Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
Anne I did register at Melange, following all the steps in that link that you sent. Maybe there is a bit of delay?? If it is not working, tell me and I will register again (if i can do it...) Regards El día 27 de marzo de 2012 10:12, Anne Ghisla escribió: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:45:38 +0200 > Victor Olaya wrote: > >> Paolo >> >> I have just registered as mentor and sent a small mesage to the GSoC >> OSGeo. If there is any other thing I can do, just tell me. > > Hi Victor, > > did you register on Melange? I don't see your request for mentoring > there, and it's a mandatory step for GSoC participation. See here for > instructions: > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012_Administrative#How_to_register_as_a_mentor > >> I am a bit busy this week, and stil wnat to work on SEXTANTE to >> release is ASAP, but the idea of participating in GSoC sounds great to >> me :)) > > Great! Welcome aboard, and enjoy GSoC :) > > Anne > -- > http://gis.cri.fmach.it/ghisla/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:45:38 +0200 Victor Olaya wrote: > Paolo > > I have just registered as mentor and sent a small mesage to the GSoC > OSGeo. If there is any other thing I can do, just tell me. Hi Victor, did you register on Melange? I don't see your request for mentoring there, and it's a mandatory step for GSoC participation. See here for instructions: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012_Administrative#How_to_register_as_a_mentor > I am a bit busy this week, and stil wnat to work on SEXTANTE to > release is ASAP, but the idea of participating in GSoC sounds great to > me :)) Great! Welcome aboard, and enjoy GSoC :) Anne -- http://gis.cri.fmach.it/ghisla/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
Paolo I have just registered as mentor and sent a small mesage to the GSoC OSGeo. If there is any other thing I can do, just tell me. I am a bit busy this week, and stil wnat to work on SEXTANTE to release is ASAP, but the idea of participating in GSoC sounds great to me :)) Regards ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
Il 27/03/2012 00:45, Martin Dobias ha scritto: I am not sure whether to keep the processing framework ideas given the recent news about sextante port to QGIS being in works... anyone has an opinion on that? Hi Martin. I think it is really important and urgent to analyze the issue, an take a decision. Could anybody inspect the code, and help us taking an informed decision? Of course, having com-mentored Camilo's work, I'm a bit partial in keeping on the good work on the Processing Framework, but sextante seems a more mature solution. On the other hand, analytical tools receive typically less attention (i.e. funding) than other tools of more general use, so it may be dangerous to try and keep both approaches, as we can run short of manpower. Camilo, would you be interested in applying for sextante, bringing your experience in? Victor, could you add quickly your proposal for sextante? Thanks to all. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Zirneklitis wrote: > Hi, > > The idea "All-in-one Projects" is not the best one. The main issues: > > 1. Licensing of the included maps. It is up to user how he/she will handle licensing. Please note that all-in-one projects would basically do the same thing what users already manually do (e.g. when providing data for bug reports), the only difference is that it would be automatic. > 2. Use of the web services. What particular issues do you see here? Layers from web services could be either just linked (not included) or when it is easy to download the data then they could be included. > 3. Huge data files. This is up to common sense of the users. Regards Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
RE: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Zirneklitis Sent: 27/03/2012 2:21 PM To: qgis-dev Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas Hi, The idea "All-in-one Projects" is not the best one. The main issues: 1. Licensing of the included maps. 2. Use of the web services. 3. Huge data files. Best regards, Karlis Martin Dobias wrote: > .. > since this year's GSoC has just opened for student applications, I > have taken the liberty to add some more ideas and reorganize our page > with ideas [1]. .. > .. > [1] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 >.. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC Ideas
Hi, The idea "All-in-one Projects" is not the best one. The main issues: 1. Licensing of the included maps. 2. Use of the web services. 3. Huge data files. Best regards, Karlis Martin Dobias wrote: .. since this year's GSoC has just opened for student applications, I have taken the liberty to add some more ideas and reorganize our page with ideas [1]. .. .. [1] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 .. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Il 21/02/2012 16:03, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I started > wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > Added my ideas. Feel free to add and improve. Thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: >> Hmm... If I remember correctly, when Processing Framework project >> was started we also have discussion which language to use Python or >> C++. And decision was to use Python... > > > I think the goal was to use Python to get the design fleshed out and > running, with the idea to port it to C++ in the future. That's right. Personally I find it much easier to prototype API in Python and then move it to C++. Like this it is possible save a lot of development time when designing and doing lots of modifications in API - typing, compiling, fixing compilation errors, synchronizing .h and .cpp files etc. Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
> > Hmm... If I remember correctly, when Processing Framework project > was started we also have discussion which language to use Python or > C++. And decision was to use Python... I think the goal was to use Python to get the design fleshed out and running, with the idea to port it to C++ in the future. - Nathan ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Hi, 2012/2/27 Martin Dobias : > fTools should probably experience some core/gui decoupling first - I > remember the individual tools contained a mixture of algorithm logic > and gui stuff handling (progress bar etc). After that, the tools > should ideally implement a common interface, to allow easy running of > the tools from API (instead of having to use slightly different calls > for each tool). As I can see some algorithms already ported to C++, see QgsGeometryAnalyzer class. But currently this implementation don't uses threads and memory layers. > For that we need a simple processing framework - > during last year's GSoC such framework has been developed as a side > effect - but it still lacks various important things such as: show job > progress, cancel running job or asynchronous job execution. Therefore > a summer project could involve adding missing functionality, porting > from python to c++ for inclusion in qgis_analysis library and possibly > adding few modules from fTools to demonstrate the capabilities. Hmm... If I remember correctly, when Processing Framework project was started we also have discussion which language to use Python or C++. And decision was to use Python... Anyway, I agree that porting fTools to analysis lib with or without processing framework will be great. -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Il 26/02/2012 23:20, Martin Dobias ha scritto: > a summer project could involve adding missing functionality, porting > from python to c++ for inclusion in qgis_analysis library and possibly > adding few modules from fTools to demonstrate the capabilities. +1; thanks Martin for your thoughts. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > I'm a +1 to Alisters ideas. I think it would be good to have a full suite > of tools for manipulating vector objects and layers. These tools should be > ports of fTools to C++ and live in the analysis lib so that they can be used > in C++, Python and UI (Carson and I have talked about this before). > > I think this project would be good as it is tightly scoped and would be easy > to mange in chunks. Merging would also be easy, even merging as the project > moves along as each tool is independent. Nathan, fTools should probably experience some core/gui decoupling first - I remember the individual tools contained a mixture of algorithm logic and gui stuff handling (progress bar etc). After that, the tools should ideally implement a common interface, to allow easy running of the tools from API (instead of having to use slightly different calls for each tool). For that we need a simple processing framework - during last year's GSoC such framework has been developed as a side effect - but it still lacks various important things such as: show job progress, cancel running job or asynchronous job execution. Therefore a summer project could involve adding missing functionality, porting from python to c++ for inclusion in qgis_analysis library and possibly adding few modules from fTools to demonstrate the capabilities. Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:40 PM, arunthe...@gmail.com wrote: > > I am currently doing my Masters in Remote Sensing, and GIS is a integral > part of my curriculum. So I have been working with Qgis for quite sometime > and even have got a few things done like the heatmaps plugin. I am going to > apply for QGIS this GSOC. Sure, you are welcome to apply for a summer project (given that OSGeo will be accepted and thus QGIS will participate under its umbrella). > It would be great if people could add the ideas to the page, anyways I am > looking at the previous years' projects also, but it seems that some things > have been worked out. Looking for a great mentor-ship and a fruitful summer. Keep an eye on the wiki page with ideas - I am sure that more ideas will be coming in following weeks. Of course you are free to come up with your own ideas for a project - at the end it is always better when you work on something you really care about, right? :) Regards Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Are there students around this year? I'd love to but I'm not allowed any more... ciao Marco On 02/24/2012 06:34 PM, Marco Hugentobler wrote: I fully agree. Porting the analysis code of fTools to the analysis lib would be a great gsoc project. Regards, Marco On 24.02.2012 08:55, Nathan Woodrow wrote: I'm a +1 to Alisters ideas. I think it would be good to have a full suite of tools for manipulating vector objects and layers. These tools should be ports of fTools to C++ and live in the analysis lib so that they can be used in C++, Python and UI (Carson and I have talked about this before). I think this project would be good as it is tightly scoped and would be easy to mange in chunks. Merging would also be easy, even merging as the project moves along as each tool is independent. Would should be careful not to start a GSoC project that is too large, has wide scope, vague goals, or is to hard to mange in a summer. - Nathan On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Alister Hood mailto:alister.h...@synergine.com>> wrote: Something that has been mentioned by a few people, and would probably be very popular, I described like this: "Vector editing/geoprocessing tools or whatever they are called, like the ones found in the Mapinfo 'Object' menu - i.e. similar to ftools, but taking sets of selected features as inputs, instead of whole layers." http://woostuff.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/the-things-i-would-like-to-see-in-qgis-what-are-yours/ http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2011-May/012041.html Later in that second thread someone also mentioned the following; I think other people have also made similar requests/suggestions: "I guess implementing topology rules and visualizing the existing errors would be a way to identify and correct problems like polygon overlapping. It might already exist some code." This second idea would probably require more research and thinking about exactly what to do. I think both these ideas are complementary, and could perhaps be done in a single project. But I guess they are also features that might be able to attract other sponsors - you might think it is better to use Google money to do something which is unlikely to get sponsorship otherwise. Regards, Alister Somebody started working on a plugin similar to this (early last year I think), but it didn't get very far. > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:31:02 +0100 > From: jr.morre...@enoreth.net <mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net> > Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas > To: mailto:qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>> > Message-ID: mailto:ee204f37fdb370744d28a4c105369...@enoreth.net>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:03:15 +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I > > started > > wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > > Hi, > > how about these projects : > > 1. Update and merge the multithread branch > > 2. QGIS, Valgrind & Co > > Both would get the student to put its hand in all the dark corners of > QGIS and both would produce a positive and visible impact. > > Regards, > Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Dr. Marco Hugentobler Sourcepole - Linux& Open Source Solutions Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Marco Bernasocchi www.opengis.ch ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
I fully agree. Porting the analysis code of fTools to the analysis lib would be a great gsoc project. Regards, Marco On 24.02.2012 08:55, Nathan Woodrow wrote: I'm a +1 to Alisters ideas. I think it would be good to have a full suite of tools for manipulating vector objects and layers. These tools should be ports of fTools to C++ and live in the analysis lib so that they can be used in C++, Python and UI (Carson and I have talked about this before). I think this project would be good as it is tightly scoped and would be easy to mange in chunks. Merging would also be easy, even merging as the project moves along as each tool is independent. Would should be careful not to start a GSoC project that is too large, has wide scope, vague goals, or is to hard to mange in a summer. - Nathan On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Alister Hood mailto:alister.h...@synergine.com>> wrote: Something that has been mentioned by a few people, and would probably be very popular, I described like this: "Vector editing/geoprocessing tools or whatever they are called, like the ones found in the Mapinfo 'Object' menu - i.e. similar to ftools, but taking sets of selected features as inputs, instead of whole layers." http://woostuff.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/the-things-i-would-like-to-see-in-qgis-what-are-yours/ http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2011-May/012041.html Later in that second thread someone also mentioned the following; I think other people have also made similar requests/suggestions: "I guess implementing topology rules and visualizing the existing errors would be a way to identify and correct problems like polygon overlapping. It might already exist some code." This second idea would probably require more research and thinking about exactly what to do. I think both these ideas are complementary, and could perhaps be done in a single project. But I guess they are also features that might be able to attract other sponsors - you might think it is better to use Google money to do something which is unlikely to get sponsorship otherwise. Regards, Alister Somebody started working on a plugin similar to this (early last year I think), but it didn't get very far. > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:31:02 +0100 > From: jr.morre...@enoreth.net <mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net> > Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas > To: mailto:qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>> > Message-ID: mailto:ee204f37fdb370744d28a4c105369...@enoreth.net>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:03:15 +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I > > started > > wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > > Hi, > > how about these projects : > > 1. Update and merge the multithread branch > > 2. QGIS, Valgrind & Co > > Both would get the student to put its hand in all the dark corners of > QGIS and both would produce a positive and visible impact. > > Regards, > Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Dr. Marco Hugentobler Sourcepole - Linux& Open Source Solutions Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
I'm a +1 to Alisters ideas. I think it would be good to have a full suite of tools for manipulating vector objects and layers. These tools should be ports of fTools to C++ and live in the analysis lib so that they can be used in C++, Python and UI (Carson and I have talked about this before). I think this project would be good as it is tightly scoped and would be easy to mange in chunks. Merging would also be easy, even merging as the project moves along as each tool is independent. Would should be careful not to start a GSoC project that is too large, has wide scope, vague goals, or is to hard to mange in a summer. - Nathan On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Alister Hood wrote: > Something that has been mentioned by a few people, and would probably be > very popular, I described like this: > > "Vector editing/geoprocessing tools or whatever they are called, like the > ones found in the Mapinfo 'Object' menu - i.e. similar to ftools, but > taking sets of selected features as inputs, instead of whole layers." > > http://woostuff.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/the-things-i-would-like-to-see-in-qgis-what-are-yours/ > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2011-May/012041.html > > Later in that second thread someone also mentioned the following; I think > other people have also made similar requests/suggestions: > > "I guess implementing topology rules and visualizing the existing errors > would be a way to identify and correct problems like polygon overlapping. > It might already exist some code." > > This second idea would probably require more research and thinking about > exactly what to do. > > I think both these ideas are complementary, and could perhaps be done in a > single project. But I guess they are also features that might be able to > attract other sponsors - you might think it is better to use Google money > to do something which is unlikely to get sponsorship otherwise. > > Regards, > Alister > > > Somebody started working on a plugin similar to this (early last year I > think), but it didn't get very far. > > > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:31:02 +0100 > > From: jr.morre...@enoreth.net > > Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas > > To: > > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:03:15 +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > > > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I > > > started > > > wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > > > > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > > > > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > > > > Hi, > > > > how about these projects : > > > > 1. Update and merge the multithread branch > > > > 2. QGIS, Valgrind & Co > > > > Both would get the student to put its hand in all the dark corners of > > QGIS and both would produce a positive and visible impact. > > > > Regards, > > Jean-Roc > ___ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Something that has been mentioned by a few people, and would probably be very popular, I described like this: "Vector editing/geoprocessing tools or whatever they are called, like the ones found in the Mapinfo 'Object' menu - i.e. similar to ftools, but taking sets of selected features as inputs, instead of whole layers." http://woostuff.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/the-things-i-would-like-to-see-in-qgis-what-are-yours/ http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2011-May/012041.html Later in that second thread someone also mentioned the following; I think other people have also made similar requests/suggestions: "I guess implementing topology rules and visualizing the existing errors would be a way to identify and correct problems like polygon overlapping. It might already exist some code." This second idea would probably require more research and thinking about exactly what to do. I think both these ideas are complementary, and could perhaps be done in a single project. But I guess they are also features that might be able to attract other sponsors - you might think it is better to use Google money to do something which is unlikely to get sponsorship otherwise. Regards, Alister Somebody started working on a plugin similar to this (early last year I think), but it didn't get very far. > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:31:02 +0100 > From: jr.morre...@enoreth.net > Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas > To: > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:03:15 +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I > > started > > wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > > Hi, > > how about these projects : > > 1. Update and merge the multithread branch > > 2. QGIS, Valgrind & Co > > Both would get the student to put its hand in all the dark corners of > QGIS and both would produce a positive and visible impact. > > Regards, > Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:03:15 +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote: Hi all, Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I started wiki page for collecting ideas [0] Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 Hi, how about these projects : 1. Update and merge the multithread branch 2. QGIS, Valgrind & Co Both would get the student to put its hand in all the dark corners of QGIS and both would produce a positive and visible impact. Regards, Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Hello, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Alexander Bruy wrote: > Hi all, > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I started > wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > Its great that GSOC discussion is happening. I wanted to write to the list, but was away for a work. I am currently doing my Masters in Remote Sensing, and GIS is a integral part of my curriculum. So I have been working with Qgis for quite sometime and even have got a few things done like the heatmaps plugin. I am going to apply for QGIS this GSOC. It would be great if people could add the ideas to the page, anyways I am looking at the previous years' projects also, but it seems that some things have been worked out. Looking for a great mentor-ship and a fruitful summer. -- Regards Arunmozhi Twitter: @tecoholic Website: http://arunmozhi.in IRC Nick: teco ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > Thanks Alex. One first thing we have to decide is whether to participate > within the OSGeo framework. This seems a natural choice, but there are > possible shortcomings: > - it is possible that we'll have more chances (an higher number of accepted > projects) running alone, due to Google priorities I think that QGIS would not be accepted alone (it already got rejected few years ago). Also participating with OSGeo offloads some program administration work. > - less motivation by mentors (they do not receive any financial incentive, > that goes to OSGeo instead). I hope that is something that can still be discussed within OSGeo. I would be much happier if destination of most of the money would go to participating project - e.g. 20% for OSGeo and the rest for QGIS sounds like a sensible choice. Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:30:23 +0100 Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 21/02/2012 16:03, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as > > I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I > > started wiki page for collecting ideas [0] > > > > Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too > > > > [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 > Thanks Alex. One first thing we have to decide is whether to > participate within the OSGeo framework. This seems a natural choice, > but there are possible shortcomings: Hello all, I wish to see QGIS participate this year, after many successful editions! Let me add some more elements for the decision: > - it is possible that we'll have more chances (an higher number of > accepted projects) running alone, due to Google priorities It is also possible that QGIS as separate organisation won't get accepted, thus will have no students, whereas under OSGeo umbrella, one or two students are almost certain. Well, also OSGeo could not get accepted, but as umbrella organisations are especially welcome in participate and OSGeo participated successfully in former editions, it is less likely than QGIS not getting accepted. > - less motivation by mentors (they do not receive any financial > incentive, that goes to OSGeo instead). The payment for mentors in this edition of Summer of Code will be discussed shortly. It has been a point of debate in past editions, and I will see what can be done about it for this year. Of course as a separate organisation QGIS will need a organisation administrator and will be required to complete some bureaucracy on its own. See http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/faqs#mentoring_apply http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/org_admin_agreement > Opinions? QGIS is fully entitled to participate to GSoC, alone or with OSGeo. If you look for more information about org administration, feel free to ask me. All the best, Anne -- http://gis.cri.fmach.it/ghisla/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] GSoC ideas
Il 21/02/2012 16:03, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: Hi all, Google Summer of Code 2012 is announced few weeks ago and as far as I know OSGeo will participate. Hope QGIS will participate too. I started wiki page for collecting ideas [0] Maybe we should announce also to the user list asking for ideas too [0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Google_Summer_of_Code_2012 Thanks Alex. One first thing we have to decide is whether to participate within the OSGeo framework. This seems a natural choice, but there are possible shortcomings: - it is possible that we'll have more chances (an higher number of accepted projects) running alone, due to Google priorities - less motivation by mentors (they do not receive any financial incentive, that goes to OSGeo instead). Opinions? -- Paolo Cavallini See: http://www.faunalia.it/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
