[Texascavers] OT - Vacation to Mexico

2007-12-08 Thread Sheryl Rieck
George and I are planning a couple of weeks in Mexico and I would like
opinions and some 'sites to see' information from anyone who feels like
sharing.  

 

We will cross at Eagle Pass and go to Mazatlan and then down the coast to
Zihuateanejo.  After that, we will wander our way back up to Matamoros.  We
haven't been over in a long time, so I wondered if anyone had suggestions.

 

Also, does anyone have Mike Walsh's email address?  Or, give him mine,
shri...@cableone.net . 

 

Thanks.

Sheryl

 

 

There is no reason that the universe should be designed for our convenience.

John D. 
Barrow 

 



Re: [Texascavers] Graduation party

2007-12-08 Thread J. LaRue Thomas
Major milestone, Wes. Congratulations! Jacqui
  - Original Message - 
  From: wesley s 
  To: Texascavers@texascavers.com 
  Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:13 PM
  Subject: [Texascavers] Graduation party


  Hey all. I'm graduating this sat, 

Re: [Texascavers] Graduation party

2007-12-08 Thread speleosteele
Wes,

Go for one of those karst research scholarships and get a masters.  Keep your 
momentum going.

Bill 

 "J. LaRue Thomas"  wrote: 
> Major milestone, Wes. Congratulations! Jacqui
>   - Original Message - 
>   From: wesley s 
>   To: Texascavers@texascavers.com 
>   Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:13 PM
>   Subject: [Texascavers] Graduation party
> 
> 
>   Hey all. I'm graduating this sat,


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] RE: Vacation to Mexico

2007-12-08 Thread Minton, Mark
Sheryl,

>I would like opinions and some 'sites to see' information from anyone who 
>feels like sharing.

  If you're going down the west coast, I would highly recommend Copper 
Canyon (Barranca del Cobre).  A bit to the north is the spectacular waterfall 
Cascada de Basaseachic, over 800 feet tall.  Both of these are nominally parks, 
but when I was there you could basically do whatever you wanted, within reason 
of course.  These are fairly high alpine environments, so be ready for snow and 
cold weather in December.

Mark Minton


Re: [Texascavers] computer progress

2007-12-08 Thread Nancy Weaver

so how do you know someone 'didnt' go back with a contemporary computer?

hmmm

Nance

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] computer progress

2007-12-08 Thread John P. Brooks
Wasn¹t the ³bat mobile² turbine powered? If Batman had a turbine back in the
60¹s.it seems like the vigilante police industry would have created a
consumer version by now. Seriously, they could create super-heroesque
consumer vehicles and provide jobs and real job training for ex-themed
psychotic villians that were seriously altered in radiation related
accidents...and our streets would be safer as a result.

On 12/7/07 11:46 PM, "Robert Tait"  wrote:

> Turbine cars have been around since 1950, on and off.  They were all custom
> and impracticalmostly. Chrysler built 50 turbine cars and did customer
> trials in '65.
> 
> http://aardvark.co.nz/pjet/chrysler.shtml
> 
> http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/classic_concept_cars/chrysler_turbine_c
> ar.html 
> 
> GM made a few EV-1 electrics with turbine chargers.
> 
> The cool thing about the old turbine engines is that they would burn about
> anything, gas, jp4, paraffin. I'm not sure about carbide. Makes getting fuel
> easier on those backwater cave trips.  (no longer off topic.. )
> 
> Turbines are getting very small. Hand held prototypes are being tested.
> Microturbines are available from Honeywell, and GE (although in this case
> Micro the size of a small shed with generator and support gear)
> 
> Exotic materials that can withstand high temperatures and high tolerances are
> factors in high cost.
> 
> They may make a comeback yet!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rob, in upstate NY
> 
> 
> At 04:57 PM 12/7/2007, Don Cooper wrote:
>> Through the years I've crossed my fingers and held high hopes that the same
>> thing would occur with the logical replacement for the internal combustion
>> engine (IMO) : the small gas turbine.
>> If large gas turbines can operate at 80% efficiency and piston combustion
>> engines are limited to a maximum of 23% by the physics of the otto cycle -
>> then what's achievable is better than what we got!  And with composites,
>> ceramics and the brains for real-time digital automation control becoming
>> cheaper than a cup of coffee - I still am wondering why are such engines not
>> available (well, except for $200,000 replacement turbine powerplants for when
>> the six cylinder horizontally opposed, air-cooled 520 cu inch engine in your
>> Cessna 185 wears out).
>> Also there is a new alternate powerplant available for small aircraft which
>> uses jet fuel, but is a two-stroke piston engine - it's more efficient than a
>> Continental aircraft engine - it costs $75,000.
>> Progress, sure.  A little. Digital control of the gasoline engine does a
>> WHOLE lot to improve efficiency of the old standard truck or car motor.  But
>> powerplant technology seems really pushed to the cutting edge in building
>> humongous airliner-moving jet engines - not small affordable mass-produced
>> engines.  
>> 
>> I like to imagine a nice little car that is an absolutely true hybrid and
>> runs on a small generator powered by a tiny fuel efficient
>> gasoline/diesel/alcohol/LNG turbine.  It would cost millions to build one,
>> but if millions were built - I'd bet they'd be affordable.
>> 
>> -WaV.  
>> Boycotting the limited selection, and keeping alive the obsolete dinosaurs I
>> already have.
>> 
>> On Dec 7, 2007 1:33 PM, Mixon Bill < bmixon...@austin.rr.com
>>  > wrote:
>> I could bore everybody to tears with oldtime computer stories. When I
>> started out as a programmer, memory cost a dollar (a 1960 dollar) a
>> byte. Of course back then there was no such thing as a megabyte of
>> memory. IBM mainframes had a quarter of a megabyte.
>> 
>> - Visit
>> our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail:
>> texascavers-h...@texascavers.com