Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status

2013-06-19 Thread Alan McGinlay
I haven't posted much to the list so far but have tried to help out 
once or twice when I know the answer to a question, and have had 
questions of my own.. all of which have been answered. I also started a 
Puppet module a while back which I am using in production, it has more 
added to it than the one I announced before and needs a  bit of polish, 
I will try and get it in a nice enough state to show.


Overall, Pound *rocks* it's one of a few peices of Free Software which 
truly shine, it does exactly what it's supposed to do and it does it 
exceptionally well.


+1 for github

On tis 18 jun 2013 17:35:00, Joe Gooch wrote:

Seems like I didn't have to chime in. :)

Robert Segall is the maintainer... I haven't heard from him in awhile; I know 
his life is very busy.  He has put out v2.7b which is the next beta branch.

I maintain a github project with the source code at 
http://github.com/goochjj/pound/  Branches of note would be what Andreas posted 
from the prior thread, reposted here:

My suggestion to anyone who needs PCI-DSS compliance is to run my branch here:
https://github.com/goochjj/pound/tree/stage_for_upstream/v2.7b

Zip here: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/stage_for_upstream/v2.7b.zip

This is based on 2.7b, and includes a bunch of patches that I usually include
in pound, to do things like SNI, CertDir includes, IncludeDir, PCRE redirects,
etc.


If you don't feel comfortable running a 2.7 branch, or don't want to include
those patches, I've rolled a new branch:
https://github.com/goochjj/pound/tree/pcidss/v2.6
Zip here: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/pcidss/v2.6.zip

Which includes only the XSRF, SSLv2, SSL compression and cipher enhancements
against a 2.6 baseline.




My overall goal for Pound is I feel it's a great product that does exactly what 
it's designed to do, no less, no more.  It's stable and I use it in multiple 
production environments for load balancing and SSL termination.  Any features 
it hasn't been able to do, I've added over the years.

It's also a product I'd like to see in continued use, and so I like to help out 
where I can, adding features, applying patches, keeping things secure (i.e. SSL 
fixes and such).  That's why I maintain my branches... Because I see the merit 
and I want to be sure people using pound are covered.

I'd love to see Pound gain more community support... perhaps moving to github 
as a primary distro, getting 2.7 polished and out the door and a bunch of 
things... Right now Robert's the only one we can make those sorts of 
decisions... and there are some bits that aren't available in releases that 
would need to be checked in. (things like the autoconf script source)   I am by 
no means the only contributor and it'd be great to wrap more people around the 
project.

As far as support, there are many people on this list who are active with 
config/production questions as well as code level support, so this project is 
very much alive. :)


Joe





-Original Message-
From: Andreas Hilboll [mailto:li...@hilboll.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:09 AM
To: pound@apsis.ch
Cc: Scott McKeown
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status

Hi,

Joe stated the links to updated  2.6 and 2.7 branches in this thread:


http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2013/2013-
04/136765000/index_html

Cheers, Andreas.


On 18.06.2013 14:55, Scott McKeown wrote:

Hi Peter,

Welcome to Pound.

I'm sure that Joe will jump in at some stage with more details but we
use Pound ourselves and you can find that the community is quite
active and supportive.

Patches and fixes are normally found being posted to this list which
if you know some basic Unix commands and you don't mind building

Pound

from source yourself you can have quite an efficient and productive
SSL Terminator at your disposal.

If memory serves me correctly Joe does keep a fork somewhere but I
don't know where it is.

However, once again welcome to the group.


~Scott



On 18 June 2013 13:45, Peter Shaw unthough...@googlemail.com
mailto:unthough...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi pound users and developers.
 I just want to know if there is a acive development on the pound
 project. Or is the last Date in 2.6 (2010) the last and final

commit?

 is this grub active? and may i get help if i ran my production

farm

 with pound.

 Thanx al lot,
 ps
 --
 To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
 pound@apsis.ch mailto:pound@apsis.ch.
 Please contact ro...@apsis.ch mailto:ro...@apsis.ch for

questions.





--
With Kind Regards.

Scott McKeown
Loadbalancer.org
http://www.loadbalancer.org



--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.


--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.


--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch

[Pound Mailing List] Current development status

2013-06-18 Thread Peter Shaw
Hi pound users and developers. 
I just want to know if there is a acive development on the pound project. Or is 
the last Date in 2.6 (2010) the last and final commit? 
is this grub active? and may i get help if i ran my production farm with pound. 

Thanx al lot, 
ps
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.


Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status

2013-06-18 Thread Scott McKeown
Hi Peter,

Welcome to Pound.

I'm sure that Joe will jump in at some stage with more details but we use
Pound ourselves and you can find that the community is quite active and
supportive.

Patches and fixes are normally found being posted to this list which if you
know some basic Unix commands and you don't mind building Pound from source
yourself you can have quite an efficient and productive SSL Terminator at
your disposal.

If memory serves me correctly Joe does keep a fork somewhere but I don't
know where it is.

However, once again welcome to the group.


~Scott



On 18 June 2013 13:45, Peter Shaw unthough...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi pound users and developers.
 I just want to know if there is a acive development on the pound project.
 Or is the last Date in 2.6 (2010) the last and final commit?
 is this grub active? and may i get help if i ran my production farm with
 pound.

 Thanx al lot,
 ps
 --
 To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
 Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.




-- 
With Kind Regards.

Scott McKeown
Loadbalancer.org
http://www.loadbalancer.org


Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status

2013-06-18 Thread Andreas Hilboll
Hi,

Joe stated the links to updated  2.6 and 2.7 branches in this thread:


http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2013/2013-04/136765000/index_html

Cheers, Andreas.


On 18.06.2013 14:55, Scott McKeown wrote:
 Hi Peter,
 
 Welcome to Pound.
 
 I'm sure that Joe will jump in at some stage with more details but we
 use Pound ourselves and you can find that the community is quite active
 and supportive.
 
 Patches and fixes are normally found being posted to this list which if
 you know some basic Unix commands and you don't mind building Pound from
 source yourself you can have quite an efficient and productive SSL
 Terminator at your disposal.
 
 If memory serves me correctly Joe does keep a fork somewhere but I don't
 know where it is.
 
 However, once again welcome to the group.
 
 
 ~Scott
 
 
 
 On 18 June 2013 13:45, Peter Shaw unthough...@googlemail.com
 mailto:unthough...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 Hi pound users and developers.
 I just want to know if there is a acive development on the pound
 project. Or is the last Date in 2.6 (2010) the last and final commit?
 is this grub active? and may i get help if i ran my production farm
 with pound.
 
 Thanx al lot,
 ps
 --
 To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
 pound@apsis.ch mailto:pound@apsis.ch.
 Please contact ro...@apsis.ch mailto:ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 With Kind Regards.
 
 Scott McKeown
 Loadbalancer.org
 http://www.loadbalancer.org


--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.


Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status

2013-06-18 Thread Scott McKeown
Thanks Andreas now bookmarked.

Don't know how I didn't see that before.


~Scott



On 18 June 2013 14:08, Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de wrote:

 Hi,

 Joe stated the links to updated  2.6 and 2.7 branches in this thread:



 http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2013/2013-04/136765000/index_html

 Cheers, Andreas.


 On 18.06.2013 14:55, Scott McKeown wrote:
  Hi Peter,
 
  Welcome to Pound.
 
  I'm sure that Joe will jump in at some stage with more details but we
  use Pound ourselves and you can find that the community is quite active
  and supportive.
 
  Patches and fixes are normally found being posted to this list which if
  you know some basic Unix commands and you don't mind building Pound from
  source yourself you can have quite an efficient and productive SSL
  Terminator at your disposal.
 
  If memory serves me correctly Joe does keep a fork somewhere but I don't
  know where it is.
 
  However, once again welcome to the group.
 
 
  ~Scott
 
 
 
  On 18 June 2013 13:45, Peter Shaw unthough...@googlemail.com
  mailto:unthough...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  Hi pound users and developers.
  I just want to know if there is a acive development on the pound
  project. Or is the last Date in 2.6 (2010) the last and final commit?
  is this grub active? and may i get help if i ran my production farm
  with pound.
 
  Thanx al lot,
  ps
  --
  To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
  pound@apsis.ch mailto:pound@apsis.ch.
  Please contact ro...@apsis.ch mailto:ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
 
 
 
 
  --
  With Kind Regards.
 
  Scott McKeown
  Loadbalancer.org
  http://www.loadbalancer.org


 --
 To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
 Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.




-- 
With Kind Regards.

Scott McKeown
Loadbalancer.org
http://www.loadbalancer.org