On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Gunnar Hellström <
gunnar.hellst...@omnitor.se> wrote:
> On 2012-10-13 04:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> I know that Kev has been quite busy, but he's quire reliable and I'm
>> sure he will incorporate the Last Call feedback as he has promised to do.
>>
> Was there any last call conclusion?
> The feedback was so varied,
> some saying that the feature was essential, some saying that it should not
> be allowed,
> some requiring that the edited message shall be shown last with
> changemarks, some accepting the change made in place.
> Edit any versus strictly edit last was also discussed.
>
> My conclusions are:
> 1. The feature will be allowed. ( deduced from your answer that Kev is
> asked do do an update )
> 2. How edits are presented to the receiving user is out of scope, but a
> recommendation to make it clearly displayed that there was an edit will be
> included.
> 3. Edit any previous will be included. It is up to the transmitter to use
> it or not. Receivers should be prepared to act on editing any previous.
>
This is my preference as well, though I seemed to recall that Kevin was
going to keep it as is, for editing just the last message. Regardless,
the XEP-0301 protocol will be compatible with either method.
As for my XEP-0301 updates, keep tuned. Workload and certain priorities
has increased as of late, but I will be catching up. I know that the U.S.
access board has inquired asking about when it'll be ready.
Thanks,
Mark Rejhon
