Re: [RCSE] As the Current Reigning World Champion Woody Pilot... PT 1 1/2 SWC 2.4

2008-02-19 Thread Craig Greening
Just wanted to clarify Gordy's comments about the use of multiple receivers 
within the Spektrum system. It's a function of the shorter wavelength (higher 
frequency). With a single receiver there is the potential for a secondary 
signal, reflected from structure/object within the model, to arrive 180 degrees 
out of phase and cancel the 'good' signal. Having multiple receivers makes this 
impossible and is one of the advantages of the Spektrum system. This situation 
is not unique to Spektrum, but all 2.4ghz systems.

The amount of separation required is only a few inches, but depending on the 
receiver location can be as far as 36 distant.

Craig.


  - Original Message - 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Soaring@airage.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 7:47 PM
  Subject: [RCSE] As the Current Reigning World Champion Woody Pilot... PT 1 
1/2 SWC  2.4


  And finally...well not finally cuz its still early in this game...2.4 news.  
I flew 2.4 in my Marauder and a handful of guys flew various brands in their 
2.4 friendly RES and Open ships.  It does work if you apply those little gray 
cells when installing.

  I had a really good chat with Peter Goldsmith (Horizon Hobby) during a lull 
in the action and I threw a couple of what-if's at him concerning concern for 
2.4 limitations...and well, he was ready for them!

  Yep, its about 40 Spectrum TX's that can be on at once, and it while it would 
be possible for a situation to arise in some fictional situation where someone 
would be inconvenienced...all indications in actual contest conditions so 
faras in real world versus hypotheticalall indications are that its a 
case of don't worry...be REAL happy!

  This was my first opportunity to experience the out right feeling of freedom 
of having a 2.4 system at a contest.  Each time they'd call me up to fly my 
woody, hand me the 16 clip I had registered for my other classes, I'd just 
smile, knowing that it no longer applied...none of 'it'.  And flying that woody 
that took the MMGliderTech boys a lot of hours of meticulous building to 
create...knowing that it was safe from at least one threat of undeserved 
destruction.  Each timeit sunk in a little deeper, that feeling of first 
freedom, then real realization of what it meant to not even consider the 
possibilities, responsibilities and liabilities of having to have a 'channel'. 
It really made me understand how worth it is would be to do the 'work' of 
getting those RX's installed correctly.

  My chat with Peter  G also enlightened me about why they decided on the two 
RX system...its pretty logical actually.  The 2.4 signal is no more or less 
affected by the carbon fuses we use in all of our molded ships today than 72mhz 
is.  But we figured out how to overcome the carbon problem...by extending the 
antenna and allowing it to dangle free of RF signal shading caused by wings and 
fuses.

  Spectrum's dual RX's provide actual triangulation system for the signals that 
pass back and forth, from TX to RXs', a wider 'backstop' of sorts for the TX 
signal to be caught with...two hands instead of one to get a good grip on the 
information your thumb is trying to get to the servos.  A bit of over kill for 
most RC applications but just enough for RC sailplanes...that fly wa off, 
in sometimes foggy weather, sometimes blocked or deflected by tree tops, 
antenna and power towers..and of course timer's bellies :-).

  This kind of thinking comes from a company with two top RC sailplane guys in 
positions to offer up the 'what-ifs' to designers and engineers at the 
manufacturer levels.

  Okay does that mean none of the other systems won't or don't work?  Nope, but 
it does give you all some insight I know I didn't have until I had a chance to 
ask about...after I had some personal experience with 2.4.

  Currently I don't have non carbon fuselages for my World's Heaviest Carbon 
Supra Lite, or my Perfect, or Pike Giant, or even my Super AVA...but I have 
some ideas to try in order to use 2.4 in those airframes successfully. I'll 
keep you guys posted on my experiments :-).

  Gordy





--
  Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL Living.

[RCSE] As the Current Reigning World Champion Woody Pilot... PT 1 1/2 SWC 2.4

2008-02-19 Thread GordySoar
 
And finally...well not finally cuz its still early in this game...2.4  news.  
I flew 2.4 in my Marauder and a handful of guys flew various brands  in their 
2.4 friendly RES and Open ships.  It does work if  you apply those little 
gray cells when installing.
 
I had a really good chat with Peter Goldsmith (Horizon Hobby) during a lull  
in the action and I threw a couple of what-if's at him concerning  concern for 
2.4 limitations...and well, he was ready for them!
 
Yep, its about 40 Spectrum TX's that can be on at once, and it while  it 
would be possible for a situation to arise in some fictional situation where  
someone would be inconvenienced...all indications in actual contest  conditions 
so 
faras in real world versus hypotheticalall indications are  that its 
a case of don't worry...be REAL happy!
 
This was my first opportunity to experience the out right feeling of  freedom 
of having a 2.4 system at a contest.  Each time they'd  call me up to fly my 
woody, hand me the 16 clip I had registered for my  other classes, I'd just 
smile, knowing that it no longer applied...none  of 'it'.  And flying that 
woody 
that took the MMGliderTech boys a lot  of hours of meticulous building to 
create...knowing that it was safe from  at least one threat of undeserved 
destruction.  Each timeit sunk  in a little deeper, that feeling of first 
freedom, then real  realization of what it meant to not even consider the  
possibilities, responsibilities and liabilities of having to have a  'channel'. 
It 
really made me understand how worth it is would be to do  the 'work' of getting 
those RX's installed correctly.
 
My chat with Peter  G also enlightened me about why they decided on  the two 
RX system...its pretty logical actually.  The 2.4 signal is no more  or less 
affected by the carbon fuses we use in all of our molded ships today  than 
72mhz is.  But we figured out how to overcome the  carbon problem...by 
extending 
the antenna and allowing it to dangle free of  RF signal shading caused by 
wings and fuses.
 
Spectrum's dual RX's provide actual triangulation system for the signals  
that pass back and forth, from TX to RXs', a wider 'backstop' of sorts  for the 
TX signal to be caught with...two hands instead of one to get a  good grip on 
the information your thumb is trying to get to the servos.  A  bit of over kill 
for most RC applications but just enough for RC  sailplanes...that fly wa 
off, in sometimes foggy weather, sometimes blocked  or deflected by tree 
tops, antenna and power towers..and of course timer's  bellies :-).
 
This kind of thinking comes from a company with two top RC sailplane guys  in 
positions to offer up the 'what-ifs' to designers and engineers at the  
manufacturer levels.
 
Okay does that mean none of the other systems won't or don't work?   Nope, 
but it does give you all some insight I know I didn't have until I had a  
chance 
to ask about...after I had some personal experience with 2.4.
 
Currently I don't have non carbon fuselages for my World's Heaviest Carbon  
Supra Lite, or my Perfect, or Pike Giant, or even my Super AVA...but I have 
some  ideas to try in order to use 2.4 in those airframes successfully. I'll 
keep 
you  guys posted on my experiments :-).

Gordy




**Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.  
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp0030002598)


RE: [RCSE] As the Current Reigning World Champion Woody Pilot... PT 1 1/2 SWC 2.4

2008-02-19 Thread bgtwining
I flew the whole contest with a Supra that had a 2.4 friendly fuselage with
a 9303 2.4 GHZ and 9 CH receiver. Never had any kind of problem and, like
Gordy, never had to wait for someone to bring back the pin. It was
fantastic. I had tried an XPS system with this configuration previously but
had some occasions when it went into failsafe. They (XPS) need a remote
antenna for sailplanes. 

 

Gordy, when you figure out how to put a Spektrum system in the carbon Pike
Perfect let us know. That is my next challenge.

 

Bruce T.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:47 PM
To: Soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] As the Current Reigning World Champion Woody Pilot... PT 1
1/2 SWC  2.4

And finally...well not finally cuz its still early in this game...2.4 news. 
I flew 2.4 in my Marauder and a handful of guys flew various brands in their
2.4 friendly RES and Open ships.  It does work if you apply those little
gray cells when installing.
 
I had a really good chat with Peter Goldsmith (Horizon Hobby) during a lull
in the action and I threw a couple of what-if's at him concerning concern
for 2.4 limitations...and well, he was ready for them!
 
Yep, its about 40 Spectrum TX's that can be on at once, and it while it
would be possible for a situation to arise in some fictional situation where
someone would be inconvenienced...all indications in actual contest
conditions so faras in real world versus hypotheticalall indications
are that its a case of don't worry...be REAL happy!
 
This was my first opportunity to experience the out right feeling of freedom
of having a 2.4 system at a contest.  Each time they'd call me up to fly my
woody, hand me the 16 clip I had registered for my other classes, I'd just
smile, knowing that it no longer applied...none of 'it'.  And flying that
woody that took the MMGliderTech boys a lot of hours of meticulous building
to create...knowing that it was safe from at least one threat of undeserved
destruction.  Each timeit sunk in a little deeper, that feeling of first
freedom, then real realization of what it meant to not even consider the
possibilities, responsibilities and liabilities of having to have a
'channel'. It really made me understand how worth it is would be to do the
'work' of getting those RX's installed correctly.
 
My chat with Peter  G also enlightened me about why they decided on the two
RX system...its pretty logical actually.  The 2.4 signal is no more or less
affected by the carbon fuses we use in all of our molded ships today than
72mhz is.  But we figured out how to overcome the carbon problem...by
extending the antenna and allowing it to dangle free of RF signal shading
caused by wings and fuses.
 
Spectrum's dual RX's provide actual triangulation system for the signals
that pass back and forth, from TX to RXs', a wider 'backstop' of sorts for
the TX signal to be caught with...two hands instead of one to get a good
grip on the information your thumb is trying to get to the servos.  A bit of
over kill for most RC applications but just enough for RC sailplanes...that
fly wa off, in sometimes foggy weather, sometimes blocked or deflected
by tree tops, antenna and power towers..and of course timer's bellies :-).
 
This kind of thinking comes from a company with two top RC sailplane guys in
positions to offer up the 'what-ifs' to designers and engineers at the
manufacturer levels.
 
Okay does that mean none of the other systems won't or don't work?  Nope,
but it does give you all some insight I know I didn't have until I had a
chance to ask about...after I had some personal experience with 2.4.
 
Currently I don't have non carbon fuselages for my World's Heaviest Carbon
Supra Lite, or my Perfect, or Pike Giant, or even my Super AVA...but I have
some ideas to try in order to use 2.4 in those airframes successfully. I'll
keep you guys posted on my experiments :-).

Gordy



Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL
Living.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format