Re: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-03 Thread Thibault GROUAS
 Which is your favorite for large (8x10  up) prints,
 in 35mm format?

For large enlargements (10x12 and larger) I use Kodak Technical Pan which I
rate at ISO 20. Here are my recipes with Rodinal :

- Rodinal 1+100 6' 20° for high contrast but still continuous tone
(reproduction, abstracts).

- Rodinal 1+120 6' 20° for places - normal contrast.

- Rodinal 1+135 6' 20° for people - softer contrast.

Agitation for the first 10 seconds than 5 seconds every minute.

I use distilled water (plain water gives me black spots on the negs) and mix
the developper with a 10ml and 1ml syringes (a must have with such high
dilutions).

This gives nice razor sharp negs, far sharper than those I got with Pan F+ /
Tmax 100. My dilutions and times provide negs that print best at grade 2.

The other really nice thing about tech pan is that negatives a far thinner
and transparent than with other films. Enlarging exposures are about 2 to 4
times shorter and this saves a lot of time with large prints at f/8.
Exposures are about 5 to 10 minutes when usually it was 20 to 40 minutes
with tri-X ! I can tell that my arms fell the difference...

The only problem with Tech pan is its price (about 10 EUR at local stores
here). Not the kind of film you will want to use with the motor drive set at
5fps. Hopefully development with Rodinal is very cheap. And since I use to
load/unload tech pan in complete darkness I use to develop only the part of
the film I just exposed and put the remaining film back on the camera for
later use.

I'am used to tri-X in Rodinal and can tell that if you like grain 8x10 and
10x12 still look nice enlarged. I only choose tech pan when I need absolute
sharpness. I don't use much other films than those two.

Oh and since I'am back from my New Year's Eve trip I wish you all a very
happy new year, and the best photographic opportunities you can get.

Cheers,

Thibault Grouas.




Re: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-03 Thread Timothy Sherburne

Thanks, Thibault, for posting those notes. I'll have to try that combo
shortly.

t

On 1/3/03 11:20 AM, Thibault GROUAS wrote:

 Which is your favorite for large (8x10  up) prints,
 in 35mm format?
 
 For large enlargements (10x12 and larger) I use Kodak Technical Pan which I
 rate at ISO 20. Here are my recipes with Rodinal :
 
 - Rodinal 1+100 6' 20° for high contrast but still continuous tone
 (reproduction, abstracts).
 
 - Rodinal 1+120 6' 20° for places - normal contrast.
 
 - Rodinal 1+135 6' 20° for people - softer contrast.
 
 Agitation for the first 10 seconds than 5 seconds every minute.
 
 I use distilled water (plain water gives me black spots on the negs) and mix
 the developper with a 10ml and 1ml syringes (a must have with such high
 dilutions).
 
 This gives nice razor sharp negs, far sharper than those I got with Pan F+ /
 Tmax 100. My dilutions and times provide negs that print best at grade 2.
 
 The other really nice thing about tech pan is that negatives a far thinner
 and transparent than with other films. Enlarging exposures are about 2 to 4
 times shorter and this saves a lot of time with large prints at f/8.
 Exposures are about 5 to 10 minutes when usually it was 20 to 40 minutes
 with tri-X ! I can tell that my arms fell the difference...
 
 The only problem with Tech pan is its price (about 10 EUR at local stores
 here). Not the kind of film you will want to use with the motor drive set at
 5fps. Hopefully development with Rodinal is very cheap. And since I use to
 load/unload tech pan in complete darkness I use to develop only the part of
 the film I just exposed and put the remaining film back on the camera for
 later use.
 
 I'am used to tri-X in Rodinal and can tell that if you like grain 8x10 and
 10x12 still look nice enlarged. I only choose tech pan when I need absolute
 sharpness. I don't use much other films than those two.
 
 Oh and since I'am back from my New Year's Eve trip I wish you all a very
 happy new year, and the best photographic opportunities you can get.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Thibault Grouas.
 




Re: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-02 Thread Mat Maessen
For people: Plus-X
For places: TMax 100

-Mat

 Steve Pearson wrote:
 
 
  Which is your favorite for large (8x10  up) prints,
  in 35mm format?




Re: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-01 Thread Mark Roberts
Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Which is your favorite for large (8x10  up) prints,
in 35mm format?

Mine is Ilford Pan-F+, developed in Microdol-X and printed on Ilford paper.
It's a pain to work with because it's slow and the grain isn't as fine as
some faster films like Dela 100, but I *love* the tonal range.

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




Re: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-01 Thread Paul Stenquist


Steve Pearson wrote:

 
 Which is your favorite for large (8x10  up) prints,
 in 35mm format?

Kodak Plus-X
Paul Stenquist




Re: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-01 Thread Mark D.
--- Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have recently tried Ilfor FP4 (ISO 125).  I liked
 the grain at 5x7, but at 8x10, I did not.  I'm
 giving
 some thought to:

I'm partial to Delta 100. It develops very well in
ID-11. I've also developed it in PMK Pyro and the
results were fantastic.

Mark

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com




RE: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-01 Thread J. C. O'Connell
Kodak TMAX 100, damn sharp!
JCO




RE: Sharp BW Film

2003-01-01 Thread tom
Delta 100 or Acros in XTOL.

tv