Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map
Steve Chilton wrote: > I am afraid I don't know the answer. Yahoo surely have all the imagery, but > presumably have chosen to release this random coverage to OSM. Eh? We're using their standard imagery, not some special OSM released subset... Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.compton.nu/ ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map
Steve I am afraid I don't know the answer. Yahoo surely have all the imagery, but presumably have chosen to release this random coverage to OSM. Cheers STEVE -Original Message- From: Steve Hill [mailto:st...@nexusuk.org] Sent: Sun 4/5/2009 9:35 AM To: Steve Chilton Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Steve Chilton wrote: > Because I wanted to know, and as an exercise in OpenOverLayerIng, I > have produced a map combining the extent of Yahoo aerial imagery > coverage in GB with an overlay of the significant places calculated to > be in most need of mapwork (from UK_Map_Priorities). Interesting stuff - it really shows just how limited the aerial coverage is though. :( Do you know if Yahoo are actively expanding their coverage? It's quite surprising to see some large cities like Birmingham not included. - Steve xmpp:st...@nexusuk.org sip:st...@nexusuk.org http://www.nexusuk.org/ Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map
> You can see result at http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~steve8/yahoo.html Thanks for doing this. I knew their coverage wasn't great but surprised at just how sparse. > Interesting that St Helens should be on list and also within Y! coverage > but it looks to me that someone has done a lot of work there since the > calculations (in December I think it was). I've done some bits from Y! around there and Warrington area, mostly fields, streams, woodlands etc. Following discussions on the lists, I thought I'd leave roads to people 'on the ground'. cheers, LT ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map
On 5 Apr 2009, at 09:24, Steve Chilton wrote: [...] Also good that mapping parties are starting to be arranged for these places (M Keynes and Sunderland already - Grimsby anyone? [zoom in on mapnik layer for full effect]). Are you setting a Grimsby mapping party up? Shaun ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Steve Chilton wrote: > Because I wanted to know, and as an exercise in OpenOverLayerIng, I > have produced a map combining the extent of Yahoo aerial imagery > coverage in GB with an overlay of the significant places calculated to > be in most need of mapwork (from UK_Map_Priorities). Interesting stuff - it really shows just how limited the aerial coverage is though. :( Do you know if Yahoo are actively expanding their coverage? It's quite surprising to see some large cities like Birmingham not included. - Steve xmpp:st...@nexusuk.org sip:st...@nexusuk.org http://www.nexusuk.org/ Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
