Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Benjamin Reed wrote: > Benjamin Reed wrote: > | There are a couple of patches needed for the OSX build: > Also: thanks Benjamin. Unfortunately I had problems receiving email, so I only received this just now, which is too late for updating the tarballs :( Thanks for fixing all the stuff, I hope the next release will be a better experience. Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dirk Mueller wrote: | thanks Benjamin. Unfortunately I had problems receiving email, so I only | received this just now, which is too late for updating the tarballs :( | | Thanks for fixing all the stuff, I hope the next release will be a | better experience. No problem. It'll be in my binaries at least. =) - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIO/JKUu+jZtP2Zf4RAhmGAJ9zASAHvrgDKLXrFTU5FhQgSqHg2ACeOdGX rOnprju6KijvIFOt9NfGw8E= =bNEL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On 26.05.08 13:33:20, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Friday 23 May 2008, Robby Workman wrote: > > > Well, unless I'm missing something obvious, kdevelop won't compile > > without kdevplatform. Cluestick, anyone? :) > > it is supposed to compile without kdevplatform, as only quanta depends on > kdevplatform, the rest doesn't. The rest of kdewebdev to be precise. > if you have a concrete compile error, then I'd like to have a look. I haven't > managed to test kdewebdev without kdevplatform yet. I think was Robby meant is that the kdevelop-module also cannot be included as it also depends on kdevplatform. Andreas -- Generosity and perfection are your everlasting goals. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On Monday 26 May 2008 13:33:20 Dirk Mueller wrote: > it is supposed to compile without kdevplatform, as only quanta depends on > kdevplatform, the rest doesn't. No. KDevelop does need kdevplatform, and won't compile without it. Dirk, please tag KDevelop 4.0 alpha2 and kdevplatform 1.0 alpha 2 togeter. Thanks, -- Amilcar Lucas KDevelop.org webmaster ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On Friday 23 May 2008, Robby Workman wrote: > Well, unless I'm missing something obvious, kdevelop won't compile > without kdevplatform. Cluestick, anyone? :) it is supposed to compile without kdevplatform, as only quanta depends on kdevplatform, the rest doesn't. if you have a concrete compile error, then I'd like to have a look. I haven't managed to test kdewebdev without kdevplatform yet. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
Dirk Müller schrieb: Hi, I've finished tagging KDE 4.1 Beta1 (it is mostly r810705) and generating tarballs except for l10n, which is still running. Note that this release again removes kdevplatform and kdewebdev/quanta. There is no replacement. Currently there is also not a kdeplasmoids module even though that was discussed. Perhaps we have that with beta2 :) Please report any issues, especially compile issues or blockers to me. if you have svn revisions that should be included in beta1, please let me know. We plan to publically release the tarballs next week wednesday, please supply binary packages if you have time. Nearly all packages I build for windows worked fine. There were two issues in kdegames and kdeedu but they're fixed in trunk (both by a rewrite of the code). l10n is currently building but it looks good. Christian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benjamin Reed wrote: | There are a couple of patches needed for the OSX build: Also: kdeedu: ~ r812211 (marble installs icon incorrectly) kdepim: ~ r812212 (build error from missing icon) I've made it through everything else (except kdebindings, which I haven't figured out how much work it will be to port yet.) - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIOINPUu+jZtP2Zf4RArktAJ4hDKz12gYgZz+BJhvf4sunqU5OOQCfe3r9 IahlTzTprkmqsRDUv8BlvAA= =c/Dw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On 22.05.08 21:36:45, Robby Workman wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2008, "Dirk M�ller" wrote: > >> I've finished tagging KDE 4.1 Beta1 (it is mostly r810705) and generating >> tarballs except for l10n, which is still running. >> >> Note that this release again removes kdevplatform and kdewebdev/quanta. >> There is no replacement. Currently there is also not a kdeplasmoids module >> even though that was discussed. Perhaps we have that with beta2 :) >> >> Please report any issues, especially compile issues or blockers to me. if >> you have svn revisions that should be included in beta1, please let me >> know. We plan to publically release the tarballs next week wednesday, please >> supply binary packages if you have time. > > > Well, unless I'm missing something obvious, kdevelop won't compile > without kdevplatform. Cluestick, anyone? :) I suspect that Dirk just forgot to mention kdevelop in the sentence, of course kdevelop isn't supposed to be released either. Andreas -- You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dirk Müller wrote: | Please report any issues, especially compile issues or blockers to | me. if you have svn revisions that should be included in beta1, | please let me know. We plan to publically release the tarballs next | week wednesday, please supply binary packages if you have time. There are a couple of patches needed for the OSX build: kdegames: ~ r810911 (OpenGL fix) kdegraphics: ~ r810941 (createButtonBarButton fix) ~ r811021 ($SANE_INCLUDE_DIR not in default incpath fix) kdenetwork: ~ r811169 ($GMP_INCLUDE_DIR not in default incpath fix) kdepim: ~ r881462 (bad automoc behavior) That's as much as I've gotten so far, I've got more stuff to build still. I'll update as I hit things. - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFINs5/Uu+jZtP2Zf4RAgWcAKCTBfSVPBGmzNM1Wj42qjzZ0lH7qQCdHpKD Mpfvq2ba1lvh8TrLcbo3Ae0= =XxdK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On Wed, 21 May 2008, "Dirk M?ller" wrote: I've finished tagging KDE 4.1 Beta1 (it is mostly r810705) and generating tarballs except for l10n, which is still running. Note that this release again removes kdevplatform and kdewebdev/quanta. There is no replacement. Currently there is also not a kdeplasmoids module even though that was discussed. Perhaps we have that with beta2 :) Please report any issues, especially compile issues or blockers to me. if you have svn revisions that should be included in beta1, please let me know. We plan to publically release the tarballs next week wednesday, please supply binary packages if you have time. Well, unless I'm missing something obvious, kdevelop won't compile without kdevplatform. Cluestick, anyone? :) -RW___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
Hi, > Please report any issues, especially compile issues or blockers to me. if > you have svn revisions that should be included in beta1, please let me > know. We plan to publically release the tarballs next week wednesday, please > supply binary packages if you have time. > It could be nice to include the fix for bug #162424: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424 http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=811027 cheers, Fathi ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.1 Beta1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
Hi, I've finished tagging KDE 4.1 Beta1 (it is mostly r810705) and generating tarballs except for l10n, which is still running. Note that this release again removes kdevplatform and kdewebdev/quanta. There is no replacement. Currently there is also not a kdeplasmoids module even though that was discussed. Perhaps we have that with beta2 :) Please report any issues, especially compile issues or blockers to me. if you have svn revisions that should be included in beta1, please let me know. We plan to publically release the tarballs next week wednesday, please supply binary packages if you have time. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
