Re: [talk-au] Petition to MP

2009-06-15 Thread Delta Foxtrot

--- On Mon, 15/6/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
  I definitely agree external data sources
 should be reviewed some how before being imported such that
 anything currently in place remains as the authoritative
 instance.

I didn't mean to suggested that any govt provided data would be more or less 
accurate than what exists in the DB, but it wouldn't be any worst than landsat 
type quality. Unlike landsat I'd expect it would contain meta information such 
street/road names.
 
 I approached the Sunshine Coast Council (Qld) some months
 ago about accessing their data and my request is still under
 review.  Currently they provide mapping data without
 charge to commercial vendors (eg UBD).

Did you file the request in writing, and if so do you still have a copy?


  

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Petition to MP

2009-06-15 Thread Delta Foxtrot

--- On Mon, 15/6/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
 Yep
 have the email history and a copy is on its way to you
 directly.

Thanks for that, it's exactly what I was looking for, not planning to use it 
word for word, but it's given me a nice template to start from.


  

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Petition to MP

2009-06-14 Thread Delta Foxtrot

--- On Sun, 14/6/09, Paul Zagoridis pa...@zagz.com wrote:
 Pick up the phone and talk to your
 local member AND the electoral staff.

I know from previous correspondence on issues they always tell me to put it in 
a letter and send it to the member, luckily they also accept emails these days.

 Educate them on the issue either face to face or later by
 phone appointment.

face to face would require a 3hr trip to Tamworth, or a 2 hr trip to Armidale, 
probably both if you want/need to see both.

 THEN follow up with a letter that they expect.
 
 Don't bother with email as it is hard to track.
 
 Lastly a petition should only be started if you are willing
 to drive it.
 Better to lobby with your vested interest.

By petition, I'm pretty sure I meant to petition the member informally, rather 
than some formal campaign, although we pay, indirectly, for the mapping 
information to be produced, so in turn they can turn round and charge/license 
the data out.

Is it just me sick of being doubled, trippled or quadrupled taxed to death?


  

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Petition to MP

2009-06-14 Thread Liz
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Delta Foxtrot wrote:
 I'm just wondering, nothing came up on google when searching, if there is
 any example letters floating about petitioning MPs for access to federal
 data and making it public domain.

 The reason I ask is the electorate, both state and federal, I'm in is
 currently held by independents and they might be sympathetic to the cause,
 or at least give lip service about it :)

I am involved in political lobbying at times.
Lots of issues pass these men and women, and one thing mentioned is easily 
lost. But things which are happening in common across many electorates will 
get talked about in the lunch rooms and party rooms, and this gives an 
impression of a groundswell of public opinion.

So we would all need to be doing this at about the same time - writing 
individual letters or emails - if we want to have an effect.

I've been cautious lately in asking for information, waiting for the licence 
debate to be settled.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Petition to MP

2009-06-14 Thread b . schulz . 10
Lets just think about the end goals of getting MPs involved: adding more data 
to the map.

Now basically there seems to be 2 threads of argument about how best to do 
this: 1) Through mass import of external datasets and 2) through contributions 
by users.

Method 1) is often required for things that can't be easily surveyed, such as 
administrative borders whereas method 2) tends to yield better results for 
things open to rapid (ie, static for 1-2 years) changes such as POIs and new 
housing developments.

From that basis one would then ask what is a higher priority for our part of 
the world. In my opinion completion of street name surveys is probably the 
highest priority, as once that's done OSM begins to look like a useful tool 
for people who aren't interested in contributing, eg tourists, small 
businesses etc.

This is not to say that administrative borders aren't useful, but if I was in a 
foreign country I'm much more interested in navigation, where to eat, where the 
closest toilet is etc than what suburb I'm in or exactly where the border of a 
national park is.

So anyway, what I'm trying to get to is a consensus on what would be a more 
efficient use of our time: marketing to the masses or petitioning for 
government databases.

Personally I think that marketing to the masses would yield better results. Ie: 
organise more mapping parties where newbies are encouraged to attend and are 
introduced to a friendly, supportive atmosphere. Or get a few small regions 
finished and get some printed maps into tourist information centers and youth 
hostels. I dare say that small regions such as the Sydney CBD and Canberra 
would be excellent pilot projects which could be started right away.

By getting lots of free maps out to the people it broadens our readership. 
Eventually I think it would be really awesome to get an OSM street directory 
onto bookshop shelves, starting with capital cities (or regional centers, as 
they're smaller goals) and eventually (in 5-10 years) publishing an OSM 
touring guide, complete with a Wikipedia-like database of town descriptions, 
free camping sites etc, kind of like a compeditor to Explore Australia.

Anyway, I've seriously rambled on here. I think that both general populace 
marketing and MP petitioning are needed, but if somebody has some spare time 
and a choice, what does Talk-Au think they should concentrate on?

Brent

- Original Message -
From: Delta Foxtrot delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2009 11:29 pm
Subject: [talk-au] Petition to MP
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org

 
 I'm just wondering, nothing came up on google when searching, if 
 there is any example letters floating about petitioning MPs for 
 access to federal data and making it public domain.
 
 The reason I ask is the electorate, both state and federal, I'm 
 in is currently held by independents and they might be 
 sympathetic to the cause, or at least give lip service about it :)
 
 Just a thought, but previous letters that usually address non-
 local specific issues tended to get forwarded to the relevant 
 ministers and form letters were replied.
 
 I believe the state member was formally the mayor of Armidale 
 council so he may have access to other resources, for that area 
 at least.
 
 Has anyone gone down this path before, if so what was the outcome?
 
 
   
 
 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Petition to MP

2009-06-14 Thread Ross Scanlon
And the problem with importing things like roads from government databases is 
that they are the gazetted road position not the actual on ground road 
position.  That's why google maps etc are so often incorrect.

Thats why some of the ABS data does not line up with the actual plotted road.

Here's an example

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-20.30721lon=148.54535zoom=16layers=B000FTF

The roads are in their current place but when they were gazetted the ABS 
boundary is there.  You can still see where the Bruce Highway used to be if you 
go to this intersection.

Cheers
Ross
 

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:08:33 +1000
b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:

 This is not to say that administrative borders aren't useful, but if I was in 
 a foreign country I'm much more interested in navigation, where to eat, where 
 the closest toilet is etc than what suburb I'm in or exactly where the border 
 of a national park is.
 
 So anyway, what I'm trying to get to is a consensus on what would be a more 
 efficient use of our time: marketing to the masses or petitioning for 
 government databases.
 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au