Re: [Question #686106]: Project "Eoan Backports" missing
Question #686106 on Launchpad itself changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/686106 Status: Answered => Solved Manfred Hampl confirmed that the question is solved: Eoan is EOL, closing the question being obsolete. -- You received this question notification because your team Ubuntu Backporters is subscribed to the question. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Question #686106]: Status of bug #1853616 changed to 'Fix Released' in Bionic Backports
Bug #1853616 status changed in Bionic Backports: New => Fix Released https://bugs.launchpad.net/bionic-backports/+bug/1853616 "Focal-Backports project does not exist" This bug is linked to #686106. Project "Eoan Backports" missing https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/686106 -- You received this question notification because your team Ubuntu Backporters is subscribed to the question. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Question #686106]: Status of bug #1853616 changed to 'Invalid' in ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu
Bug #1853616 status changed in ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu: Confirmed => Invalid https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1853616 "Focal-Backports project does not exist" This bug is linked to #686106. Project "Eoan Backports" missing https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/686106 -- You received this question notification because your team Ubuntu Backporters is subscribed to the question. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Question #686106]: Status of bug #1853616 changed to 'Confirmed' in ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu
Bug #1853616 status changed in ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu: New => Confirmed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1853616 "Eoan Backports project does not exist" This bug is linked to #686106. Project "Eoan Backports" missing https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/686106 -- You received this question notification because your team Ubuntu Backporters is subscribed to the question. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 61716] Re: Hi all! Quick question, when going through Control Centre -> System Administration -> Users & Groups causes KDE Crash Handler
We are closing this bug report as it was filed under breezy-backports and Breezy is no longer supported. However, please reopen it if it is still an issue with a supported version of Ubuntu and feel free to submit bug reports in the future. ** Changed in: breezy-backports (upstream) Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- Hi all! Quick question, when going through Control Centre -> System Administration -> Users & Groups causes KDE Crash Handler https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the bug contact for Breezy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 61716] Hi all! Quick question, when going through Control Centre -> System Administration -> Users & Groups causes KDE Crash Handler
idget::load () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #38 0xb67691aa in DockContainer::loadModule () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #39 0xb676943e in DockContainer::dockModule () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #40 0xb6769602 in TopLevel::activateModule () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #41 0xb6769ff0 in TopLevel::qt_invoke () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #42 0xb7231eb9 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #43 0xb67589ce in IndexWidget::moduleActivated () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #44 0xb6767e95 in IndexWidget::moduleSelected () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #45 0xb6768731 in IndexWidget::qt_invoke () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #46 0xb7231eb9 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #47 0xb6758f02 in ModuleTreeView::moduleSelected () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #48 0xb675900f in ModuleTreeView::slotItemSelected () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #49 0xb67590ee in ModuleTreeView::qt_invoke () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #50 0xb7231eb9 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #51 0xb75db897 in QListView::clicked () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #52 0xb7333c42 in QListView::contentsMouseReleaseEventEx () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #53 0xb7333f30 in QListView::contentsMouseReleaseEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #54 0xb6c892f4 in KListView::contentsMouseReleaseEvent () from /usr/lib/libkdeui.so.4 #55 0xb7366499 in QScrollView::viewportMouseReleaseEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #56 0xb736905c in QScrollView::eventFilter () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #57 0xb732d6ed in QListView::eventFilter () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #58 0xb722f002 in QObject::activate_filters () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #59 0xb722f080 in QObject::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #60 0xb726c5aa in QWidget::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #61 0xb71c7e56 in QApplication::internalNotify () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #62 0xb71c83e0 in QApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #63 0xb7894e31 in KApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #64 0xb71591c5 in QApplication::sendSpontaneousEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #65 0xb7154873 in QETWidget::translateMouseEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #66 0xb7152d59 in QApplication::x11ProcessEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #67 0xb716c4db in QEventLoop::processEvents () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #68 0xb71e0947 in QEventLoop::enterLoop () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #69 0xb71e086a in QEventLoop::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #70 0xb71c6965 in QApplication::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #71 0xb676babd in kdemain () from /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so #72 0xb7ef04f4 in kdeinitmain () from /usr/lib/kde3/kcontrol.so #73 0x0804e0a3 in ?? () #74 0x0007 in ?? () #75 0x081801b0 in ?? () #76 0x0001 in ?? () #77 0x in ?? () ** Affects: breezy-backports (upstream) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Hi all! Quick question, when going through Control Centre -> System Administration -> Users & Groups causes KDE Crash Handler https://launchpad.net/bugs/61716 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: what is probably a question you are sick of being asked.
Sebastian Dröge wrote: I'll take care of a banshee backport after I've actually updated it in dapper and made it breezy-compatible ;) Don't worry, it will come sooner or later :) Bye I could kiss you for that! :) SCNR It would be a really good thing to have the latest version of Banshee available for Breezy. Thanks in advance, Hannes (Status: praying for a recent version) -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: totem 1.2.1 question.
never mind, i just built it with the script and both packages, totem-xine and totem-gstreamer were built, along with firefox plugins etc. about to start testing. On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:52 PM, matt nicholson wrote: was looking into backporting it. defaults to xine backend. should 2 versions be built with xine/gstreamer enabled? what would the easiest way to do that be (other than a completely manual ./configure, compile, and package build). thanks. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
totem 1.2.1 question.
was looking into backporting it. defaults to xine backend. should 2 versions be built with xine/gstreamer enabled? what would the easiest way to do that be (other than a completely manual ./configure, compile, and package build). thanks. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
On 11/25/05, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a list of packages that are approved or is it just from theforums?The forums; mailing list archives (I CC a copy of build requests to the list) Also is there a way of marking them as approved then approved then done?Yes -- the forums has 3 subforums for various states of backporting acceptance/progress. I'm just trying to think of ways to make it a bit more streamlined?IMO this works well for now... Maybe when LP and the forums get more integrated we could do something else, but right now I am satisfied with the current system. Regards,MarcOn Tue, 2005-11-22 at 17:32 +0100, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski wrote: > Hello.>> Marc Wiriadisastra:>> > Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine.> > However installation.> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb > > Selecting previously deselected package trac.> > (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.)> > Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ...> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: > > trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however:> > Package python-clearsilver is not installed.>> dpkg won't by itself download the missing dependencies.>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy python-clearsilver> python-clearsilver:> Installed: (none)> Candidate: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1> Version table:> 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 0> 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com breezy/universe Packages>> python-clearsilver is in Breezy's universe and in version higher than> required by Trac, so when you fulfill Trac's dependencies it should be > fully installable.>> Cheers,> -- Shot-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBDhwf1OTR/Y2USyNgRApjBAKCxZg8vEyCFJEGkeLgyMQbdlyFtqwCePeA+ +p+X5gnDA3QYu1MxC5+VcPA==DbDZ-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
Is there a list of packages that are approved or is it just from the forums? Also is there a way of marking them as approved then approved then done? I'm just trying to think of ways to make it a bit more streamlined? Regards, Marc On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 17:32 +0100, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski wrote: > Hello. > > Marc Wiriadisastra: > > > Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. > > However installation. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb > > Selecting previously deselected package trac. > > (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.) > > Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: > > trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: > > Package python-clearsilver is not installed. > > dpkg won't by itself download the missing dependencies. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy python-clearsilver > python-clearsilver: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 > Version table: > 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 0 > 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com breezy/universe Packages > > python-clearsilver is in Breezy's universe and in version higher than > required by Trac, so when you fulfill Trac's dependencies it should be > fully installable. > > Cheers, > -- Shot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question about backports build process
On 11/23/05, sjoeboo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: just one question more for my own curiosity:when a package get built for backports, with what options/etc is it built, or it is always a plain ./configure ? It's built how the package maintainers want it to be. See the debian/rules in the extracted source directory for more info. I ask because I was excited to see rhythmbox 0.9.1 backported the other day, but was sad to see none of the great new features, such as itunes style daap, etc, were built into it. no big deal for me, since an apt-get build-dep and the right ./configure options is all i need, but, would still like to know how its decided what to build the package with, and if this will change in teh futureo at all or anything. File a Bugzilla request to get more stuff if you want... otherwise, keep up the good work, and have a great thanksgiving. You too. mat nicholson[EMAIL PROTECTED] sjoeboo.com--ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
question about backports build process
just one question more for my own curiosity: when a package get built for backports, with what options/etc is it built, or it is always a plain ./configure ? I ask because I was excited to see rhythmbox 0.9.1 backported the other day, but was sad to see none of the great new features, such as itunes style daap, etc, were built into it. no big deal for me, since an apt-get build-dep and the right ./configure options is all i need, but, would still like to know how its decided what to build the package with, and if this will change in teh futureo at all or anything. otherwise, keep up the good work, and have a great thanksgiving. mat nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sjoeboo.com -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
Hello. Marc Wiriadisastra: > Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. > However installation. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb > Selecting previously deselected package trac. > (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: > trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: > Package python-clearsilver is not installed. dpkg won't by itself download the missing dependencies. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy python-clearsilver python-clearsilver: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 Version table: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com breezy/universe Packages python-clearsilver is in Breezy's universe and in version higher than required by Trac, so when you fulfill Trac's dependencies it should be fully installable. Cheers, -- Shot -- With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. -- Steven Weinberg == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
On 11/22/05, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a couple of questions.that ubp-build.py I remember someone saying it was updated however Ican't find that link can someone point it to me. google for ubp-build.py, and that is the latest version. Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine.However installation. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *debSelecting previously deselected package trac.(Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.)Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: Package python-clearsilver is not installed. trac depends on python2.4-subversion (>= 0.37); however: Package python2.4-subversion is not installed. trac depends on subversion (>= 1.0.1); however: Package subversion is not installed.dpkg: error processing trac (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: trac That's normal, it just means some dependencies for it are not installed... dpkg does NOT do dependency resolution. Run apt-get -f install to fix that. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo apt-cache show python-clearsilverpython2.4-subversion Package: python-clearsilverPriority: optionalSection: universe/pythonInstalled-Size: 36Maintainer: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: allSource: clearsilverVersion: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1Depends: python2.4-clearsilverhowever as you can python-clearsilver seems to be the culprit. Shouldthat be backported as well? I'm not sure whether backports wants to go down that path. No, it doesn't need to be backported. Only version 0.9.3 is needed, and the last time I checked 13 is bigger than 3. Regards,Marc-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBDgy3ROTR/Y2USyNgRAl2NAJ4iXXZoq6ClDYMh8UafhI09UmEY1QCghXAw+OxmMaXBbz4pCCKYA9TPEa4==nDVD-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.comhttp://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
question
I have a couple of questions. that ubp-build.py I remember someone saying it was updated however I can't find that link can someone point it to me. Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. However installation. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb Selecting previously deselected package trac. (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: Package python-clearsilver is not installed. trac depends on python2.4-subversion (>= 0.37); however: Package python2.4-subversion is not installed. trac depends on subversion (>= 1.0.1); however: Package subversion is not installed. dpkg: error processing trac (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: trac [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo apt-cache show python-clearsilver python2.4-subversion Package: python-clearsilver Priority: optional Section: universe/python Installed-Size: 36 Maintainer: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Source: clearsilver Version: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 Depends: python2.4-clearsilver however as you can python-clearsilver seems to be the culprit. Should that be backported as well? I'm not sure whether backports wants to go down that path. Regards, Marc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: what is probably a question you are sick of being asked.
I have sent two backport requests over to James Troup, hoping that the process would auto-open the breezy-backports tree...On 11/3/05, Sebastian Dröge < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Do, 2005-11-03 at 13:22 -0500, matt nicholson wrote: > the main reason i ask is actually because of rhythmbox (and banshee> maybe ). alot of good thing have been happening in rhythmbox as of late> and i think people(ie, those whom do not build from cvs/source > constantly) would like to have the newest version and all its great new> features. plus as far as i know its already in the dapper tree.I'll take care of a banshee backport after I've actually updated it in dapper and made it breezy-compatible ;) Don't worry, it will come sooneror later :)Bye-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBDalaoBsBdh1vkHyERAvX9AJ9JJMT0XgD+HzFuZZd85j/1D/3cugCfeuDg 5qUWFTK1HMJQISO/scWAips==x32i-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: what is probably a question you are sick of being asked.
On Do, 2005-11-03 at 13:22 -0500, matt nicholson wrote: > the main reason i ask is actually because of rhythmbox (and banshee > maybe ). alot of good thing have been happening in rhythmbox as of late > and i think people(ie, those whom do not build from cvs/source > constantly) would like to have the newest version and all its great new > features. plus as far as i know its already in the dapper tree. I'll take care of a banshee backport after I've actually updated it in dapper and made it breezy-compatible ;) Don't worry, it will come sooner or later :) Bye signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
what is probably a question you are sick of being asked.
now, i know UBZ is going on. and i know this question has been asked a few times already, least i would imagine it has been. so, in advance, i'm sorry if they don't want to hear this again. i do not aim to make people pissed, i'm just curious. when/will breezy backports open? i'm not asking about extras (w32codecs, etc) cause i know some of them have been pulled due to legal issues. what i'm asking about is regular backports, like rhythmbox 0.9.1 from dapper, backported to breezy, etc etc etc. the main reason i ask is actually because of rhythmbox (and banshee maybe ). alot of good thing have been happening in rhythmbox as of late and i think people(ie, those whom do not build from cvs/source constantly) would like to have the newest version and all its great new features. plus as far as i know its already in the dapper tree. so, my question, again, is, when, or better yet, will, breezy backports open? is help needed? i would be more than willing to help, so long as someone guided be at least through my first "backport". I can say that the newest rhythmbox is working perfectly on breezy with all of the crazy new features enabled (DAAP, auidoscrobbler support, etc) once again sorry if this has been asked a hundered times, i don't mean to nag, i just haven't found an actual answer, the forums are all speculation as far as i can see. thanks. matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] sjoeboo.com -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
