> 4) Any other business > Brief discussion of XEP 71, to continue on standards list.
This made me curious and I belong to those who reads conference minutes. And to my astonishment I found this: [15:18:46] <stpeter> I have one AOB.... XEP-0071 and how to come to agreement on structured elements vs. stylistic presentation, but I suppose I'll just post to the list about that [15:18:50] <Kev> I started and then got distracted, as so often happens. [15:18:57] <ralphm> I wish to stamp that on the head of everyone involved the slightest in anything related to publishing web pages [15:19:23] <Kev> stpeter: I think at this stage the answer is "We don't substantially change the XEP". [15:19:34] <Kev> But yes, that discussion can happen on-list. ... [15:19:47] <ralphm> To be more blunt. I'm a solid -1 on anything adding stuff [15:19:55] <ralphm> like rdfa http://logs.xmpp.org/council/121011/ According to http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/ ralphm is currently a member of the XMPP Council. Can someone please let me know if he has a veto right there? If that is the case there would be no reason for me to spend a minute more on finding a reasonable way to add RDFa to XEP-0071. I generally do not participate in discussions with a predetermined outcome. Cheers, Andreas
