Re: [ubuntu-art] Humility Icons TODO list

2005-07-21 Thread volvoguy
On 7/21/05, Luka Cehovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is somebody working on the list of all icons that need to be done ... or
> are we waiting for the new web site? (we can write it in ubuntu wiki ...
> at least temporary)

We're "kinda" waiting for our server, but we do need to add more to
the ubuntu wiki. I'm going to try to get with Andrew about it on IRC
later tonight. I'd like to see a detailed how-to and to-do list on the
icon wiki page he started. I know that right now it's hard to justify
putting a lot of work into something when we don't know what everyone
else is working on.

-- 
Aaron

Ubuntu SVG Artwork - www.volvoguy.net/ubuntu
---
Art, like morality, consists of drawing the line somewhere. ~ G.K. Chesterton

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Humility Icons TODO list

2005-07-21 Thread Luka Cehovin
is somebody working on the list of all icons that need to be done ... or 
are we waiting for the new web site? (we can write it in ubuntu wiki ... 
at least temporary)




-Luka

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: Art team site

2005-07-21 Thread Andy Fitzsimon
yep,

there is alot of TLC in art.gnome.org

in a perfect world we would have a web interface for whatever version
control repo we use .  but in theory documentation can fix anything.


4 GiB is ample for now. Im happy with anything so long as we have a
presence to work from.

Thank you very much guys!

Andy


On 7/21/05, Travis Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/21/05, Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i personally would prefer something like art.gnome.org uses since the
> > interface is easier and even my mother would find what she looks for
> > there, imho gnome-look.org and kde-look.org have usabilty issues, but
> > since is a team effort here, we should get input and a sane discussion
> > from the people who use it and make a decision based on this...
> > (putting the list on CC)
> 
> art.gnome.org is so much nicer it's almost a joke. That code should be
> in GNOME CVS too. I don't even know if you can get the code for
> gnome-look.org
> 
> --
> Travis Watkins
> http://www.realistanew.com
> 
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [UBUNTU-ART] Breezy Badger Logo Contest? / Medicine Mask / Hi!

2005-07-21 Thread Andy Fitzsimon
Hi Nikolai,

I'll ask around and see what happened.


you're not annoying,  just passionate.

do some more concept artwork.
personally im freaked by the idea but would really like to see how the
idea matures.

take it easy mate

Cheers

Andy

On 7/16/05, Nikolai Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> hey everyone! 
> 
> my name is nikolai, and I'm that annoying guy who keeps pushing his idea of
> a new logo/mascot for ubuntu: the medicine mask! 
> 
> heres what I'm talking about: 
> 
> http://ubuntuforums.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=554
> 
> I made a lot of wallpapers/alternative suggestions on this thread: 
> 
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=21702&page=1&pp=10
> 
> does ANYBODY know what happened to that breezy badger mascot/logo contest???
> I entered, and nobody has heard ANYTHING about it yet!!! 
> 
>   
> 
> cheers, n. 
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> 
> 
>

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: Art team site

2005-07-21 Thread Travis Watkins
On 7/21/05, Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i personally would prefer something like art.gnome.org uses since the
> interface is easier and even my mother would find what she looks for
> there, imho gnome-look.org and kde-look.org have usabilty issues, but
> since is a team effort here, we should get input and a sane discussion
> from the people who use it and make a decision based on this...
> (putting the list on CC)

art.gnome.org is so much nicer it's almost a joke. That code should be
in GNOME CVS too. I don't even know if you can get the code for
gnome-look.org

-- 
Travis Watkins
http://www.realistanew.com

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Re: Art team site

2005-07-21 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.07.2005, 12:48 +0100 schrieb Henrik Nilsen Omma:
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> I see that you are the technical contact person for the Art team. I'm 
> meant to set up a Linode server for them to host art.ubuntu.com. Shall I 
> just go ahead with that? Any ideas of what sort of software they'll want 
> to install? Will they want kde-look.org type software (is that PHP?).
> 
> How beefy hardware is required? Will a Linode 96 be enough you think? 
> (http://www.linode.com/products/linodes.cfm)
i personally would prefer something like art.gnome.org uses since the
interface is easier and even my mother would find what she looks for
there, imho gnome-look.org and kde-look.org have usabilty issues, but
since is a team effort here, we should get input and a sane discussion
from the people who use it and make a decision based on this...
(putting the list on CC)

a linode server will fit our needs completely (4 GiB might be a bit
small regarding that there will be a lot of bitmaps in the end, but if
we can upgrade easily i would suggest to take this for a start).

ciao
oli


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art