Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Gordon Kent]

Hey Slau:
Well, I certainly can relate to your situation.  I really haven't been nearly 
as active with Cakewalk as I used to be.  Fortunately, we have a choice of 
several options now.  THough none of them are perfect, they all have their good 
points.  I find myself switching between different daw software and screen 
readers/operating systems depending on the situation.  I hope that avid will 
not forget us.  They really haven't done much more with Sibelius since that 
initial effort on the part of one of their former developers.  And with the new 
plug-in format of pro tools, we're losing something.  I will say that my friend 
up in Jersey who I do a lot of tracking for  hates pt 11, and he's sighted.  I 
just wish I'd never gone to Mountain lion  with the loss of numeric output in 
so many places.  
So thanks so much for what you've done, we wouldn't have it at all if it 
weren't for what you've done.  BTW, I have outspoken working quite well now on 
my g3 with the synclavier software, though there doesn't seem to be a way to 
have it automatically read highlighted text.  I always have to hit option find 
to see where I'm at, but that's not too bad.  
GOrd
On Sep 19, 2013, at 10:07 AM, David  Eagle  wrote:

> Thanks for all your endeavours Slau. Your dedication to the cause really 
> means a lot. Thanks for everything. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 19 Sep 2013, at 12:59, Kevin Shaw  wrote:
>> 
>> Slau,
>> 
>> YOur contribution to ProTools accessibility will go down in history. As far 
>> as I'm concerned, you and Rick are the Armstrong and Aldrin of ProTools 
>> accessibility. YOu've brought accessibility out of the shadows and into the 
>> spotlight and your efforts will change the lives of many, from the 
>> enthusiast to the professional.
>> 
>> If the NARAS could give out a Grammy for technical and social achievements, 
>> you, rick, Kevin and all of the other folks who have worked tirelessly to 
>> put ProTools accessibility on he map should share one of those trophies for 
>> sure.
>> 
>> As our friend Neil Young says, keep on rocking int he free world and thanks 
>> for everything.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Kevin shaw
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

[Mike Lockett]

Hey Scott,
Avid found some issues with the way they displayed certain items and it
Affects the way it reports them to the OS.

They are working with Apple to rectify this as we speak.

This release will be available in a few months according to them.
Here’s to looking up!!!


On 9/19/13, Scott Chesworth  wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
> Interesting. I was under the impression that the big bug with Pro
> Tools in ML was Apples to tackle, rather than Avid. Have I got that
> wrong? Of course, that's not to detract from all the other stuff Avid
> would need to tidy up to make PT 11 workable, but just wanted to be
> sure I was up to date on how the land lies.
>
> Scott
>
> On 9/19/13, Mike Lockett  wrote:
>> Hey Ramy as I said Avid is as we speak resolving the accessibility
>> issues in pro tools.
>> Lets not delude ourselves there are many DAWS used in many studios
>> But from my experience working in rooms outside of mine
>> And receiving sessions for clients, Pro Tools owns the greater share
>> of the software recording market.
>> If your desire is to work using Pro Tools just exercise a bit more
>> patience.
>>
>>
>> On 9/18/13, Poppa Bear  wrote:
>>> Ramy, I felt the same way that you do, like you need to have PT to be
>>> considered a viable studio, but I am coming to the terms that that is
>>> not
>>> always the case. I find that maybe 2% of clients, if even that many,
>>> even
>>> ask what softwhere is being used. They mainly just want a clean
>>> recording
>>> that is professional quality. Also, consider this, if you are not
>>> familiar
>>> with VoiceOver and Protools, then you have at least a six month to a
>>> year
>>> learning curve to offer really compatent studio services with the Mac
>>> IMO.
>>> I
>>>
>>> would try to get the money back in my hand if possible, look for an
>>> older
>>> I7
>>>
>>> mac mini if it looks to be worth it or a Imac that is no older than 2011
>>> if
>>>
>>> you can't resolve this issue. Also, what are some of your recording
>>> goals,
>>> do you see yourself using alot of soft sinths to creat music
>>> productions,
>>> do
>>>
>>> you see yourself doing alot of mixing with heavy track counts between 48
>>> and
>>>
>>> 98 tracks? Remember, we can be our worst enamy when it comes to
>>> assessing
>>> the tools that we really need. We often think if we just have that one
>>> new
>>> thing we will be able to change the whole game, but this is seldom the
>>> case.
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Ramy Moustafa" 
>>> To: 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:36 PM
>>> Subject: RE: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?
>>>
>>>
 Ok, but they will not fix my issue.
 So what?


 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Nick Gawronski
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:22 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

 Hi, I would call Apple on the phone and be infront of the system if it
 is possible as the more people like me that do call them and demo the
 issue the more results we should get.  I knew this issue was going to
 happen with the newer systems as I have other sited friends who can't
 go
 back to Lion as the hardware is not supported.  I am not saying we are
 not making progress but I think we all should do more on this issue
 such
 as calling people like Apple on the phone and refreshing their minds on
 these issues as if enough of us call and explain the issues they will
 get resolved.  I would also mention like I did that as Apple supports
 education so much and as pro tools is used for audio engineering
 students like me this is something they should really work on.  Nick
 Gawronski
 On 9/18/2013 9:37 AM, ramy moustafa wrote:
> aha thanks so much for your replys. but, even the latest updates to ml
 didn't fix the issue?
> i'm really in trouble and don't know what to do.
> anyway, if you can think with me for a solution please tell me.
> thanks so much
>
> Ramy moustafa saber
> licturer at:
> faculty of musical education
> music arranger and sound engineer
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Scott Chesworth
> 
 wrote:
>
>> They're probably struggling because his Mac Mini was manufactured
>> recently, and some of the new hardware won't be supported by Lion.
>> Had
>> the same problem here. I got around it by buying a used machine that
>> was built when Lion was the latest OS and doing some hardware
>> upgrades
>> to bring it up to a spec that runs well with big sessions.
>>
>> Dunno what to advise beyond doing the same thing I did really. Even
>> then, I only made that move because there was work that relies on me
>> being in PT guaranteed. Without that, I can't say I would've bothered
>> until the futu

Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

[Scott Chesworth]

Ooh, good to know. Something to look forward to then.

Scott

On 9/19/13, Mike Lockett  wrote:
> Hey Scott,
> Avid found some issues with the way they displayed certain items and it
> Affects the way it reports them to the OS.
>
> They are working with Apple to rectify this as we speak.
>
> This release will be available in a few months according to them.
> Here’s to looking up!!!
>
>
> On 9/19/13, Scott Chesworth  wrote:
>> Hey Mike,
>>
>> Interesting. I was under the impression that the big bug with Pro
>> Tools in ML was Apples to tackle, rather than Avid. Have I got that
>> wrong? Of course, that's not to detract from all the other stuff Avid
>> would need to tidy up to make PT 11 workable, but just wanted to be
>> sure I was up to date on how the land lies.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On 9/19/13, Mike Lockett  wrote:
>>> Hey Ramy as I said Avid is as we speak resolving the accessibility
>>> issues in pro tools.
>>> Lets not delude ourselves there are many DAWS used in many studios
>>> But from my experience working in rooms outside of mine
>>> And receiving sessions for clients, Pro Tools owns the greater share
>>> of the software recording market.
>>> If your desire is to work using Pro Tools just exercise a bit more
>>> patience.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/18/13, Poppa Bear  wrote:
 Ramy, I felt the same way that you do, like you need to have PT to be
 considered a viable studio, but I am coming to the terms that that is
 not
 always the case. I find that maybe 2% of clients, if even that many,
 even
 ask what softwhere is being used. They mainly just want a clean
 recording
 that is professional quality. Also, consider this, if you are not
 familiar
 with VoiceOver and Protools, then you have at least a six month to a
 year
 learning curve to offer really compatent studio services with the Mac
 IMO.
 I

 would try to get the money back in my hand if possible, look for an
 older
 I7

 mac mini if it looks to be worth it or a Imac that is no older than
 2011
 if

 you can't resolve this issue. Also, what are some of your recording
 goals,
 do you see yourself using alot of soft sinths to creat music
 productions,
 do

 you see yourself doing alot of mixing with heavy track counts between
 48
 and

 98 tracks? Remember, we can be our worst enamy when it comes to
 assessing
 the tools that we really need. We often think if we just have that one
 new
 thing we will be able to change the whole game, but this is seldom the
 case.
 - Original Message -
 From: "Ramy Moustafa" 
 To: 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:36 PM
 Subject: RE: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?


> Ok, but they will not fix my issue.
> So what?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf
> Of Nick Gawronski
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:22 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?
>
> Hi, I would call Apple on the phone and be infront of the system if it
> is possible as the more people like me that do call them and demo the
> issue the more results we should get.  I knew this issue was going to
> happen with the newer systems as I have other sited friends who can't
> go
> back to Lion as the hardware is not supported.  I am not saying we are
> not making progress but I think we all should do more on this issue
> such
> as calling people like Apple on the phone and refreshing their minds
> on
> these issues as if enough of us call and explain the issues they will
> get resolved.  I would also mention like I did that as Apple supports
> education so much and as pro tools is used for audio engineering
> students like me this is something they should really work on.  Nick
> Gawronski
> On 9/18/2013 9:37 AM, ramy moustafa wrote:
>> aha thanks so much for your replys. but, even the latest updates to
>> ml
> didn't fix the issue?
>> i'm really in trouble and don't know what to do.
>> anyway, if you can think with me for a solution please tell me.
>> thanks so much
>>
>> Ramy moustafa saber
>> licturer at:
>> faculty of musical education
>> music arranger and sound engineer
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Scott Chesworth
>> 
> wrote:
>>
>>> They're probably struggling because his Mac Mini was manufactured
>>> recently, and some of the new hardware won't be supported by Lion.
>>> Had
>>> the same problem here. I got around it by buying a used machine that
>>> was built when Lion was the latest OS and doing some hardware
>>> upgrades
>>> to bring it up to a spec that runs well with big sessions.

RE: Anyone using the tascam us 2400 Surfase?

[Jed Barton]

Curious to hear about this myself.

 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Poppa Bear
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:48 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Anyone using the tascam us 2400 Surfase?

 

Anyone using this surface and if so, how is the build, accessibility and
latency? I am looking to up grade from my 002, but am a little skeptical of
a USB interface. I have thought about an RME set up and run my Mackie onyx
into it, but I don't want to lose my transport functions. Any thoughts?

Nate Kile, Cross Road Recording Studios, specializing in Mixing, Mastering
and all your audio needs. www.crossroadrecording.com
 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Anyone using the tascam us 2400 Surfase?

[Poppa Bear]

Anyone using this surface and if so, how is the build, accessibility and 
latency? I am looking to up grade from my 002, but am a little skeptical of a 
USB interface. I have thought about an RME set up and run my Mackie onyx into 
it, but I don't want to lose my transport functions. Any thoughts?

Nate Kile, Cross Road Recording Studios, specializing in Mixing, Mastering and 
all your audio needs. www.crossroadrecording.com

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[David Eagle]

Thanks for all your endeavours Slau. Your dedication to the cause really means 
a lot. Thanks for everything. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 19 Sep 2013, at 12:59, Kevin Shaw  wrote:
> 
> Slau,
> 
> YOur contribution to ProTools accessibility will go down in history. As far 
> as I'm concerned, you and Rick are the Armstrong and Aldrin of ProTools 
> accessibility. YOu've brought accessibility out of the shadows and into the 
> spotlight and your efforts will change the lives of many, from the enthusiast 
> to the professional.
> 
> If the NARAS could give out a Grammy for technical and social achievements, 
> you, rick, Kevin and all of the other folks who have worked tirelessly to put 
> ProTools accessibility on he map should share one of those trophies for sure.
> 
> As our friend Neil Young says, keep on rocking int he free world and thanks 
> for everything.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kevin shaw
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

[Scott Chesworth]

Hey Mike,

Interesting. I was under the impression that the big bug with Pro
Tools in ML was Apples to tackle, rather than Avid. Have I got that
wrong? Of course, that's not to detract from all the other stuff Avid
would need to tidy up to make PT 11 workable, but just wanted to be
sure I was up to date on how the land lies.

Scott

On 9/19/13, Mike Lockett  wrote:
> Hey Ramy as I said Avid is as we speak resolving the accessibility
> issues in pro tools.
> Lets not delude ourselves there are many DAWS used in many studios
> But from my experience working in rooms outside of mine
> And receiving sessions for clients, Pro Tools owns the greater share
> of the software recording market.
> If your desire is to work using Pro Tools just exercise a bit more
> patience.
>
>
> On 9/18/13, Poppa Bear  wrote:
>> Ramy, I felt the same way that you do, like you need to have PT to be
>> considered a viable studio, but I am coming to the terms that that is not
>> always the case. I find that maybe 2% of clients, if even that many, even
>> ask what softwhere is being used. They mainly just want a clean recording
>> that is professional quality. Also, consider this, if you are not
>> familiar
>> with VoiceOver and Protools, then you have at least a six month to a year
>> learning curve to offer really compatent studio services with the Mac IMO.
>> I
>>
>> would try to get the money back in my hand if possible, look for an older
>> I7
>>
>> mac mini if it looks to be worth it or a Imac that is no older than 2011
>> if
>>
>> you can't resolve this issue. Also, what are some of your recording
>> goals,
>> do you see yourself using alot of soft sinths to creat music productions,
>> do
>>
>> you see yourself doing alot of mixing with heavy track counts between 48
>> and
>>
>> 98 tracks? Remember, we can be our worst enamy when it comes to assessing
>> the tools that we really need. We often think if we just have that one
>> new
>> thing we will be able to change the whole game, but this is seldom the
>> case.
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ramy Moustafa" 
>> To: 
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:36 PM
>> Subject: RE: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?
>>
>>
>>> Ok, but they will not fix my issue.
>>> So what?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>>> Behalf
>>> Of Nick Gawronski
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:22 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?
>>>
>>> Hi, I would call Apple on the phone and be infront of the system if it
>>> is possible as the more people like me that do call them and demo the
>>> issue the more results we should get.  I knew this issue was going to
>>> happen with the newer systems as I have other sited friends who can't go
>>> back to Lion as the hardware is not supported.  I am not saying we are
>>> not making progress but I think we all should do more on this issue such
>>> as calling people like Apple on the phone and refreshing their minds on
>>> these issues as if enough of us call and explain the issues they will
>>> get resolved.  I would also mention like I did that as Apple supports
>>> education so much and as pro tools is used for audio engineering
>>> students like me this is something they should really work on.  Nick
>>> Gawronski
>>> On 9/18/2013 9:37 AM, ramy moustafa wrote:
 aha thanks so much for your replys. but, even the latest updates to ml
>>> didn't fix the issue?
 i'm really in trouble and don't know what to do.
 anyway, if you can think with me for a solution please tell me.
 thanks so much

 Ramy moustafa saber
 licturer at:
 faculty of musical education
 music arranger and sound engineer
 Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Scott Chesworth 
>>> wrote:

> They're probably struggling because his Mac Mini was manufactured
> recently, and some of the new hardware won't be supported by Lion. Had
> the same problem here. I got around it by buying a used machine that
> was built when Lion was the latest OS and doing some hardware upgrades
> to bring it up to a spec that runs well with big sessions.
>
> Dunno what to advise beyond doing the same thing I did really. Even
> then, I only made that move because there was work that relies on me
> being in PT guaranteed. Without that, I can't say I would've bothered
> until the future is a bit more certain.
>
> Scott
>
> On 9/18/13, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> Edit fields won't read at all. FOr example where you go to enter in
>>> tempo or
>> to see what thempo the project is in. What the counters are set to
>> etc
>>> etc.
>> I am not sure why your apple store is doing there, but it
>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Ramy Moustafa
>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all:
>>>
>>>
>>> After a week with my apple store h

Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

[Mike Lockett]

Hey Ramy as I said Avid is as we speak resolving the accessibility
issues in pro tools.
Lets not delude ourselves there are many DAWS used in many studios
But from my experience working in rooms outside of mine
And receiving sessions for clients, Pro Tools owns the greater share
of the software recording market.
If your desire is to work using Pro Tools just exercise a bit more patience.


On 9/18/13, Poppa Bear  wrote:
> Ramy, I felt the same way that you do, like you need to have PT to be
> considered a viable studio, but I am coming to the terms that that is not
> always the case. I find that maybe 2% of clients, if even that many, even
> ask what softwhere is being used. They mainly just want a clean recording
> that is professional quality. Also, consider this, if you are not familiar
> with VoiceOver and Protools, then you have at least a six month to a year
> learning curve to offer really compatent studio services with the Mac IMO. I
>
> would try to get the money back in my hand if possible, look for an older I7
>
> mac mini if it looks to be worth it or a Imac that is no older than 2011 if
>
> you can't resolve this issue. Also, what are some of your recording goals,
> do you see yourself using alot of soft sinths to creat music productions, do
>
> you see yourself doing alot of mixing with heavy track counts between 48 and
>
> 98 tracks? Remember, we can be our worst enamy when it comes to assessing
> the tools that we really need. We often think if we just have that one new
> thing we will be able to change the whole game, but this is seldom the
> case.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ramy Moustafa" 
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:36 PM
> Subject: RE: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?
>
>
>> Ok, but they will not fix my issue.
>> So what?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>> Behalf
>> Of Nick Gawronski
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:22 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?
>>
>> Hi, I would call Apple on the phone and be infront of the system if it
>> is possible as the more people like me that do call them and demo the
>> issue the more results we should get.  I knew this issue was going to
>> happen with the newer systems as I have other sited friends who can't go
>> back to Lion as the hardware is not supported.  I am not saying we are
>> not making progress but I think we all should do more on this issue such
>> as calling people like Apple on the phone and refreshing their minds on
>> these issues as if enough of us call and explain the issues they will
>> get resolved.  I would also mention like I did that as Apple supports
>> education so much and as pro tools is used for audio engineering
>> students like me this is something they should really work on.  Nick
>> Gawronski
>> On 9/18/2013 9:37 AM, ramy moustafa wrote:
>>> aha thanks so much for your replys. but, even the latest updates to ml
>> didn't fix the issue?
>>> i'm really in trouble and don't know what to do.
>>> anyway, if you can think with me for a solution please tell me.
>>> thanks so much
>>>
>>> Ramy moustafa saber
>>> licturer at:
>>> faculty of musical education
>>> music arranger and sound engineer
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Scott Chesworth 
>> wrote:
>>>
 They're probably struggling because his Mac Mini was manufactured
 recently, and some of the new hardware won't be supported by Lion. Had
 the same problem here. I got around it by buying a used machine that
 was built when Lion was the latest OS and doing some hardware upgrades
 to bring it up to a spec that runs well with big sessions.

 Dunno what to advise beyond doing the same thing I did really. Even
 then, I only made that move because there was work that relies on me
 being in PT guaranteed. Without that, I can't say I would've bothered
 until the future is a bit more certain.

 Scott

 On 9/18/13, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
> Edit fields won't read at all. FOr example where you go to enter in
>> tempo or
> to see what thempo the project is in. What the counters are set to etc
>> etc.
> I am not sure why your apple store is doing there, but it
> On Sep 18, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Ramy Moustafa
> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all:
>>
>>
>> After a week with my apple store here, and after they do all things
>> really
>> to install Lion on my Mac mini, they failed, in doing this,
>>
>> So, my mac mini is with mountain lion, so, what is your advice?
>>
>> What are the problems that  I will face when using pro tools  with
>> voice
>> over?
>>
>> I have pro tools  9, but of cores it will not work, so, I must get
>> 10,
>>
>> But need to know the disadvantages, of Mountain lion.
>>
>> And, please, what about protocols v11, is it goo

Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Kevin Shaw]

Slau,

YOur contribution to ProTools accessibility will go down in history. As far as 
I'm concerned, you and Rick are the Armstrong and Aldrin of ProTools 
accessibility. YOu've brought accessibility out of the shadows and into the 
spotlight and your efforts will change the lives of many, from the enthusiast 
to the professional.

If the NARAS could give out a Grammy for technical and social achievements, 
you, rick, Kevin and all of the other folks who have worked tirelessly to put 
ProTools accessibility on he map should share one of those trophies for sure.

As our friend Neil Young says, keep on rocking int he free world and thanks for 
everything.

Cheers,
Kevin shaw

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Chris Norman]

Well, thanks for all you've done mate, and glad you're sticking about!

On 19/09/2013 01:39, Slau Halatyn wrote:

Folks,

For various reasons, I'm going to limit my future involvement regarding the 
work of accessibility in Pro Tools. It's been a long ride and I've been 
thinking about this for some time. I've managed to develop important 
relationships with the folks at Avid and I'm pleased that we managed to get the 
issue of accessibility onto a level of IL support just like other international 
languages. It was a pivotal moment.

I feel I've done all I can do for now. Avid continues to be committed to the 
end result of making Pro tools accessible and I have no doubt that the work 
will continue. I've approached Rick Boggs about taking the reigns, so to speak. 
The fact is, he's the one that started the whole ball rolling almost 20 years 
ago when Digidesign first helped make Pro Tools accessible with outSPOKEN. Rick 
is an excellent communicator and I think he'll be effective in continuing the 
relationship that we've worked to build over the years. I encourage you all to 
support him.

I'm obviously not disappearing. I'll still help whenever possible. I appreciate 
those who have supported me throughout the years.

I'm leaving town for a few days to attend a family wedding but I'll be back 
after the weekend. We'll be in touch.

Best,

slau



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

RE: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Jim Noseworthy]

Hey Slau:

You're a class act.

Thanks.



-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stefan Albertshauser
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:39 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

Hi Slau,

Thank you for the affords, You made. I have two questions:
1. How can we as community help Rick Boggs?
2. It's also interesting, how the current state of accessibility is. Are
there changes, that happened after your last mail, you wrote to the list?

Best wishes

Stefan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virus Database: 3222/6679 - Release Date: 09/19/13

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Stefan Albertshauser]

Hi Slau,

Thank you for the affords, You made. I have two questions:
1. How can we as community help Rick Boggs?
2. It's also interesting, how the current state of accessibility is. Are there 
changes, that happened after your last mail, you wrote to the list?

Best wishes

Stefan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Jean-Philippe Rykiel]

Slau,
Thank you so much for what you have done.
Best,
JPR

http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet

Le 19/09/2013 09:53, Scott Chesworth a écrit :

Surprised and sad to read this, but I guess everyone has to find a
balance between expending energy and seeing some return for it.
Actually, looking at it from that angle, I guess it's a pleasant
surprise that it took this long for the man to grind you down lol.

Thanks for everything man. Hopefully, we'll see the result of what you
set in motion before too long.

Scott

On 9/19/13, Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Folks,

For various reasons, I'm going to limit my future involvement regarding the
work of accessibility in Pro Tools. It's been a long ride and I've been
thinking about this for some time. I've managed to develop important
relationships with the folks at Avid and I'm pleased that we managed to get
the issue of accessibility onto a level of IL support just like other
international languages. It was a pivotal moment.

I feel I've done all I can do for now. Avid continues to be committed to the
end result of making Pro tools accessible and I have no doubt that the work
will continue. I've approached Rick Boggs about taking the reigns, so to
speak. The fact is, he's the one that started the whole ball rolling almost
20 years ago when Digidesign first helped make Pro Tools accessible with
outSPOKEN. Rick is an excellent communicator and I think he'll be effective
in continuing the relationship that we've worked to build over the years. I
encourage you all to support him.

I'm obviously not disappearing. I'll still help whenever possible. I
appreciate those who have supported me throughout the years.

I'm leaving town for a few days to attend a family wedding but I'll be back
after the weekend. We'll be in touch.

Best,

slau

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: stepping down my involvement with Pro Tools accessibility

[Scott Chesworth]

Surprised and sad to read this, but I guess everyone has to find a
balance between expending energy and seeing some return for it.
Actually, looking at it from that angle, I guess it's a pleasant
surprise that it took this long for the man to grind you down lol.

Thanks for everything man. Hopefully, we'll see the result of what you
set in motion before too long.

Scott

On 9/19/13, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> Folks,
>
> For various reasons, I'm going to limit my future involvement regarding the
> work of accessibility in Pro Tools. It's been a long ride and I've been
> thinking about this for some time. I've managed to develop important
> relationships with the folks at Avid and I'm pleased that we managed to get
> the issue of accessibility onto a level of IL support just like other
> international languages. It was a pivotal moment.
>
> I feel I've done all I can do for now. Avid continues to be committed to the
> end result of making Pro tools accessible and I have no doubt that the work
> will continue. I've approached Rick Boggs about taking the reigns, so to
> speak. The fact is, he's the one that started the whole ball rolling almost
> 20 years ago when Digidesign first helped make Pro Tools accessible with
> outSPOKEN. Rick is an excellent communicator and I think he'll be effective
> in continuing the relationship that we've worked to build over the years. I
> encourage you all to support him.
>
> I'm obviously not disappearing. I'll still help whenever possible. I
> appreciate those who have supported me throughout the years.
>
> I'm leaving town for a few days to attend a family wedding but I'll be back
> after the weekend. We'll be in touch.
>
> Best,
>
> slau
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.