 4425.687178] FAT-fs (dm-0): codepage cp437 not found [ 4457s] Sep-12 09:46:31 <3> : Failed to mount /dev/mapper/loop0p1 to: /tmp/kiwiloop.rmYFty/vboot: Unsupported ioctl: cmd=0x5331 (0) [ 4457s] mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/mapper/loop0p1, Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages
Hi, Le 10/03/2016 08:23, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi, On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:50:59 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: Hi, Thank you Stefan and Guillaume for your modifications and accepting the change. I see that kodi.binary-addons build are failing because the following patches are missing : kodi.binary-addons-audiodecoder.ncsf-gcc5.3.patch kodi.binary-addons-screensavers.rsxs-upstream-stdbool_h.patch line 70: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kodi.binary-addons-audiodecoder.ncsf-gcc5.3.patch: No such file or directory Oh fsck! was in a hurry Yesterday... Just branched it out again and added the patches. Will submit it once I see all build succeeding. It is failing on: error: 'hdhomerun_discover_find_devices_custom_v2' was not declared in this scope Because it must use a newer libhdhomerun. See: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798069 So, I guess we should update our libhdhomerun which is very old (2010). https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Multimedia/libhdhomerun Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages
Hi, Le 09/03/2016 10:29, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi, On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:52:25 +0100 Stefan Botter wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:44:25 +0100 Olaf Hering wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: I've submitted a pull request for kodi 16.0 and binary addons packages. Can someone review the request ? What happend to libSOIL? Its missing in Factory, so the addon package does not build. It is also not in Tumbleweed. Should we link the package to packman for Factory and Tumbleweed? Or is it really needed - if not, it could be pulled in conditionally in the package for suse_version <= 1320. I pulled in libSOIL from openSUSE:games to Multimedia, but recompressed the source zip with a shorter directory name, it is built for Tumbleweed and Factory only. Once Sagi's submitted packages build fine for Tumbleweed, I will accept both kodi packages - should be within the hour. kodi still needs pkgconfig(platform) for Factory, can someone more into kodi/platform have a look at this? Kodi does not need it anymore. But kodi addons package does. I have some fixes for kodi 16.0 for ARM. I will push them once kodi will be updated. Guillaume Greetings, Stefan ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] kodi update to 16.0
Le 03/03/2016 09:44, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : Hi, Le 02/03/2016 19:11, Sagi Ben-Akiva a écrit : Hi Guillaume, Sorry for the delayed response I didn't notice that you opened a SR (don't know why but I don't get notifications) Regarding p8-platform, Kodi 16.0 was released with libplatform and not p8-platform so I don't think we should make this change. Indeed, this is in kodi trunk only. It is strange since my modification fixed build! Maybe platform is no more mandatory? I will try to build without it to check. It does compile without libplatform because you removed kodi-platform*.tar.gz Is it wanted? Guillaume Guillaume Sagi. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Guillaume Gardet mailto:guillaume.gar...@free.fr>> wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to update kodi to 16.0? It will allow us to fix build for Factory (x86* and arm*) and build for Raspberry Pi 2 platform. It seems to be ready in home:sagiben (once SR#2519 will be accepted). Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] kodi update to 16.0
Hi, Le 02/03/2016 19:11, Sagi Ben-Akiva a écrit : Hi Guillaume, Sorry for the delayed response I didn't notice that you opened a SR (don't know why but I don't get notifications) Regarding p8-platform, Kodi 16.0 was released with libplatform and not p8-platform so I don't think we should make this change. Indeed, this is in kodi trunk only. It is strange since my modification fixed build! Maybe platform is no more mandatory? I will try to build without it to check. Guillaume Sagi. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Guillaume Gardet mailto:guillaume.gar...@free.fr>> wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to update kodi to 16.0? It will allow us to fix build for Factory (x86* and arm*) and build for Raspberry Pi 2 platform. It seems to be ready in home:sagiben (once SR#2519 will be accepted). Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] kodi update to 16.0
Hi, Would it be possible to update kodi to 16.0? It will allow us to fix build for Factory (x86* and arm*) and build for Raspberry Pi 2 platform. It seems to be ready in home:sagiben (once SR#2519 will be accepted). Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] no armv6l builds
Ping. This problem appears about a week ago. Guillaume Le 24/01/2016 11:30, guillaume.gar...@free.fr a écrit : Hi, There are armv6l packages ready to build but x86_64 workers are all idle! Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] kodi unresolvable due to new licec
Le 25/01/2016 11:37, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : Hi, kodi is unresolvable because new libcec needs p8-platform instead of libplatform. I guess we need to _link p8-platform from OBS to pmbs? In Multimedia? p8-platform is already in Essentials, so spec file need to be reworked? Guillaume Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] kodi unresolvable due to new licec
Hi, kodi is unresolvable because new libcec needs p8-platform instead of libplatform. I guess we need to _link p8-platform from OBS to pmbs? In Multimedia? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] no armv6l builds
Hi, There are armv6l packages ready to build but x86_64 workers are all idle! Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Packman OBS setup broken?
Ping. Guillaume Le 20/01/2016 11:56, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : Hi, it seems there is a problem on PMBS. omxplayer is available here: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Multimedia/omxplayer But kodi-noX-raspberry-pi is unresolvable because "nothing provides omxplayer": https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Multimedia/kodi-noX-raspberry-pi Maybe a service needs to be restarted? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Packman OBS setup broken?
Hi, it seems there is a problem on PMBS. omxplayer is available here: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Multimedia/omxplayer But kodi-noX-raspberry-pi is unresolvable because "nothing provides omxplayer": https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Multimedia/kodi-noX-raspberry-pi Maybe a service needs to be restarted? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Stat graphs broken on monitor page
Le 05/10/2015 13:17, Stefan Botter a écrit : On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:01:14 +0200 Guillaume Gardet wrote: Hi, on https://pmbs.links2linux.de/monitor stat graphs are broken. You can get stats for "1 week" and more but it stays blank for "1 day" and "1 hour". I restarted the delayed jobs and the graph seems to work again, but - at least ATM - is missing the past week. Ok. Thanks. :) Perhaps it is time, that OBS switches to systemd-style units instead of init.d scripts, to get the dependencies right. Indded. According to OBS release notes, it should be done within the next months (I hope): ** Notes for systems using systemd: OBS is using init scripts, not systemd style .service files. This will stay until we will switch from SLES 11 to SLES 12 as default production platform. ** Guillaume Greetings, Stefan ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Stat graphs broken on monitor page
Hi, on https://pmbs.links2linux.de/monitor stat graphs are broken. You can get stats for "1 week" and more but it stays blank for "1 day" and "1 hour". Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv6l build hangs in 13.1
Le 06/07/2015 12:34, Olaf Hering a écrit : Is anyone using armv6l anyway, and if so is that someone using 13.1? For some reason installing kernel-obs takes several hours. Not sure if the build gets a time-out again this time, see Essentials/ffmpeg. I already seen that. I will try to fix it. Given the overall low quality of the armv6l target I suggest to build just Factory and 13.2. I think some raspberry pi users are still on 13.1. :( Let me try to fix kernel-obs problem, first. Guillaume Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] PMBS monitor: images not shown
Hi, images showing load, number of workers and repos are not displayed anymore, it is just blank. See: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/monitor Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Delete Extra:libgdal
Hi, I would like to delete libgdal from Extra : https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Extra/libgdal It is outdated, unresolvable and did not build since 3 years. Morevoer, it is available and maintained in OBS : https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Application:Geo/gdal Any objection? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Disable 12.3 ARM build
Hi, I would like to disable 12.3 ARM builds since 12.3 is discontinued and I think there is nobody still using 12.3 openSUSE ARM images. This should allow us to enable Extra repo for ARM. Is there any objection? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] ARM repositories
Hi, Le 16/02/2015 04:24, Bill Merriam a écrit : How to I get access to ARMv7 binary packages that are built by packman? See here : http://pmbs.links2linux.de:82/ and subdirectories. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 Hardware contribution
Le 07/01/2015 17:24, Philipp Seiler a écrit : On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:28:36 +0100 Guillaume Gardet wrote: Hi, Le 07/01/2015 15:57, Philipp Seiler a écrit : Hi Packman guys, I started to build against armv7 because of a little private project. So I found out that there are only two worker. In fact, 2 boards with 2 workers each, so 4 workers. ;) Ok, this is still not huge. Maybe some people can contribute their armv7 hardware to enhance the build power of PMBS. I would donate to bananapi's but I don't know where to put it. I meant "two" for sure. My home connection is to slow to host them there. Any Ideas or other suggestions? What is slow for you? Here, I have 3.5 Mbits/s (0.4 MBytes/s) down and 1 Mbits/s (0.12 MBytes/s) up and it is enough to contribute, especially if you enable caches. Thats a good point. But regarding the mass rebuilds on packman I think the upload is the more important connection also for my online gaming part. But I'll try it. Is it possible to compile armv6 on a armv7 chipsets like building i586 on x86_64 hardware? It is possible but the build service is configured to build armv6 using x86 + qemu. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv7 Hardware contribution
Hi, Le 07/01/2015 15:57, Philipp Seiler a écrit : Hi Packman guys, I started to build against armv7 because of a little private project. So I found out that there are only two worker. In fact, 2 boards with 2 workers each, so 4 workers. ;) Ok, this is still not huge. Maybe some people can contribute their armv7 hardware to enhance the build power of PMBS. I would donate to bananapi's but I don't know where to put it. My home connection is to slow to host them there. Any Ideas or other suggestions? What is slow for you? Here, I have 3.5 Mbits/s (0.4 MBytes/s) down and 1 Mbits/s (0.12 MBytes/s) up and it is enough to contribute, especially if you enable caches. Guillaume Best Regards Philipp ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] pmbs down?
Hi, pmbs seems to be down (408: Request Timeout). Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] aMule-2.3.1+git20140914.1007
Le 22/09/2014 13:35, Lorenzo Porta a écrit : Can you please revert amule to revision 17? Because it doesn't work anymore (I'm on Factory) It would be better to know what is not working and try to fix it, no? Maybe an update is already known and available. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Vivante graphics drivers
Hi, Le 07/06/2014 18:15, Josua Mayer a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > I am a happy owner of a cubox-i device and am currently work on > getting opensuse running properly on this device. Good news. :) I saw your post on opensuse-arm ML. > Now I have a found a rather difficult piece of software, the Vivante > binary drivers for the GPU and the opensource xorg driver. > > Basically, the xorg driver requires headers from the vivante gpu > package to build, so having the vivante driver packaged properly, and > usable for further builds is important. > > So I wondered if I can package these on packman OBS? Does the license allow redistribution? > > I can provide the involved licenses if necessary and I will for sure > take care of not violating them. Yes, please share the license to check it. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: timeout for emulated ARM too low
- Olaf Hering a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 04, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > > > The workarounds I got are either build on powerful workers, or remove > > Texinfo/makeinfo from BuildRequires. > > I think the way to fix it is to %define with_docs 1, wrap all the > texinfo related stuff around it, and set the new variable to 0 in case of > %arm. Armv6l armv6hl would ne enough since there is no problem with armv7. Guillaume > > > Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] timeout for emulated ARM too low
Yes, I know. I reported it to opensuse-buildservice ML some times ago. The workarounds I got are either build on powerful workers, or remove Texinfo/makeinfo from BuildRequires. If you have better solutions, please share. :) Guillaume Le 04/06/2014 17:07, Olaf Hering a écrit : > ffmpeg is now supposed to build for armv6l, but it still fails because > building the tetex stuff from rpm %post scripts takes too long. And > there is no output logged for some reason. I suggest to either fix the > missing output or increase the timeout. On my system it takes more than > 6 hours. > > Olaf > > ... > [ 422s] brp-extract-appdata-2012.02.13-16.3.2 > > [ 422s] build-mkbaselibs-20131015-1.2 > > [ 422s] yasm-1.2.0-7.1.2 > > [ 429s] kernel-obs-build-1-1.2 > > [23017s] removing nis flags from > /oscbuild/pmbs-api.links2linux.org-armv6l-openSUSE_13.1_ARM-Essentials-ffmpeg/etc/nsswitch.conf... > [23017s] now finalizing build dir... > ... > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman > ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv6l raspberrypi-userland failures
Le 26/05/2014 11:13, Olaf Hering a écrit : > On Mon, May 26, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > >> If someone have ideas to solve this, please share. > Get rid of raspberrypi-userland.rpm? It is needed for XMBC and omxplayer. Maybe we could just use this RPM for XBMC and omxplayer and use Mesa packages instead for other packages? The best way would be to use an update-alternative script for this. Which packages are you trying to fix? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] armv6l raspberrypi-userland failures
Le 23/05/2014 13:06, Herbert Graeber a écrit : > Am 23.05.2014 10:44, schrieb Olaf Hering: >> Is this self-healing, should armv6hl builds be disabled or should one >> just filter the failure mails? >> >> [ 29s] file /usr/lib/libEGL.so conflicts between attempted installs of >> Mesa-libEGL-devel-10.2.0~rc2-83.1.armv6hl and >> raspberrypi-userland-2014.05.12-1.2.armv6hl > Looks like you have to prefer one of those packages in The projects > "Project Config". The project config of Essentials already containes the > neccessary lines. Apparently, the Prefer option is not enough. :( If someone have ideas to solve this, please share. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] HTTP Error 500 Internal Server Error while trying to osc build a package
Le 19/05/2014 13:50, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : > Le 19/05/2014 13:32, Olaf Hering a écrit : >> On Mon, May 19, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >> >>> I guess there is a problem with pmbs server? >> This morning a cmd like this worked for me, in vlc/: >> >> time pbs build --disable-cpio-bulk-download --no-verify openSUSE_11.4 >> x86_64 > I have no --disable-cpio-bulk-download option in osc 0.145. In fact the option is there. Strange. It did not work with a copy/paste 2 minutes ago. It seems to download things now. Thanks. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] HTTP Error 500 Internal Server Error while trying to osc build a package
Le 19/05/2014 13:32, Olaf Hering a écrit : > On Mon, May 19, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > >> I guess there is a problem with pmbs server? > This morning a cmd like this worked for me, in vlc/: > > time pbs build --disable-cpio-bulk-download --no-verify openSUSE_11.4 x86_64 I have no --disable-cpio-bulk-download option in osc 0.145. It is for building ffmpeg locally for armv6. Maybe the request is too long? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] HTTP Error 500 Internal Server Error while trying to osc build a package
Hi, I am trying to build a package locally using osc build but I get the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/osc", line 26, in r = babysitter.run(osccli) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/babysitter.py", line 60, in run return prg.main(argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 343, in main return self.cmd(args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 366, in cmd retval = self.onecmd(argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 484, in onecmd return self._dispatch_cmd(handler, argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 1214, in _dispatch_cmd return handler(argv[0], opts, *args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/commandline.py", line 5647, in do_build return osc.build.main(self.get_api_url(), opts, args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/build.py", line 715, in main fetcher.run(bi) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/fetch.py", line 272, in run self.__fetch_cpio(buildinfo.apiurl) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/fetch.py", line 173, in __fetch_cpio self.__download_cpio_archive(apiurl, project, repo, arch, package, **pkgs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/fetch.py", line 118, in __download_cpio_archive text='fetching packages for \'%s\'' % project) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/fetch.py", line 64, in urlgrab raise exc urlgrabber.grabber.URLGrabError: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error I guess there is a problem with pmbs server? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] xbmc 13
Le 19/05/2014 11:15, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
> Le 18/05/2014 21:48, Mariusz Fik a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just sent request with xbmc 13 to Multimedia repository.
>> https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/1010
>> I didn't touch any arm patches, so anyone with arm knowledge, please adjust
>> arm bits as needed/required.
> For ARM, you need to remove some screensaver / visualization addons (probably
> availaible in openGL only and not for open GL ES) from the filelist:
> /usr/share/xbmc/addons/screensaver.rsxs.euphoria/*
> /usr/share/xbmc/addons/screensaver.rsxs.plasma/*
> /usr/share/xbmc/addons/screensaver.rsxs.solarwinds/*
> /usr/share/xbmc/addons/visualization.fishbmc/*
> /usr/share/xbmc/addons/visualization.projectm/*
>
> a "%if %{with enable_opengles}" should do the trick.
I meant: "%if %{with enable_opengl}"
Guillaume
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] xbmc 13
Hi,
Le 18/05/2014 21:48, Mariusz Fik a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've just sent request with xbmc 13 to Multimedia repository.
> https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/1010
> I didn't touch any arm patches, so anyone with arm knowledge, please adjust
> arm bits as needed/required.
For ARM, you need to remove some screensaver / visualization addons (probably
availaible in openGL only and not for open GL ES) from the filelist:
/usr/share/xbmc/addons/screensaver.rsxs.euphoria/*
/usr/share/xbmc/addons/screensaver.rsxs.plasma/*
/usr/share/xbmc/addons/screensaver.rsxs.solarwinds/*
/usr/share/xbmc/addons/visualization.fishbmc/*
/usr/share/xbmc/addons/visualization.projectm/*
a "%if %{with enable_opengles}" should do the trick.
Guillaume
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] vlc in 11.4
Le 15/04/2014 16:40, Olaf Hering a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 15, Stefan Botter wrote: > >> I have confirmed your account, go! > Thanks, still lacks the permissions: > > /usr/bin/osc -A https://pmbs-api.links2linux.org meta pkg -e Essentials vlc > BuildService API error: change_package_no_permission (403) > no permission to modify package 'Essentials'/vlc You should branch the package, fix it on your branch and submit it back. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] too much updates
Le 28/03/2014 17:08, Dmitriy Perlow a écrit : > Guillaume Gardet Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:00:53 +0300: > >> >> Le 28/03/2014 16:26, Martin Schlander a écrit : >>> Fredag den 28. marts 2014 11:40:07 skrev Hendrik Vogelsang: >>>> On 27.03.2014 17:21, Guido Berhoerster wrote: >>>>> The alternative would be to have separate >>>>> projects for each release and linking the Packman packages to the >>>>> corresponding Packages in stable releases on OBS >>>> One of the main reasons for having Packman is to provide updates to the >>>> latest and greatest versions of various packages >>> I guess the problem is not so much the "real" updates, but all the rebuilds >>> with little or no changes. >> >> Don't we have a build-compare script enabled to not trigger unnecessary >> rebuilds? >> >> >> Guillaume > > We have, see > https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/live_build_log?arch=x86_64&package=QMPlay2&project=Multimedia&repository=openSUSE_13.1 > f.e. > > So, there are little changes for each update. ;) Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] too much updates
Le 28/03/2014 16:26, Martin Schlander a écrit : > Fredag den 28. marts 2014 11:40:07 skrev Hendrik Vogelsang: >> On 27.03.2014 17:21, Guido Berhoerster wrote: >>> The alternative would be to have separate >>> projects for each release and linking the Packman packages to the >>> corresponding Packages in stable releases on OBS >> One of the main reasons for having Packman is to provide updates to the >> latest and greatest versions of various packages > I guess the problem is not so much the "real" updates, but all the rebuilds > with little or no changes. Don't we have a build-compare script enabled to not trigger unnecessary rebuilds? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] pipelight status?
Hi, pipelight package is disabled in pmbs and is uninstallable. We get the following error: ** Problem: nothing provides mingw32-cross-gcc = 4.8.2n needed by pipelight-0.1+2+2013081840-3.9.x86_64 Solution 1: do not install pipelight-0.1+2+2013081840-3.9.x86_64 Solution 2: break pipelight-0.1+2+2013081840-3.9.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies ** Moreover, according to the official pipelight page, here: http://fds-team.de/cms/pipelight-installation.html#section_1_4 for openSUSE, we should install pipelight from this home repo: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:rbos:pipelight/pipelight Should we update our pipelight package (and deps) to _link this one? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] [RFC] Add support to no X version to XBMC
Hi, I am preparing a no X version of XBMC, based on our standard X XBMC. This is really useful for ARM boards which do not need to have a full X environment. Since it does build for all architectures, I enabled it for all architectures even if it makes less sense for x86/x86_64. Maybe someone would be interested for an old computer. I have prepared a patch (which I still continue to improve) here: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show?package=xbmc-noX&project=home%3Aguillaume%3Abranches%3AMultimedia This patch add support to noX option in xbmc.spec. Then a pre_checkin.sh script will copy xbmc.spec to xbmc-noX.spec (and xbmc.changes to xbmc-noX.changes) and enable the noX option automatically. A new package xbmc-noX will be created and will only _link to xbmc. Therefore, each XBMC update will update xbmc-noX. Standard XBMC build will not be modified. I used something similar to what is done for glibc/glibc-utils/glibc-testsuite. Is there any comment/request/idea before I commit my patch? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Re : Re: FFmpeg and libvpx
Le 27/01/2014 20:59, guillaume.gar...@free.fr a écrit : > - Manfred Tremmel a écrit : >> Hello Guillaume, >> >> Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 19:17:21 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: >>> In ffmpeg, there is a '%ifarch %ix86 x86_64 amd64 ia32e' for libvpx. >>> Is there any reason to not enabling it for all architectures since >>> libvpx is built for all architectures? >> I can't remember what exactly was the problem. In the past I've build >> packages for ppc, maybe it didn't build on ppc. We had no other >> architectures at packman. >> >>> It is the same for all ffmpeg (oldabi, 1 and 2). >> which architectures have you tested successfully? > Not tested yet. It is building for arm v6 and v7. > > Waiting for build result. Tested just now and it is working fine. PMBS SR #831. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: FFmpeg and libvpx
- Manfred Tremmel a écrit : > Hello Guillaume, > > Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 19:17:21 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > > In ffmpeg, there is a '%ifarch %ix86 x86_64 amd64 ia32e' for libvpx. > > Is there any reason to not enabling it for all architectures since > > libvpx is built for all architectures? > > I can't remember what exactly was the problem. In the past I've build > packages for ppc, maybe it didn't build on ppc. We had no other > architectures at packman. > > > It is the same for all ffmpeg (oldabi, 1 and 2). > > which architectures have you tested successfully? Not tested yet. It is building for arm v6 and v7. Waiting for build result. Guillaume > > -- > Machs gut | http://www.iivs.de/schwinde/buerger/tremmel/ > > Manfred | http://packman.links2linux.de/ > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] FFmpeg and libvpx
Hi, In ffmpeg, there is a '%ifarch %ix86 x86_64 amd64 ia32e' for libvpx. Is there any reason to not enabling it for all architectures since libvpx is built for all architectures? It is the same for all ffmpeg (oldabi, 1 and 2). Regards, Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] blender 2.69. + ffmpeg + cycle_render + OpenImageIO dependency
Hi, Le 17/01/2014 16:09, Diego Ercolani a écrit : > I recycle my question because I don't know how to manage > In data lunedì 13 gennaio 2014 09:41:48, Diego Ercolani ha scritto: >> I released my packaging and it seem working. >> As you see it depends on OIIO library that is foundable under >> obs.opensuse.org (home:adra) >> in the pmbs system manage the dependancy but how to tell to the final user? >> Diego I think you should commit your blender changes in openSUSE.org:graphics, and just _link it in pmbs. Could OpenImageIO be added in openSUSE instance? If so, add it there. Otherwise, add it to PMBS. The rule is to commit the most to openSUSE build service and to commit only what is not allowed in openSUSE OBS in PMBS. Hope it helps you. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] VLC fix
Le 02/10/2013 13:05, Wolfgang Bauer a écrit : > Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2013, 22:08:14 schrieb Wolfgang Bauer: >> I managed to fix the build problem: >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:wolfi323/vlc/0001-no-retur >> n-in-non-void.patch?expand=1 >> >> I will try to submit this to multimedia:libs, but of course you're free to >> add it to the Packman package right now if you want to. >> > My patch has been accepted. > And VLC has already been built successfully for 12.3 on PMBS! :-) Yes, I saw that. Thanks. :) Guillaume > > Kind regards, > Wolfgang > > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman > ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] VLC fix
Le 30/09/2013 17:29, Wolfgang Bauer a écrit : > Am Montag, 30. September 2013, 16:27:48 schrieben Sie: >>> And you can see my changes to the multimedia:libs package in the link I >>> provided (click on "Could have a link diff", but I guess you know how to >>> use OBS... ;) ) >>> >>> I don't have a patch yet for the "no-return-in-nonvoid-function" errors, I >>> just disabled the post-build-checks (this problem you also seem to have in >>> your PMBS home repo). But this should be better fixed in multimedia:libs >>> itself I think. >> It fails with this error for 12.3 and tumbleweed, but succeeds for Factory >> and 12.2. Strange. > Yes, I find that strange as well (that it builds fine for Factory and 12.2). > And I guess that's the reason why they didn't fix it yet in multimedia:libs. > Maybe a bugreport is necessary? ;) Yes. ;) > > I don't have the time right now to fix this, but it should be quite easy > (just > add some return statements) > > But, as I said, IMHO this should be fixed in multimedia:libs directly, or > even VLC upstream. I have submitted a patch to switch back from ffmpeg 1 to ffmpeg 2: https://pmbs.links2linux.de/request/show/558 And I also submitted a patch in OBS for a missing file in the file list (vdpau plugin) and I also added openGL ES support (enabled by default for %arm): https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/201596 Guillaume > > Kind regards, > Wolfgang > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman > ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] VLC fix
Le 30/09/2013 12:39, Wolfgang Bauer a écrit : > Sorry, this went out as PM to Guillaume, resending to the mailinglist for > reference... > > Am Montag, 30. September 2013, 10:37:24 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: >> Wolfgang, could you submit your patch to use ffmpeg 2 with VLC, please? >> >> Guillaume >> > Which patch do you mean? > I can't submit anything because I don't have a packman account. Sorry, I have not seen that it was an OBS home, not a packman home. ;) > > And you can see my changes to the multimedia:libs package in the link I > provided (click on "Could have a link diff", but I guess you know how to use > OBS... ;) ) > > I don't have a patch yet for the "no-return-in-nonvoid-function" errors, I > just disabled the post-build-checks (this problem you also seem to have in > your PMBS home repo). But this should be better fixed in multimedia:libs > itself I think. It fails with this error for 12.3 and tumbleweed, but succeeds for Factory and 12.2. Strange. > > If you are referring to the ffmpeg thing, just revert the link to the current > version in OBS, multimedia:libs. There it still uses libffmpeg-devel. > Or change it yourself in PMBS, I don't think you need a patch by me for that, > it's line#141 in the spec file... ;) Indeeded. ;) > > But there was another problem I forgot to mention (but can be seen in the > link > diff): > The spec file in multimedia:libs (and PMBS:Essentials therefore) > BuildRequires > faad2-devel, which the RedDwarf:fakePackman packages don't provide anymore, > so > I had to change this to libfaad-devel. I'm not sure if this would be a > problem > on Packman as well, maybe that's been taken care of in the Project config? This one is fine in PMBS. Guillaume > > But of course, I'm open to help if I can. ;) > > Kind regards, > Wolfgang > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman > ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] VLC fix
Le 29/09/2013 21:55, Manfred Tremmel a écrit : > Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013, 20:11:53 schrieb Wolfgang Bauer: >> Hi! >> >> Am Samstag, 28. September 2013, 00:25:47 schrieb Manfred Tremmel: >>> Am Freitag, 27. September 2013, 11:48:55 schrieb Stefan Botter: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:26:04 +0200 >>>> >>>> Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I submitted 2 SR : >>>>> * #556 : FFmpeg1 update to 1.2.3 >>>>> * #557 : VLC build fix >>>>> >>>>> in order to fix VLC package (which need ffmpeg >= 1.2) >>>> I am a little reluctant to accept the request, I believe it is >>>> good to have Manfred accept it, as he is the one usually dealing >>>> with ffmpeg and all its children ;-) >>>> >>>> Manfred, can you have a look? >>> I've packaged ffmpeg 1.2 and 1.2.1 in the past and got back to >>> 1.0.x. >>> Three or four packages didn't work correctly with 1.2.x (no compile >>> problems, but runtime problems). I don't think, we should switch to >>> 1.2! >> VLC 2.1.0 compiles and works fine with ffmpeg 2.0.1. > Then use it, ffmpeg 1.0.6 is only available for compatibility reasons. > >> I have built it successfully here: >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:wolfi323/vlc >> I only added "BuildRequires: -post-build-checks" to the spec file >> there to get rid of some "no-return-in-nonvoid-function" errors that >> made the build fail (I didn't want to dig deeper into that right >> now). But those are not related to ffmpeg, they are also there when >> building without it (see KDE:Distro:Factory f.e.). >> >> So I would suggest to just change the "BuildRequires: >> libffmpeg1-devel" to libffmpeg-devel again, instead of updating >> ffmpeg1 (or maybe trying to patch vlc to build against 1.0.8). > Building against libffmpeg-devel is the solution. VLC 2.0.x didn't > compile against ffmpeg 2.x, that's the only reason for building against > ibffmpeg1-devel. > Wolfgang, could you submit your patch to use ffmpeg 2 with VLC, please? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] VLC fix
Hi, I submitted 2 SR : * #556 : FFmpeg1 update to 1.2.3 * #557 : VLC build fix in order to fix VLC package (which need ffmpeg >= 1.2) Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Arm7 build issue
Le 26/09/2013 09:56, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : > Hi, > > > Le 26/09/2013 07:13, Dmitriy Perlow a écrit : >> Hello. >> >> I've found a strange bug: >> [ 146s] error: unpacking of archive failed on file >> /usr/lib/libQtSql.so.4.8.4;524344fb: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate ioctl >> for device >> [ 146s] error: libqt4-sql-4.8.4-3.3.1.armv7hl: install failed >> [ 146s] error: unpacking of archive failed on file >> /usr/lib/libpng15.so.15.13.0;524344fb: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate >> ioctl for device >> [ 146s] error: libpng15-15-1.5.13-3.1.1.armv7hl: install failed >> >> See >> https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show?package=simplescreenrecorder&project=Multimedia >> f.e. >> Arm6 is finished fine. >> > I have some problems with the main ARM worker ATM. Will have a look at it. Fixed. Builds fine now. :) Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Arm7 build issue
Hi, Le 26/09/2013 07:13, Dmitriy Perlow a écrit : > Hello. > > I've found a strange bug: > [ 146s] error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /usr/lib/libQtSql.so.4.8.4;524344fb: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate ioctl > for device > [ 146s] error: libqt4-sql-4.8.4-3.3.1.armv7hl: install failed > [ 146s] error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /usr/lib/libpng15.so.15.13.0;524344fb: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate > ioctl for device > [ 146s] error: libpng15-15-1.5.13-3.1.1.armv7hl: install failed > > See > https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show?package=simplescreenrecorder&project=Multimedia > f.e. > Arm6 is finished fine. > I have some problems with the main ARM worker ATM. Will have a look at it. Thanks for reporting. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Offer to help
- Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : > Hello guys, > > I would like to ask for access to your obs instance so I could package mpv > media player and help you improve the repo + move stuff to opensuse obs > instance where possible. > > Also I would like to merge some changes I have in my home project [1] (not > everything but libs/xbmc are in good shape :P). Be careful, openSUSE OBS forbids packages such as ffmpeg, xbmc, etc. ;) Guillaume > > Cheers > > Tom > > [1] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:scarabeus_iv > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: XBMC update and deps
- Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi Guillaume, > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:15:18 +0200 > Guillaume Gardet wrote: > > > I am preparing an XBMC update and to add libcec support, I need to > > add libcec in packman (available in hardware project in openSUSE OBS, > > but not in Factory). So, could I add libcec to Multimedia project? Or > > is there any better solution? Same question with omxplayer (a player > > for Raspberry Pi ARM board). > > Yes, if you need them in Multimedia, put them there. Ok, I added libcec to Multimedia. I submited my XBMC update, SR #528. I will not accept it myself, I would prefer that someone else review it. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] XBMC update and deps
Hi, I am preparing an XBMC update and to add libcec support, I need to add libcec in packman (available in hardware project in openSUSE OBS, but not in Factory). So, could I add libcec to Multimedia project? Or is there any better solution? Same question with omxplayer (a player for Raspberry Pi ARM board). Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Ffmpeg rebuild
Le 30/08/2013 08:32, Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi Guillaume, > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:04:49 +0200 (CEST) > guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote: > >> Could you trigger a rebuild of ffmpeg for arm, please? Because of a >> worker failure some time ago. > > Did that ;-) Thanks. > > > Do you want to make a reqms on Essentials and Multimedia? Thanks for the offer. I think it could be good idea. Will do a reqms later. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Ffmpeg rebuild
Hi, Could you trigger a rebuild of ffmpeg for arm, please? Because of a worker failure some time ago. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] XBMC fix
Le 28/08/2013 08:20, Stefan Botter a écrit : > On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:23:44 +0200 > Stefan Botter wrote: >> It is _not_ libgpg-error-related. The problem arises from >> libmysqlclient. There has been a security update for MySQL some three >> weeks ago, which seems to have an odd behavior while installing. This >> does happen on 12.2 both archs, and both 12.3 and Tumbelweed, i586 >> only. >> >> I am trying to find time today to confirm the setup error and >> (hopefully) file a bugzilla error against the security update. >> >> I'll keep you posted. > > darix helped my confirm this error in the latest mariadb update, > bugzilla is https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837123. > > For the time being we have to wait for that to be fixed. Ok, thanks for info. :) Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] XBMC fix
Le 28/08/2013 08:16, Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi Sagi, > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:58:43 +0300 > Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: > >> One more question, why did you decided to disable vdpau in your >> patch ? > > vdpau is disabled only for arch == armv7[h]l, or did I miss another > change? That is true. It is only disabled for armv7. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] XBMC fix
Le 27/08/2013 14:53, Malcolm a écrit : > On Tue 27 Aug 2013 01:49:46 PM CDT, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > >> Le 27/08/2013 13:31, Malcolm a écrit : >>> On Tue 27 Aug 2013 12:25:23 PM CDT, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>> It is _not_ libgpg-error-related. The problem arises from >>>>> libmysqlclient. There has been a security update for MySQL some >>>>> three weeks ago, which seems to have an odd behavior while >>>>> installing. This does happen on 12.2 both archs, and both 12.3 and >>>>> Tumbelweed, i586 only. >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to find time today to confirm the setup error and >>>>> (hopefully) file a bugzilla error against the security update. >>>>> >>>>> I'll keep you posted. >>>> Ok, thanks for the hint. >>>> >>>> Maybe you could accept this SR to get most builds working and then, >>>> investigate on gpg-error/mysqlclient error and submit a fix when/if >>>> we find one. >>>> >>>> >>>> Guillaume >>>> >>> Hi >>> Is that a really good idea, just to push it out when there is a known >>> issue? Plus I see from the spec file that post build checks are >>> disabled, that's not good form. >> I think that partial build is better than no build at all, which is >> the current state. >> >> Moreover, if my patch is merged, someone else could work on a fix for >> other problems or enhancements. >> >> What do you mean by "post build checks are disabled" ? >> >> >> Guillaume > Hi > This entry; > > BuildRequires: -post-build-checks > > Does it build without this? > Checked just now and, no it fails with "directories not owned by a package" errors. It should be easily fixed but I cannot do it right now. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] XBMC fix
Le 27/08/2013 13:31, Malcolm a écrit : > On Tue 27 Aug 2013 12:25:23 PM CDT, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>> It is _not_ libgpg-error-related. The problem arises from >>> libmysqlclient. There has been a security update for MySQL some three >>> weeks ago, which seems to have an odd behavior while installing. This >>> does happen on 12.2 both archs, and both 12.3 and Tumbelweed, i586 >>> only. >>> >>> I am trying to find time today to confirm the setup error and >>> (hopefully) file a bugzilla error against the security update. >>> >>> I'll keep you posted. >> Ok, thanks for the hint. >> >> Maybe you could accept this SR to get most builds working and then, >> investigate on gpg-error/mysqlclient error and submit a fix when/if we >> find one. >> >> >> Guillaume >> > Hi > Is that a really good idea, just to push it out when there is a known > issue? Plus I see from the spec file that post build checks are > disabled, that's not good form. I think that partial build is better than no build at all, which is the current state. Moreover, if my patch is merged, someone else could work on a fix for other problems or enhancements. What do you mean by "post build checks are disabled" ? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] XBMC fix
Hi, Le 27/08/2013 08:23, Stefan Botter a écrit : > Hi, > > sorry, I could have said something earlier ... > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:53:33 +0200 > Mariusz Fik wrote: > >> Dnia poniedzia?ek, 26 sierpnia 2013 16:36:47 Guillaume Gardet pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have made a SR to fix most XBMC builds. Is there an admin which >>> could >> review it and then accept it if all is ok, please? >>> This is SR#504 : >>> https://pmbs.links2linux.de/request/show/504 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Guillaume >>> >> >> I can see there a new BuildRequires: libgpg-error-devel. Package >> failed to build for >= 12.2 due to: >> | [ 104s] checking for main in -lgpg-error... no >> | [ 104s] configure: error: Could not find a required library. >> Please see the README for your platform. >> >> But libgpg-error-devel package is available in OSS repository. Could >> You trigger rebuild of xbmc to check if it's gonna build on other >> worker? > > It is _not_ libgpg-error-related. The problem arises from > libmysqlclient. There has been a security update for MySQL some three > weeks ago, which seems to have an odd behavior while installing. This > does happen on 12.2 both archs, and both 12.3 and Tumbelweed, i586 only. > > I am trying to find time today to confirm the setup error and > (hopefully) file a bugzilla error against the security update. > > I'll keep you posted. Ok, thanks for the hint. Maybe you could accept this SR to get most builds working and then, investigate on gpg-error/mysqlclient error and submit a fix when/if we find one. Guillaume > > > Stefan > > PS: yes, I know, hermes would have made this easier, but I did not have > time for this up to now. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] XBMC fix
Le 26/08/2013 20:53, Mariusz Fik a écrit : > Dnia poniedzia?ek, 26 sierpnia 2013 16:36:47 Guillaume Gardet pisze: >> Hi, >> >> I have made a SR to fix most XBMC builds. Is there an admin which could > review it and then accept it if all is ok, please? >> This is SR#504 : >> https://pmbs.links2linux.de/request/show/504 >> >> Regards, >> >> Guillaume >> > > I can see there a new BuildRequires: libgpg-error-devel. Package failed to > build for >= 12.2 due to: > | [ 104s] checking for main in -lgpg-error... no > | [ 104s] configure: error: Could not find a required library. Please see the > README for your platform. > > But libgpg-error-devel package is available in OSS repository. Could You > trigger rebuild of xbmc to check if it's gonna build on other worker? It is always the same error. I added libgpg-error-devel as BuildRequires but the error is still there. The errors are only for 12.2 (i586 / x86_64), 12.3 i586 and Tumbleweed i586. Factory is fine, ARM builds also fine. I guess it is a problem with gpg-error, not XBMC. Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] XBMC fix
Hi, I have made a SR to fix most XBMC builds. Is there an admin which could review it and then accept it if all is ok, please? This is SR#504 : https://pmbs.links2linux.de/request/show/504 Regards, Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] ARM build in packman?
Hi, Would it be possible to enable ARM (armv5/armv7) build in packman as it is done on OBS? Guillaume ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
