That didn't seem to do, apparently, I checked the correct functionality of our DNS and
so on.
Although in my log quote I used fake addresses those were just slightly changed. The
usual protect the innocent (not from the
regulars from this list, of course).
Actually I do remember obtaining one of those messages and log entries when I tried to
subscribe to this list. Which would mean that
q-mail smtp daemons do give this Remote_host_said: response.
Anyone has any pointers?
The weirdest thing is that we have another qmail installation in here that does not
receive any of those messages at all. Although I
could re-route all outgoing e-mail to it, I rather not as it is a customer system.
I am trying to figure out what is the reason for _our_ server to fail, rather than
just patch it using another one that works...
Yet again, thanks for your time.
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Ridha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:____/
Alfonso Armenta writes:
>>> new msg 2703468
>>> info msg 2703468: bytes 4430 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28506 uid 502
>>> starting delivery 106109: msg 2703468 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> status: local 0/100 remote 1/100
>>> delivery 106109: failure:
>Connected_to_195.98.97.5_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:/
>>> status: local 0/100 remote 0/100
>>> bounce msg 2703468 qp 28512
>>> end msg 2703468
>
> Apparently this is 'random' error.
>
> The user then gets a bounce like this:
>
> Connected to 195.98.97.5 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said:
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Any clues/hints?
>
Is your fqdn valid (known to the Internet)? I experienced the error when
experimenting with my first qmail installation using unknown fqdn and the
destination host did domain checking. I noticed usa.net and stupid.com were
some of such ones.
Regards,
Ahmad Ridha