Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-02-25 Thread Herbert Schonbohm

On 1/30/2014 11:03 PM, Carl Braun wrote:

If I can't get the antenna to resonate using the L I'd say that I'd consider 
shunt feeding the tower and work out an (omega) matching scheme to match the 
tower to my target freq.  If that's the case, do I mount my upper shunt arm on 
the tower at 67' or at 90'?

Can I run a single drop wire into my panel and then switch the feed between two 
matching networks?  One for 160 and one for 80?

Please advise

Thanks

Carl AG6X




Carl,

Why not just run a slant wire to your shack and feed the bottom against 
a ground system through an ATU. Don't expect any real drama on 80 meters 
as the tower is probably to long electrically. ut a slant on any 
frequency could be modeled to see what you choices are. The only way 
this could change if you made a decoupling sleeve on the tower so the 
radiator appear to be between 1/4 and 3/8 wave length.  It can work as a 
duo bander but it will require some extra work and a good vacuum switch 
since the voltages may be high at the in/out switch point.  Some 
directive in the direction of the slant may occur but it should be be 
slight. As far as a drop wire shunt is concerned:  There should not be 
any advantage of having the drop wire shunt arm much higher than the 
approximated sweet point for you tower.



Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-02-25 Thread kd9sv
Herb, you can feed any number of bands through one gamma arm or wire as long
as the highest frequency to be used is less than 1/4 wave length on the
gamma arm or wire.  The appropriate matching is still required for each
band.  I fed my 70ft grounded tower for 160, 80 and 40 meters with a gamma
of 27ft length...de gary

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Herbert
Schonbohm
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:52 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: In search of resonance

On 1/30/2014 11:03 PM, Carl Braun wrote:
 If I can't get the antenna to resonate using the L I'd say that I'd
consider shunt feeding the tower and work out an (omega) matching scheme to
match the tower to my target freq.  If that's the case, do I mount my upper
shunt arm on the tower at 67' or at 90'?

 Can I run a single drop wire into my panel and then switch the feed
between two matching networks?  One for 160 and one for 80?

 Please advise

 Thanks

 Carl AG6X



Carl,

Why not just run a slant wire to your shack and feed the bottom against 
a ground system through an ATU. Don't expect any real drama on 80 meters 
as the tower is probably to long electrically. ut a slant on any 
frequency could be modeled to see what you choices are. The only way 
this could change if you made a decoupling sleeve on the tower so the 
radiator appear to be between 1/4 and 3/8 wave length.  It can work as a 
duo bander but it will require some extra work and a good vacuum switch 
since the voltages may be high at the in/out switch point.  Some 
directive in the direction of the slant may occur but it should be be 
slight. As far as a drop wire shunt is concerned:  There should not be 
any advantage of having the drop wire shunt arm much higher than the 
approximated sweet point for you tower.


Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-02-01 Thread Carl Braun
Thanks to all who responded to my post

I will consider all of the ideas that were presented including improving the 
ground radials. That's a given.

I have an ICE broadcast filter for RX...can this be of any use with the MFJ for 
analyzing the antenna?

Shall I drop the 40m verticals or open them at the base to see if any readings 
change?

The good news is the end of the L is run through a pulley attached to a 70' 
palm tree.  I'll lower the end of the wire down and fold it back a few feet 
until I can get something to resonate. Stay tuned (pun intended).

What's strange is that I had a version of this L up before with 2 temp radials 
lying on the ground.  I used a REYCO trap at 67' and ran the rest of the L up 
20' to the top of the tower and then out 15 to 20 ft.  The REYCO trap has some 
inductance but the whole 160 portion wasn't much over 100' and the thing 
resonated on 80 too. The vertical portion was much closer to the tower than it 
is now...maybe 15-18 instead of 36 now.  My Reyco trap has since bit the dust 
and Unadilla isn't making any more for at least another month.

I'll post some results later after folding back some wire.

Tnx again

Carl AG6X




From: donov...@starpower.net [mailto:donov...@starpower.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 7:59 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: In search of resonance

Carl,

Are you sure your MFJ meter isn't being overloaded by a broadcast station?
Thats a very common problem especially on 160 meters.

73
Frank
W3LPL


From: Carl Braun carl.br...@lairdtech.com
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:16:53 AM
Subject: Topband: In search of resonance


Hello to the group

I'm a newbie to 160 having only participated in various contests over the 
course of the last two years.  I used an 80 meter aluminum tube vertical with a 
Reyco trap affixed to the top with a horizontal L: wire heading over to the 
palm tree.  I've since converted that antenna into a pair of 40M verticals so 
I'm focusing my efforts on getting a resonant antenna on 60 and especially 160.

Here's the hardware I'm working with...

90' Tri Ex Skyneedle tower with a Telrex 20 meter 5-element yagi on a 45' boom 
at 94'.

Inverted L wire runs parallel to the tower and is spaced at 36 up to 85' and 
then out approx 60' or so.

The tower is grounded via copper strap to three ground rods that are bonded to 
1 ½ copper pipe that circles the perimeter of my tower and control panel base. 
The perimeter copper pipe is a 4' x 8' rectangle that currently has 16 radials 
screwed to it.  Three of those radials are tied into my 40M phased array ground 
radial system with some of the radials as short as 30' and others as long as 
100'.  The ground screen for my 40M array uses 100 radials each 60-90' long.  
I'm adding radials as I have time.  Half of the 16 radials are multi conductor 
rotor control cable that fans out to affix to the radial ring then converge 
back together for 10' across the driveway and then fan out.  I do this to 
eliminate a lot of individual wires crossing my secondary driveway.

I cannot get the inverted L to provide a dip on my MFJ 259 analyzer anywhere in 
the 160 meter band.  I get dips at 8.2 MHz (R=36 ohms X=0) with reactance on 
each side of X=0.  At 5 MHz R=40 ohms X=0 with reactance on each side of X=0.  
I cant get any significant dips neat the 80 or 160 band.  However, when I 
approach 1.750MHz the resistance drops to 6 ohms and X is off the scale...at 
1.825 I'm at 10 ohms and X is off the scale.  Its as if my 140+ feet of wire is 
resonant on 8MHz.

Also, I've experimented with shunt feeding the tower to see where the thing 
would resonate but got similar results.  ON4UN says my 90' tower and 5 ele yagi 
should yield an antenna that is 110 to 115 degrees in total length so I 
followed his guidelines and tapped the tower at 67' with a gamma wire spaced at 
36 .  The tower had multiple dips at 27 MHz, 20 MHz, 14 MHz and at 7.5 MHz the 
resistance dropped to 6 ohms...the same low resistance I' m now seeing on the L 
at 1.750 or so.  No dips were observed at 3.5 or 1.8 MHz. I plan to experiment 
with a gamma wire that goes all the way to the top of the tower to see where it 
resonates...if its still high in freq maybe I should consider an Omega match

So all of that being said...why cant I find a resonant frequency on 160 with 
this L?  Am I still too long?  Is the tower causing that much interaction? I'd 
rather not cut the L long and insert a variable cap...I want it resonant at 
1820 so I can use an unun to match the impedance and then run it into the shack.

Any suggestions on getting the antenna to work?

Thanks in advance for any help


Carl AG6X

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-01-31 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
To my amazement, a 5000-watt AM station on 1550 KHz 5 miles away is 
enough to clobber my MFJ-259's usefulness during the day.  Fortunately 
they drop to 6 watts at local sundown (what do you suppose that is, a 
single 6L6?)


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 1/30/2014 9:22 PM, chetmoore wrote:

Thanks for this tidbit of information.  As soon as this white manure melts
(some people call it snow)   I will do a re-check on my shunt fed tower.  I
think I did have at least one  dip to zero and never did find a resonance
point.

Thanks

Chet N4FX

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Tree
Cc: 160; Carl Braun
Subject: Re: Topband: In search of resonance



You might be dealing with AM BCB being detected by the meter - and
masking what you are looking for.


No, because he gets a dip to zero reactance.

If that happens anywhere, there is no BCI.


73 Tom

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-01-31 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR

On 160, that is.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 1/31/2014 6:27 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
To my amazement, a 5000-watt AM station on 1550 KHz 5 miles away is 
enough to clobber my MFJ-259's usefulness during the day. Fortunately 
they drop to 6 watts at local sundown (what do you suppose that is, a 
single 6L6?)


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 1/30/2014 9:22 PM, chetmoore wrote:
Thanks for this tidbit of information.  As soon as this white manure 
melts
(some people call it snow)   I will do a re-check on my shunt fed 
tower.  I
think I did have at least one  dip to zero and never did find a 
resonance

point.

Thanks

Chet N4FX

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
Tom W8JI

Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Tree
Cc: 160; Carl Braun
Subject: Re: Topband: In search of resonance



You might be dealing with AM BCB being detected by the meter - and
masking what you are looking for.


No, because he gets a dip to zero reactance.

If that happens anywhere, there is no BCI.


73 Tom

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-01-30 Thread Tom W8JI



You might be dealing with AM BCB being detected by the meter - and masking
what you are looking for.



No, because he gets a dip to zero reactance.

If that happens anywhere, there is no BCI.


73 Tom 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-01-30 Thread chetmoore
Thanks for this tidbit of information.  As soon as this white manure melts
(some people call it snow)   I will do a re-check on my shunt fed tower.  I
think I did have at least one  dip to zero and never did find a resonance
point.

Thanks

Chet N4FX

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Tree
Cc: 160; Carl Braun
Subject: Re: Topband: In search of resonance


 You might be dealing with AM BCB being detected by the meter - and 
 masking what you are looking for.


No, because he gets a dip to zero reactance.

If that happens anywhere, there is no BCI.


73 Tom 

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: In search of resonance

2014-01-30 Thread Tom W8JI

Tom

Maybe you saw my post where I stated that the MFJ plunged to a minimum 
reading of 4 0hms at 1825?  Does this reading mean that the L is near ground 
potential and 'in union' with the grounded Skyneedle at that freq?


It could be from a few things, but two closely spaced conductors, with the 
parasitic conductor resonant near the target band of the fed conductor, 
commonly behaves this way. You might never be able to get Inverted L real 
part (resistance part) high at that spacing and length.


If I can't get the antenna to resonate using the L I'd say that I'd 
consider shunt feeding the tower and work out an (omega) matching scheme to 
match the tower to my target freq.  If that's the case, do I mount my upper 
shunt arm on the tower at 67' or at 90'? 


There is probably some ideal point where the shunt capacitance is minimized, 
and that would be best. There are hundreds of points that will work, but 
they will have higher Q.


Can I run a single drop wire into my panel and then switch the feed 
between two matching networks?  One for 160 and one for 80?


I don't know. I've never looked at doing that.

73 Tom 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband