Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread Martin Owens
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:12 -0700, j_baer wrote:
> It sounds like most agree the Wiki is not a good solution for our
> purpose.
> The Design Hub which is available from Live Gnome (
> http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/Whiteboard/DesignHub ) looks
> interesting but may require additional development work.
> 
> What are the chances we could leverage this effort into our
> infrastructure
> solution? Can we call out for developers? If the answer is no, what
> other
> solution holds the most promise. We have the solution proposed by
> Martin. 

I would also say that ccHost is what Debian uses for it's art site.

http://www.debianart.org/cchost/

Martin,


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread j_baer



Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:56 -0700, j_baer wrote:
> 
>> As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
>> still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they
>> know
>> something we should?
> 
> You could ask them ;)
> 
> Máirín Duffy from Fedora is or has been looking for something better:
> http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/design-hub-update/
> 
> Both projects might be using a wiki without a nasty surge protection?
> Though I doubt they have automatic thumbnail generation or WYSIWYG
> editing (things I see as a must to have more of a tool and less of a
> barrier).
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thorsten Wilms
> 
> thorwil's design for free software:
> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> -- 
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> 
> 

It sounds like most agree the Wiki is not a good solution for our purpose.
The Design Hub which is available from Live Gnome (
http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/Whiteboard/DesignHub ) looks
interesting but may require additional development work.

What are the chances we could leverage this effort into our infrastructure
solution? Can we call out for developers? If the answer is no, what other
solution holds the most promise. We have the solution proposed by Martin.

John
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Owl%27s-ccHost-Website-tp29761318p29763759.html
Sent from the ubuntu-art mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:56 -0700, j_baer wrote:

> As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
> still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they know
> something we should?

You could ask them ;)

Máirín Duffy from Fedora is or has been looking for something better:
http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/design-hub-update/

Both projects might be using a wiki without a nasty surge protection?
Though I doubt they have automatic thumbnail generation or WYSIWYG
editing (things I see as a must to have more of a tool and less of a
barrier).



-- 
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread Vishnoo
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:56 -0700, j_baer wrote:
> Thanks Martin,
> 
> As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
> still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they know
> something we should?
> 
> John

They are using it does not mean that they prefer it ;)
>From Fedora
team :

There are a lot of issues with wiki like surge protection that thorwil
mentions and the wiki being very tedious, lets not dwell too much on it
now :)

Also, a reminder to everyone, we have an irc channel for Ubuntu:
#ubuntu-artwork , do come and hang out.. ;)

This channel has existed for a very long time.

-- 
Cheers,
Vish


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread j_baer



DoctorMO wrote:
> 
> Full information:
> 
> ccHost is a PHP based system and for svg uploads it had a couple of
> holes, so we had to fix them. The site works from skins and that may
> need fixing too to make it all nice.
> 
> We've cleverly committed it all to a bzr branch so if you'd like to play
> with your own instance and commit fixes, you can:
> 
> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~owlers/ubuntu-learning-materials/art-website
> 
> You can also use GroundControl to download the project.
> 
> Martin,
> 
> 
> -- 
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> 
> 

Thanks Martin,

As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they know
something we should?

John

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Owl%27s-ccHost-Website-tp29761318p29761994.html
Sent from the ubuntu-art mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art