Re: [OSM-talk] OSMI Boundaries Views
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: Just for you information in case that might suits your needs : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Yet_another_validation_tool_for_osm_data Magic ... just what I was asking about on the gb list ;) I need to add ward boundaries and this shows they ARE missing. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSMI Boundaries Views
On 22 September 2012 11:30, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: > Hi Markus, > >> > But osmi bundles together all relation >> > above admin_level=4 (Swedish municipalities are on level 7) > > Just for you information in case that might suits your needs : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Yet_another_validation_tool_for_osm_data > I didn't know, thanks for the info. It suits my needs very well, spotted right away that Sollefteå needs a bit of attention. Thanks again. /Markus ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSMI Boundaries Views
Hi Markus, > > But osmi bundles together all relation > > above admin_level=4 (Swedish municipalities are on level 7) Just for you information in case that might suits your needs : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Yet_another_validation_tool_for_osm_data The coverage is world wide, and admin_level 4,5,6,7,8,10 are in seperate layers. This tool was created for France at first, but then extended to world coverage. In case you absolutely need the admin_level 9 (not used in France) I can add it if that's needed. -- sly (sylvain letuffe) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] OSMI Boundaries Views
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Markus Lindholm wrote: > On 21 September 2012 20:52, Jochen Topf wrote: > > I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector > > Hi and thanks for your work with osmi. I hope you don't mind if I take > this opportunity to put forward a feature request; to separate > admin_levels in the boundaries view. I don't mind, but please change the subject next time (as I have done now), or even better, start a new thread. That helps keeping things tidy and easier to distinguish different discussions. > I've been using the boundaries view in osmi to check for problems with > municipalities i Sweden. It's been a convenient and easy way to > visually spot a blank area on the map where the municipality relation > is no longer self-contained. But osmi bundles together all relation > above admin_level=4 (Swedish municipalities are on level 7) and now > people are adding more and more boundary relation for lower level > entities (higher admin_level) which means that there's no longer a > blank area if there's a problem with the municipality but the lower > level entities are ok. The boundaries view is very old, from a time when there weren't that many boundaries around. Today it is IMHO pretty much unusable because it is too slow and there is too much data. Adding more layers would make it worse. Also it is only available for Europe. We'll probably need a tool thats more powerful then OSMI and lots of time to implement it, to really improve the situation. I had some discussions with Frederik already about a better boundary tool, but without some funding I don't think we'll get that soon. :-( Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
