I think Mudbox will be better with a tool like "Zspheres", when they put a solution like that to create the base for models, i'll be more than happy; because Mudbox it's easy and most of the tools necessary are there. More brushes and presets are welcome, too.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Tim Leydecker <bauero...@gmx.de> wrote: > a 1:1 copy of some of the best ZBrush brushes (dam standard springs to > mind) > would have been nice, something ZBrush Dynamesh as a surprise extension, > too. > > How about some new presets, some vector tooltips/brush images, just a > little well deserved love. > > Mudbox is so nice in how easy it can be picked up and used (compared to > ZBrush´s GUI and methodology) > it´s sad that it´s been left out like that. > > Still, I took the treetrunk example, retopoed, subdivided it to some 50 > million polygons by mistake and Mudbox > kept itself responsive... > > > > > Am 01.05.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Tenshi S.: > > Your right. Few updates in 2016. Less than 4 features and a few bug fixes. > For a new version one will expect something more. At least 10 features and > 20 bug fixes. =/ > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Tim Leydecker <bauero...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Relax. I don´t want to miss the new Relax brush in Mudbox 2016. >> >> That´s the only green bracketed (highlight what´s new option = 1) I found >> sofar. >> >> I´m sure there´s more inovations but it´s in another package? >> >> >> Am 30.04.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Mirko Jankovic: >> >> well just stay on mudbox 2015 then as well. not like they made anything >> interesting in 2016 anyway.... >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Tenshi S. <tenshu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Mudbox to Softimage, It's something i'll miss a lot then, it works >>> really good. Maya to Softimage and viceversa, too. Damn... how the heck >>> they remove this thing? It's really important feature, it saves a lot of >>> time. If they don't want to give us a 2016 version, at least they'll try to >>> put those lines of codes to make it work in the 2015SP2(i hope that's >>> coming?) version. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Tim Leydecker <bauero...@gmx.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be a very welcome functionality, especially when being dealt >>>> an old Softimage 2015 along with everything else labeled 2016 as part of >>>> a new suite package. >>>> >>>> In the past, I found it difficult to run differently labeled versions, >>>> e.g. Softimage 2012 >>>> with Maya 2014 or Mudbox 2014 simultaneously, due to lmtools telling me >>>> there´s >>>> no license available, that could well be a setup error on my end or a >>>> misunderstanding >>>> of the suite licensing scheme but if that´s the root of the problem, >>>> that Softimage2015 >>>> +Mudbox2016 will not easily serve themselves in sharing a >>>> (suite)license, then it >>>> would be a good time to adress that, too? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 30.04.2015 um 06:20 schrieb Raffaele Fragapane: >>>> >>>> Yeah, I reckon they should add it back in. AD has back pedalled on some >>>> minor things like this before, so it might still happen, and it would be a >>>> welcome grace to a userbase that has, frankly speaking, already been >>>> slighted pretty hard. >>>> >>>> It certainly won't happen though if part of that user base takes the >>>> pessimist approach and claims it never worked, when it did, or because they >>>> don't need it assumes other don't either. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Greg Punchatz <g...@janimation.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It and goZ are huge time savers! Huge! >>>>> >>>>> It does seem to me this would fall into the " AD should do it I the >>>>> SPs until the Soft support being promised until 2016" >>>>> >>>>> It is just a few lines of code Luc, can you do us old softies a >>>>> favor and send the request the send up the ranks to send to apps back in? >>>>> Did Maya and Max lose their send to soft connections too? >>>>> >>>>> I think we are in our right to ask for this small gesture from AD >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for listening Luc... I know there is nothing you can promise, >>>>> but give it a shot for those of us you used to your clients. >>>>> >>>>> g >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
