I think Mudbox will be better with a tool like "Zspheres", when they put a
solution like that to create the base for models, i'll be more than happy;
because Mudbox it's easy and most of the tools necessary are there. More
brushes and presets are welcome, too.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Tim Leydecker wrote:
> a 1:1 copy of some of the best ZBrush brushes (dam standard springs to
> mind)
> would have been nice, something ZBrush Dynamesh as a surprise extension,
> too.
>
> How about some new presets, some vector tooltips/brush images, just a
> little well deserved love.
>
> Mudbox is so nice in how easy it can be picked up and used (compared to
> ZBrush´s GUI and methodology)
> it´s sad that it´s been left out like that.
>
> Still, I took the treetrunk example, retopoed, subdivided it to some 50
> million polygons by mistake and Mudbox
> kept itself responsive...
>
>
>
>
> Am 01.05.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Tenshi S.:
>
> Your right. Few updates in 2016. Less than 4 features and a few bug fixes.
> For a new version one will expect something more. At least 10 features and
> 20 bug fixes. =/
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Tim Leydecker wrote:
>
>> Relax. I don´t want to miss the new Relax brush in Mudbox 2016.
>>
>> That´s the only green bracketed (highlight what´s new option = 1) I found
>> sofar.
>>
>> I´m sure there´s more inovations but it´s in another package?
>>
>>
>> Am 30.04.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Mirko Jankovic:
>>
>> well just stay on mudbox 2015 then as well. not like they made anything
>> interesting in 2016 anyway
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Tenshi S. wrote:
>>
>>> Mudbox to Softimage, It's something i'll miss a lot then, it works
>>> really good. Maya to Softimage and viceversa, too. Damn... how the heck
>>> they remove this thing? It's really important feature, it saves a lot of
>>> time. If they don't want to give us a 2016 version, at least they'll try to
>>> put those lines of codes to make it work in the 2015SP2(i hope that's
>>> coming?) version.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Tim Leydecker
>>> wrote:
>>>
It would be a very welcome functionality, especially when being dealt
an old Softimage 2015 along with everything else labeled 2016 as part of
a new suite package.
In the past, I found it difficult to run differently labeled versions,
e.g. Softimage 2012
with Maya 2014 or Mudbox 2014 simultaneously, due to lmtools telling me
there´s
no license available, that could well be a setup error on my end or a
misunderstanding
of the suite licensing scheme but if that´s the root of the problem,
that Softimage2015
+Mudbox2016 will not easily serve themselves in sharing a
(suite)license, then it
would be a good time to adress that, too?
Cheers,
tim
Am 30.04.2015 um 06:20 schrieb Raffaele Fragapane:
Yeah, I reckon they should add it back in. AD has back pedalled on some
minor things like this before, so it might still happen, and it would be a
welcome grace to a userbase that has, frankly speaking, already been
slighted pretty hard.
It certainly won't happen though if part of that user base takes the
pessimist approach and claims it never worked, when it did, or because they
don't need it assumes other don't either.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Greg Punchatz
wrote:
> It and goZ are huge time savers! Huge!
>
> It does seem to me this would fall into the " AD should do it I the
> SPs until the Soft support being promised until 2016"
>
> It is just a few lines of code Luc, can you do us old softies a
> favor and send the request the send up the ranks to send to apps back in?
> Did Maya and Max lose their send to soft connections too?
>
> I think we are in our right to ask for this small gesture from AD
>
> Thanks for listening Luc... I know there is nothing you can promise,
> but give it a shot for those of us you used to your clients.
>
> g
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
