[squid-users] It is possible using squid to cache YouTube ?

2015-05-29 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Hi,

My freind asked why dont we cache youtube? In 2014 i read a website page
about how to caching youtube using squid lusca, and later in comment
section the author said the method not work anymore so I wonder it is
possible to cache YouTube using squid ? For what I know it is impossible
cause https and new google video mechanism is 2014.

Thx
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users


Re: [squid-users] It is possible using squid to cache YouTube ?

2015-05-29 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Hi Antony,

I consider the answer is 'it cant', even is yes it seems the road is dark
and scary.

Thx
On May 29, 2015 2:57 PM, Antony Stone antony.st...@squid.open.source.it
wrote:

 On Friday 29 May 2015 at 09:44:51 (EU time), Ibrahim Lubis wrote:

  Hi,
 
  My freind asked why dont we cache youtube? In 2014 i read a website page
  about how to caching youtube using squid lusca, and later in comment
  section the author said the method not work anymore so I wonder it is
  possible to cache YouTube using squid ? For what I know it is impossible
  cause https and new google video mechanism is 2014.

 Please see the recent thread on this list, starting with
 http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2015-May/003717.html

 http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2015-May/003725.html in
 particular may help you in the direction of a working solution.


 Regards,


 Antony.

 --
 Wanted: telepath.   You know where to apply.

Please reply to the
 list;
  please *don't* CC
 me.
 ___
 squid-users mailing list
 squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
 http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users


[squid-users] Squid as transparent in 'caching layer'

2015-05-10 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Hi,

Most of all know about tiered network
topology(access,aggregation/dist,core) from core than to firewall and then
to router. For redundancy usually there 2 core and 2 firewall. I was
thinking adding a transparent caching layer between core and firewall,just
adding squid box. It is okay just adding 2 independent squid box or I need
some sync between squid box ? What if I add not 2 but 6 and doing
active-active on both core n firewall? Can anybody give me insight ? Btw My
objective is to save some bandwidths from user for internet access.

Thx
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users


Re: [squid-users] Squid as transparent in 'caching layer'

2015-05-10 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Thx all for the info
On May 10, 2015 5:35 PM, Yuri Voinov yvoi...@gmail.com wrote:


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA256

 Amos,

 independent proxies also supported by Cisco WCCP. For redundancy it can
 group any numbers of transparent proxies.

 WBR, Yuri

 10.05.15 12:57, Amos Jeffries пишет:
  On 10/05/2015 6:31 p.m., Ibrahim Lubis wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Most of all know about tiered network
  topology(access,aggregation/dist,core) from core than to firewall and
 then
  to router. For redundancy usually there 2 core and 2 firewall. I was
  thinking adding a transparent caching layer between core and
 firewall,just
  adding squid box. It is okay just adding 2 independent squid box or I
 need
  some sync between squid box ? What if I add not 2 but 6 and doing
  active-active on both core n firewall? Can anybody give me insight ?
 Btw My
  objective is to save some bandwidths from user for internet access.
 
  Go with independent Squid boxes until you are happy that they are
  operating properly and you know whats going on. Number of Squid does not
  matter much, so long as they each can handle the traffic load you put
  through. If you are new to this start with just one and put only a small
  amount of the traffic through, then increase gradually until you need 2,
  and so on.
 
  Sync'ing between the Squid caches, and interception proxying can each
  have unwanted side effects. Its best to deal with those in separately to
  avoid confusion and troubles.
 
 
  active-active on both core n firewall does not matter. You MUST NOT
  perform destination-NAT (or TPROXY) on any machine other than the Squid
  box receiving the TCP connection from client(s). The firewalls and core
  only perform *routing* (perhapse over a tunnel) to get the TCP packets
  to the right Squid box. This has the nice side effect of greatly
  reducing the amount of data the firewalls need to sync.
 
 
  Hints for beginners:
 
   Caching can make some traffic appear slower - all MISS and some REFRESH
  transactions. There is extra packet processing done by the proxy and
  latency getting the packets around. This is the tradeoff for bandwidth
  saving. Super-fast HITs and traffic optimization can make up for that,
  but not always.
 
  Amos
 
  ___
  squid-users mailing list
  squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
  http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2

 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVTzRXAAoJENNXIZxhPexGXJYIAMtb90ri0hymGN7ZGTVH98cy
 uZbNjQ2kYQqxXGCkkSFECpjM0wqkONF6pPGrL1YqcecZCkmGNS6ExE6r4FMuX8y1
 oBE2z9OfaN/4CfMq4+WvE0jwtyOSVyKIUSUKr+I2qTNCubg0kFgr9yWONOdLbUDJ
 FJ06c1qqb1U8u8ZsYFTL7/hfTgVRr6QjnGQlnNcCwzU+/QIAtAP7GyRxJB0b0yxJ
 i2M/LQ+d1LJMhCgX6ICgBas5x+GXXB3KHtH0jAn/xF854qciQhbOrMf0O/j/ac19
 4XB8qfqsGkIvPe3TcPSYypyOJn1dXILpb7mmNogGzh+rE4nmdRG7cam6MX3En8c=
 =SXkU
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 squid-users mailing list
 squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
 http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users


Re: [squid-users] http_access traffic

2012-10-16 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Logging daemon?  syslog?  what do you mean by other system?

-Original Message-

From: Amos Jeffries
Sent: 16 Oct 2012 06:47:04 GMT
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] http_access traffic

On 15/10/2012 9:33 p.m., Ibrahim Lubis wrote:
 I use this line to allowed some traffic
 Acl vlan2 src 10.10.13.0/24
 Http_access allow vlan2

 Can i monitor traffic with snmp for certain vlan i allowed?

 Thx

Not easily. Squid records statistics per-client not per-subnet.

You have to find the individual client IPs in the SNMP client table and
monitor their traffic usage while adding them all together to get the
subnet usage.

It would be easier (but not as accurate) to create a logging daemon that
monitored the log and reported traffic usage back to your other systems.

Amos


[squid-users] http_access traffic

2012-10-15 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
I use this line to allowed some traffic
Acl vlan2 src 10.10.13.0/24
Http_access allow vlan2 

Can i monitor traffic with snmp for certain vlan i allowed? 

Thx

[squid-users] Ask about delay pool?

2012-06-25 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Hi,

How to limit bandwith user from subnet example 10.10.10.0/24 to maximal use of 
20Mbit, and limit max use per client in that subnet to 1024 Kbit using delay 
pools.

I read somewhere delay_pools is deprecated, is this true? 
If i activate zph does it disable delay pool? 

Thx


[squid-users] Squid load balancing access log

2012-05-14 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Squid guru,

I do load balancing 2 centos server with ucarp and haproxy, with cache peering 
all squid server as sibling. I use squid as caching. The problem is every log 
line what i see in access log file is ip from squid cache not from user 
requested web access. Before i do load balancing,only one squid box, in access 
log file i see ip user requested web access.

Thx

[squid-users] Bridge or transparent ?

2012-04-29 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
What the pros n cons using squid as bridge n transparent ?

[squid-users] Squid load balancing n cluster

2012-04-20 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
I need some info about load balancing n cluster in squid , is there use some 
cluster software or just use icap ?

Re: [squid-users] About access.log hourly?

2012-03-14 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
Ohh i see thx...

-Original Message-

From: Amos Jeffries
Sent: 14 Mar 2012 02:18:58 GMT
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] About access.log hourly?

On 14.03.2012 14:54, Ibrahim Lubis wrote:
 I use cron...

Then the answer is quite simply to set it to run its command every 15
minutes and bump up your logfile_rotate limit to prevent loosing logs
earlier.

Amos



 -Original Message-

 From: Amos Jeffries

 On 13.03.2012 23:09, Ibrahim Lubis wrote:
 How can i configurre squid to create a new access.log file every 15
 minutes, in 1 hour i have 4 different log file...

 What are you using to manage the Squid logs  cron? logrotate?
 something else?

 Amos



[squid-users] About access.log hourly?

2012-03-13 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
How can i configurre squid to create a new access.log file every 15 minutes, in 
1 hour i have 4 different log file...

Re: [squid-users] About access.log hourly?

2012-03-13 Thread Ibrahim Lubis
I use cron...

-Original Message-

From: Amos Jeffries
Sent: 13 Mar 2012 10:15:54 GMT
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] About access.log hourly?

On 13.03.2012 23:09, Ibrahim Lubis wrote:
 How can i configurre squid to create a new access.log file every 15
 minutes, in 1 hour i have 4 different log file...

What are you using to manage the Squid logs  cron? logrotate?
something else?

Amos